Zeng, Xiangyu

Abstract Imatinib mesylate (IM) has revolutionized the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, most patients inevitably acquire IM resistance. Second- and third-line treatments exhibit modest clinical benefits with a median time to disease progression of 4 to 6 months, highlighting the urgency for novel therapeutic approaches. Here, we report that the expression of BCL6, a known oncogenic driver and transcriptional repressor, was significantly induced in GIST cells following IM treatment. Elevated BCL6 levels suppressed apoptosis and contributed to IM resistance. Mechanistically, BCL6 recruited SIRT1 to the TP53 promoter to modulate histone acetylation and transcriptionally repress TP53 expression. The reduction in p53 subsequently attenuated cell apoptosis and promoted tolerance of GIST cells to IM. Concordantly, treatment of GIST cells showing high BCL6 expression with a BCL6 inhibitor, BI-3802, conferred IM sensitivity. Furthermore, BI-3802 showed striking synergy with IM in IM-responsive and IM-resistant GIST cells in vitro and in vivo. Thus, these findings reveal a role for BCL6 in IM resistance and suggest that a combination of BCL6 inhibitors and IM could be a potentially effective treatment for GIST. Significance: BCL6 drives resistance to imatinib by inhibiting p53-mediated apoptosis and can be targeted in combination with imatinib to synergistically suppress tumor growth, providing a therapeutic strategy for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Abstract Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has revolutionized cancer therapy. However, the response of patients to ICB is difficult to predict. Here, we examined 81 patients with lung cancer under ICB treatment and found that patients with MET amplification were resistant to ICB and had a poor progression-free survival. Tumors with MET amplifications had significantly decreased STING levels and antitumor T-cell infiltration. Furthermore, we performed deep single-cell RNA sequencing on more than 20,000 single immune cells and identified an immunosuppressive signature with increased subsets of XIST- and CD96-positive exhausted natural killer (NK) cells and decreased CD8+ T-cell and NK-cell populations in patients with MET amplification. Mechanistically, we found that oncogenic MET signaling induces phosphorylation of UPF1 and downregulates tumor cell STING expression via modulation of the 3′-UTR length of STING by UPF1. Decreased efficiency of ICB by MET amplification can be overcome by inhibiting MET. Significance: We suggest that the combination of MET inhibitor together with ICB will overcome ICB resistance induced by MET amplification. Our report reveals much-needed information that will benefit the treatment of patients with primary MET amplification or EGFR–tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistant-related MET amplification. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2659

Abstract PARP inhibitors induce DNA lesions, the repair of which are highly dependent on homologous recombination (HR), and preferentially kill HR‐ deficient cancers. However, cancer cells have developed several mechanisms to transform HR and confer drug resistance to PARP inhibition. Therefore, there is a great clinical interest in exploring new therapies that induce HR deficiency (HRD), thereby sensitizing cancer cells to PARP inhibitors. Here, we found that GSK2578215A, a high‐selective and effective leucine‐rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) inhibitor, or LRRK2 depletion suppresses HR preventing the recruitment of RAD51 to DNA damage sites through disruption of the interaction of RAD51 and BRCA2. Moreover, LRRK2 inhibition or depletion increases the susceptibility of ovarian cancer cells to Olaparib in vitro and in vivo. In clinical specimens, LRRK2 high expression is high related with advanced clinical characteristics and poor survival of ovarian cancer patients. All these findings indicate ovarian cancers expressing high levels of LRRK2 are more resistant to treatment potentially through promoting HR. Furthermore, combination treatment with an LRRK2 and PARP inhibitor may be a novel strategy to improve the effectiveness of LRRK2 expression ovarian cancers.

Abstract PrimPol has been recently identified as a DNA damage tolerant polymerase that plays an important role in replication stress response. However, the regulatory mechanisms of PrimPol are not well defined. In this study, we identify that the deubiquitinase USP36 interferes with degradation of PrimPol to regulate the replication stress response. Mechanistically, USP36 is deubiquitinated following DNA replication stress, which in turn facilitates its upregulation and interaction with PrimPol. USP36 deubiquitinates K29-linked polyubiquitination of PrimPol and increases its protein stability. Depletion of USP36 results in replication stress-related defects and elevates cell sensitivity to DNA-damage agents, such as cisplatin and olaparib. Moreover, USP36 expression positively correlates with the level of PrimPol protein and poor prognosis in patient samples. These findings indicate that the regulation of PrimPol K29-linked ubiquitination by USP36 plays a critical role in DNA replication stress and chemotherapy response.

