Citations

The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Reviewer Academy seeks to train and establish a community of trusted, reliable, and skilled peer reviewers with diverse backgrounds and interests to promote high-quality reviews for each of the SCCM journals. Goals of the Academy include building accessible resources to highlight qualities of excellent manuscript reviews; educating and mentoring a diverse group of healthcare professionals; and establishing and upholding standards for insightful and informative reviews. This manuscript will map the mission of the Reviewer Academy with a succinct summary of the importance of peer review, process of reviewing a manuscript, and the expected ethical standards of reviewers. We will equip readers to target concise, thoughtful feedback as peer reviewers, advance their understanding of the editorial process and inspire readers to integrate medical journalism into diverse professional careers.

This discussion summarizes the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for managing squamous cell anal carcinoma, which represents the most common histologic form of the disease. A multidisciplinary approach including physicians from gastroenterology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and radiology is necessary. Primary treatment of perianal cancer and anal canal cancer are similar and include chemoradiation in most cases. Follow-up clinical evaluations are recommended for all patients with anal carcinoma because additional curative-intent treatment is possible. Biopsy-proven evidence of locally recurrent or persistent disease after primary treatment may require surgical treatment. Systemic therapy is generally recommended for extrapelvic metastatic disease. Recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Anal Carcinoma include staging classification updates based on the 9th edition of the AJCC Staging System and updates to the systemic therapy recommendations based on new data that better define optimal treatment of patients with metastatic anal carcinoma.

e21030 Background: Docetaxel +/- ramucirumab remains the standard of care therapy after progression on platinum doublet and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical benefit from docetaxel is short-lived with substantial toxicity. Additionally, whether cancer gene mutation status impacts the benefit from docetaxel has not been systemically studied. In this real-world study, we aim to investigate whether cancer gene mutation status is associated with benefit from docetaxel. We also explored whether IMPOWER150-based regimens (ABCP-atezolizumab + bevacizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel; ACP-atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel; BCP-bevacizumab + carboplatin+paclitaxel) may serve as alternative options with better efficacy in this patient population. Methods: We retrospectively queried MD Anderson Cancer Center GEMINI database for patients with metastatic NSCLC who received docetaxel, docetaxel+ramucirumab, or one of the above-mentioned IMPOWER150-based regimens after progression on concomitant or sequential platinum-doublet and ICI. Primary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 274 patients were analyzed (docetaxel n = 99; docetaxel +ramucirumab n = 142; ABCP n = 28; BCP n = 4, ACP n = 1). No significant difference was observed in mPFS (3.00m versus 3.93m, P = 0.156) or mOS (8.40m vs.8.67m, P = 0.737) between patients from docetaxel monotherapy group and docetaxel+ ramucirumab group. Cancer gene mutations in EGFR, KRAS, TP53 or PD-L1 expression (0-1%; 1-49%; ≥50%) were not associated with PFS or OS in the 241 patients treated with docetaxel +/- ramucirumab. Furthermore, there was no difference in mPFS (5.50m versus 3.47m, P = 0.516) or mOS (10.40m versus 8.83m, P = 0.737) in patients who received IMPOWER 150-based regimens compared to those who were treated with docetaxel+/- ramucirumab. The median treatment duration was 1.60m (0.70m-20.23m), 1.90m (0.70m-32.90m), 4.80m(0.70m-33.47m) and 11 patients (11.11%), 20 patients (14.08%), and 3 patients (9.09%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events in the patients treated with docetaxel monotherapy, docetaxel+ramucirumab combined therapy, and the IMPOWER150 regimens, respectively. Conclusions: These results from this real-world study suggested that unlike for ICI therapy, where onco-driver mutations have profound impact on the clinical benefit, the cancer gene mutation status does not impact the benefit from docetaxel +/- ramucirumab in NSCLC patients who progressed on platinum doublets and ICI. Furthermore, the clinical benefit from docetaxel +/- ramucirumab is short-lived. Novel treatment regimens are urgently needed in this clinical setting.

