Citations

BACKGROUND: Recent years have seen considerable growth and significant changes in the anesthesiology residency application process. Although the National Residency Match Program provides data on attributes of successfully matching applicants, it does not provide detailed characteristics of applicants’ research portfolio. This single-program retrospective analysis aims to characterize granular aspects of applicant research experiences to determine whether research involvement is linked to higher odds of matching. METHODS: Applications from interviewed United States allopathic (US-MD) and osteopathic (US-DO) applicants at a single anesthesiology residency program were analyzed for research experience. The primary outcome assessed was the association of any research experience with odds of ranked-to-match and the association of specific types of research experience with ranked-to-match. Secondary outcomes included the association of medical degree type (US-MD vs US-DO) or affiliation of medical school with an anesthesiology residency program to the number of research experiences, and the association of research experiences with the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score type (Pass/Fail vs Scored). RESULTS: Applicants with at least one research experience were more likely to be ranked-to-match than applicants without research experience (odds ratio [OR]: 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI], [1.55–3.02], P < .001). Similar odds were demonstrated for applicants with at least one peer-reviewed publication compared to no peer-reviewed publications (OR: 2.25, 95% CI, [1.79–2.82], P < .001), and at least one anesthesiology-related research experience compared to no anesthesiology-related research experience (OR: 1.76, 95% CI, [1.36–2.26], P < .001. Applicants from US-MD schools were more likely to have research experience than those from US-DO schools ( P < .001); applicants from a medical school affiliated with an anesthesiology residency were more likely to have research experience than applicants from unaffiliated medical schools ( P < .001); and applicants with Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1 examinations were more likely than their Scored counterparts to report at least one research experience ( P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Applicant research is associated with greater odds of being ranked-to-match in anesthesiology residency. Applicants from US-MD schools and schools affiliated with anesthesiology residency programs have significantly greater rates of reporting at least one research experience. There is a trend toward a higher incidence of reporting at least one research experience with the change of USMLE Step 1 policy toward a Pass/Fail examination.

Background: Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (aNHL) commonly occurs in older adults. However, geriatric assessments (GAs), which are associated with both survival and treatment-related toxicity, are infrequently performed due to logistical constraints. In this study, we examined how the brief, self-reported Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13) screening tool and a comprehensive GA relate to clinical outcomes in this population. Methods: We conducted a longitudinal study of 105 adults aged ≥65 years who were initiating upfront chemoimmunotherapy for aNHL at 2 academic medical centers and their community affiliates between September 2020 and January 2023. Baseline frailty was evaluated using the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) GA, which classifies patients as fit, unfit, or frail. The VES-13 was assessed both continuously and by categorizing patients as vulnerable (score ≥3). Using logistic regression controlling for covariates, we examined the association of VES-13 with grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity (toxicity), unplanned hospitalization within 6 months of treatment initiation, decline in quality of life (QoL) 1 year after therapy initiation, and death within 1 year of treatment initiation. In addition, we calculated the sensitivity and specificity of both the VES-13 and the FIL GA in identifying patients at risk for these outcomes. Results: The median patient age was 73 years (range, 64–99 years), with 42% aged ≥75 years. GA classified 40% of patients as fit, 10% as unfit, and 51% as frail, while 46% of patients had a VES-13 score ≥3, indicating vulnerability. VES-13 score was significantly associated with toxicity (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; P =.026), unplanned hospitalization (OR, 1.16; P =.043), QoL decline at 1 year (OR, 1.22; P =.027), and death within 1 year (OR, 1.49; P =.010). Using the VES-13 to define vulnerability (score ≥3), sensitivity and specificity were 59% and 61% for predicting toxicity, and 100% and 59% for predicting death within 1 year, respectively. FIL GA frailty had a sensitivity of 63% and specificity of 56% for predicting toxicity, and 100% sensitivity and 54% specificity for predicting death within 1 year. Conclusions: We found that VES-13 score was associated with survival, toxicity, health care utilization, and QoL decline, demonstrating similar sensitivity and specificity to the FIL GA. These findings underscore the potential utility of VES-13 as a screening instrument to identify older patients with aNHL at risk for adverse clinical outcomes.

Abstract In a real-world analysis of brexucabtagene autoleucel recipients with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (N = 278), lack of response to prior blinatumomab correlates with significantly worse following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy outcomes.

