Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

379 citation(s) found for "Burns, R".

BSCI-10 TAPPING INTO GLIOMAS’ SECRETS: CSF PROTEOMICS FOR BIOMARKER DISCOVERY, GLIOMA MONITORING, AND THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
Riviere-Cazaux, Cécile , Ikram, Samar, Chantigian, Siobhan, Warrington, Arthur E. , Rahman, Masum , Burns, Terry C.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | August 5, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: i3-i3

10.1093/noajnl/vdac078.009 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Rapid, detailed feedback is needed to understand the individualized biological impacts of novel glioma therapies. We are performing glioma biomarker discovery by serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling from Ommaya reservoirs to determine how the CSF proteome can reveal early longitudinal intelligence regarding glioma status, biology, and therapeutic response. METHODS Global proteomic analysis of CSF was performed on the Somalogic platform − an aptamer-based technology for highly sensitive and specific analysis of over 7,000 proteins. Discovery analysis comprised of the top-500 ranked proteins in CSF from seven patients with high-grade gliomas (HGG) versus non-glioma controls. The top-500 HGG proteins were then preliminarily filtered to include only proteins that met two additional criteria of decrease with resection and increase with recurrence in individual paired patient samples. RESULTS Proteomic enrichment analysis revealed a conserved HGG CSF proteomic signature defined by 79 proteins, including ones known to be over-expressed in solid tumor malignancies, such as retinoblastoma binding protein 4, heat shock protein 90, and sorcin. The HGG proteomic signature was consistently enriched in an independent validation cohort consisting of 13 gliomas diverse in primary versus recurrent status, subtype, and grade, when compared to control CSF samples. Encouragingly, proteins in the HGG signature decreased in the two patients for whom CSF was collected prior to and after resection (both at POD16 and POD18) with decreased tumor burden. CONCLUSION Our preliminary data demonstrate the ability to gain detailed, individualized insights regarding glioma biology, tumor burden, and evolution through global CSF proteomics acquired from longitudinal neurosurgical access to unique gliomas.
Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Gradishar, William J. , Moran, Meena S. , Abraham, Jame , Aft, Rebecca , Allison, Kimberly H. , Anderson, Bethany , Burstein, Harold J. , Chew, Helen K. , Dang, Chau T. , Goldstein, Lori J. , Hurvitz, Sara A. , Isakoff, Steven J. , Jankowitz, Rachel C. , Javid, Sara H. , Leitch, Marilyn , Lyons, Janice A., Patel, Sameer A. , Pierce, Lori J. , Rosenberger, Laura H. , Sitapati, Amy M. , Smith, Mary Lou , Stringer-Reasor, Erica , Telli, Melinda L. , Wisinski, Kari B. , Burns, Jennifer L. , Telli, Melinda L , Agnese, Doreen Marie , Elias, Anthony , Giordano, Sharon H. , Goetz, Matthew P. , Krishnamurthy, Jairam , Mortimer, Joanne , Rugo, Hope S. , Smith, Karen L. , Soliman, Hatem Hussein , Ward, John Headley , Young, Jessica S. , Kumar, Rashmi

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | June 17, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 691-722

10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030 | PMID 35714673 Get It

