Wheless, James W

Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in patients with Dravet syndrome (DS) stratified by age, number of previously attempted antiseizure medications (ASMs), and SCN1A pathogenic variant status. Methods In this post hoc analysis, data from three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with DS (2–18 years) were pooled and stratified by age (<4; ≥4 years), number of previous ASMs (1–3; 4–6; ≥7), and SCN1A pathogenic variant status ( SCN1A +; SCN1A −). Stratified groups were assessed and compared with the pooled placebo group (change in monthly convulsive seizure frequency [MCSF], longest convulsive seizure‐free interval, and Clinical Global Impression–Improvement [CGI–I] scale scores rated by parents/caregivers and investigators), and safety (treatment‐emergent adverse events [TEAEs]: frequency, days to onset, and proportion resolved). Results Among 348 patients included in the RCTs, 216 were randomized to fenfluramine (0.7 mg/kg/day, n = 88; 0.4 mg/kg/day [with stiripentol], n = 43; 0.2 mg/kg/day, n = 85) and 132 to placebo. Compared with placebo, fenfluramine treatment (all doses combined) resulted in greater MCSF reductions, greater increases in longest convulsive seizure‐free intervals, and a higher proportion of parents/caregivers and investigators reporting clinically meaningful improvement (“Much Improved”, “Very Much Improved”) on CGI–I scores across all stratified groups. CGI–I scores were consistent across fenfluramine doses in most stratified groups, but patients with the fewest number of previous ASMs had the greatest frequency of clinically meaningful improvement on investigator‐rated CGI–I scores. Safety outcomes were similar across all strata. Most TEAEs resolved by end‐of‐study. Significance Fenfluramine treatment was associated with improved seizure outcomes and global functioning compared with placebo regardless of age, number of previous ASMs, and SCN1A status in patients with DS. Fenfluramine was well‐tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. Further studies with larger sample sizes (including adults) and a priori inferential analyses of stratified groups are warranted. Plain Language Summary Patients with Dravet syndrome struggle with seizures and everyday life. In three studies, patients aged 2–18 years received fenfluramine or placebo (sugar pill). Fenfluramine lowered seizures without many side effects. Researchers combined results from these studies to see how fenfluramine worked in different patient groups based on age, number of previous medications, and a gene called SCN1A . They looked at seizure reduction and whether doctors felt patients had improved. In all groups, fenfluramine worked better than placebo, with similar side effects. Researchers believe fenfluramine helped these patients, but some groups were small, so these results need to be confirmed.

Abstract Objective Dravet syndrome (DS) is the prototypic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by drug‐resistant seizures, developmental slowing, and many other morbidities. Detailed characterization of behavioral phenotypes and social–emotional skill development are limited. Methods We prospectively assessed behavioral and social–emotional problems in the ENVISION natural history study (NCT04537832) of children with DS associated with SCN1A pathogenic variants ( SCN1A + DS) enrolled at <5 years of age. Assessments every 3 months for up to 2 years included the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Brief Infant‐Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd Edition (VABS‐3). Results Fifty‐eight children with DS enrolled at 16 sites worldwide. Problematic behaviors—inattention, aggressive or oppositional behaviors, and withdrawn and autistic behaviors—began before age 3 years, became more evident with age, and were clinically significant in many children by age 3–4 years. CBCL Total, Externalizing, and Internalizing Problems T‐scores rose by approximately 3 points per year, and BITSEA Problem scale scores increased by 2.3 points annually ( p = .002). SDQ Hyperactivity scores worsened over time ( p = .013), whereas emotional difficulties remained stable. VABS‐3 Socialization domain scores, which were already more than 1 SD below the normative mean at baseline, decreased further, particularly in younger participants. Correlation analyses showed that poorer communication abilities were associated with increased problematic behaviors ( R = −.55 for CBCL Total Problems and VABS‐3 Communication scores). Mixed‐effects modeling identified age as the strongest predictor of worsening behavioral outcomes. Significance We found that behavioral and social–emotional problems are inherent components of DS that present in toddlerhood and worsen throughout early childhood. This highlights the need to diagnose and manage these issues early. Targeted therapy may alleviate the wide‐ranging morbidities that are intrinsic to DS, including the social–emotional and behavior problems that frequently emerge.

