Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

426 citation(s) found for "Nuño, Miriam".

Breast Cancer Risk Factors and Survival by Tumor Subtype: Pooled Analyses from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Morra, Anna , Jung, Audrey , Behrens, Sabine , Keeman, Renske , Ahearn, Thomas U. , Arndt, Volker , Augustinsson, Annelie , Auvinen, Päivi , Becher, Heiko , Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bojesen, Stig E. , Bolla, Manjeet K. , Brenner, Hermann , Camp, Nicola J. , Campa, Daniele , Castelao, Jose E. , Choi, Ji‐Yeob , Cox, Angela , Easton, Douglas F. , Eccles, Diana M., Egan, Kathleen M. , Evans, D. Gareth , Fasching, Peter A. , Flyger, Henrik, Gago-Domínguez, Manuela , Gapstur, Susan M. , Gaudet, Mia M. , Grip, Mervi, Guénel, Pascal , Haiman, Christopher A. , Håkansson, Niclas , Hamann, Ute, Hartman, Mikael , Heyworth, Jane , Hoppe, Reiner , Hopper, John L. , Hunter, David J. , Jager, Agnes , Jakimovska, Milena , Janni, Wolfgang , Koutros, Stella , Kristensen, Vessela N. , Lambrechts, Diether , Li, Jingmei , Lindblom, Annika , Mannermaa, Arto , Manoochehri, Mehdi, Margolin, Sara , Mariapun, Shivaani, Mavroudis, Dimitrios, Muranen, Taru , Newman, William G. , Noh, Dong‐Young , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Obi, Nadia , Olsson, Håkan , Park‐Simon, Tjoung‐Won , Petridis, Christos , Plaseska‐Karanfilska, Dijana , Rashid, Muhammad Usman , Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Gad , Rhenius, Valerie , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Schneeweiß, Andreas , Schwentner, Lukas , Shah, Mitul , Shen, Chen‐Yang , Tollenaar, Rob A.�E.�M. , Tomlinson, Ian , Torres, Diana , Vachon, Celine M. , Wang, Qin , Wang, Sophia , Williams, Justin A. , Winqvist, Robert , Wu, Anna H. , Yoo, Keun-Young, Yu, Jyh‐Cherng , Zheng, Wei , Yang, Xiaohong R. , Eliassen, A. Heather , García‐Closas, Montserrat , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Eccles, Diana , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Lambrechts, Diether , Arndt, Volker , Augustinsson, Annelie , Brenner, Hermann , Camp, Nicola J , Canzian, Federico , Cox, Angela , Dunning, Alison M , Evans, D Gareth , Fasching, Peter A , Gago-Dominguez, Manuela , García-Sáenz, José A , Gaudet, Mia M , Giles, Graham G , Guénel, Pascal , Hall, Per N , Hart, Steven N , Hartman, Mikael , Ito, Hidemi , Jager, Agnes , Jakubowska, Anna , Janni, Wolfgang , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kapoor, Pooja Middha , Koutros, Stella , Lambrechts, Diether , Li, Jingmei , Matsuo, Keitaro , Milne, Roger L , Muranen, Taru A , Newman, William G , Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won , Pharoah, Paul D P , Rennert, Gad , Rennert, Gad , Rhenius, Valerie , Romero, Atocha , Saloustros, Emmanouil , Schneeweiss, Andreas , Scott, Christopher , Southey, Melissa C , Stram, Daniel O. , Tamimi, Rulla M , Tomlinson, Ian , Torres, Diana , Vachon, Celine M. , Wolk, Alicja , Ziogas, Argyrios , Holmes, Michelle D , García-Closas, Montserrat , Teo, Soo H , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Chang-Claude, Jenny , Lambrechts, Diether , Behrens, Sabine , Eccles, Diana , Keeman, Renske , Zheng, Wei , Wang, Sophia S , Jung, Audrey Y , Becher, Heiko , Eliassen, A Heather , Håkansson, Niclas , Rashid, Muhammad U , Bojesen, Stig E , Lindblom, Annika , Plaseska-Karanfilska, Dijana , Sawyer, Elinor J , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Freeman, Laura E. Beane , Blomqvist, Carl , Briceño, Ignacio , Brucker, Sara Yvonne , Canzian, Federico , Chanock, Stephen Jacob , Clarke, Christine L. , Couch, Fergus J. , Cross, Simon S. , Czene, Kamila , Dörk, Thilo , Dunning, Alison M. , Dwek, Miriam , García-Sáenz, José Á. , Giles, Graham G. , Han, Sileny , Hart, Steven N. , Ito, Hidemi , Jakubowska, Anna , Kaaks, Rudolf , Kang, Daehee , Middha, Pooja , Kitahara, Cari M. , Kraft, Peter , Lacey, James V. , Marchand, Loı̈c Le , Lubiński, Jan , Lush, Michael J. , Manoochehri, Mehdi, Matsuo, Keitaro , Milne, Roger L. , Olshan, Andrew F. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Presneau, Nadège , Scott, Christopher G. , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Southey, Melissa C. , Tamimi, Rulla M. , Tapper, William , Troester, Melissa A. , Truong, Thérèse , Wolk, Alicja , Ziogas, Argyrios , Schmidt, Marjanka K.

