Citations

Abstract: To ensure that participants in randomized controlled trials are protected from harm, interim analyses and review of results by an independent data monitoring committee have become standard practice. If an analysis of accumulating data partway through a trial reveals an unanticipated degree of benefit or toxicity, or differences in outcomes between the intervention and control groups are so unimpressive that any prospect of a positive result with the planned sample size is extremely unlikely, investigators may stop the trial earlier than originally scheduled. The practice of stopping randomized controlled trials early is, however, problematic, especially if the trial is stopped for apparent benefit. Concerns in trials stopped early for apparent benefit include appropriate interpretation of results and ethical problems concerning trial participants, clinicians, and society as a whole. In this article, we review the epidemiology of trials stopped early and illustrate some of the problems and controversies associated with stopping randomized controlled trials early for apparent benefit. Finally, we offer guidance for clinicians, those running clinical trials, and authors of systematic reviews.

Adults with intellectual disabilities (ID) have low levels of physical activity and higher than average rates of related chronic health conditions. Understanding correlates of their physical activity participation may improve health promoting interventions. Forty-two adults with ID participated in a physical activity study. Physical activity knowledge and skills, awareness of recommendations and demographic characteristics were analyzed for their association with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) participation measured by accelerometers. Five variables were significantly correlated with MVPA. Body mass index was inversely correlated with MVPA, and gender, job location, job tasks, and place of residence were all significantly associated with MVPA. Understanding correlates of physical activity in this population will help inform disability service and health promotion professionals in future research and health intervention design.

Examining the patient's subjective experience in prospective clinical comparative effectiveness research (CER) of oncology treatments or process interventions is essential for informing decision making. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are the standard tools for directly eliciting the patient experience. There are currently no widely accepted standards for developing or implementing PRO measures in CER. Recommendations for the design and implementation of PRO measures in CER were developed via a standardized process including multistakeholder interviews, a technical working group, and public comments. Key recommendations are to include assessment of patient-reported symptoms as well as health-related quality of life in all prospective clinical CER studies in adult oncology; to identify symptoms relevant to a particular study population and context based on literature review and/or qualitative and quantitative methods; to assure that PRO measures used are valid, reliable, and sensitive in a comparable population (measures particularly recommended include EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT, MDASI, PRO-CTCAE, and PROMIS); to collect PRO data electronically whenever possible; to employ methods that minimize missing patient reports and include a plan for analyzing and reporting missing PRO data; to report the proportion of responders and cumulative distribution of responses in addition to mean changes in scores; and to publish results of PRO analyses simultaneously with other clinical outcomes. Twelve core symptoms are recommended for consideration in studies in advanced or metastatic cancers. Adherence to methodologic standards for the selection, implementation, and analysis/reporting of PRO measures will lead to an understanding of the patient experience that informs better decisions by patients, providers, regulators, and payers.

The present study examines treatment length and timing of exposure from two child anxiety disorders clinics. Data regarding symptoms and treatment characteristics for 28 youth were prospectively obtained through self, parent, and therapist report at each session. Information regarding length of treatment, timing of exposure initiation, and drop-out rates were compared with those obtained through efficacy and effectiveness trials of manualized treatment for anxious youth. Findings from the authors’ clinical data revealed significantly shorter treatment duration with exposures implemented sooner than in the previous studies. Dropout rates were significantly higher than in the efficacy trial but comparable with the effectiveness trial. Outcome data from a subset of eight patients revealed large effect sizes. These findings suggest that effective treatment can be shorter and more focused on exposure than is often outlined in manuals and have important implications for outcome research and dissemination.

Abstract Recent molecular and pathologic evidence indicate that high-grade serous carcinomas of the ovary, which are the most common type of epithelial carcinomas, may arise from the distal part of fallopian tubes or tubal carcinoma implants. Oviductal glycoprotein 1 (Ovgp1), a glycosylated protein found in the epithelial cells in the oviduct, is the only specific tubal marker so far. Ovgp1 promoter-driven SV40 large T-antigen transgenic mice develop tumors in the female reproductive organs. To characterize these tumors, we performed immunohistochemical analysis in paraffin-embedded sections. Mice were sacrificed at 8 or 13 weeks old. Macroscopically we observed large tumors in the uterus and cervix and markedly enlarged region in the oviduct. Due to the large tumor in the uterus and cervix, we could not keep the mice longer than 13 weeks. Histologically, there were no major differences in these affected regions between 8 weeks old and 13 weeks old mice. We observed, (i) relatively small ovaries and ovarian follicular hyperplasia, (ii) intact ovarian surface epithelium showing no atypical histology, (iii) atypical epithelial hyperplasia within the oviduct (with endometrioid architectural and cytologic features), (iv) leiomyosarcomatous proliferation in the myometrium, and (v) squamous carcinoma in situ in the cervix or early invasive cervical cancer with extensive papillary architecture. We did not detect metastasis from the tumor to other organs. The atypical abnormalities of the oviduct were more significant in the proximal site to the uterus than the distal site. The proximal oviduct demonstrated weak and spotty p53 expression, beneath the epithelium, similar to p53 signature in the human oviduct. We hypothesized that stem cell components may contribute to the tumor development and that putative cancer stem cells could be identified by stem cell markers. In the oviduct epithelium, Bmi1 expression was not detectable. Cytoplasmic expression of Sox2 was observed in all epithelial cells of the oviduct. There was little correlation between Sox2/Bmi1 staining and p53 staining in the oviduct. Interestingly, Sox2 and Bmi1 staining in the wild-type control mice showed immunoreactive cells interspersed between glandular structures, a pattern similar to previously described label-retaining cells in the endometrium. The expression pattern in Ovgp1-SV40 mice, Bmi1 and Sox2 expression were more obvious in the endometrial stromal area but not in the leiomyosarcoma region, which implies that stem cell components in the endometrial region may support the leiomyosarcoma progression in this mouse model. In conclusion, Ovgp1-SV40 transgenic mouse is a useful model for studies involving fallopian and lower genital tract carcinogenesis. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3272. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3272