Citations

Preceding the joint meeting of the 19th annual Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (NEURODIAB) and the 8th International Symposium on Diabetic Neuropathy in Toronto, Canada, 13–18 October 2009, expert panels were convened to provide updates on classification, definitions, diagnostic criteria, and treatments of diabetic peripheral neuropathies (DPNs), autonomic neuropathy, painful DPNs, and structural alterations in DPNs.

✓ As a rule, normal human nerve does not contain glomus bodies. Nonetheless, rare examples of glomus tumors do arise in peripheral nerves of various sizes. Their pathobiological characteristics are poorly understood, but reported examples have been small and clinically benign. The authors identified in 1 patient each a glomus tumor and a glomangioma involving nerve. Clinical histories as well as imaging and surgical findings were reviewed. All available H & E–stained slides were examined in both cases. Immunohistochemical stains and electron microscopy, as appropriate, were also performed. The lesions were subtotally and completely resected, respectively. An uneventful postoperative recovery was noted in both patients. Glomus tumors and glomangiomas can involve major nerves on rare occasions. They seem to follow a favorable clinical course, and conservative resection can be of benefit.

OBJECTIVE—Assessing clinimetric performance of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) end points in single and multicenter trials. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Assessed were placebo-treated patients with DSPN in the Viatris and Eli Lilly trials and an epidemiologic cohort. RESULTS—Test reproducibility in clinical trial cohorts (rI ∼ 0.7–0.85) approached that in the epidemiologic cohort (rI ∼ 0.85–0.95). Associations between pairs of end points explained <10% of the variability of data (sometimes 15–35%), being higher in the epidemiologic cohort and the Viatris trial than in the Lilly trial. Most end points did not show monotonic worsening over 4 years. However, sural nerve amplitude and peroneal motor conduction velocity did. A nerve conduction score (Σ 5 NC nds [5 attributes of nerve conduction expressed as normal deviates]) did not show monotonic worsening in established DSPN. In the epidemiologic cohort followed for 9.5 years, monotonic worsening of small magnitude occurred for sural amplitude, vibration detection threshold, and especially for composite quantitative sensation. CONCLUSIONS—The main reason why it is difficult to demonstrate monotonic worsening of neuropathic end points appears to be a very slow worsening of DSPN, a placebo effect for symptoms and signs, and measurement noise. Demonstrating disease progression in controlled trials of DSPN is more likely when 1) patients with developing rather than established DSPN are selected, 2) type 1 diabetic patients are preferentially recruited, 3) patients are selected who cannot or will not achieve ideal glycemic control, 4) end points chosen are known to show monotonic worsening, and 5) a restricted number of centers and expert examiners (trained, certified, using standard approaches, and reference values and interactive surveillance of tests) are used.

OBJECTIVE—The objective of this study was to test whether monotone worsening of nerve function, attributable to diabetes, can be demonstrated before criteria for diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN) have been met. Which nerve tests are best? RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—From a prevalence cohort of 504 individuals in the Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy study (RDNS), we identified 238 individuals (group 1) who at first examination were without polyneuropathy (DSPN) by a sum score of the normal deviates (from percentiles) of five attributes of nerve conduction of the legs (i.e., their five nerve conduction normal deviate values were <97.5th percentile) and were followed longitudinally two or more times. Of these 238, 90 (group 2) were followed six or more times at yearly or biyearly intervals. We compared different nerve tests for the ones most sensitive and reliable in showing latent nerve dysfunction and monotone (the extent to which a variable measured repeatedly over time reveals a significant trend of worsening or improvement). RESULTS—In group 1 patients, the mean sum score of five attributes of nerve conduction (Σ 5 NC nds) at baseline was 1.08 and at the last examination (only patients with Σ 5 NC nds <97.5th percentile) was 3.63, markedly higher than that in healthy subjects (only of individuals with Σ 5 NC nds <97.5th percentile) (−0.12), indicating a subtle latent shift of nerve conduction tests toward abnormality. Serial evaluations of many individual and especially sum scores of nerve conduction tests in group 2 patients showed statistically significant worsening with time, even when nerve conduction tests were still well within normal limits. Neurologic signs also worsened but barely to significant levels; however, symptoms and quantitative sensation tests did not. Considering the composite score Σ 5 NC nds, 42 (of 90 group 2 patients) showed significant worsening, 22 were still without DSPN by nerve conduction test criteria, and some were even below the 50th percentile at the last evaluation. CONCLUSIONS—Subtle and latent functional worsening of nerve conduction can be demonstrated even before nerve conduction test criteria for DSPN have been met. For demonstrating monotone worsening, the order (from best to worst) of tests was: some composite scores of nerve conduction and individual attributes of nerve conduction. We did not show monotone worsening of symptoms or of quantitative sensation test results. In multivariate analysis of risk factors and their association with worsening Σ 5 NC nds, 24-h microalbuminuria (a marker of microvessel disease) was found to be a significant covariate, an indication that the asymptomatic alterations of nerve conduction are meaningful.

OBJECTIVE—The prevalence of autonomic symptoms and deficits in certain systems is known, but a comprehensive autonomic symptom profile in diabetes is not available. We aimed to estimate this using a laboratory evaluation of autonomic function and a validated self-report measure of autonomic symptoms in patients and matched control subjects from the population-based Rochester Diabetic Neuropathy Study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Participants included 231 patients with diabetes (type 1, n = 83; type 2, n = 148) and 245 healthy age-matched control subjects. We assessed symptoms using a validated self-report instrument (Autonomic Symptom Profile) and evaluated the severity and distribution of autonomic deficits (cardiovagal, sudomotor, adrenergic) with the objective, laboratory-based Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS). RESULTS—Autonomic symptoms were present more commonly in type 1 than in type 2 diabetes, with symptoms of orthostatic intolerance, secretomotor, urinary control, diarrhea, and sleep disturbance and pupillomotor, vasomotor, and erectile dysfunction significantly increased over healthy control subjects in type 2 diabetic patients. The prevalence of autonomic impairment was 54% in type 1 and 73% in type 2 diabetic patients. Severity of autonomic failure was mild overall (mean CASS 2.3; maximum 10), with orthostatic hypotension occurring in 8.4 and 7.4% of type 1 and 2 diabetic patients, respectively. Fourteen percent of patients had a CASS ≥5, indicating moderate to severe generalized autonomic failure. The correlation of symptoms with autonomic deficits (CASS) was better in type 1 than type 2 diabetic subjects and was weak overall. CONCLUSIONS—These findings indicate that autonomic symptoms and deficits are common in diabetes, but mild in severity, and that the correlation between symptom scores and deficits is overall weak in mild diabetic neuropathy, emphasizing the need to separately evaluate autonomic symptoms.