The therapeutic options for patients with noninvasive or invasive breast cancer are complex and varied. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer include recommendations for clinical management of patients with carcinoma in situ, invasive breast cancer, Paget disease, phyllodes tumor, inflammatory breast cancer, and management of breast cancer during pregnancy. The content featured in this issue focuses on the recommendations for overall management of ductal carcinoma in situ and the workup and locoregional management of early stage invasive breast cancer. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer, visit NCCN.org .
PATH-16. Noninvasive diagnosis of gliomas through CSF cfDNA sequencing in pediatric and adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients
Hill, Katherine , Miller, Alexandra , Li, Bryan Kincheon, Bouvier, Nancy, Li, Shanita , Doe-Tetteh, Seyram A. , Huereca, Claudia, DiNapoli, Sara , Lee, Alex , Szalontay, Luca , Riviere-Cazaux, Cécile , Haque, Sofia , Doğan, Snjezana , Ross, Dara S. , Donzelli, Maria, Gilheeney, Stephen W., Souweidane, Mark, Greenfield, Jeffrey, Berger, Michael , Benayed, Ryma , Arcila, Maria E. , Ladanyi, Marc , Vanderbilt, Chad , Bouvier, Nancy , Alano, Tina , Burns, Terry C. , Bale, Tejus , Benhamida, Jamal K. , Chang, Jason C. , Dunkel, Ira J. , Sait, Sameer Farouk , Khakoo, Yasmin , Mellinghoff, Ingo K. , Karajannis, Matthias A.

Neuro-Oncology | June 3, 2022 | Volume: 24 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: i162-i162

10.1093/neuonc/noac079.600 Get It

Abstract PURPOSE: A subset of pediatric, adolescent and young adult (AYA) gliomas are located in the brainstem, eloquent locations, or present with diffuse/leptomeningeal disease, and are associated with high risk and low yield of biopsy. At the same time, accurate molecular diagnosis is necessary to direct optimal therapy. In such cases, analysis of cell free DNA (cfDNA) form cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) may represent a diagnostic alternative to biopsy. METHODS: We investigated the utility of CSF cfDNA sequencing through a stepwise approach, using clinically validated, targeted molecular assays. Testing was performed using a broad hybrid capture next generation sequencing assay (MSK-IMPACT) and subsequent targeted digital droplet PCR in a subset of cases. RESULTS: We analyzed 17 CSF samples from 17 pediatric (n=6) and AYA (n=11) glioma patients with primary or recurrent disease. Thirteen had tumors located within the brainstem, and four had leptomeningeal involvement. Somatic alterations were detected in 12/17 samples (71%). In 3/4 patients with leptomeningeal involvement, cfDNA testing revealed a BRAF fusion consistent with the diagnosis of diffuse leptomeningeal glioneuronal tumor (DLGNT). Among the 13 patients with brainstem involvement, four had somatic H3 K27M mutations, three had IDH mutations, and one had TP53 and ATRX mutations; five patients had no detectable mutations. CONCLUSION: In our analysis, we found that established glioma hotspot mutations were able to be detected within the CSF. We propose that in patients for whom tissue biopsy is high risk, not feasible, or tissue was nondiagnostic, CSF cfDNA sequencing has a substantial diagnostic yield and should be considered as a valuable novel diagnostic tool. Ongoing research is aiming to further increase the sensitivity of cfDNA testing, especially in patients with very low levels of CSF cfDNA.
Selective Vulnerability of Senescent Glioblastoma Cells to BCL-XL Inhibition
Rahman, Masum , Olson, Ian , Mansour, Moustafa , Carlstrom, Lucas P. , Sutiwisesak, Rujapope , Saber, Rehan, Warrington, Arthur E. , Howard, A. B., Chen, Sisi , Decker, Paul A. , Sananikone, Eliot F., Zhu, Yi , Burma, Sandeep , Kirkland, James L. , Rajani, Karishma , Howard, Adam, Schroeder, Mark, Decker, Paul A. , Parney, Ian F , Brown, Desmond , Sarkaria, Jann N , Kirkland, James L , Burns, Terry C , Zhu, Yi , Mansour, Moustafa A , Schroeder, Mark A. , Tchkonia, Tamar , Parney, Ian F. , Brown, Desmond , Rodriguez, Moses , Sarkaria, Jann N. , Burns, Terry C.

