Citations

AbstractObjectiveWe describe neurologic phenotype, clinical associations, and outcomes in autoimmune brainstem encephalitis.MethodsMedical records of neural‐IgG positive autoimmune brainstem encephalitis patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic (January 1, 2006–December 31, 2022) were reviewed.ResultsNinety‐eight patients (57 male) were included. Median age of symptom onset was 51 years (range, 8 months‐85 years). Frequent presenting features were ≥1: diplopia (80%), ataxia (78%), dysarthria (68%), vestibulocochlear symptoms (67%), dysphagia (61%), nausea/vomiting (42%), and facial weakness (32%). Altered mental status (11%) was uncommon. Neural antibodies detected were as follows: KLHL‐11 (26 patients), GAD65 (high titer, 12), ANNA‐1 (anti‐Hu, 8), ANNA‐2 (anti‐Ri, 8), Ma2 (7), IgLON‐5 (6), AQP4 (6), MOG (4), glycine receptor (4), GQ1B (4), PCA‐1 (anti‐Yo, 4), DPPX (2), neurochondrin (2), neurofilament (2), NMDA‐R (2), AGNA‐1 (SOX‐1, 1), ANNA‐3 (DACH1, 1), amphiphysin (1), CRMP‐5 (1), ITPR‐1 (1), PCA‐Tr (DNER, 1), and PDE10A (1). Cancer was identified in 55 patients: germ cell (23 patients; 3 extra‐testicular), ductal breast adenocarcinoma (8), small cell carcinoma (6, lung 4), adenocarcinomas (6), neuroendocrine carcinoma (3), hematologic (2), squamous cell (2), and other (7). Median modified Ranking score (mRS) at last follow‐up was 3 (range, 0–6). Factors associated with poor outcome included abnormal brain MRI, bulbar symptoms, and elevated CSF IgG index. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed faster progression to wheelchair in patients who were immunotherapy refractory and with elevated CSF IgG index. Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune brainstem encephalitis (definite and probable) are proposed.InterpretationAutoimmune brainstem encephalitis is a distinct clinical subphenotype of autoimmune encephalitis. Abnormal brain MRI, bulbar symptoms, and elevated CSF‐IgG index associate with poor outcome.

Background and Objectives: This survey study aimed to (1) identify patient/family research priorities in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis (POMS), and (2) delineate optimized methods for research study/clinical trials design, engagement, and implementation. Methods: Participants were as follows: (1) parents of a child (<18 years) with POMS enrolled in a national registry, (2) adolescents (13–17 years) with POMS in the registry, and (3) adults (18–40 years) with POMS receiving care at a registry affiliated clinic. Of 293 eligible participants, 192 completed surveys. Results: Experiences with health care and medications were generally positive but there remain areas of priority improvement. Incentives to participate in clinical trials included medications previously tested and in pill form, bloodwork/study visits required ⩾ every 3 months, cognitive testing ⩽1 hour, compensation for travel and time, ability to continue current multiple sclerosis (MS) medication, option to take study medication if on placebo, and individualized study feedback. Priorities for clinical research were (1) psychosocial impact, (2) cognitive/academic impact, (3) environmental risk, and (4) nutrition. Conclusions: Results highlighted the importance of a holistic approach to study design and a focus on the impact of disease on daily life to best engage patients and families in POMS clinical trials and research.

Background: Understanding nutrition’s role in multiple sclerosis (MS) can guide recommendations and intervention-based studies. Objective: Evaluate the association between nutrition and pediatric-onset MS outcomes. Methods: Prospective longitudinal multicenter study conducted as part of the US Network of Pediatric MS centers. Predictors were collected using a food screener estimating intake of various dietary food groups (e.g. dairy and fruits) and additional calculated indices (e.g. Healthy Eating Index (HEI)). Outcomes included time-from-enrollment to clinical relapse, new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T2 lesions, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) increase. Results: 353 children with MS were enrolled (mean ± SD age 15.4 ± 2.9, follow-up 3.9 ± 2.6 years). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that increased dairy by 50% of recommended intake was associated with increased relapse risk by 41% (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.41, 95% CI 1.07–1.86), and risk of T2 progression by 40% (1.40, 1.12–1.74). Increased intake of fruit or vegetable above recommended, and every five-point HEI increase decreased relapse risk by 25% (0.75, 0.60–0.95), 45% (0.55, 0.32–0.96), and 15% (0.84, 0.74–0.96), respectively. No associations were found with EDSS. Conclusion: This work supports the influence of dietary intake on MS course, particularly with dairy intake. Future prospective study is required to establish causation.