Citations

3145 Background: SnoRNAs are non-coding RNAs that primarily guide the chemical modification of ribosomal RNA. Emerging evidence suggests snoRNAs play critical roles in cancer, including CRC, by regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis and tumor progression. Aberrant snoRNA expression has been linked to CRC development and poor prognosis, offering potential as diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. We investigated whether the tumor expression levels of 3 types of snoRNAs (SCARNA, SNORA, SNORD) affect treatment response in pts enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (NCT00265850). Methods: 433 mCRC pts treated with bevacizumab (bev, n = 226) or cetuximab (cet, n = 207) in combination with first-line chemotherapy were analyzed. RNA was isolated from FFPE tumor samples and sequenced on the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). 422 snoRNAs were evaluated (23 SCARNA, 140 SNORA, 259 SNORD). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared across tertiles of gene expression (high [H], medium [M], low [L]) by multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, ECOG performance status, tumor side, number of metastatic sites, KRAS , CMS subtypes, and treatment. Interaction tests for the predictive effect (bev vs cet) were performed. P -values were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg approach ( q < 0.05). Results: Only SCARNA21 achieved statistical significance for OS after false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Tumors with H levels of SCARNA21 had shorter survival compared to tumors with M or L expression (median OS 24.4 vs 32.4 vs 33.9 months, respectively; P = 0.0015, q = 0.033), independent of treatment. No snoRNAs achieved FDR significance for PFS. However, several snoRNAs showed significant treatment interactions with biologic agents. SCARNA6-H and SCARNA5-H tumors had longer PFS and OS when treated with cet, but shorter PFS and OS when treated with bev, compared to the M and L expression groups (PFS interaction q = 0.0067 and 0.045, respectively; OS interaction q = 0.022 and 0.034, respectively). SCARNA7 also showed significant treatment interaction for OS, favoring cet in the H expression group ( q = 0.018); the opposite was observed for SNORA63B, SNORA63D, SNORA35B, and SNORA36C ( q = 0.027, 0.027, 0.027 and 0.047, respectively). No significant results were observed for any of the tested SNORDs. Conclusions: SnoRNAs dysregulation affects key pathways such as cell cycle control and immune evasion, making them promising players in CRC biology. Our study highlights the prognostic and predictive potential of specific snoRNAs in mCRC. Notably, high SCARNA21 expression was linked to shorter OS, while SCARNA5 and 6 showed predictive value for treatment response, indicating their potential for guiding treatment decisions. Further validation is needed to confirm these findings, and mechanistic studies are warranted.

3128 Background: LncRNAs have emerged as key regulators of cancer progression and therapeutic responses. In CRC, several lncRNAs have been implicated in modulating tumor growth, metastasis and treatment resistance by interacting with critical tumorigenic pathways. Here, we investigate the potential prognostic and predictive value of lncRNA expression in patients (pts) with mCRC enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (NCT00265850) trial. Methods: We analyzed 433 mCRC pts treated with either bevacizumab (bev, n = 226) or cetuximab (cet, n = 207) plus first-line chemotherapy. Tumor RNA expression (Illumina HiSeq 2500) of 13 candidate lncRNAs (SNHG11, HOTAIR, FGF14-AS2, H19, YWHAE, NEAT1, MIR100HG, UCA1, LINC00973, SLCO4A1-AS1, POU5F1P4, MALAT1, HCG18) was explored. Median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS) in months (mo) were compared between pts grouped by tertiles (low [L] vs medium [M] vs high [H]) of gene expression. Likelihood ratio tests, hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were computed from multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, sex, ECOG PS, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, KRAS , Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS), and treatment. Results: Overall, SNHG11 was strongly associated with OS and PFS after adjusting for multiple tests (Benjamini-Hochberg False Discovery Rate < 0.05). High SNHG11 expression (H group, n = 144) was associated with improved mPFS (H: 14.3 vs M: 11.2 vs L: 8.3 mo; p = 0.038) and mOS (H: 39.6 vs M: 31.1 vs L: 20.5 mo; p = 0.033) in the combined treatment analysis. Among cet-treated pts, SNHG11-H showed a numerically longer mPFS (H: 14.2 vs M: 11.1 vs L: 7.6 mo; p = 0.19) and significantly longer mOS (H: 41.1 vs M: 32.4 vs L: 14.3 mo; p = 0.012). In contrast, no statistically significant OS or PFS differences were observed in bev-treated pts. SNHG11-H tumors had a significant OS benefit from cet compared to bev (mOS 41.1 vs 36.5 mo, respectively; p = 0.016), with a nominally significant treatment interaction observed for OS (p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed in the L or M expression groups. Additional analyses showed that SNHG11 expression was high in the CMS2 (canonical) subtype and substantially lower in CMS1 (immune). Conclusions: LncRNA SNHG11 plays a significant role in CRC progression and metastasis via tumorigenic pathways, including c-Myc and HIF-1α. Moreover, elevated circulating SNHG11 levels show promise as a non-invasive biomarker for early CRC detection. In CALGB/SWOG 80405, high SNHG11 expression correlated with improved PFS and OS, particularly in cet-treated pts, supporting its role as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. Its strong association with CMS2 aligns with its reported involvement in c-Myc-driven pathways. Further validation is needed to confirm the clinical utility of this biomarker and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