Molecular Cancer Research | June 3, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 938-948

10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-21-0029 | PMID 35191501 Get It

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a rapidly fatal malignancy typically treated with radiation and temozolomide (TMZ), an alkylating chemotherapeutic. These cytotoxic therapies cause oxidative stress and DNA damage, yielding a senescent-like state of replicative arrest in surviving tumor cells. Unfortunately, recurrence is inevitable and may be driven by surviving tumor cells eventually escaping senescence. A growing number of so-called “senolytic” drugs have been recently identified that are defined by their ability to selectively eliminate senescent cells. A growing inventory of senolytic drugs is under consideration for several diseases associated with aging, inflammation, DNA damage, as well as cancer. Ablation of senescent tumor cells after radiation and chemotherapy could help mitigate recurrence by decreasing the burden of residual tumor cells at risk of recurrence. This strategy has not been previously explored for GBM. We evaluated a panel of 10 previously described senolytic drugs to determine whether any could exhibit selective activity against human GBM persisting after exposure to radiation or TMZ. Three of the 10 drugs have known activity against BCL-XL and preferentially induced apoptosis in radiated or TMZ-treated glioma. This senolytic activity was observed in 12 of 12 human GBM cell lines. Efficacy could not be replicated with BCL-2 inhibition or senolytic agents acting against other putative senolytic targets. Knockdown of BCL-XL decreased survival of radiated GBM cells, whereas knockdown of BCL-2 or BCL-W yielded no senolytic effect. Implications: These findings imply that molecularly heterogeneous GBM lines share selective senescence-induced BCL-XL dependency increase the significance and translational relevance of the senolytic therapy for latent glioma.
MDACT: A New Principle of Adjunctive Cancer Treatment Using Combinations of Multiple Repurposed Drugs, with an Example Regimen
Kast, Richard E. , Alfieri, Alex , Assi, Hazem , Elyamany, Ashraf , González‐Cao, María , Karpel‐Massler, Georg , Marosi, Christine , Salacz, Michael, Sardi, Iacopo , Vlierberghe, Pieter Van , Zaghloul, Mohamed S. , Halatsch, Marc‐Eric , Assi, Hazem I , Elyamany, Ashraf M , Gonzalez-Cao, Maria , Sardi, Iacopo , Van Vlierberghe, Pieter , Zaghloul, Mohamed S , Halatsch, Marc-Eric , Burns, Terry C.