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | January 26, 2021 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 623-642

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0924 | PMID 33500318 Get It

Abstract Background: It is not known whether modifiable lifestyle factors that predict survival after invasive breast cancer differ by subtype. Methods: We analyzed data for 121,435 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 67 studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium with 16,890 deaths (8,554 breast cancer specific) over 10 years. Cox regression was used to estimate associations between risk factors and 10-year all-cause mortality and breast cancer–specific mortality overall, by estrogen receptor (ER) status, and by intrinsic-like subtype. Results: There was no evidence of heterogeneous associations between risk factors and mortality by subtype (Padj > 0.30). The strongest associations were between all-cause mortality and BMI ≥30 versus 18.5–25 kg/m2 [HR (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.19 (1.06–1.34)]; current versus never smoking [1.37 (1.27–1.47)], high versus low physical activity [0.43 (0.21–0.86)], age ≥30 years versus <20 years at first pregnancy [0.79 (0.72–0.86)]; >0–<5 years versus ≥10 years since last full-term birth [1.31 (1.11–1.55)]; ever versus never use of oral contraceptives [0.91 (0.87–0.96)]; ever versus never use of menopausal hormone therapy, including current estrogen–progestin therapy [0.61 (0.54–0.69)]. Similar associations with breast cancer mortality were weaker; for example, 1.11 (1.02–1.21) for current versus never smoking. Conclusions: We confirm associations between modifiable lifestyle factors and 10-year all-cause mortality. There was no strong evidence that associations differed by ER status or intrinsic-like subtype. Impact: Given the large dataset and lack of evidence that associations between modifiable risk factors and 10-year mortality differed by subtype, these associations could be cautiously used in prognostication models to inform patient-centered care.
Comparison of the current renal staging, progression and response criteria to predict renal survival in AL amyloidosis using a Mayo cohort
Drosou, Maria Eleni , Vaughan, Lisa E. , Muchtar, Eli , Dingli, David , Fonder, Amie , Gertz, Morie A. , Gonsalves, Wilson I. , Hayman, Suzanne R. , Hobbs, Miriam, Hwa, Yi L. , Kapoor, Prashant , Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Kumar, Shaji , Kyle, Robert A. , Lacy, Martha Q. , Lin, Yi , Lopez, Camden , Lust, John A., Russell, Stephen J. , Sidana, Surbhi , Siddiqui, Mustaqeem , Warsame, Rahma , Dispenzieri, Angela , Fonder, Amie L, Gertz, Morie A , Gonsalves, Wilson , Hwa, Yi L , Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Lopez, Camden L, Rajkumar, S Vincent , Sidana, Surbhi , Sidiqi, M Hasib , Warsame, Rahma , Leung, Nelson , Muchtar, E , Russell, Stephen J , Siddiqui, Mustaqeem A , Lopez, Camden L , Dingli, David , Lin, Yi , Buadi, Francis K. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Go, Ronald S. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Sidiqi, M Hasib , Leung, Nelson

American Journal of Hematology | January 15, 2021 | Volume: 96 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 446-454