Abstract Background Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response have emerged as potential prognostic indicators in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their associations with overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and postprogression survival in patients receiving anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies or bevacizumab remain unclear. Methods We analyzed 3219 treatment-naive patients with RAS wild-type metastatic CRC from 8 randomized studies (CRYSTAL, OPUS, PRIME, CAIRO2, CALGB80405, WJOG4407G, ATOM, PARADIGM) in the Aid and Research in Digestive Cancerology database. Early tumor shrinkage was defined as a 20% or more reduction in tumor size at 8 ± 2 weeks, whereas depth of response was assessed by maximum tumor shrinkage at nadir. Cox regression models evaluated the associations of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response with overall survival, PFS, and postprogression survival, adjusting for confounders. A 2-sided test was conducted with a significance level of .05. Results Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response substantially stratified overall survival, PFS, and postprogression survival outcomes across all treatment groups. Early tumor shrinkage positivity was associated with improved overall survival, PFS, and postprogression survival in anti-EGFR and bevacizumab-based therapies, with a trend toward better outcomes in the anti-EGFR group. The depth of response analysis revealed optimal cutoff values of 0.55 for anti-EGFR–based therapy and 0.47 for bevacizumab-based therapy to achieve a median overall survival of approximately 32 months. Conclusions Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response serve as valuable prognostic markers in RAS wild-type metastatic CRC, particularly for patients treated with anti-EGFR antibodies. These findings highlight the potential role of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in guiding treatment strategies and improving outcomes for patients with CRC.

224 Background: Metabolic pathways are reprogrammed during CRC development, leading to increased glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and fatty acid synthesis. Understanding the impact of metabolic reprogramming on treatment outcomes is paramount. Hence, we investigated whether the tumor gene expression of 4 selected major metabolic genes ( PKM, SLC2A1 , SLC16A1 , and CAV1 ) could affect treatment response in pts enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial. Methods: 433 mCRC pts treated with either bevacizumab (bev, n = 226) or cetuximab (cet, n = 207) in combination with first-line chemotherapy were analyzed. RNA was isolated from FFPE tumor samples and sequenced on the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between groups of pts categorized by tertiles of gene expression (high [H], medium [M] and low [L]). Logrank P -values provide a non-parametric unadjusted assessment of differences. Likelihood ratio tests (LRT) were computed from multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, sex, ECOG, tumor side, number of metastatic sites, KRAS , CMS, and treatment. Results: PKM gene expression was associated with cet treatment outcomes with PKM- low tumors showing significantly longer PFS and OS (median PFS: 14.3 vs 9.8 vs 8.1 months, L vs M vs H, P < 0.0001, LRT P = 0.011; median OS: 45.9 vs 31.2 vs 20.9 months, P < 0.0001, LRT P = 0.12). Low SLC2A1 was also associated with longer OS in cet-treated pts (32.4 vs 35.8 vs 25.2 months, P = 0.02, LRT P < 0.0001). Similar results were observed in bev-treated pts where low SLC2A1 expressing tumors had longer OS (37.4 vs 26.1 vs 29 months, P = 0.037, LRT P = 0.069) and a non-significant trend for longer PFS (13.1 vs 11 vs 9.5 months, P = 0.076). CAV1 low gene expression was associated with longer OS in cet-treated pts (37.4 vs 34 vs 21.5 months, P = 0.0048, LRT P = 0.013), while no significant associations were found in bev-treated (interaction LRT P = 0.0009). No significant results were observed for SLC16A1 . Conclusions: The intratumoral expression of metabolic genes was prognostic and predictive in mCRC pts treated with first-line therapy. GLUT1 (encoded by SLC2A1 ) and PKM2 (encoded by PKM ) promote aerobic glycolysis of cancer cells, known as Warburg effect, supporting rapid cell proliferation and survival. CAV1 has been shown to be involved in mitochondrial bioenergetics and fatty acid metabolism and to play either a tumor suppressor or oncogenic role depending on the cancer type and stage. Lower expression of SLC2A1 and PKM was associated with improved survival and increased benefit from cet treatment in our cohort. Low CAV1 expression was also associated with increase survival suggesting a cancer-promoting role in mCRC. Our results suggest that targeting cancer cell metabolism through novel inhibitors of the aforementioned pathways may be a promising therapeutic strategy.