Cancers | May 23, 2022 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2563

10.3390/cancers14102563 | PMID 35626167 Get It

In part one of this two-part paper, we present eight principles that we believe must be considered for more effective treatment of the currently incurable cancers. These are addressed by multidrug adjunctive cancer treatment (MDACT), which uses multiple repurposed non-oncology drugs, not primarily to kill malignant cells, but rather to reduce the malignant cells’ growth drives. Previous multidrug regimens have used MDACT principles, e.g., the CUSP9v3 glioblastoma treatment. MDACT is an amalgam of (1) the principle that to be effective in stopping a chain of events leading to an undesired outcome, one must break more than one link; (2) the principle of Palmer et al. of achieving fractional cancer cell killing via multiple drugs with independent mechanisms of action; (3) the principle of shaping versus decisive operations, both being required for successful cancer treatment; (4) an idea adapted from Chow et al., of using multiple cytotoxic medicines at low doses; (5) the idea behind CUSP9v3, using many non-oncology CNS-penetrant drugs from general medical practice, repurposed to block tumor survival paths; (6) the concept from chess that every move creates weaknesses and strengths; (7) the principle of mass—by adding force to a given effort, the chances of achieving the goal increase; and (8) the principle of blocking parallel signaling pathways. Part two gives an example MDACT regimen, gMDACT, which uses six repurposed drugs—celecoxib, dapsone, disulfiram, itraconazole, pyrimethamine, and telmisartan—to interfere with growth-driving elements common to cholangiocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. gMDACT is another example of—not a replacement for—previous multidrug regimens already in clinical use, such as CUSP9v3. MDACT regimens are designed as adjuvants to be used with cytotoxic drugs.
Neurologic Manifestations of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection in Hospitalized Patients During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Cervantes-Arslanian, Anna M., Venkata, Chakradhar, Anand, Pria, Burns, Joseph D., Ong, Charlene J., LeMahieu, Allison M., Schulte, Phillip J., Singh, Tarun D., Rabinstein, Alejandro A., Deo, Neha, Bansal, Vikas, Boman, Karen, Garces, Juan Pablo Domecq, Armaignac, Donna Lee, Christie, Amy B., Melamed, Roman R., Tarabichi, Yasir, Cheruku, Sreekanth R., Khanna, Ashish K., Denson, Joshua L., Banner-Goodspeed, Valerie M., Anderson, Harry L., Gajic, Ognjen, Kumar, Vishakha K., Walkey, Allan, Kashyap, Rahul, Group, on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS): COVID-19 Registry Investigator, Bansal, Vikas , Singh, Tarun D. , Kaur, Nirmaljot , Danesh, Valerie , Заболотских, И. Б. , Armaignac, Donna Lee , Nawathe, Pooja , Tarabichi, Yasir , Cavallazzi, Rodrigo , Anand, Pria , Domecq Garces, Juan Pablo, Bansal, Vikas , Kaur, Nirmaljot , Domecq Graces, Juan Pablo , Cervantes-Arslanian, Anna M., Venkata, Chakradhar, Anand, Pria, Burns, Joseph D., Ong, Charlene J., LeMahieu, Allison M., Schulte, Phillip J., Singh, Tarun D., Rabinstein, Alejandro A., Deo, Neha, Bansal, Vikas, Boman, Karen, Christie, Amy B., Melamed, Roman R., Cheruku, Sreekanth R., Khanna, Ashish K., Denson, Joshua L., Banner-Goodspeed, Valerie M., Anderson, Harry L., Gajic, Ognjen, Kumar, Vishakha K., Walkey, Allan, Kashyap, Rahul, Group, on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study (VIRUS): COVID-19 Registry Investigator

Critical Care Explorations | April 25, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 4 | Pages: e0686

10.1097/cce.0000000000000686 | PMID 35492258 Get It

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence, associated risk factors, and outcomes of serious neurologic manifestations (encephalopathy, stroke, seizure, and meningitis/encephalitis) among patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: One hundred seventy-nine hospitals in 24 countries within the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Infection and Respiratory Illness Universal Study COVID-19 Registry. PATIENTS: Hospitalized adults with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. INTERVENTIONS: None. RESULTS: Of 16,225 patients enrolled in the registry with hospital discharge status available, 2,092 (12.9%) developed serious neurologic manifestations including 1,656 (10.2%) with encephalopathy at admission, 331 (2.0%) with stroke, 243 (1.5%) with seizure, and 73 (0.5%) with meningitis/encephalitis at admission or during hospitalization. Patients with serious neurologic manifestations of COVID-19 were older with median (interquartile range) age 72 years (61.0–81.0 yr) versus 61 years (48.0–72.0 yr) and had higher prevalence of chronic medical conditions, including vascular risk factors. Adjusting for age, sex, and time since the onset of the pandemic, serious neurologic manifestations were associated with more severe disease (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; p < 0.001) as defined by the World Health Organization ordinal disease severity scale for COVID-19 infection. Patients with neurologic manifestations were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (OR, 1.45; p < 0.001) and require critical care interventions (extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: OR, 1.78; p = 0.009 and renal replacement therapy: OR, 1.99; p < 0.001). Hospital, ICU, and 28-day mortality for patients with neurologic manifestations was higher (OR, 1.51, 1.37, and 1.58; p < 0.001), and patients had fewer ICU-free, hospital-free, and ventilator-free days (estimated difference in days, –0.84, –1.34, and –0.84; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Encephalopathy at admission is common in hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and is associated with worse outcomes. While serious neurologic manifestations including stroke, seizure, and meningitis/encephalitis were less common, all were associated with increased ICU support utilization, more severe disease, and worse outcomes.
Survival and associated predictors for patients with pineoblastoma or pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation older than 3 years: Insights from the National Cancer Database
Kerezoudis, Panagiotis , Yolcu, Yagiz U. , Laack, Nadia N., Ruff, Michael W. , Khatua, Soumen , Kizilbash, Sani H. , Yolcu, Yagiz Ugur, Kizilbash, Sani H , Daniels, David J. , Burns, Terry C.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | April 17, 2022 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdac057 | PMID 35611271 Get It