10.1002/ajh.26092 | PMID 33428787 Get It

AbstractThree sets of criteria (International Society of Amyloidosis [ISA], Palladini and Kastritis) were independently developed for staging, progression and response criteria to predict renal survival in patients with AL amyloidosis. We evaluated these criteria using a cohort of 495 newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients with renal involvement using time to event competing risk analysis at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Only Palladini and Kastritis had a staging system and both predicted a higher risk of end stage renal disease (ESRD) in the stage III vs stage I patients but only the Palladini model was predictive for stage II patients. At 3 months, risk of ESRD was significantly higher for Palladini and ISA renal progression (hazard ratio [HR] 2.8 [95% CI: 1.5–5.3, p = .001] and 2.5 [CI: 1.4–4.6, p = .004, respectively]), but renal response was not significantly protective; conversely, the risk of ESRD was not significantly higher for the Kastritis renal progression, but was significantly protective for the Kastritis renal responders (HR 0.38 [95% CI: 0.17–0.84], p = .017). Both progression and response with ISA, Palladini and Kastritis criteria were predictive of ESRD at 6 months and 12 months. While the Palladini staging criteria at baseline, and the ISA and Palladini criteria for progression at 3 months performed better than the Kastritis criteria at baseline and 3 months post‐treatment, the Kastritis criteria performed better for response 3 months after treatment. All three sets of criteria performed well at and after 6 months post‐treatment. These differences are important when choosing endpoints for clinical trials.
Outcomes with different administration schedules of bortezomib in bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) as first‐line therapy in multiple myeloma
Cook, Joselle , Johnson, Isla McKerrow , Higgins, Alexandra , Sidana, Surbhi , Warsame, Rahma , Gonsalves, Wilson I. , Gertz, Morie A. , Lacy, Martha Q. , Kapoor, Prashant , Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Dingli, David , Fonder, Amie , Hayman, Suzanne R. , Hobbs, Miriam, Hwa, Yi L. , Kyle, Robert A. , Kumar, Shaji , Johnson, Isla, Gonsalves, Wilson , Lacy, Martha, Dispenzieri, Angela , Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Hwa, Yi L , Leung, Nelson , Rajkumar, S Vincent , Gertz, Morie A , Higgins, Alexandra , Sidana, Surbhi , Dingli, David , Cook, Joselle M , Buadi, Francis K. , Dispenzieri, Angela , Leung, Nelson , Go, Ronald S. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent

American Journal of Hematology | December 17, 2020 | Volume: 96 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 330-337

10.1002/ajh.26074 | PMID 33326116 Get It

AbstractInduction therapy for multiple myeloma with bortezomib (Velcade), lenalidomide (Revlimid), and dexamethasone (d) (VRd) was traditionally administered as bortezomib given twice weekly on a 3 week cycle. A modified schedule of weekly bortezomib has been adopted over time to decrease treatment burden for patients and reduce treatment‐emergent neuropathy. This study evaluates the response rates and outcomes with different schedules of bortezomib in VRd administered for first‐line treatment for patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM). We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with upfront VRd from June 30th 2008 to December 31st 2018, for variations of bortezomib administration. Five hundred and fifty‐five (555) NDMM patients met inclusion criteria; median age 63 years and 61% men. Bortezomib was administered twice weekly every 21 days in 43%, once weekly every 21 days in 41% and once weekly every 28 days in 16%. Though peripheral sensory neuropathy was more frequent with twice weekly dosing (P = .002), this group achieved shorter time to best response (P = .01). Weekly every 21‐day treatment saw higher VGPR or better rates (P = .02). However, with median follow up time of 37 months (IQR 22–56), we found no difference in PFS or OS among the groups. While small differences in response rates were found among the varying administration schedules of bortezomib administration, there was no significant effect on PFS or OS. Given that VRd remains a first line standard of care option for newly diagnosed MM, in the absence of a large trial comparing bortezomib dosing schedule modifications, these results are helpful in supporting current practices of once weekly administration.
NFB-09. ENROLLMENT AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED, NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1 ASSOCIATED OPTIC PATHWAY GLIOMA (NF1-OPG): PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CENTER NATURAL HISTORY STUDY
Fisher, Michael J. , Liu, Grant T. , Ferner, Rosalie E. , Listernick, Robert , Zeid, Janice Lasky, Ullrich, Nicole J. , Stasheff, Steven F., Rosser, Tena, Ardern‐Holmes, Simone , Flaherty, Maree , Hummel, Trent R. , Motley, William W., Bielamowicz, Kevin , Phillips, Paul H. , Reginald, Arun, Peragallo, Jason H. , Sato, Aimee , Hogan, Nick, Foreman, Nick, McCourt, Emily A. , Ranka, Milan P., Campen, Cynthia , Beres, Shannon , Stearns, Duncan , Örge, Faruk , O’Halloran, Henry S., Brodsky, Michael A., Donahue, Sean P., Gutmann, David H. , Blank, Peter M K de , Heidary, Gena , Bornhorst, Miriam , Borchert, Mark , Bouffet, Éric , Wolf, David S. , Mater, David Van , El-Dairi, Mays , Tarczy‐Hornoch, Kristina , Klesse, Laura J. , Foreman, Nick, Allen, Jeffrey C. , Moertel, Christopher L. , Areaux, Raymond G. , Crawford, John Ross , Esbenshade, Adam J. , Cutter, Gary , Avery, Robert A.

