Back to Authors

Vinik, Aaron I.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5279-0628

Mayo Clinic

Eastern Virginia Medical School

Citations 2

Efficacy and Safety of Antioxidant Treatment With α-Lipoic Acid Over 4 Years in Diabetic Polyneuropathy
Low, Phillip A. , Litchy, William J. , Vinik, Aaron I. , Самигуллин, Р. Р., Tritschler, Hans, Munzel, Ullrich , Maus, Joachim, Schütte, Klemens, Dyck, P. James B. , Ziegler, Dan , Boulton, Andrew J.M. , Freeman, Roy L.

Diabetes Care | July 21, 2011 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2054-2060

10.2337/dc11-0503 Get It

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of α-lipoic acid (ALA) over 4 years in mild-to-moderate diabetic distal symmetric sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSPN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a multicenter randomized double-blind parallel-group trial, 460 diabetic patients with mild-to-moderate DSPN were randomly assigned to oral treatment with 600 mg ALA once daily (n = 233) or placebo (n = 227) for 4 years. Primary end point was a composite score (Neuropathy Impairment Score [NIS]–Lower Limbs [NIS-LL] and seven neurophysiologic tests). Secondary outcome measures included NIS, NIS-LL, nerve conduction, and quantitative sensory tests (QSTs). RESULTS Change in primary end point from baseline to 4 years showed no significant difference between treatment groups (P = 0.105). Change from baseline was significantly better with ALA than placebo for NIS (P = 0.028), NIS-LL (P = 0.05), and NIS-LL muscular weakness subscore (P = 0.045). More patients showed a clinically meaningful improvement and fewer showed progression of NIS (P = 0.013) and NIS-LL (P = 0.025) with ALA than with placebo. Nerve conduction and QST results did not significantly worsen with placebo. Global assessment of treatment tolerability and discontinuations due to lack of tolerability did not differ between the groups. The rates of serious adverse events were higher on ALA (38.1%) than on placebo (28.0%). CONCLUSIONS Four-year treatment with ALA in mild-to-moderate DSPN did not influence the primary composite end point but resulted in a clinically meaningful improvement and prevention of progression of neuropathic impairments and was well tolerated. Because the primary composite end point did not deteriorate significantly in placebo-treated subjects, secondary prevention of its progression by ALA according to the trial design was not feasible.
Diabetic Neuropathies: Update on Definitions, Diagnostic Criteria, Estimation of Severity, and Treatments
Tesfaye, Solomon , Dyck, Peter James , Kempler, Péter , Lauria, Giuseppe , Malik, Rayaz A. , Spallone, Vincenza , Vinik, Aaron I. , Bernardi, Luciano, Valensi, Paul, Group, on behalf of the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert, Feldman, Eva L. , Pop‐Busui, Rodica , Boulton, Andrew J.M. , Freeman, Roy L. , Horowitz, Michael , Group, on behalf of the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert, Pop-Busui, Rodica , Feldman, Eva L

Diabetes Care | September 28, 2010 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2285-2293

10.2337/dc10-1303 Get It

Preceding the joint meeting of the 19th annual Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (NEURODIAB) and the 8th International Symposium on Diabetic Neuropathy in Toronto, Canada, 13–18 October 2009, expert panels were convened to provide updates on classification, definitions, diagnostic criteria, and treatments of diabetic peripheral neuropathies (DPNs), autonomic neuropathy, painful DPNs, and structural alterations in DPNs.