Citations

Background Ankle‐brachial indexes ( ABI ) are a noninvasive diagnostic tool for peripheral arterial disease and a marker of increased cardiovascular risk. ABI is calculated using the highest systolic blood pressure of the 4 ankle arteries (bilateral dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial). Accordingly, patients may be assigned a normal ABI when the result would be abnormal if calculated using one of the other blood pressure readings. Cardiovascular outcomes for patients with discordant ABI s are undescribed. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent ABI measurement for any indication between January 1996 and June 2018. Those with normal ABI s (1.00–1.39) were included. We compared patients with all 4 normal ABI s (calculated using all 4 ankle arteries; n=15 577, median age 64.0 years, 54.4% men) to those with discordant ABI s (at least 1 abnormal ABI ≤0.99; n=2095, median age 66.0 years, 47.8% men). The outcomes assessed were ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all‐cause mortality. Compared with patients with concordant normal ABI s, patients with discordant ABI s were older; women; smoked; and had chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, or prior stroke. Patients with discordant ABI s had a greater risk of myocardial infarction (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.10–1.56), ischemic stroke ( HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.37–1.72), and all‐cause mortality ( HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.16–1.39), including after adjustment for baseline comorbidities. Conclusions Discordant ABI results were associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all‐cause mortality in the studied population. Clinicians should examine ABI calculations using all 4 ankle arteries to better characterize a patient's cardiovascular risk.

AbstractBackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are commonly associated. Cotreatment with multiple antithrombotic agents can increase the risk of bleeding. We sought to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes in patients with AF on double therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to patients with standard triple therapy, [a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy].MethodsWe performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes of patients receiving double therapy with DOACs compared to triple therapy with VKAs in patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patient‐centered outcomes were the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNB), all‐cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke.ResultsFour RCTs (9602 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with significantly lower ISTH major bleeding/ CRNB (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67‐0.82, P < .00001, I2 = 11%). There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy outcomes, including myocardial infarction (RR: 0.99, 95% CI :0.79‐1.25, P = .96), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.6‐1.55, P = .89), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.5‐1.15, P = .19), all‐cause mortality (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.85‐1.31, P = .61), and MACE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91‐1.22, P = .97).ConclusionCompared with triple therapy with VKAS, double therapy with DOACs is associated with a reduced risk of bleeding and is as effective in patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Abstract Background Peripheral arterial disease is a marker of aggressive atherosclerosis. The ankle brachial index (ABI) is a simple and non-invasive tool to diagnose peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Patients with PAD are at increased risk for ischemic strokes and other cardiovascular diseases. Purpose To evaluate the association of abnormal ABI and poorly compressible vessels with ischemic stroke in a large patient cohort. Methods We analyzed lower extremity vascular studies of all patients with ABI measurements at a tertiary care hospital between January 1996 and August 2018. PAD is defined as ABI<1.0, and poorly or non-compressible (PC/NC) arteries as ABI>1.4 while ABI between 1.0–1.4 is normal. Association of these ABIs with new ischemic stroke events post ABI measurement were analyzed after adjusting for high risk confounders such as atrial fibrillation. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using multivariable Cox proportional regression with 95% confidence intervals. Results In total, 38,016 unique patients (mean age 66.1±14.8 years, female 42.3%) were included. Abnormal ABI was found to be more prevalent among elderly male patients compared to patients with normal ABI. In contrast to non-PAD patients, both PAD and PC/NC patients as defined by ABI had a statistically significant risk of ischemic stroke, with PAD conferring the greatest risk compared to PC/NC vessels. The data is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Unadjusted HR p-value Adjusted HR p-value PAD vs. No PAD 2.77 (2.62, 2.92) <0.001 2.10 (1.98, 2.22) <0.001 PC/NC vs. No PAD 2.11 (1.95, 2.28) <0.001 1.38 (1.26, 1.51) <0.001 PAD vs. PC/NC 1.37 (1.28, 1.46) <0.001 1.37 (1.28, 1.48) <0.001 Adjusted and unadjusted hazard ratios with p-values. HR adjusted for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, chronic heart failure, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. PAD = Peripheral artery disease and PC/NC = poorly compressible/non-compressible. Conclusion This study adds to the growing body of evidence that PAD and poorly-compressible vessels are independently associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Given the associated risk of cerebrovascular disease, clinicians should aggressively treat to minimize risk factors in those with abnormal ABIs.

Abstract Introduction Lower extremity physiologic studies are an important non-invasive diagnostic tool in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). PAD and atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with increased cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. Purpose To evaluate the association between PAD and new-onset AF and the risk of stroke. Methods We performed a study of all patients without AF undergoing ankle-brachial index (ABI) for any indication between January 1996 to June 2018. The ABI cut-off were as follows: abnormal ABI (0–0.99), normal ABI (1.00–1.39) and poor vessel compressibility (PC) (1.40+). Demographic, comorbidity, and outcome variables were extracted using the electronic medical record. Results Overall, 34,441 patients (mean age 66.8±14.3, 57.3% male, 88.2% white) were included in the study with a median follow-up of 7.2 years (interquartile range, 3.0–12.9 years). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis showed increased risk of new-onset AF for male sex, older age, hypertension, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease stage III or greater, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cancer (all p<0.0001). After adjustment, ABI results were significantly associated with new-onset AF, particularly poorly-compressible vessels (adjusted HR: 1.42 (1.30–1.55), p<0.0001) compared to abnormal ABI (adjusted HR: 1.12 (1.05–1.20), p=0.0012). Patients with atrial fibrillation were more likely to experience ischemic stroke (39.2% versus 16.1%, p<0.0001). Conclusion Abnormalities in ABI results, particularly poorly-compressible vessels, are independently associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation in a large ambulatory cohort. While the mechanism cannot be assessed, common inflammatory mechanisms and increased vascular stiffness may play an important role. Identification of AF in these at-risk patients may improve cardiovascular outcomes.

AbstractPatients with atrial fibrillation often undergo repeat catheter ablation for the recurrence of tachyarrhythmia. If the pulmonary veins were isolated in prior procedure, the operator should focus on substrate homogenization with identification and ablation of only arrhythmogenic areas.

Background: The treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction has been the subject of numerous randomized controlled trials involving medications and cardiac implantable electronic device therapies. As newer effective pharmacological therapies suggest significant reductions in all-cause mortality, the role of additional device therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction deserves further scrutiny. Methods: A systematic review and network meta-analysis on the effect of medication and device therapies in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction on all-cause mortality was performed. Randomized controlled trials published between January 1980 and July 2017 were identified using Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials databases. Pcnetmeta package in R was used to calculate treatment arm–based estimated rates, rate ratios, and probability ranks with 95% credible intervals. Results: Combination therapy of ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitors or ARBs (angiotensin receptor blockers) with β-blockers (BBs) alone or in addition to implantable cardiac defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillators demonstrated a significant reduction of all-cause mortality when compared with placebo. By probability rank, implantable cardiac defibrillator+ACE inhibitor or ARB+BB+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, implantable cardiac defibrillator+ACE inhibitor or ARB+BB, and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor+BB+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist combination therapies have the highest probability of being ranked the best treatment. There was no significant difference in the rate of mortality when comparing angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor+BB+mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist to implantable cardiac defibrillator+optimal pharmacological combination therapy. Conclusions: BB and renin-angiotensin system blockers alone or in combination with defibrillator device therapy have robust evidence for a reduction in mortality compared with placebo. The comparative efficacy of pharmacological therapy with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and device therapy deserves further investigation.