Abstract Objective Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with a high seizure burden and mortality risk. Stiripentol, one of the first DS‐specific therapies, received FDA approval in 2018 but its real‐world use and impact post‐approval in the USA remain insufficiently characterized. The STIRUS study aimed to assess treatment patterns, clinical efficacy, and quality of life outcomes associated with stiripentol in a contemporary US cohort. Methods STIRUS was a retrospective, multicenter chart review of 98 DS patients who initiated stiripentol after FDA approval and were treated for at least 3 months. Data were collected from 10 USA epilepsy centers on seizure types and frequency, status epilepticus (SE), rescue medication use, emergency room visits, and quality of life, at baseline and during the first and final 3 months on stiripentol. Changes over time were assessed using generalized estimating equation models. Results Initiation of stiripentol was associated with a significant reduction in bilateral convulsive seizure frequency (OR = 2.16, p < 0.006) and a nearly 50% decrease in SE episodes (OR = 2.9, p < 0.003). Importantly, there was a marked decline in rescue medication use and seizure‐related hospital visits: the proportion of patients requiring no rescue medications increased from 23% to over 53%, and those needing frequent emergency interventions dropped from 39% at baseline to 14% during the final 3 months. Quality of life improved in more than half of patients and caregivers. Significance The STIRUS study supports the real‐world efficacy of stiripentol in reducing seizure burden and healthcare utilization in DS. Despite its demonstrated benefits and approval for use in infants, stiripentol remains underutilized and often introduced late in the treatment course. Early and broader adoption may help improve clinical outcomes and quality of life in this vulnerable population. Plain Language Summary The STIRUS study found that stiripentol, an anti‐seizure medication specifically approved for Dravet Syndrome, helped reduce seizures and hospital visits for children living with this severe form of epilepsy. Patients had fewer convulsive seizures, needed fewer rescue medicines, and reported better quality of life. Despite these benefits, stiripentol is still not widely used and often started too late in treatment, suggesting earlier use could further improve outcomes.

Abstract Objective Dravet syndrome (DS) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by drug‐resistant seizures and developmental slowing. Although cognitive and executive function deficits have been described, their early trajectory is not well understood. Methods The prospective ENVISION natural history study (NCT04537832) assessed cognitive, executive, and adaptive function in children younger than 5 years of age with SCN1A + DS every 6 months for up to 2 years using Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition (BSID‐III), Wechsler Preschool & Primary Scale of Intelligence, 4th Edition (WPPSI‐IV), Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, 3rd Edition (VABS‐3), Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Preschool Version (BRIEF‐P), and Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI). Results Fifty‐eight children were enrolled, with 47% younger than age 2 years. At least 80% of children did not achieve age‐appropriate milestones. Mean BSID‐III Cognitive raw scores increased minimally, with age‐equivalent gains of only 3 months over 1.5 years. Mean Cognitive Composite scores declined significantly by Month 12 (from 81.6 to 72.2; change: –11.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −15.3 to −6.8), signaling a widening gap compared with neurotypical development. Executive function worsened, with mean BRIEF‐P Global Executive Composite T‐scores increasing by 3.2 points/year. For some participants, scores were 5 standard deviations (SD) above the normative mean, reflecting abilities profoundly below age expectations (bottom .00003% of the population). Adaptive functioning worsened, with mean VABS‐3 Adaptive Behavior Composite decreasing from 78.7 to 68.1 over 1.5 years (change: –9.0, 95% CI: −11.9 to −6.1) and greater decline among children <2 years at enrollment, with scores decreasing by ~15 points (1 SD). Over half of children >3 years could not remove clothing independently; and when placed on a toilet, 48% could not use it. Significance Infants and young children with SCN1A + DS show significant and progressive developmental slowing across several domains, highlighting urgent need for therapies to mitigate the devastating impact on individuals and families.