9065 Background: Rearranged during transfection ( RET) gene alterations are the oncogenic driver in diverse tumor types, including RET fusions identified in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). While RET-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) selpercatinib and pralsetinib are effective, acquired drug resistance remains a challenge. Here, we report the initial results from the RETgistry, an international consortium aimed at elucidating mechanisms of resistance to RET TKIs across RET-altered solid tumors. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis performed across 16 institutions. Patients (pts) were eligible if they had advanced solid tumor harboring an oncogenic RET alteration, received ≥1 RET TKI with disease progression, and underwent resistant tumor or liquid biopsy for next-generation sequencing (NGS). Results: A total of 103 time-distinct biopsies (62 tissue, 30 plasma, 11 paired tissue/plasma) were included in analysis, obtained from 88 pts with progression on a RET-selective TKI [selpercatinib (n = 70), pralsetinib (n = 14), selpercatinib and pralsetinib sequentially (n = 4)]. Pts had the following tumor types: 72 NSCLC (69% KIF5B-RET, 21% CCDC6-RET, 10% other RET fusion), 13 medullary thyroid cancer (TC) (54% RET M918T, 46% other RET mutation), and 2 papillary and 1 anaplastic TC (all, RET fusion). Median age was 58 (range, 21-86); 48% were male with 89% never/light smokers. Median duration of RET TKI preceding biopsies [first-line, n = 32 (31%); second-line, n = 42 (41%); third-/greater-line, n = 29 (28%)] was 16.5 months (mos) (95% CI, 14.0-19.6); median PFS was 14.1 mos (95% CI, 9.3-17.0). Resistant biopsies were obtained at median 15.0 mos from TKI initiation (range, 1.8-58.8). Acquired RET mutations were detected in 14 (14%), most common being G810 substitutions in 12 (12%). Potential off-target resistance gene alterations identified in 43 cases (42%) included MET amplification (14%), BRAF V600E or fusion (2%), KRAS gain or mutation (5%), ERBB2 amplification (2%), EGFR amplification (3%), ROS1 fusion (1%), and activating PIK3CA mutation or PTEN loss (4%). No resistant lung cancer biopsy demonstrated small cell transformation. The duration of TKI therapy (HR 0.64, p = 0.11) or PFS (HR 0.75, p = 0.33) did not differ according to the presence of on-target vs off-target resistance. NGS analyses of pre-RET-selective TKI tumors (n = 92) revealed frequent co-occurring alterations in TP53 (29%) and CDKN2A/B (12%). Conclusions: On-target resistance to RET inhibition due to acquired RET mutations was less common than off-target resistance, identified in 14%. The majority of RET TKI resistance is mediated by off-target mechanisms such as bypass receptor tyrosine kinase activation. Further studies are warranted to enable the development of therapeutic strategies to address resistance in pts with RET-altered tumors. The RETgistry accrual and data analyses continue.

8032 Background: Patients (pts) with TCE RRMM have few treatment (Tx) options and poor HRQoL. Ide-cel, the first in class CAR T cell Tx for pts with TCE RRMM, improved PFS versus standard (std) regimens in the KarMMa-3 trial. We report the PRO results comparing the Tx arms. PROs provide further understanding of Tx benefit of ide-cel from the pts’ perspective. Methods: KarMMa-3 (NCT03651128) is an open-label phase 3 RCT comparing the efficacy and safety of ide-cel with std regimens in pts with TCE RRMM, who had received 2–4 prior regimens. In addition to clinical endpoints, we evaluated the impact of ide-cel compared with std regimens on the changes in HRQoL, measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-MY20, and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. PROs were collected at baseline (screening), day of infusion and monthly from 2–24 months (mo) and thereafter every 3 mo. This interim analysis reports PROs through 20 mo. Comparisons were performed on least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline over time between arms using constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA). Results: In total, 386 pts were randomized (ide-cel, 254; std regimens, 132). PRO compliance was high over time ( > 80%). At baseline, PROs were similar between arms. LSM changes from baseline to 20 mo showed significant differences ( P < 0.05), with effect sizes of 0.3–0.7, in favor of ide-cel for most domains, including global health status/QoL, cognitive functioning, fatigue, and pain (EORTC QLQ-C30); side effects of Tx (EORTC QLQ-MY20); and the EQ-5D-5L VAS. The difference in overall LSM change reached or exceeded the pre-specified between-groups minimal importance difference (MID) for improvement in most domains in favor of ide-cel (Table). Conclusions: Ide-cel showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL, including key MM symptoms and functioning, for pts with TCE RRMM compared with std regimens. The PRO data for ide-cel expands upon the clinical outcomes observed in the KarMMa-3 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03651128 . [Table: see text]

Fibromyalgia is a common disease syndrome characterized by chronic pain and fatigue in conjunction with cognitive dysfunction such as memory difficulties. Patients currently face a difficult prognosis with limited treatment options and a diminished quality of life. Given its widespread use and potential efficacy in treating other types of pain, cannabis may prove to be an effective treatment for fibromyalgia. This review aims to examine and discuss current clinical evidence regarding the use of cannabis for the treatment of fibromyalgia. An electronic search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus using Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms on all literature published up to October 2022. A follow-up manual search included a complete verification of relevant studies. The results of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five observational studies (a total of 564 patients) that investigated the effects of cannabis on fibromyalgia symptoms were included in this review. Of the RCTs, only one demonstrated that cannabinoids did not have a different effect than placebo on pain responses. Overall, this analysis shows low-quality evidence supporting short-term pain reduction in people with fibromyalgia treated with cannabinoid therapeutics. Although current evidence is limited, medical cannabis appears to be a safe alternative for treating fibromyalgia.