Abstract Background The management of pineal parenchymal tumors remains controversial. Methods The 2004-2017 National Cancer Database was queried for cases (age &gt;3 years) with histologically confirmed pineal parenchymal tumors of intermediate differentiation (PPTID, n = 90) or pineoblastoma (n = 106). Results Within the PPTID group, median age was 41 years; 49% were males. Five- and 10-year survival were 83% and 78%, respectively. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy were administered in 64% and 17% patients, respectively. The effect of radiation with or without chemotherapy (HR 1.15, P = .81, and HR 1.31, P = .72, respectively), and extent of resection (HR = 1.07, P = .93) was not significant. Within the pineoblastoma group, median age was 25 years; 51% were males. Five- and 10-year survival were 66% and 42%, respectively. Adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy were administered in 72% and 51%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, patients with pineoblastoma who received both radiation and chemotherapy (n = 39) had significantly lower hazard of death (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.85, P = .02) compared to those who received radiation alone (n = 20) or no adjuvant treatment (n = 19). Finally, females in the pineoblastoma group were found to have a lower hazard of death compared to males (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.10-0.58, P = .001); this comparison trended toward statistical significance in the PPTID subgroup (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.14-1.08, P = .07). Conclusions Survival rates were higher in patients with PPTID vs patients with pineoblastoma. Adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved survival in pineoblastoma and females had lower hazards of death. Further research should identify specific patient profiles and molecular subgroups more likely to benefit from multimodality therapy.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Hodgkin Lymphoma, Version 2.2022
Hoppe, Richard T. , Advani, Ranjana H. , Ambinder, Richard F. , Armand, Philippe , Bello, Celeste, Benitez, Cecil M. , Chen, Weina , Dabaja, Bouthaina S. , Daly, Megan E. , Hansen, Neil, Herrera, Alex F. , Hochberg, Ephraim P. , Johnston, Patrick B. , Kaminski, Mark , Kenkre, Vaishalee P. , Lynch, Ryan C. , Maddocks, Kami J. , Metzger, Monika L. , Morgan, David , Mulroney, Carolyn , Pullarkat, Sheeja T. , Rabinovitch, Rachel , Rosenspire, Karen C., Seropian, Stuart , Tao, Randa , Torka, Pallawi , Yang, Joanna C. , Burns, Jennifer L. , Campbell, Mallory, Sundar, Hema, Advani, Ranjana H , Hoppe, Richard T , Ambinder, Richard F , Tao, Randa , Ai, Weiyun Z. , Gordon, Leo I. , Kelsey, Chris R. , Khan, Nadia , McConathy, Jonathan , Winter, Jane N. , Yahalom, Joachim

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 7, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 322-334

10.6004/jnccn.2022.0021 | PMID 35390768 Get It

Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is an uncommon malignancy of B-cell origin. Classical HL (cHL) and nodular lymphocyte–predominant HL are the 2 main types of HL. The cure rates for HL have increased so markedly with the advent of modern treatment options that overriding treatment considerations often relate to long-term toxicity. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines for HL focusing on (1) radiation therapy dose constraints in the management of patients with HL, and (2) the management of advanced-stage and relapsed or refractory cHL.
Lack of clinically relevant differences in safety and pharmacokinetics after second‐dose administration of intranasal diazepam within 4 h for acute treatment of seizure clusters: A population analysis
Cascino, Gregory D. , Wheless, James W. , Sperling, Michael R. , Desai, Jay , Vázquez, Blanca , Samara, Emil, Misra, Sunita N. , Carrazana, Enrique , Group, for the DIAZ.001.05 Study, Wheless, James W , Hogan, R Edward , Sperling, Michael R , Misra, Sunita N , Carrazana, Enrique , Rabinowicz, Adrian L , Cascino, Gregory D , Tarquinio, Daniel Charles , Rabinowicz, Adrián L. , Group, for the DIAZ.001.05 Study