Abstract Background. Mutation of the BRAF(V600E) oncogene occurs in ~8% of human colorectal cancers (CRC) and its inhibition is associated with treatment resistance that is due, in part, to paradoxical re-activation of MEK/ERK signaling. Recently, pathway analysis identified cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) upregulation in a subset of human BRAFV600E CRCs. We determined whether CDK1 antagonism can enhance the efficacy of MEK inhibition in BRAFV600E CRC cell lines. Methods. Manipulation of gene expression was achieved by siRNA and/or ectopic expression, or using isogenic cell pairs. Cells were treated with the CDK1 selective inhibitor RO-3306 or dinaciclib (CDK1,2,5,9 inhibitor) alone or combined with the MEK inhibitor cobimetinib. Apoptosis was quantified by Annexin V staining with flow cytometry; apoptotic signaling was analyzed by immunoblotting of caspase-8 phosphorylation and caspase cleavage. Long-term cell survival was evaluated by clonogenic assay. In vivo efficacy of the drug combination was determined in a murine flank xenograft model. Results. BRAFV600E CRC cell lines expressed CDK1 whose siRNA knockdown or pharmacological inhibition by RO-3306 or dinaciclib was shown to sensitize them to apoptosis (annexin V labeling). The combination of RO-3306 or dinaciclib with cobimetinib cooperatively enhanced apoptosis and reduced clonogenic survival compared to drug monotherapy. Cells isogenic or ectopic for BRAFV600E displayed apoptosis resistance to CDK inhibitors, as did cells with ectopic expression of constitutively active MEK. CDK1 inhibition by RO-3306 or dinaciclib induced a caspase-8-dependent apoptosis shown by caspase-8 restoration in deficient NB7 cells that enhanced dinaciclib-induced caspase-3 cleavage. Furthermore, CDK inhibitors suppressed procaspase-8 phosphorylation at S387 shown by drug withdrawal that restored phospho-S387 and increased cell mitosis. In a CRC xenograft model, dinaciclib plus cobimetinib produced significantly greater tumor growth inhibition in association with a caspase-dependent apoptosis than did either drug alone. Analysis of TCGA datasets revealed overexpression of CDK1 in human CRCs compared to normal colonic tissue. An inverse relationship existed between expression of CDK1 and the cell cycle inhibitor p16. In CRC cells, ectopic p16 was shown to downregulate CDK1 expression. In conclusion, our data establish CDK1 as a novel mediator of apoptosis resistance in BRAFV600E CRC cells lines whose combined targeting with CDK and MEK/ERK inhibitors may represent an effective therapeutic strategy. Citation Format: Peng Zhang, Hisato Kawakami, Weizhen Liu, Xiangyu Zeng, Klaus Stebhardt, Kaixiong Tao, Shengbing Huang, Frank A. Sinicrope. Targeting CDK1 and MEK/ERK overcomes apoptosis resistance in BRAFV600E human colorectal cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 2336.

Abstract The BRAFV600E mutation occurs in approximately 8% of human colorectal cancers and is associated with therapeutic resistance that is due, in part, to reactivation of MEK/ERK signaling cascade. Recently, pathway analysis identified cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) upregulation in a subset of human BRAFV600E colorectal cancers. Therefore, it was determined whether CDK1 antagonism enhances the efficacy of MEK inhibition in BRAFV600E colorectal cancer cells. BRAFV600E colorectal cancer cell lines expressing CDK1 were sensitized to apoptosis upon siRNA knockdown or small-molecule inhibition with RO-3306 (CDK1 inhibitor) or dinaciclib (CDK1, 2, 5, 9 inhibitors). Combination of RO-3306 or dinaciclib with cobimetinib (MEK inhibitor) cooperatively enhanced apoptosis and reduced clonogenic survival versus monotherapy. Cells isogenic or ectopic for BRAFV600E displayed resistance to CDK1 inhibitors, as did cells with ectopic expression of constitutively active MEK. CDK1 inhibitors induced a CASP8-dependent apoptosis shown by caspase-8 restoration in deficient NB7 cells that enhanced dinaciclib-induced CASP3 cleavage. CDK inhibitors suppressed pro-CASP8 phosphorylation at S387, as shown by drug withdrawal, which restored p-S387 and increased mitosis. In a colorectal cancer xenograft model, dinaciclib plus cobimetinib produced significantly greater tumor growth inhibition in association with a caspase-dependent apoptosis versus either drug alone. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) transcriptomic dataset revealed overexpression of CDK1 in human colorectal cancers versus normal colon. Together, these data establish CDK1 as a novel mediator of apoptosis resistance in BRAFV600E colorectal cancers whose combined targeting with a MEK/ERK inhibitor represents an effective therapeutic strategy. Implications: CDK1 is a novel mediator of apoptosis resistance in BRAFV600E colorectal cancers whose dual targeting with a MEK inhibitor may be therapeutically effective. Mol Cancer Res; 16(3); 378–89. ©2017 AACR.