Back to Authors

Khedr, Ahmed

0000-0002-6464-4425

Mayo Clinic

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.

Citations 2

Comparing Early Intervention to Watchful Waiting: A Review on Risk Stratification and Management in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis
Khedr, Ahmed E. , Odeh, Nour B., Bcharah, George , Abdalla, Hesham, Senjab, Abdulrahman , Zeineddine, Rawan M. , Ram, Jai, Farina, Juan M. , Crystal, Owen , Barrus, Bryan , Lester, Steven J., Shipman, Justin , Alsidawi, Said , Sell‐Dottin, Kristen , Arsanjani, Reza , Abdalla, Hesham M, Ram, Jaikrishnan, Crystal, Owen R, Sell-Dottin, Kristen A , Arsanjani, Reza , Farina, Juan M , Alsidawi, Said , Khedr, Ahmed , Ram, Jaikrishnan

Medicina | March 4, 2025 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 448

10.3390/medicina61030448 Get It

Aortic stenosis is a progressive condition with substantial implications for morbidity and mortality. In recent years, attention has shifted toward risk stratification and the development of individualized management plans to optimize treatment outcomes. The management of asymptomatic patients has become a topic of significant controversy, as emerging studies challenge traditional watchful waiting guidelines and propose the potential benefits of early intervention. While early intervention may reduce overall morbidity and mortality in this patient population, the associated procedural risks remain a critical consideration. This review seeks to analyze the existing literature, offering an updated perspective on patient risk stratification and evidence evaluating both management approaches.
Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration After TAVR and SAVR: Incidence, Diagnosis, Predictors, and Management
Bismee, Nadera N. , Javadi, Niloofar , Khedr, Ahmed E. , Omar, Fatma, Awad, Kamal , Abbas, Mohammed Tiseer , Scalia, Isabel G. , Pereyra, Milagros , Bcharah, George , Farina, Juan M. , Arsanjani, Reza , Khedr, Ahmed , Arsanjani, Reza , Farina, Juan M , Pereyra, Milagros , Scalia, Isabel G , Abbas, Mohammed Tiseer , Awad, Kamal , Omar, Fatma, Sell‐Dottin, Kristen

Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease | December 2, 2024 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 384

10.3390/jcdd11120384 Get It

Bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration (BAVD) is a significant clinical concern following both transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The increasing use of bioprosthetic valves in aortic valve replacement in younger patients and the subsequent rise in cases of BAVD are acknowledged in this review which aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the incidence, diagnosis, predictors, and management of BAVD. Based on a thorough review of the existing literature, this article provides an updated overview of the biological mechanisms underlying valve degeneration, including calcification, structural deterioration, and inflammatory processes and addresses the various risk factors contributing to BAVD, such as patient demographics, comorbidities, and procedural variables. The difficulties in early detection and accurate diagnosis of BAVD are discussed with an emphasis on the need for improved imaging techniques. The incidence and progression of BAVD in patients undergoing TAVR versus SAVR are compared, providing insights into the differences and similarities between the two procedures and procedural impacts on valve longevity. The current strategies for managing BAVD, including re-intervention options of redo surgery and valve-in-valve TAVR, along with emerging treatments are discussed. The controversies in the existing literature are highlighted to offer directions for future investigations to enhance the understanding and management of BAVD.