Shipman, Justin

Abstract Aims Obesity is linked with worse outcomes in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). While both bariatric surgery (BS) and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) promote weight loss and may improve cardiometabolic risk, their comparative outcomes in HCM remain unclear. Methods and results Adults with HCM and body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m were divided into two cohorts: (i) GLP-1 RA users who never had BS, and (ii) BS patients who never received GLP-1 RA. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance demographics, comorbidities, and medications. Outcomes over 24 months include all-cause mortality, acute heart failure (HF) hospitalization, arrhythmias, change in BMI, and cardiovascular symptoms. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox models. Of 5002 patients, 955 were included in each matched cohort after matching (mean age 54 ± 13 years, 70% female, BMI 40.0 kg/m). GLP-1 RA was associated with a significantly lower observed rate of all-cause mortality compared with BS (2.0% vs. 4.4%; HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.27–0.80; P = 0.004) and HF hospitalization (8.7% vs. 14.0%; HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.46–0.79; P < 0.001). Similarly, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower incidence of composite cardiovascular outcomes (10.7% vs. 17.2%; HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.47–0.77; P < 0.001). Rates of arrhythmia and cardiovascular symptoms were comparable between the two groups. BMI reduction was greater after bariatric surgery (−4.0 vs. −2.6 kg/m; P < 0.001). Conclusion In obese patients with HCM, GLP-1 RA therapy was associated with lower all-cause mortality and fewer HF events compared with BS. Future studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Acute exposure to hypoxia will induce right ventricular (RV) hemodynamic changes and may increase the degree of right-to-left shunting, which can contribute to dyspnea at altitude. In this retrospective study, 125 patients (median age 66 years; 50.4% women) with unexplained dyspnea at altitude underwent hypoxic simulation testing (HST) with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). During simulated hypoxia (mode (Min-Max) altitude: 8000 (6000–18,000) ft, were observed a significant decrease in oxygen saturation (97% (95–98) vs. 88% (82–92), p < 0.001) and RV free wall longitudinal strain (−19.6 ± 3.99% vs. −17.3 ± 4.17%, p < 0.01), an increase in RV systolic pressure (RVSP: 26 (23–30.5) vs. 29 (25–36.5) mmHg, p < 0.001). No significant changes were observed in TAPSE (20 (18–23) vs. 20 (19–24) mm) or S wave (0.12 (0.11–0.14) vs. 0.13 (0.12–0.14) m/s). Right-to-left shunting was present in 47.2% of patients and 11.9% exhibited inducible shunting only under hypoxia. However, under hypoxia, there were no significant differences in RV hemodynamic parameters or saturation between those with and without shunting. TTE with HST is useful to characterize both cardiopulmonary response and the dynamic changes in right-to-left shunt behavior under hypoxic stress.

Aortic stenosis is a progressive condition with substantial implications for morbidity and mortality. In recent years, attention has shifted toward risk stratification and the development of individualized management plans to optimize treatment outcomes. The management of asymptomatic patients has become a topic of significant controversy, as emerging studies challenge traditional watchful waiting guidelines and propose the potential benefits of early intervention. While early intervention may reduce overall morbidity and mortality in this patient population, the associated procedural risks remain a critical consideration. This review seeks to analyze the existing literature, offering an updated perspective on patient risk stratification and evidence evaluating both management approaches.

Objectives: The performed hand-held echocardiography (HHE) was evaluated and interpreted by trained advanced practice providers (APPs) on hospitalized CHF patients for image quality and interpretation by comparing with expert echocardiographer and SE findings. Background: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is associated with increased hospital admissions and mortality. While a standard echocardiogram (SE) is the gold standard for cardiac assessment, it is not readily available. Hospitalized CHF patients require rapid assessment for expedited treatment. Methods: Over 6 months, five trained APPs performed HHE on hospitalized CHF patients and interpreted: (a) left ventricular (LV) size, (b) LV ejection fraction (LVEF), and (c) right atrial pressure (RAP). The study echocardiographer reviewed and blindly interpreted the HHE images and compared them with APPs and SE findings. Kappa statistics determined the degree of agreement between APPs and the study echocardiographer’s interpretation of the HHE images and SE. Results: A total of 80 CHF patients (age 73 ± 14 years, 58% males; LVEF (by SE) 45 ± 19%; 36.3% body mass indexes ≥ 30 kg/m2) were enrolled. HHE interpretation by APPs had a good agreement for LVEF (kappa 0.79) with the study echocardiographer and SE (kappa 0.74) and a good agreement for RAP (kappa 0.67) with the study echocardiographer. The correlation between the absolute LVEF interpretation by the study echocardiographer on HHE and SE was r = 0.88 (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Trained APPs obtained diagnostic-quality HHE images and interpreted the LV function and RAP in CHF patients in good agreement with the study echocardiographer. LVEF by HHE correlated with LVEF by SE. Our study suggests trained APPs can use HHE to evaluate LVEF and RAP in CHF patients, leading to expedited and optimized treatment.