Neuro-Oncology | December 4, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: Supplement_3 | Pages: iii419-iii419

10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.613 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Because treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPG remain challenging, we sought to establish evidence-based guidelines. We prospectively enrolled children with newly-diagnosed NF1-OPGs, and gathered standardized clinical neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments. METHODS Only children with NF1 and newly diagnosed OPGs, confirmed by central review, were eligible. Indications for obtaining the initial MRI, as well as factors associated with the decision to treat with chemotherapy or observe without treatment, were obtained. Quantitative visual acuity (VA), other ophthalmic features, and imaging were captured at standard time points. Goal enrollment is 250 subjects. RESULTS One-hundred thirty-three children (52% female) from 20 institutions met inclusion criteria, and were included in this preliminary analysis. Eighty-six percent of subjects were able to perform quantitative VA testing at enrollment. The most common reasons for the diagnostic MRI included screening related to NF1 diagnosis (36.8%), ophthalmologic concerns (29.3%), and non-ophthalmologic concerns (24.8%), such as headache. To date, twenty subjects have initiated treatment with chemotherapy, twelve (9%) at the time of the initial OPG diagnosis. Median age at OPG diagnosis was 3.1 years. Age and sex distribution were similar in subjects immediately entering the observation and treatment arms (median age 3.0 versus 3.5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION Most children with NF1-OPGs are observed at time of their initial OPG diagnosis, rather than treated. Importantly, a large proportion of children are able to complete quantitative VA testing at enrollment. Once enrollment is complete, these data will help to establish evidence-based guidelines for clinical management of NF1-OPGs.
Characterization and prognostic implication of delayed complete response in AL amyloidosis
Muchtar, Eli , Kumar, Shaji , Lacy, Martha Q. , Dingli, David , Hayman, Suzanne R. , Kapoor, Prashant , Kourelis, Taxiarchis , Warsame, Rahma , Hwa, Yi L. , Fonder, Amie , Hobbs, Miriam, Russell, Stephen J. , Lust, John A., Siddiqui, Mustaqeem , Kyle, Robert A. , Gonsalves, Wilson , Kourelis, Taxiarchis V, Hwa, Yi L , Russell, Stephen, Siddiqui, Mustaqueem, Dispenzieri, Angela , Muchtar, E , Russell, Stephen J , Siddiqui, Mustaqeem A , Dingli, David , Gertz, Morie A. , Leung, Nelson , Buadi, Francis K. , Go, Ronald S. , Gonsalves, Wilson I. , Rajkumar, S. Vincent , Dispenzieri, Angela

European Journal of Haematology | November 24, 2020 | Volume: 106 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 354-361

10.1111/ejh.13554 | PMID 33230879 Get It

AbstractIntroductionLittle is known on continued response following completion of therapy in light chain (AL) amyloidosis.MethodsWe studied 373 AL amyloidosis patients who achieved complete response (CR) or very good partial response (VGPR) to first‐line therapy.ResultsBy end of therapy (EOT), 46% of patients achieved a CR and 54% a VGPR. With no further therapy, 17.5% of patients were upstaged from VGPR to CR (delayed CR), with a median of 9 months. Compared with CR and VGPR at EOT, patients with a delayed CR were characterized by higher proportion of t(11;14) and lower rate of trisomies. Autologous stem cell transplant was more frequent in the delayed CR group. Patients with a delayed CR were characterized by minimal residual disease negativity and organ response rates similar to patients with CR at EOT and higher than patients achieving VGPR at EOT. Patients with a delayed CR had a longer PFS/OS compared to patients with CR or VGPR by EOT (median PFS 149 vs 92 vs 52 months, P < .001; 10‐year OS 87% vs 71% vs 56%, P < .001).ConclusionsThis study characterizes delayed CR in AL amyloidosis, highlights its prognostic impact which is at least similar to those who achieved CR at EOT, and underlines another aspect of response monitoring.
Utility of Plasma Neurofilament Light in the 1Florida Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC)
Barker, Warren , Quiñonez, Carlos , Greig, Maria T., Behar, Raquel, Chirinos, Cesar, Rodriguez, Rosemarie, Rosselli, Mónica , Rodríguez, Miriam J. , Curiel, Rosie E. , McFarland, Karen N. , Hanson, Kevin , Vaillancourt, David E. , Adjouadi, Malek , Ertekin‐Taner, Nilüfer , Golde, Todd E. , Loewenstein, David , Duara, Ranjan , Loewenstein, David , Quinonez, Carlos, Rundek, Tatjana , Smith, Glenn E. , DeKosky, Steven T. , Marsiske, Michael , Duara, Ranjan

