Citations

AbstractObjectiveTo discover a novel peptoid antagonist that targets the interleukin‐15 (IL‐15) receptor and to evaluate its therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of inflammation and arthritis.MethodsA new compound (IFRA3, interleukin‐15 receptor antagonist 3) was discovered using a unique on‐bead two‐colour combinatorial cell screening of a peptoid library. The interaction of IFRA3 with IL‐15 receptor was assessed by in vitro pull‐down and thermal shift assays. The efficacy of IFRA3 in treating inflammation and arthritis was evaluated in mouse models.ResultsIFRA3Q1 (a tetrameric derivative of IFRA3) inhibited the activity of IL‐15 and suppressed CTLL‐2 cell proliferation (which depends on IL‐15 activity). IFRA3Q1 exhibited strong in vivo anti‐inflammatory activity in carrageenan‐induced inflammation in mice. Furthermore, IFRA3Q1 inhibited collagen‐induced arthritis in DBA/1J mice.ConclusionBy binding to and inhibiting the function of IL‐15 receptor, IFRA3Q1 exhibited significant anti‐arthritis activity. Our findings suggest that IFRA3Q1 represents a new paradigm for arthritis therapy by targeting IL‐15 signalling.

Abstract Pain is common in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and profoundly reduces quality of life (QoL). Multiple underlying mechanisms contribute to a heterogenous pain experience and reduce efficacy of pain management. This study was designed to characterize the distribution of mechanism-based pain phenotypes in painful CP. The data analyzed were collected as part of the PROspective Evaluation of Chronic Pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and Translational StuDies, an NCI/NIDDK-funded longitudinal study of the natural history of CP. The PROspective Evaluation of Chronic pancreatitis for EpidEmiologic and translational stuDies includes patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures of pain, medication use, global health, and QoL. Of subjects (N = 681) with CP, 80% experienced abdominal pain within the year before enrollment. Subjects who experienced pain in the week before enrollment (N = 391) completed PROMIS Neuropathic and Nociceptive Pain Quality instruments which were then used to classify them by pain type: 40% had nociceptive, 5% had neuropathic-like, and 32% had both types of pain. The prevalence of having both types of pain was higher among women and subjects with diabetes mellitus, whereas nociceptive-only pain was more prevalent among men and those with pancreatic duct stricture. Other factors, including pain medication use and healthcare utilization, did not differ between groups based on pain type. Subjects in the Both group had significantly worse health and QoL scores relative to those with nociceptive-only pain, suggesting that using psychosocial pain surveys may be useful for understanding pain subtypes in patients with CP. Additional research is needed to identify biochemical and biophysical signatures that may associate with and predict responses to mechanism-specific interventions.

AbstractOraxol consists of an oral dosage form of the chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel administered with a novel P‐glycoprotein inhibitor encequidar methanesulfonate monohydrate (formerly named HM30181A), which allows oral treatment of cancers that would otherwise be treated with intravenous paclitaxel. Here we describe the population pharmacokinetics (popPK) analyses for oral paclitaxel in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors to characterize pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and quantify sources of PK variability. The best fit popPK model for oral paclitaxel, based on data from seven clinical studies (197 patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors), involves a linear two‐compartment structural model containing first‐order absorption with a short lag time and first‐order elimination as well as a log additive error. In this popPK model, lower population estimates of central volume for Asian patients versus Caucasian patients did not translate into clinical meaningful differences in oral paclitaxel exposure. Age, sex, body weight or surface area, mild hepatic impairment, and mild to moderate renal impairment had no clinically meaningful effects on the systemic exposure of oral paclitaxel. Simulations were performed on clinical therapeutic dose (oral paclitaxel 205 mg/m2 once daily ×3 days per week) to predict exposure of oral paclitaxel and to support treatment benefits observed in a pivotal phase III trial.