AbstractObjectiveCurrent diazepam nasal spray labeling requires waiting 4 h before administering a second dose. The objective of the current analyses was to examine safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of second doses of diazepam nasal spray given 0−4 h after the first dose.MethodsTwo datasets were analyzed. The first, a long‐term, repeat‐dose safety study of diazepam nasal spray, compared rates of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and treatment‐related TEAEs for patients receiving ≥1 second dose ≤4 h versus all second doses >4 h after the first. The second was a population pharmacokinetic analysis using data from three phase 1 studies to model drug exposure when a second dose of diazepam nasal spray was administered across multiple time points (1 min−4 h) following the first dose.ResultsIn the repeat‐dose safety study, a second dose of diazepam nasal spray was administered ≤24 h after the first to treat 485 seizure clusters in 79 patients. Rates of TEAEs were similar between patients receiving ≥1 second dose in ≤4 h (89.5%, n = 38) compared with >4–24 h only (80.5%, n = 41). The most common treatment‐related TEAEs were associated with nasal discomfort, which was mild or moderate and transient. There were no reports of respiratory or cardiac depression. The pharmacokinetic simulations of second doses predicted comparable elevations of plasma diazepam concentrations with administrations across a range of intervals after the first dose (1 min−4 h).SignificanceThese data indicate that the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of a second dose of diazepam nasal spray administered within 4 h of the first dose are consistent with those associated with current labeling. This is potentially important for patients with seizure clusters who have a recurrent seizure within 4 h of first treatment and might benefit from immediate retreatment to reduce the risk of progression to status epilepticus.

Abstract Objective An exploratory analysis from a long‐term, phase 3, open‐label, repeat‐dose safety study of diazepam nasal spray for acute treatment of seizure clusters assessed the use of a second dose up to 24 hours after the initial dose and effectiveness in potentially reducing the number of seizures. Methods Seizures and doses were recorded in diaries. Results Of 175 patients enrolled, 163 received ≥1 dose of diazepam nasal spray and were included in the safety population; those patients received a total of 4390 doses for a total of 3853 seizure clusters. Less than half of these patients used a second dose a least once during the study (79 patients [48.5%]), with a total of 485 second doses for seizure clusters (12.6% of all seizure clusters). Among these 79 patients, 33 (41.8%) used only one second dose during the study (range: 1–82). The proportion of seizure clusters treated with a second dose over time was consistently low across 24 h: 0–4 h, 152 (3.9%); 4–6 h, 72 (1.9%); 6–8 h, 39 (1.0%); 8–12 h, 55 (1.4%); 12–16 h, 42 (1.1%); 16–20 h, 42 (1.1%); 20–24 h, 83 (2.2%). Rates of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment‐related TEAEs occurring within 1 day of a second dose were low (15.2% and 5.1%, respectively). Significance Patients with epilepsy may experience seizure clusters lasting up to 24 hours, and little is known about the effectiveness of rescue therapies for that duration. The current labeling of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved outpatient treatments for seizure clusters (rectal diazepam, intranasal midazolam, and diazepam nasal spray) allows for a second dose, if needed, for control. These findings support the safety profile of second doses, and the low use supports the effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray across 24 hours.

Abstract Objective A Phase 3 open‐label safety study (NCT02721069) evaluated long‐term safety of diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco) in patients with epilepsy and frequent seizure clusters. Methods Patients were 6–65 years old with diagnosed epilepsy and seizure clusters despite stable antiseizure medications. The treatment period was 12 months, with study visits at Day 30 and every 60 days thereafter, after which patients could elect to continue. Doses were based on age and weight. Seizure and treatment information was recorded in diaries. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs), nasal irritation, and olfactory changes were recorded. Results Of 163 patients in the safety population, 117 (71.8%) completed the study. Duration of exposure was ≥12 months for 81.6% of patients. There was one death (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy) and one withdrawal owing to a TEAE (major depression), both considered unlikely to be related to treatment. Diazepam nasal spray was administered 4390 times for 3853 seizure clusters, with 485 clusters treated with a second dose within 24 h; 53.4% of patients had monthly average usage of one to two doses, 41.7% two to five doses, and 4.9% more than five doses. No serious TEAEs were considered to be treatment related. TEAEs possibly or probably related to treatment ( n = 30) were most commonly nasal discomfort (6.1%); headache (2.5%); and dysgeusia, epistaxis, and somnolence (1.8% each). Only 13 patients (7.9%) showed nasal irritation, and there were no relevant olfactory changes. The safety profile of diazepam nasal spray was generally similar across subgroups based on age, monthly usage, concomitant benzodiazepine therapy, or seasonal allergy/rhinitis. Significance In this large open‐label safety study, the safety profile of diazepam nasal spray was consistent with the established profile of rectal diazepam, and the high retention rate supports effectiveness in this population. A second dose was used in only 12.6% of seizure clusters.