Epilepsia | April 4, 2022 | Volume: 63 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1714-1723

10.1111/epi.17249 | PMID 35377464 Get It

AbstractObjectiveCurrent diazepam nasal spray labeling requires waiting 4 h before administering a second dose. The objective of the current analyses was to examine safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of second doses of diazepam nasal spray given 0−4 h after the first dose.MethodsTwo datasets were analyzed. The first, a long‐term, repeat‐dose safety study of diazepam nasal spray, compared rates of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and treatment‐related TEAEs for patients receiving ≥1 second dose ≤4 h versus all second doses >4 h after the first. The second was a population pharmacokinetic analysis using data from three phase 1 studies to model drug exposure when a second dose of diazepam nasal spray was administered across multiple time points (1 min−4 h) following the first dose.ResultsIn the repeat‐dose safety study, a second dose of diazepam nasal spray was administered ≤24 h after the first to treat 485 seizure clusters in 79 patients. Rates of TEAEs were similar between patients receiving ≥1 second dose in ≤4 h (89.5%, n = 38) compared with >4–24 h only (80.5%, n = 41). The most common treatment‐related TEAEs were associated with nasal discomfort, which was mild or moderate and transient. There were no reports of respiratory or cardiac depression. The pharmacokinetic simulations of second doses predicted comparable elevations of plasma diazepam concentrations with administrations across a range of intervals after the first dose (1 min−4 h).SignificanceThese data indicate that the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of a second dose of diazepam nasal spray administered within 4 h of the first dose are consistent with those associated with current labeling. This is potentially important for patients with seizure clusters who have a recurrent seizure within 4 h of first treatment and might benefit from immediate retreatment to reduce the risk of progression to status epilepticus.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Head and Neck Cancers, Version 1.2022
Gillison, Maura L. , Maghami, Ellie, Spencer, Sharon, Pfister, David G. , Birkeland, Andrew C. , Busse, Paul M., Cmelak, Anthony J. , Eisele, David W. , Galloway, Thomas J. , Geiger, J.L. , Haddad, Robert I. , Hicks, Wesley L. , Hitchcock, Ying J. , Jimeno, Antonio , Leizman, Debra S., Mell, Loren K. , Mittal, Bharat B. , Pinto, Harlan A. , Rocco, James W. , Rodriguez, Cristina P. , Savvides, P. , Sher, David J. , Weber, Randal S. , Weinstein, Gregory S., Worden, Frank , Yom, Sue S. , Zhen, Weining, Burns, Jennifer L. , Darlow, Susan, Savvides, Panayiotis S, Haddad, Robert , Mittal, Bharat B , Yom, Sue S , Caudell, Jimmy J , Adkins, Douglas R. , Brizel, David M. , Colevas, Alexander Dimitrios , Schwartz, David A. , Shah, Jatin P. , John, Maie A. St. , Bruce, Justine Y.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 11, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 224-234

10.6004/jnccn.2022.0016 | PMID 35276673 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers address tumors arising in the oral cavity (including mucosal lip), pharynx, larynx, and paranasal sinuses. Occult primary cancer, salivary gland cancer, and mucosal melanoma (MM) are also addressed. The specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guide treatment (eg, the appropriate surgical procedure, radiation targets, dose and fractionation of radiation, indications for systemic therapy). The NCCN Head and Neck Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding management of HPV-positive oropharynx cancer and ongoing research in this area.