Kinsella, Lindsey

Abstract High-grade gliomas (HGGs) are aggressive tumors with poor outcomes and limited treatment options. Here, we combined genomic and transcriptomic tumor profiling with drug testing in a patient-derived 3-dimensional culture model to identify individualized treatments and predictive biomarkers. Activity of single agents targeting frequently dysregulated glioma pathways was relatively poor ex vivo and generally reflected historical patient data. However, compounds targeting PI3K, epigenetic, and survival/senescence signaling were effective in some cases. Drug sensitivity correlated with transcriptional rather than genomic features and suggested heterogeneity as a resistance mechanism. Bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibition was particularly effective in tumors enriched in the mesenchymal transcriptional subtype, promoted proneural transition, and was overcome by upregulated PI3K signaling. Notably, combinations were largely effective, with 6 strategies exhibiting stronger efficacy than corresponding single agents in most cases (58-77%). This study identifies HGG vulnerabilities and associated biomarkers, resistance mechanisms, and effective combination strategies that warrant further clinical validation. Graphical Abstract

Abstract Sequencing efforts have identified key oncogenic drivers and transcriptomic subtypes of high-grade gliomas (HGGs), but this knowledge has not resulted in individualized therapy or improved patient outcomes. Here, we used a functional genomics approach combining integrated genomic/transcriptomic analyses with patient-derived 3D micro-cancers (mCancers) to rapidly identify individualized therapeutic vulnerabilities and determine predictive response biomarkers. 30 primary/recurrent HGGs, including 20 glioblastomas, 5 astrocytomas, and 5 oligodendrogliomas, were included for drug testing. mCancers recapitulated the structural and molecular alterations, cellularity, and heterogeneity, of parental patient tumors. A total of 119 single-agent drugs and 183 drug combinations were tested, while a pre-selected drug panel comprising 25 glioma-relevant treatment strategies was tested across all cases. In general, mCancer efficacy corresponded well to historical responses to previously tested agents (EGFR, HDAC inhibitors, etc.). Combined, strong efficacy (i.e. >70% growth inhibition at Cmax) of single treatments targeting deregulated receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), p53/apoptosis, cell cycle, DNA damage repair, IDH, or telomere maintainance pathways, was observed in 14 out of 30 cases. Surprisingly, transcriptional signatures, but not specific genetic alterations, were found to stratify drug responses. For example, mCancers enriched for the most aggressive mesenchymal (MES) and glycolytic/plurimetabolic (GPM) transcriptional subtypes exhibited stronger response to the BET inhibitor JQ1 (and other clinical BET inhibitors) and the DNA-PKcs/mTOR dual inhibitor CC-115. This therapeutic vulnerability was associated with enrichment of YAP/TAZ signaling, and the glioblastoma stem cell G-STEM signature. Notably, individual combination strategies were effective across tumors, with strong responses ranging from 38% to 77% of all tumors tested. Overall, this study underscores the value of functional genomics in identifying novel vulnerabilities of HGGs and associated response biomarkers. It also highlights the need for further clinical validation of several novel therapies and especially drug combination strategies with strong efficacy in the ex vivo setting.