Abstract Background Recurrent pericarditis (RP) is an IL-1-mediated chronic autoinflammatory disease (1,2). The phase 3 trial RHAPSODY demonstrated that rilonacept (IL-1α and IL-1β cytokine trap), the first and only FDA-approved treatment for RP, was effective in treating RP not only as a third-line agent (3L; after corticosteroids) but also as a second-line agent (2L; instead of corticosteroids) and reduced recurrence risk as monotherapy (3). The REgiStry Of the NAtural history of recurreNt periCarditis in pEdiatric and adult patients (RESONANCE) has been collecting long-term combined prospective and retrospective data from US-based pericardial-disease-dedicated programs since 2020 (4). Purpose To assess the efficacy of rilonacept in RP in a real-world setting, extending the clinical trial findings of RHAPSODY. Methods Database cut-off (DCO) was 05 February 2025. Data on RP management were collected and analyzed from pts with ≥2 years of observation in RESONANCE. Disease duration at DCO was defined as time from RP diagnosis to either disease resolution (no disease flares while off all RP treatments for ≥6 months before DCO) or last follow-up (for pts with ongoing treatment at DCO). Pericarditis recurrences (investigator-assessed) were confirmed based on RP symptom data and/or objective findings. Annualized recurrence rates were calculated per RP treatment regimen as total pericarditis recurrences divided by total patient-years (PY) while receiving that treatment. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to analyze the significance in change of annualized recurrence rates before and after rilonacept initiation. Results At DCO, 81 pts had ≥2 years of follow-up data in RESONANCE; mean (SD) age was 51.0 (16.8) years; most (66.7%) were female; 84% had idiopathic etiology; median (Q1-Q3) disease duration was 3.1 (2.6-3.7) years; and median observation was 2.93 (2.54-3.38) years. Patient-year treatment exposures per treatment were: NSAIDS ± colchicine (n=79; 187.8 PY), corticosteroids (n=30; 61.1 PY), anakinra (n=1; 1.2 PY) and rilonacept (n=35; 72.8 PY). Of the 35 pts treated with rilonacept for any duration (median observation: 3.2 years; median time on rilonacept: 2.08 years), the most common reason for rilonacept initiation was chest pain/recurrence on prior treatment (n=28). The annualized recurrence rate while receiving rilonacept was significantly lower versus all combined prior lines of treatment (4.00 vs. 0.02 events per PY; p=0.002); this outcome was consistent across line of treatment for rilonacept use (2L: 3.73 vs. 0.06 events per PY, p=0.02; 3L: 4.14 vs. 0 events per PY, p&lt;0.001; Table 1). Conclusions This first report of real-world outcomes from RESONANCE shows that rilonacept-containing regimens for RP as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd line therapy reduced recurrence risk over long- term (&gt;2 year) treatment, supporting prolonged management during RP natural history.

Abstract Background Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death among women. Non-obstructive coronary disease (NOCAD), often identified by a positive stress test and negative coronary angiogram result, is linked to adverse outcomes, particularly among women. Purpose This study evaluated the impact of discordant Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) stress test and coronary angiogram results on repeat invasive angiography and survival, while assessing sex-related differences. Methods Data were extracted from a single health system for patients who underwent a SPECT MPI stress test, and invasive coronary angiography performed within 3 months from September 2002 to July 2018. Discordance was defined as: Profile A – a positive stress test with negative angiography (epicardial coronary vessel stenosis &lt;50%); Profile B – a negative stress test with positive angiography (at least one epicardial coronary vessel stenosis &gt;=50%). To assess the association between discordance and all-cause mortality, Cox-proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the most recent stress/angiogram pair (adjusting for race, age, and number of prior angiograms). For repeat invasive angiography, where mortality was considered a competing event, the Fine-Gray proportional hazards model for the sub-distribution of a competing risk was used to analyze the first stress/angiogram pair (adjusting for race and age). Hazard ratios (HRs), sub-distribution hazard ratios (SHRs), and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Results 5,179 were included in the final analysis, median age was 67.9 years and 32.7% were female. Approximately 15% and 24% were classified as Profile A and B respectively. Patients with a negative stress/negative angiogram were designated as the reference group. Profile A was not significantly associated with mortality or repeat invasive testing in both sexes. Profile B was associated with the highest risk of death (female aHR: 1.58, P&lt;.001; male aHR: 1.54, P&lt;.001) followed by those with a positive stress/positive angiogram (female aHR: 1.39, P=.009; male aHR: 1.25, P=.05) compared to the reference group. Profile B was significantly associated with repeat invasive testing and a stronger association was seen in females (female aSHR: 9.84, P&lt; .001; male aSHR: 3.42, P&lt;.001). A similar pattern was seen for those with a positive stress/positive angiogram. Conclusion Discordant Profile A showed no significant association with mortality or repeat invasive testing. Discordant Profile B was associated with the highest mortality risk in both sexes and showed a stronger association with repeat invasive testing among females. These findings underscore the importance of careful patient selection for stress testing, the need for improved stress testing options (especially in females), and prompt coronary evaluation in patients with a negative stress test and persistent symptoms or high-risk features.

