Citations

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Platelet factor 4-polyanion enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are considered highly sensitive for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), such that current practice guidelines recommend use of ELISA-negative results to exclude HIT. Once HIT is ruled out, alternative, non-heparin-based anticoagulant treatments are ceased, and heparin reintroduction frequently occurs. METHODS Antigen-based and PF4-dependent functional testing were used to study PF4/polyvinyl sulfonate ELISA-negative platelet-activating antibodies in HIT-suspected patients and mice immunized with PF4/heparin. RESULTS Three patients with clinical presentations consistent with HIT tested negative in an ELISA using PF4-polyvinylsulfonate (PF4/PVS), an antigenic target very commonly used for HIT antibody detection. All three patients demonstrated PF4-dependent platelet activation in functional testing that was sensitive to blockade of platelet FcγRIIa receptors and inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, consistent with pathogenic HIT antibodies. Functional testing-based screening of 500 ELISA-negative patients identified three patients whose sera activated platelets in a PF4- and FcγRIIa-dependent manner, and had clinical histories consistent with HIT. Five of the six ELISA-negative HIT patients were re-exposed to heparin, which precipitated a decrease in platelet counts in all re-exposed patients, and one patient developed a new thrombus. To advance the study of ELISA-negative HIT antibodies, mice were immunized with PF4/heparin, and functional and antigenic assays were simultaneously used to successfully identify an ELISA-negative, PF4-dependent platelet-activating murine monoclonal antibody that recapitulated the serological characteristics of ELISA-negative HIT patients. CONCLUSIONS Recognition of ELISA-negative HIT is critical to avoid harm due to the cessation of alternative anticoagulation therapy and re-exposure of these patients to heparin.

Abstract Rationale Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Ground-glass opacities (GGOs) are common in Group 1 PH, but their clinical significance is unclear. Objectives We sought to characterize the clinical features and outcomes of patients with Group 1 PH with and without GGOs in the PVDOMICS study, a prospective multicenter cohort study aimed at deep phenotyping PH. Methods Patients with incident and prevalent PH were enrolled across seven U.S. centers. We included patients with Group 1 PH and excluded those with parenchymal lung disease or without chest imaging, resulting in a cohort of 242 patients. Results GGOs were common among patients with Group 1 PH (43% prevalence), associated with female sex, younger age, prostanoid use, and longer disease duration. GGOs were more common among patients with familial pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary veno-occlusive disease. GGOs were associated with established markers of disease severity, including echocardiographic (right ventricular systolic pressure and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion), biomarkers (N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide), and worse hemodynamics (higher mean pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and pulmonary artery wedge pressure). GGOs were associated with worse transplant-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval = 1.43–4.32; P = 0.001) and had independent prognostic value for predicting transplant-free survival after adjusting for European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society risk stratification (hazard ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval = 1.20–3.99; P = 0.01). Conclusions Overall, GGOs were associated with specific clinical characteristics and disease phenotypes, as well as worse hemodynamics, longer disease duration, prostanoid use, and worse survival. Future studies evaluating the pathophysiology and “omic” correlates of GGOs are warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02980887).

Abstract Thromboembolic complication is common in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), leading to an investigation into the presence of prothrombotic antibodies akin to those found in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). In a study of samples from 130 hospitalized patients, collected 3.6 days after COVID-19 diagnosis, 80% had immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies recognizing complexes of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4; PF4/H), and 41% had antibodies inducing PF4-dependent P-selectin expression in CpG oligodeoxynucleotide–treated normal platelets. Unlike HIT, both PF4/H-reactive and platelet-activating antibodies were found in patients with COVID-19 regardless of recent heparin exposure. Notably, PF4/H-reactive IgG antibodies correlated with those targeting the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 spike protein. Moreover, introducing exogenous RBD to or removing RBD-reactive IgG from COVID-19 plasma or IgG purified from COVID-19 plasma significantly reduced their ability to activate platelets. RBD-specific antibodies capable of platelet activation were cloned from peripheral blood B cells of patients with COVID-19. These antibodies possessed sequence motifs in the heavy-chain complementarity-determining region 3 (HCDR3), resembling those identified in pathogenic HIT antibodies. Furthermore, IgG+ B cells having these HCDR3 signatures were markedly expanded in patients with severe COVID-19. Importantly, platelet-activating antibodies present in patients with COVID-19 were associated with a specific elevation of platelet α-granule proteins in the plasma and showed a positive correlation with markers for inflammation and tissue damage, suggesting a functionality of these antibodies in patients. The demonstration of functional and structural similarities between certain RBD-specific antibodies in patients with COVID-19 and pathogenic antibodies typical of HIT suggests a novel mechanism by which RBD-specific antibodies might contribute to thrombosis in COVID-19.