Citations 2
Recommendations for Advanced Practice Provider Postgraduate Training Programs in the United States: A Work Product of the Advanced Practice Provider Postgraduate Training Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine
Ricker, Melissa, Abide, Aimee, Bakshi, Vishal, Bane, Tina, Bhullar, Simrit K., Byrd, Cindy , Fuller, Todd E., Gunville, Cameron, Hogan, Brett , Nugent, Katherine Lyn, Pandya, Komal , Peacock, Sarah, Pisa, Michael, Meissen, Heather H., McLaughlin, Diane , Boling, Bryan , Farley, Thomas, Newman, Christopher, Nugent, Katherine Lyn, Peacock, Sarah, Meissen, Heather
Critical Care Medicine | January 30, 2026 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 825-835
OBJECTIVES: The overall goal of this work is to discuss the various topics associated with critical care advanced practice provider (APP) postgraduate training programs and provide resources for new, developing and existing programs. DESIGN: Three rounds of voting until consensus achieved. SETTING: Electronic surveys, followed by virtual meeting. SUBJECTS: Critical care APPs, physicians, a pharmacist, and a nurse were also included to ensure multidisciplinary representation. All subjects resided and practiced in the United States with a history of education scholarship or post-graduate training leadership. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The workgroup included 14 APPs (ten nurse practitioners and four physician associates), three physicians, one pharmacist, and one registered nurse from 14 institutions across the United States. The workgroup identified six areas of concentration: administration, audience, program structure, curriculum, procedural competence, and accreditation. A survey was generated and employed in three rounds. The first two rounds of voting were completed anonymously, the third round was completed as a live meeting until consensus recommendations, defined as 75% agreement or more, were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Expert consensus was used to generate consensus recommendations for critical care postgraduate training programs based upon 3 rounds of voting.
The Reviewer Academy of the Society of Critical Care Medicine: Key Principles and Strategic Plan
Aslakson, Rebecca A. , Frazee, Erin N. , Meissen, Heather , Morrow, Brenda M., Nazer, Lama , Branson, Richard D. , Mayer, Kirby P. , Napolitano, Natalie , Lane‐Fall, Meghan B. , John, Preeti R. , Dellinger, R. Phillip, Parker, Margaret M. , Argent, Andrew C. , Boateng, Adjoa , Green, Thomas P. , Kudchadkar, Sapna R. , Checchia, Paul A. , Alexander, Peta , Lee, Jan Hau , Morrow, Brenda May , Sikora, Andrea , Maslove, David M. , Rech, Megan A. , Sorce, Lauren R. , Tasker, Robert C. , Buchman, Timothy G.
Critical Care Medicine | June 21, 2023 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1111-1123
The Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Reviewer Academy seeks to train and establish a community of trusted, reliable, and skilled peer reviewers with diverse backgrounds and interests to promote high-quality reviews for each of the SCCM journals. Goals of the Academy include building accessible resources to highlight qualities of excellent manuscript reviews; educating and mentoring a diverse group of healthcare professionals; and establishing and upholding standards for insightful and informative reviews. This manuscript will map the mission of the Reviewer Academy with a succinct summary of the importance of peer review, process of reviewing a manuscript, and the expected ethical standards of reviewers. We will equip readers to target concise, thoughtful feedback as peer reviewers, advance their understanding of the editorial process and inspire readers to integrate medical journalism into diverse professional careers.