Back to Authors

Tesfaye, Solomon

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1190-1472

Mayo Clinic

Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Citations 3

Proficiency of nerve conduction using standard methods and reference values (cl. NPhys Trial 4)
Litchy, William J. , Albers, James W., Wolfe, James, Bolton, Charles F., WALSH, NANCY, Klein, Christopher J. , Zafft, Andrew J., Russell, James W. , Zwirlein, Melanie, Overland, Carol J., Davies, Jenny L., Carter, Rickey E. , Dyck, P. James B. , Investigators, the CI. Nphys Trial 4, Tesfaye, Solomon , Investigators, the CI. Nphys Trial 4, Klein, Christopher J , Carter, Rickey E

Muscle & Nerve | March 19, 2014 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 900-908

10.1002/mus.24243 Get It

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe Cl. NPhys Trial 3 showed that attributes of nerve conduction (NC) were without significant intraobserver differences, although there were significant interobserver differences. Methods: Trial 4 tested whether use of written instructions and pretrial agreement on techniques and use of standard reference values, diagnostic percentile values, or broader categorization of abnormality could reduce significant interobserver disagreement and improve agreement among clinical neurophysiologists. Results: The Trial 4 modifications markedly decreased, but did not eliminate, significant interobserver differences of measured attributes of NC. Use of standard reference values and defined percentile values of abnormality decreased interobserver disagreement and improved agreement of judgment of abnormality among evaluators. Therefore, the same clinical neurophysiologist should perform repeat NCs of therapeutic trial patients. Conclusions: Differences in interobserver judgment of abnormality decrease with use of common standard reference values and a defined percentile level of abnormality, providing a rationale for their use in therapeutic trials and medical practice. Muscle Nerve 50: 900–908, 2014
Multicenter trial of the proficiency of smart quantitative sensation tests
Dyck, P. James B. , Argyros, Barbara, Russell, James W. , Gahnstrom, Linde E., Nalepa, Susan, Albers, James W., Lodermeier, Karen A., Zafft, Andrew J., Klein, Christopher J. , Litchy, William J. , Davies, Jenny L., Carter, Rickey E. , Melton, L. Joseph , (Appendix), members of the Cl versus NPhys Trials, Tesfaye, Solomon , (Appendix), members of the Cl versus NPhys Trials, Klein, Christopher J , Carter, Rickey E

Muscle & Nerve | August 8, 2013 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 645-653

10.1002/mus.23982 Get It

ABSTRACTIntroduction: We assessed proficiency (accuracy and intra‐ and intertest reproducibility) of smart quantitative sensation tests (smart QSTs) in subjects without and with diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN). Methods: Technologists from 3 medical centers using different but identical QSTs independently assessed 6 modalities of sensation of the foot (or leg) twice in patients without (n = 6) and with (n = 6) DSPN using smart computer assisted QSTs. Results: Low rates of test abnormalities were observed in health and high rates in DSPN. Very high intraclass correlations were obtained between continuous measures of QSTs and neuropathy signs, symptoms, or nerve conductions (NCs). No significant intra‐ or intertest differences were observed. Conclusions: These results provide proof of concept that smart QSTs provide accurate assessment of sensation loss without intra‐ or intertest differences useful for multicenter trials. Smart technology makes possible efficient testing of body surface area sensation loss in symmetric length‐dependent sensorimotor polyneuropathies. Muscle Nerve 49: 645–653, 2014
Diabetic Neuropathies: Update on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, Estimation of Severity, and Treatments
Tesfaye, Solomon , Dyck, Peter James , Kempler, Péter , Lauria, Giuseppe , Malik, Rayaz A. , Spallone, Vincenza , Vinik, Aaron I. , Bernardi, Luciano, Valensi, Paul, Group, on behalf of the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert, Feldman, Eva L. , Pop‐Busui, Rodica , Boulton, Andrew J.M. , Freeman, Roy L. , Horowitz, Michael , Group, on behalf of the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert, Pop-Busui, Rodica , Feldman, Eva L

Diabetes Care | September 28, 2010 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2285-2293

10.2337/dc10-1303 Get It

Preceding the joint meeting of the 19th annual Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (NEURODIAB) and the 8th International Symposium on Diabetic Neuropathy in Toronto, Canada, 13–18 October 2009, expert panels were convened to provide updates on classification, definitions, diagnostic criteria, and treatments of diabetic peripheral neuropathies (DPNs), autonomic neuropathy, painful DPNs, and structural alterations in DPNs.