Introduction: Patients with concomitant peripheral artery disease (PAD) and heart failure (HF) are known to have increased morbidity and mortality. Though they share common risk factors, the utility of HF screening in patients with PAD remains controversial and without international consensus. We sought to clarify whether PAD is an independent risk factor for HF. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients without a history of heart failure who underwent ankle brachial index (ABI) measurement for any indication between 1995-2020. Patients were then stratified by ABI: PAD with low ABI (<1.10), healthy (ABI= 1.10-1.39), and PAD with elevated ABI (>1.39). The associations between PAD and incident diagnosis of heart failure, systolic dysfunction (HF with reduced ejection fraction, HFrEF), and diastolic dysfunction (HF with preserved ejection fraction, HFpEF) were assessed. All patient and outcomes variables were obtained using the institutional electronic health record. Multivariable Cox proportional regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and active tobacco use. Results: The cohort included 36,816 patients (median follow-up 4.21 years), of whom 2,116 (5.7%) were diagnosed with HF. Among HF patients, 1,110 (3.0%) had HFrEF and 1,006 (2.7%) had HFpEF. Both low and elevated ABI groups were associated with an increased risk of HF, both HFrEF, and HFpEF. After multivariable analysis, PAD with elevated ABI was associated with higher overall HF risk (HR, 2.36 [95% CI, 2.03, 2.73]) than low ABI (HR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.40, 1.74]) when compared to normal ABI. Similarly, PAD with elevated ABI was associated with greater risk of HFrEF (HR, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.93, 2.92]) and HFpEF (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.48, 2.25]) than PAD with low ABI (HFrEF: HR 1.77 [95% CI, 1.52, 2.07], HFpEF: HR 1.31 [95% CI, 1.12, 1.52]). Conclusions: PAD, especially with elevated ABI, is an independent risk factor for heart failure even after adjusting for common HF risk factors. Our findings support HF screening in PAD patients, but longitudinal data on HF morbidity and mortality is necessary to evaluate the value of this practice.

Introduction: Catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic substrate reduces the recurrence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). However, the all-cause mortality benefit in this population is unclear. Hypothesis: Prophylactic ablation of the arrhythmogenic substrate decreases all-cause mortality and prevents the recurrence of VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception through May 2021. We included randomized controlled trials that compared all-cause mortality and ventricular arrhythmia recurrence in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy who underwent ICD implantation with and without prophylactic ablation. The data from each study was combined using a fixed effects model to calculate the hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Four randomized controlled trials during 2007-2020 involving 505 patients (249 patients with and 256 patients without prophylactic VT ablation) were included in our meta-analysis. Compared with control, prophylactic VT ablation did not decrease the all-cause mortality (pooled hazard ratio = 0.94, 95% CI 0.54-1.63, p = 0.818, I2 = 5.8%). However, prophylactic VT ablation significantly decreased appropriate ICD therapy (pooled hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82, p = 0.002, I 2 = 26.1%) and VT/VF recurrence (pooled hazard ratio = 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.93, p = 0.015, I 2 = 0.0%). Conclusions: Prophylactic VT ablation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy did not decrease all-cause mortality; however, it did lead to decreased appropriate ICD therapy and VT/VF recurrence.

Abstract Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are commonly associated. Co-treatment with multiple anti-thrombotic agents can increase the risk of bleeding. Purpose We sought to evaluate patient-centered outcomes in patients with AF on double therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to patients with standard triple therapy, [a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy]. Methods We performed an extensive systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes of patients receiving double therapy with DOACs compared to triple therapy with VKAs in patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patient-centered outcomes were the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNB), all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke. Results Four randomized controlled trials (9602 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with significantly lower ISTH major bleeding/ CRNB (RR - 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67-0.82, p &lt; 0.00001, I2 = 11%). There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy outcomes, including myocardial infarction (RR- 0.99, 95% CI :0.79-1.25, p = 0.96, I2 = 0%), stent thrombosis (RR - 0.97, 95% CI: 0.6-1.55, p = 0.89, I2 = 0%), ischemic stroke (RR - 0.76, 95% CI: 0.5-1.15, p = 0.19, I2 = 0%), all-cause mortality (RR - 1.06, 95% CI: 0.85-1.31, p = 0.61, I2 = 0%) and MACE (RR - 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91-1.22, p = 0.97, I2 = 0%). Conclusion Compared with triple therapy with VKAS, double therapy with DOACs is associated with a reduced risk of bleeding and is as effective in patients with AF undergoing PCI. Abstract Figure.