Abstract Background: Mutations in RAS is reported in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS). Upregulation of IGF2/IGF1R axis and IGF2 overexpression is a common finding. Targeting RAS downstream is associated with high toxicity. Combination therapies targeting parallel pathways is necessary to overcome treatment resistance. Dual inhibition of RAS downstream and IGF2/IGF1R axis can be a potential mechanism of targeted treatment. The efficacy of this mechanism was studied using a microcancer 3D exvivo tumor cell viability assay in a KRAS mutant ERMS. Design: Tumor was collected for a high-risk pediatric ERMS patient. Comprehensive genomic analysis, for identification of targetable genomic alterations, was performed by integrating WES, MPseq and RNAseq. Tumor spheroids grown in 3D environment were tested against multiple single drugs and combinations. The tumor viability was assed employing the Cell Titer Glow Luminescent Cell Viability Assay. Results were expressed as nMATP and were shown as drug-response curve exhibiting the ATP concentration changes at Cmax. Results: Genomic findings included an oncogenic KRAS (G12D) mutation. BAY-293 has a partial cell killing response as a single agent. Given to the presence of IGF2 over-expression, IGF2/IGF1R pathway was targeted by linsitinib. Addition of BAY-293 to linsitinib led to enhanced effectiveness of this agent (Table 1). Conclusion: Combination of comprehensive genomic profiling and a laboratory-based 3D micro-cancer model using the patient’s own tumor is an effective way to determine drug efficacy. Targeting RAS pathway by single agents, increases the possibility of resistance. Dual targeting of downstream pathways by MEK and PI3K pathway inhibition is highly toxic, and the clinical usage of this combination is limited. Our results have indicated inhibition of IGF-1R/IGF2 axis in combination with other agents targeting RAS pathway, can be a potential method to address these limitations. ABEL 1. Summary of molecular alterations and targeting methods Molecular alteration Drug Target Kill% at Cmax KRAS (G12D) Mutation BAY-293 RAS-SOS1 interaction 55.3 Trametinib MEK1/2 88.3 Selumetinib MEK1/2 76 Paxalisib PI3K/mTOR 89.7 Samotolisib PI3K/mTOR 92.9 Copanlisib PI3K 95.2 Perifosine AKT 89.2 IGF2 Over-expression Linsitinib IGF-1R/InsR 84.1 BMS-754807 IGF-1R/InsR 67.4 NTRK2 mutation Larotrectinib NTRK 41.9 KMT2D mutation Panobinostat HDAC 85.3 Combinations Kill% at Cmax BAY-293+Selumetinib 100 BAY-293+Samotolisib 100 BAY-293+Paxalisib 99.7 BAY-293+Linsitinib 97.5 Selumetinib+Samotolisib 93.1 Citation Format: Dorsay Sadeghian, Wan-Hsin Lin, James Smadbeck, Alan Panheiter, Michael Barrett, Alexa F. Mccune, Giannoula Karagouga, Sarah Johnson, Ryan W. Feathers, Faye R. Harris, Lindsey Kinsella, Taylor Berry, John Cheville, Panos Anastasiadis, Candace Granberg, Patricio Gargollo, Vasmatzis George. Dual inhibition of RAS and the IGF2/IGF1R pathways: a potential targeting strategy for RAS-mutated embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3391.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive adult brain tumor with no effective therapy. Despite advances on its molecular characterization, targeted therapeutics remain out of reach. This lack-of-progress is largely attributed to molecular and spatial heterogeneity and absence of clinically applicable models to guide patient care. Moreover, as standard surgical resection is aimed at contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor, the molecular landscape and treatment response of the remaining non-contrast enhancing (nCE) component is largely unknown despite its active role in tumor progression and local recurrence. Here, we aimed to identify the functional impact of tumor heterogeneity and to explore therapeutic vulnerabilities of both CE and nCE components. Four tumor regions (two CE and two nCE) from each of five GBM patients were collected under neuronavigation. The resulting tissue was subjected to generation of 3D tumor models (a brain tumor initiating-enriched cell line and a spheroid-based mcancer model) with comparable success in both CE and nCE samples. A panel of 25 brain penetrant drugs (alone and in combination) targeting GBM drivers (i.e. RTK/Ras/PI3K, RB/cell cycle, p53/apoptosis, DNA damage repair, transcription addiction) was developed and used to test for therapeutic vulnerabilities. From each tumor region, 4.5 ± 3.7 (average ± SD) different targeting strategies were identified exhibiting at least 70% growth inhibition at Cmax. Drug response heterogeneity was relatively rare, varied among cases, and was independent of tumor enhancement status. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systemically assess treatment response from both CE and nCE patient-derived GBM models. Ongoing studies include comprehensive genome and transcriptome profiling and pathway analysis from these different tumor regions. We postulate that interrogation of molecular landscapes and vulnerability profiles of both CE and nCE tumor regions, will enable us to personalize and prioritize effective targeted interventions for GBM treatment.