Jeck, William R.

This discussion summarizes the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for managing squamous cell anal carcinoma, which represents the most common histologic form of the disease. A multidisciplinary approach including physicians from gastroenterology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and radiology is necessary. Primary treatment of perianal cancer and anal canal cancer are similar and include chemoradiation in most cases. Follow-up clinical evaluations are recommended for all patients with anal carcinoma because additional curative-intent treatment is possible. Biopsy-proven evidence of locally recurrent or persistent disease after primary treatment may require surgical treatment. Systemic therapy is generally recommended for extrapelvic metastatic disease. Recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Anal Carcinoma include staging classification updates based on the 9th edition of the AJCC Staging System and updates to the systemic therapy recommendations based on new data that better define optimal treatment of patients with metastatic anal carcinoma.

This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer focuses on management of malignant polyps and resectable nonmetastatic rectal cancer because important updates have been made to these guidelines. These recent updates include redrawing the algorithms for stage II and III disease to reflect new data supporting the increasingly prominent role of total neoadjuvant therapy, expanded recommendations for short-course radiation therapy techniques, and new recommendations for a “watch-and-wait” nonoperative management technique for patients with cancer that shows a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer, available online at NCCN.org , covers additional topics including risk assessment, pathology and staging, management of metastatic disease, posttreatment surveillance, treatment of recurrent disease, and survivorship.

Abstract Cholangiocarcinomas are rare but aggressive cancers, with an increasing incidence and a dismal 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Mutations in the genes encoding isocitrate dehydrogenase, IDH1 and IDH2, have been reported in ∼70% of gliomas, ∼20% of myeloid leukemias, ∼56% of chondrosarcomas, and ∼10% of melanomas. We discovered IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in 29 of 305 (9%) intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Tumors with mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 had lower 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and higher 5-methylcytosine levels, as well as increased dimethylation of histone H3K79. Mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 were independently associated with longer time to recurrence of cholangiocarcinoma in multivariate analysis (p = 0.046). We identified 2,267 genes that were significantly hypermethylated in tumors with mutations in IDH1 or IDH2. Hypermethylated CpG sites were significantly enriched in CpG shores and in the 1500 bp upstream of annotated transcription start sites, suggesting a global regulation of transcriptional potential. Gene expression profiling of 7 IDH1/2-mutant and 20 IDH1/2-wildtype tumors revealed increased expression of citric acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation enzymes, as well as decreased expression of cytoskeleton organization genes. Integrated analyses of DNA methylation and gene expression identified interleukin-6 and several of its downstream targets as candidates for silencing by DNA methylation. Conclusions: Cholangiocarcinomas with mutations in IDH1 or IDH2 represent a molecular subclass with distinct signaling pathway alterations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1058. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1058