Objective: Orthobiologics are increasingly sought-after interventions in sports medicine for treatment of musculoskeletal injuries and conditions. Despite this trend, differences exist across sports medicine fellowship programs regarding foundational knowledge, educational curricula, and practical experience with orthobiologic therapies (eg, platelet-rich plasma, bone marrow aspirate concentrate, microfragmented adipose tissue). This represents an important educational gap for those training in sports medicine fellowships. To address this gap, an educational toolkit was envisioned with the sports medicine fellowship director and trainee in mind. Data Sources: Collective observations from physician experts in sports medicine education established the variations in curricula and expertise of graduating fellows. A literature review was conducted to source English-language peer reviewed articles from the online PubMed database. The scope of this project did not include an independent systematic analysis or statistical assessments. Main Results: An educational toolkit consisting of 12 adaptable modules was developed, each with a suggested reading list from the published literature. The modules may be rearranged to support each program's learning schedule. The information and lessons contained herein may be valuable to all healthcare providers interested in the evidence-based application of orthobiologics and insightful interpretation of related research. Conclusions: By implementing an educational toolkit, sports medicine fellowships may improve the quality of education on orthobiologics. This is intended to improve the knowledge and skill set of fellowship graduates, thus promoting the scientific, responsible use of orthobiologic interventions.

Abstract When using real-world data to construct an external comparator arm for a single-arm trial, there may be differences in how and when patients are assessed for disease between trial and real-world settings. Such differences can generate outcome measurement error when comparing time-to-event endpoints and lead to biased findings. Recent methods have been developed to mitigate measurement error bias in real-world endpoints; however, they rely on the existence of a validation sample, ie, data on a set of patients where both the “true” trial-like and “mis-measured” real-world measures are collected. We demonstrate how novel statistical methods can be leveraged as quantitative bias analyses (QBA) to contextualize real-world evidence findings when outcome measurement error is of concern, but validation samples are infeasible to collect. Quantitative bias analyses allow researchers to set plausible ranges for the amount of error when not directly measurable. We highlight how to conduct QBA with two recent methods, cumulative incidence curve correction and survival regression calibration, and illustrate how to generate plausible parameter values through simulation. We provide an illustrative QBA example in a cohort of real-world patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and provide practical guidance to apply QBA for outcome measurement error and interpret results.

Abstract High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive tumors with poor outcomes and limited treatment options. Here, we combined genomic and transcriptomic tumor profiling with drug testing in a patient-derived 3-dimensional culture model to identify individualized treatments and predictive biomarkers. Activity of single agents targeting frequently dysregulated glioma pathways was relatively poor ex vivo and generally reflected historical patient data. However, compounds targeting PI3K, epigenetic, and survival/senescence signaling were effective in some cases. Drug sensitivity correlated with transcriptional rather than genomic features and suggested heterogeneity as a resistance mechanism. Bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibition was particularly effective in tumors enriched in the mesenchymal transcriptional subtype, promoted proneural transition, and was overcome by upregulated PI3K signaling. Notably, combinations were largely effective, with 6 strategies exhibiting stronger efficacy than corresponding single agents in most cases (58-77%). This study identifies HGG vulnerabilities and associated biomarkers, resistance mechanisms, and effective combination strategies that warrant further clinical validation. Graphical Abstract