AbstractAcute kidney injury (AKI) may develop in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and is associated with in‐hospital death. We investigated the incidence of AKI in 223 hospitalized COVID‐19 patients and analyzed the influence factors of AKI. The incidence of cytokine storm syndrome and its correlation with other clinicopathologic variables were also investigated. We retrospectively enrolled adult patients with virologically confirmed COVID‐19 who were hospitalized at three hospitals in Wuhan and Guizhou, China between February 13, 2020, and April 8, 2020. We included 124 patients with moderate COVID‐19 and 99 with severe COVID‐19. AKI was present in 35 (15.7%) patients. The incidence of AKI was 30.3% for severe COVID‐19 and 4.0% for moderate COVID‐19 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, cytokine storm was found in 30 (13.5%) patients and only found in the severe group. Kidney injury at admission (odds ratio [OR]: 3.132, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.150–8.527; p = 0.025), cytokine storm (OR: 4.234, 95% CI: 1.361–13.171; p = 0.013), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (OR: 7.684, 95% CI: 2.622–22.523; p < 0.001) were influence factors of AKI. Seventeen (48.6%) patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation developed AKI, of whom 64.7% (11/17) died. Up to 86.7% of AKI patients with cytokine storms may develop a secondary bacterial infection. The leukocyte counts were significantly higher in AKI patients with cytokine storm than in those without (13.0 × 10⁹/L, interquartile range [IQR] 11.3 vs. 8.3 × 10⁹/L, IQR 7.5, p = 0.005). Approximately 1/6 patients with COVID‐19 eventually develop AKI. Kidney injury at admission, cytokine storm and ARDS are influence factors of AKI. Cytokine storm and secondary bacterial infections may be responsible for AKI development in COVID‐19 patients.

Background: Prior ATPIII lipid guidelines recommended statin therapy for patients with clinical ASCVD to achieve low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets, while the 2013 ACC/AHA lipid guidelines recommend high-intensity statin therapy for all ASCVD patients. How closely these recommendations are followed in routine clinical practice is unknown. Methods: We evaluated statin use, intensity, and LDL-C values in 1,483 patients with ASCVD (coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease) enrolled and seen serially at 62 geographically dispersed US cardiology and primary care clinics in the Patient and Provider Assessment of Lipid Management (PALM) Registry between May - September 2015. Factors associated with high intensity statin use (atorvastatin ≥40 mg or rosuvastatin ≥20 mg daily) and LDL-C <70 mg/dL were evaluated in multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 1,483 ASCVD patients, 86.2% were on a statin, but only 31.4% were on a high-intensity statin. Overall, 64.0% had an LDL-C <100 mg/dL, but only 29.0% had an LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Factors associated with high-intensity statin use in multivariable regression were younger age (OR 0.74 per 10 year increase, p<0.001, 95% CI 0.66-0.83), male sex (OR 1.69, p<0.001, 95% CI, 1.32-2.16), cerebrovascular disease (OR 1.55, p=0.008, 95% CI 1.12-2.13), coronary heart disease (OR 2.42, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.67-3.50), and being seen by a cardiologist (OR 1.35, p =0.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.81). Factors associated with an increased likelihood of LDL-C<70 were male sex (OR 1.55, p=0.001, 95% CI 1.20-2.01), white (OR 1.62, p=0.03, 95% CI 1.04-2.5-, diabetes (OR 1.64, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.29-2.09) and being seen by a cardiologist (OR 1.94, p<0.001, 95% CI 1.41-2.67). Discussion: Substantial gaps in care remain for secondary prevention of ASCVD despite simplified recommendations. While the majority of patients with ASCVD in community practice are on a statin, only one-third are on high intensity statins and over two-thirds have LDL ≥70 mg/dL.