Journal of Alzheimer's Disease | November 17, 2020 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 59-70

10.3233/jad-200901 | PMID 33216030 Get It

Background: Plasma NfL (pNfL) levels are elevated in many neurological disorders. However, the utility of pNfL in a clinical setting has not been established. Objective: In a cohort of diverse older participants, we examined: 1) the association of pNfL to age, sex, Hispanic ethnicity, diagnosis, and structural and amyloid imaging biomarkers; and 2) its association to baseline and longitudinal cognitive and functional performance. Methods: 309 subjects were classified at baseline as cognitively normal (CN) or with cognitive impairment. Most subjects had structural MRI and amyloid PET scans. The most frequent etiological diagnosis was Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but other neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders were also represented. We assessed the relationship of pNfL to cognitive and functional status, primary etiology, imaging biomarkers, and to cognitive and functional decline. Results: pNfL increased with age, degree of hippocampal atrophy, and amyloid load, and was higher in females among CN subjects, but was not associated with Hispanic ethnicity. Compared to CN subjects, pNfL was elevated among those with AD or FTLD, but not those with neuropsychiatric or other disorders. Hippocampal atrophy, amyloid positivity and higher pNfL levels each added unique variance in predicting greater functional impairment on the CDR-SB at baseline. Higher baseline pNfL levels also predicted greater cognitive and functional decline after accounting for hippocampal atrophy and memory scores at baseline. Conclusion: pNfL may have a complementary and supportive role to brain imaging and cognitive testing in a memory disorder evaluation, although its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity as a stand-alone measure is modest. In the absence of expensive neuroimaging tests, pNfL could be used for differentiating neurodegenerative disease from neuropsychiatric disorders.
Abstract 17272: Frequency of Acute Vasodilator Response in Incident and Prevalent Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (Group 1): Results From the Pulmonary Vascular Disease Omics (PVDOMICS) Study
Larive, A. Brett, Jacob, Miriam , Hassoun, Paul M. , Rosenzweig, Erika B. , Frantz, Robert P. , Hemnes, Anna R. , Horn, Evelyn M. , Leopold, Jane A. , Rischard, Franz

Circulation | November 12, 2020 | Volume: 142 | Issue: Suppl_3 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.17272 Get It

Introduction: The prevalence of acute vasodilator response (AVR) to inhaled NO (defined as a reduction in mPAP ≥ 10 mmHg with an absolute value of mPAP ≤ 40 mmHg with increased/unchanged CO) is reported to be around 12% in incident patients with idiopathic PAH (IPAH). The prevalence of AVR, however, is reportedly lower in other disease-associated PAH in Group 1, such as connective tissue disease (CTD). Furthermore, the prevalence of AVR for combined inhaled NO and oxygen, and in patients on PAH therapy (prevalent cohort), is less known. Hypothesis: We hypothesized there would be differences in the prevalence of AVR in PAH subgroups in the large PVDOMICS cohort of incident and prevalent patients. Methods: Group 1 PAH patients enrolled in PVDOMICS underwent right heart catheterization for baseline measurements. AVR was then measured in response to 100% inhaled oxygen (O 2 ) and 100% O 2 plus NO at 40 ppm (O 2 +NO) for 5 min each before hemodynamic measurements. Details of the PVDOMICS methodology and core adjudication of hemodynamic measurements were reported previously. Rates of AVR to 100% O 2 and 100% O 2 +NO were compared between incident and prevalent patients in each PAH subgroup. Results: 351 patients, mostly female (73%), average age of 52.9 years, with mostly prevalent disease (87%) and an average of 4 years from PAH diagnosis, underwent AVR assessment. A positive AVR was found in 0.6% of patients in response to 100% oxygen and 6% of patients in response to 100%+NO for the overall cohort. AVR was similar in incident and prevalent IPAH patients (6 and 6.9%, respectively). It was, however, 0% and 6.9%, in incident vs. prevalent CTD-PAH patients, respectively. There were no responders to either challenge in any other PAH subgroup. Conclusions: The prevalence of AVR is relatively rare in IPAH and CTD-PAH (~ 6%) and absent in other subgroups. There was no response to 100% O2 alone, suggesting specificity of AVR to NO in PAH. AVR is more common than previously reported in CTD-PAH, but only in prevalent disease. Whether the latter is related to long-term PAH therapy affecting pulmonary vasomotor response and/or vascular remodeling in these patients would warrant further studies.