Boling, Bryan

OBJECTIVES: The overall goal of this work is to discuss the various topics associated with critical care advanced practice provider (APP) postgraduate training programs and provide resources for new, developing and existing programs. DESIGN: Three rounds of voting until consensus achieved. SETTING: Electronic surveys, followed by virtual meeting. SUBJECTS: Critical care APPs, physicians, a pharmacist, and a nurse were also included to ensure multidisciplinary representation. All subjects resided and practiced in the United States with a history of education scholarship or post-graduate training leadership. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The workgroup included 14 APPs (ten nurse practitioners and four physician associates), three physicians, one pharmacist, and one registered nurse from 14 institutions across the United States. The workgroup identified six areas of concentration: administration, audience, program structure, curriculum, procedural competence, and accreditation. A survey was generated and employed in three rounds. The first two rounds of voting were completed anonymously, the third round was completed as a live meeting until consensus recommendations, defined as 75% agreement or more, were achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Expert consensus was used to generate consensus recommendations for critical care postgraduate training programs based upon 3 rounds of voting.

OBJECTIVES: A number of trials related to critical care pharmacotherapy were published in 2022. We aimed to summarize the most influential publications related to the pharmacotherapeutic care of critically ill patients in 2022. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online and the Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, or systematic review/meta-analyses of adult critically ill patients assessing a pharmacotherapeutic intervention and reporting clinical endpoints published between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2022, were included in this article. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles from a systematic search and the Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update were included and stratified into clinical domains based upon consistent themes. Consensus was obtained on the most influential publication within each clinical domain utilizing an a priori defined three-round modified Delphi process with the following considerations: 1) overall contribution to scientific knowledge and 2) novelty to the literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: The systematic search and Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update yielded a total of 704 articles, of which 660 were excluded. The remaining 44 articles were stratified into the following clinical domains: emergency/neurology, cardiovascular, gastroenterology/fluids/nutrition, hematology, infectious diseases/immunomodulation, and endocrine/metabolic. The final article selected from each clinical domain was summarized following a three-round modified Delphi process and included three randomized controlled trials and three systematic review/meta-analyses. Article topics summarized included dexmedetomidine versus other sedatives during mechanical ventilation, beta-blocker treatment in the critically ill, restriction of IV fluids in septic shock, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in critically ill adults, duration of antibiotic therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia, and low-dose methylprednisolone treatment in severe community-acquired pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: This concise review provides a perspective on articles published in 2022 that are relevant to the pharmacotherapeutic care of critically ill patients and their potential impact on clinical practice.