Abstract Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer therapy. However, the response of patients to ICB is difficult to predict. Here, we examined 81 patients with lung cancer under ICB treatment and found that patients with MET amplification were resistant to ICB and had a poor progression-free survival. Tumors with MET amplifications had significantly decreased STING levels and antitumor T-cell infiltration. Furthermore, we performed deep single-cell RNA sequencing on more than 20,000 single immune cells and identified an immunosuppressive signature with increased subsets of XIST- and CD96-positive exhausted natural killer (NK) cells and decreased CD8+ T-cell and NK-cell populations in patients with MET amplification. Mechanistically, we found that oncogenic MET signaling induces phosphorylation of UPF1 and downregulates tumor cell STING expression via modulation of the 3′-UTR length of STING by UPF1. Decreased efficiency of ICB by MET amplification can be overcome by inhibiting MET. Significance: We suggest that the combination of MET inhibitor together with ICB will overcome ICB resistance induced by MET amplification. Our report reveals much-needed information that will benefit the treatment of patients with primary MET amplification or EGFR–tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistant-related MET amplification. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659

AbstractBackgroundNon‐statin lipid lowering therapies (LLTs) provide additional treatment options for patients. Use patterns and patient perceptions of non‐statin LLT remain incompletely described.HypothesisThe guideline‐recommended statin intensity remains underutilized in patients treated with and without non‐statin LLT.MethodsThe PALM Registry collected LLT information on patients with or at risk of ASCVD treated at 125 US clinics in 2015. We compared patient perceptions, lipid levels and statin use among patients treated with and without non‐statin LLT.ResultsAmong 7720 patients, 1930 (25.0%) were treated with a non‐statin LLT (1249 fish oil, 417 fibrates, 329 ezetimibe, 196 niacin). Concurrent statin treatment occurred in 73.7%, of which 45.4% were dosed under the guideline‐recommended intensity. Compared with patients on statin alone, patients receiving both a statin and non‐statin LLT (n = 1423) were more likely to be male, white race and to perceive themselves as higher risk of ASCVD compared with their peers (38.5% vs. 34.9%, p = .047). Only 27.4% of patients treated with non‐statin LLT alone perceived themselves at higher risk. Most (75.7%) patients treated with a non‐statin LLT alone reported never being treated with a statin, despite ASCVD in 30.8% of these patients. Among those previously treated with a statin, 59.3% reported being willing to try a statin again.ConclusionsNon‐statin LLT is used in one in four patients with or at risk for ASCVD; its use is frequently in place of statin therapy or in the absence of guideline‐recommended statin intensity. More work is needed to establish statins as first line therapy.

Abstract Intratumoral genomic heterogeneity in glioblastoma (GBM) is a barrier to overcoming radiation (RT) resistance. To discover genotype-independent mediators of RT resistance, we correlated RT resistance with the concentration of approximately 700 metabolites across 23 GBM cell lines. Purine metabolites, especially those containing the base guanine, were most correlated with RT resistance. Similarly, increased abundance of tumor purines was associated with decreased survival in GBM patients treated with RT. This relationship is causal. Purine supplementation protected RT-sensitive GBMs from RT and promoted the repair of RT-induced double strand DNA breaks (DSBs). In vitro and in vivo stable isotope tracing confirmed that GBM cell lines and orthotopic patient-derived xenografts primarily generated purines through the de novo synthetic pathway. RT treatment further increased de novo purine synthesis in GBM through signaling via the DNA damage response. Inhibition of de novo GTP synthesis with mycophenolic acid (MPA) sensitized multiple GBM cell lines and neurospheres to RT by slowing the repair of RT-induced DSBs. MPA-induced radiosensitization was GTP-dependent as it was rescued by nucleoside supplementation. Modulating pyrimidine metabolism affected neither RT resistance nor DSB repair, suggesting these GTP-specific effects are due to active signaling rather than its ability to act as a physical substrate for DNA repair and candidate signaling molecules have been identified. These results were recapitulated in vivo with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), the orally bioavailable FDA-approved prodrug of MPA. MMF potentiated RT efficacy, reduced tumor guanylates and slowed the repair of RT-induced DSBs across multiple models. Because de novo purine synthesis is activated by many of the oncogenic alterations that drive GBM, its inhibition is a promising genotype-independent strategy to overcome GBM RT resistance. We have now begun a clinical trial to determine whether combining MMF and RT is safe and potentially efficacious in patients with GBM.