AbstractObjectiveThis prospective longitudinal study compares outcomes between Medicare beneficiaries receiving percutaneous image‐guided lumbar decompression (PILD) using the mild® procedure and a control group of patients receiving interspinous spacers for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with neurogenic claudication (NC).MethodsPatients diagnosed with LSS with NC and treated with either the mild procedure or a spacer were identified in the Medicare claims database. The incidence of harms, the rate of subsequent interventions, and the overall combined rate of harms and subsequent interventions during 2‐year follow‐up after the index procedure were compared between the two groups and assessed for statistical significance with p = 0.05.ResultsThe study included 2229 patients in the mild group and 3401 patients who were implanted with interspinous spacers. The rate of harms for those treated with the mild procedure was less than half that of patients implanted with a spacer (5.6% vs. 12.1%, respectively; p < 0.0001) during 2‐year follow‐up. The rate of subsequent interventions was not significantly different between the two groups (24.9% and 26.1% for the mild and spacer groups, respectively; p = 0.7679). The total rate of harms and subsequent interventions for mild was found to be noninferior to spacers (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsThis comprehensive study of real‐world Medicare claims data demonstrated a significantly lower rate of harms for the mild procedure compared to interspinous spacers for patients diagnosed with LSS with NC, and a similar rate of subsequent interventions during 2‐year follow‐up.

AbstractObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess differences in reported information about treatment, integration into care, and respect by self‐identified Black and White individuals with advanced prostate cancer in the United States.Patients and MethodsThis is a prospective cohort study of 701 participants (20% identifying as Black) enrolled in the International Registry for Men with Advanced Prostate Cancer at 37 US sites from 2017 to 2022. Participants were asked six questions from the Cancer Australia National Cancer Control Indicators about their experience with care at study enrollment. Prevalence differences by self‐reported race were estimated using marginal standardization of logistic‐normal mixed effects models (adjusted for age at enrollment and disease state at enrollment), and 95% CIs were estimated using parametric bootstrapping.ResultsMost participants reported a high quality of care for each question. Black participants generally reported higher care quality compared with White participants. Black participants reported more frequently that they were offered a written assessment and care plan (71%) compared with White participants (58%; adjusted difference, 13 percentage points; 95% CI, 4–23). Black participants also reported more frequently being given the name of nonphysician personnel who would support them (64%) than White participants (52%; adjusted difference, 10; 95% CI, 1–20). Prevalence differences did not differ by disease state at enrollment.ConclusionsBlack participants generally reported a higher quality of care compared with White participants. This study calls attention to the need to study potential mediating factors and interpersonal aspects of care in this population to improve survivorship.

Abstract The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) has set clear priorities in recent years to promote inclusion, diversity, access, and equity (IDA&E) in infectious disease (ID) clinical practice, medical education, and research. The IDSA IDA&E Task Force was launched in 2018 to ensure implementation of these principles. The IDSA Training Program Directors Committee met in 2021 and discussed IDA&E best practices as they pertain to the education of ID fellows. Committee members sought to develop specific goals and strategies related to recruitment, clinical training, didactics, and faculty development. This article represents a presentation of ideas brought forth at the meeting in those spheres and is meant to serve as a reference document for ID training program directors seeking guidance in this area.

Abstract Purpose This scoping review summarises five decades of research on gender bias in subjective performance evaluations of medical trainees. Method A medical librarian searched PubMed, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane DBSR in June 2020. Two researchers independently reviewed each abstract to determine if it met inclusion criteria (original research article investigating gender bias in subjective medical trainee evaluations by staff). References from selected articles were also reviewed for inclusion. Data were extracted from the articles, and summary statistics were performed. Results A total of 212 abstracts were reviewed, and 32 met criteria. Twenty (62.5%) evaluated residents, and 12 (37.5%) studied medical students. The majority of studies on residents were Internal Medicine ( n = 8, 40.0%) and Surgery ( n = 7, 35.0%). All studies were performed in North America and were either retrospective or observational. Nine (28.0%) were qualitative, and 24 (75.0%) were quantitative. The majority of studies were published in the last decade ( n = 21, 65.6%). Twenty (62.5%) studies documented gender bias, of which 11 (55%) found that males received higher quantitative performance evaluations and 5 (25%) found that females received higher evaluation scores. The remaining 4 (20%) reported gender differences in qualitative evaluations. Conclusions Most studies detected gender bias in subjective performance evaluations of medical trainees, with a majority favouring males. There is a paucity of studies on bias in medical education with a lack of standardised approach to investigating bias.