Back to Authors

Liu, Han

0000-0002-0014-4675

Mayo Clinic

Jinan University

Citations 2

Critical roles of cytokine storm and secondary bacterial infection in acute kidney injury development in COVID‐19: A multi‐center retrospective cohort study
Li, X J , Meng, Yu , Yin, Haiyan , Gao, Wenyong , Yang, Xiao , Xu, Dian‐Shuang, Cai, Xingdong , Guan, Yin, Lerman, Lilach O. , Peng, Zhiyong , Zhou, Hourong, Li, Xia-Qing , Liu, Han

Journal of Medical Virology | July 27, 2021 | Volume: 93 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 6641-6652

10.1002/jmv.27234 Get It

AbstractAcute kidney injury (AKI) may develop in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and is associated with in‐hospital death. We investigated the incidence of AKI in 223 hospitalized COVID‐19 patients and analyzed the influence factors of AKI. The incidence of cytokine storm syndrome and its correlation with other clinicopathologic variables were also investigated. We retrospectively enrolled adult patients with virologically confirmed COVID‐19 who were hospitalized at three hospitals in Wuhan and Guizhou, China between February 13, 2020, and April 8, 2020. We included 124 patients with moderate COVID‐19 and 99 with severe COVID‐19. AKI was present in 35 (15.7%) patients. The incidence of AKI was 30.3% for severe COVID‐19 and 4.0% for moderate COVID‐19 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, cytokine storm was found in 30 (13.5%) patients and only found in the severe group. Kidney injury at admission (odds ratio [OR]: 3.132, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.150–8.527; p = 0.025), cytokine storm (OR: 4.234, 95% CI: 1.361–13.171; p = 0.013), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (OR: 7.684, 95% CI: 2.622–22.523; p < 0.001) were influence factors of AKI. Seventeen (48.6%) patients who received invasive mechanical ventilation developed AKI, of whom 64.7% (11/17) died. Up to 86.7% of AKI patients with cytokine storms may develop a secondary bacterial infection. The leukocyte counts were significantly higher in AKI patients with cytokine storm than in those without (13.0 × 10⁹/L, interquartile range [IQR] 11.3 vs. 8.3 × 10⁹/L, IQR 7.5, p = 0.005). Approximately 1/6 patients with COVID‐19 eventually develop AKI. Kidney injury at admission, cytokine storm and ARDS are influence factors of AKI. Cytokine storm and secondary bacterial infections may be responsible for AKI development in COVID‐19 patients.
Osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without T790M mutation: Real-world evidence.
Tazelaar, Henry D. , Li, Yalun , Peikert, Tobias, Leventakos, Konstantinos , Chiou, Shih‐Hwa , Luo, Yung‐Hung , Liu, Han , Wampfler, Jason A. , Tazelaar, Henry D. , Liu, Dan , Chen, Yuh‐Min , Yang, Yanan , Yang, Ping

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 25, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e21631-e21631

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e21631 Get It

e21631 Background: The efficacy of osimertinib in previously EGFR-TKI treated NSCLC patients without T790M mutation remains unclear in real-world practice. We investigated whether osimertinib can provide survival benefit in EGFR-mutant patients without T790M mutation after 1st/2nd generation TKI treatment. Methods: Between January 1, 2009, and March 31, 2019, 417 patients had stage III-IV NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation and 154 out of 417 patients receiving osimertinib as≥2nd-line EGFR-TKI treatment were identified at Mayo Clinic. The time to treatment failure of osimertinib was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. The risk of death post diagnosis was analyzed by Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Among 417 EGFR-mutant patients, higher risk of death was found in patients with age above 65 years, non-adenocarcinoma, no surgery treatment, no radiation treatment, non-exon 19 deletion/exon 21 L858R mutation, higher ECOG PS (2-4), PD-L1 expression of 50% or more, bone metastasis, live metastasis, and adrenal metastasis (all p < 0.05). Moreover, osimertinib as ≥2nd-line TKI treatment in patients with or without T790M revealed lower risk of death compared to 1st/2nd generation TKI treatment without subsequent osimertinib (HR = 0.33; 0.46, and p = 0.0002; 0.0232, respectively). However, among patients receiving osimertinib as ≥2nd-line TKI treatment, patients with T790M did not have superior survival than those without (p = 0.2803). Among 154 patients receiving osimertinib, a higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib was found in male (HR = 1.72; p = 0.0327), patients with 1st-line TKI duration ≤12 months (HR = 2.16; p = 0.0019), BMI drop > 10% (HR = 1.85; p = 0.0207), PD-L1 levels of 50% or more (HR = 4.28; p = 0.0008), and 1st-line TKI with afatinib (HR = 2.19; p = 0.0136). Nonetheless, osimertinib as ≥2nd-line TKI in patients without 790M mutation did not have higher risk of treatment failure than those with T790M (p = 0.1236). Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that osimertinib can provide similar survival benefit in previously EGFR-TKI treated NSCLC patients without T790M mutation as those with T790M in real-world practice. Additionally, EGFR-mutant patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% had a higher risk of treatment failure for osimertinib and worse overall survival than those with PD-L1 expression < 50% and may potentially gain benefit from optimizing treatment strategies including immunotherapy.