269 Background: Sirtuins (SIRT1-7) are class III histone deacetylases with different roles in CRC as tumor suppressive and oncogenic, mainly influencing proliferation, migration, invasion, DNA damage and chemoresistance. In the present study, we explored the association between tumor gene expression of sirtuins and first-line treatment outcomes in mCRC pts. Methods: We evaluated the impact of the tumor gene expression of sirtuin genes ( SIRT1 -7) on treatment outcomes (overall survival: OS; progression free survival: PFS) in 433 pts enrolled in the randomized, phase III CALGB/SWOG 80405 (NCT00265850) trial. RNA extracted from FFPE tumor samples was sequenced using the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). Subgroup analyses were based on treatment (bevacizumab [bev] (N = 226) vs. cetuximab [cet] (N = 207)). For each gene, expression was divided into tertiles of high, medium and low. The associations between tumor gene expression and outcomes (PFS and OS) were assessed using log-rank test in univariate analysis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals while adjusting for baseline characteristics. Treatment-gene interactions were analyzed using the likelihood ratio test. Results: Of the seven genes analyzed, SIRT3 high was associated with both longer PFS (HR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.46-0.74], P < 0.001) and OS (HR:0.64 [95% CI: 0.50-0.83], P = 0.002) overall. Treatment-gene interaction testing found significant interactions for SIRT1 and SIRT5 with PFS ( P values: 0.021 and 0.016, respectively) and OS ( P values: 0.038 and 0.014, respectively) with targeted therapies (bev vs. cet). Multivariate analysis showed SIRT1 high associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.42-0.89], P = 0.014) and OS (HR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.40-0.89], P = 0.036) in cet-treated pts; in contrast with shorter observed PFS (HR: 1.38 [95% CI: 0.96-1.99], P = 0.22) and OS (HR: 1.31 [95% CI: 0.90-1.93], P = 0.23) in bev-treated pts. SIRT5 high showed similar results and associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.45-0.91], P = 0.039) and OS (HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.39-0.83], P = 0.013) in cet-treated pts, with no similar associations in bev-treated pts. Conclusions: Our results highlight a potential role for SIRT3 as prognostic and, SIRT1 and SIRT5 as predictive biomarkers for first-line treatment in mCRC, with differential effects based on targeted agents. Significant interaction favored cet treatment in SIRT1 high and SIRT5 high tumors. However, previous reports suggest an opposite role of SIRT5 that has been linked to chemotherapy and/or cet resistance in CRC via the inactivation of succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit A. Therefore, further studies are warranted to dissect the mechanism behind the interaction of SIRT5 with cetuximab activity and establish the potential of targeting SIRT1/5 in CRC.

254 Background: SLFN11 was recently identified as a dominant determinant of response to DNA-damaging anticancer agents. Several studies showed SLFN11 expression led to better sensitivity to topoisomerase inhibitors and PARP inhibitors. However, clinical evidence in mCRC has been lacking. Methods: Two independent cohorts (CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial and a real-world patient [Caris CODEai] cohort) were included in this study. Patients were stratified into SLFN11 -high and -low groups based on the median SLFN11 gene expression levels. Survival outcomes were compared between SLFN11 -high and SLFN11 -low in irinotecan-treated and oxaliplatin-treated patients. Median time was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models were used for covariate adjustment. Endpoints of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial cohort, 433 patients were included (110 treated with FOLFIRI-based chemotherapy and 323 treated with FOLFOX-based chemotherapy). In patients treated with FOLFIRI-based chemotherapy, SLFN11 -low patients exhibited numerically better PFS (median PFS, 13.4 vs 11.2 months, log-rank p = 0.03, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.39, p = 0.50) and OS (median OS, 39.6 vs 30.3 months, log-rank p = 0.02, adjusted HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.46-1.16, p = 0.19) compared to SLFN11 -high patients. In patients treated with FOLFOX-based chemotherapy, SLFN11 -low patients exhibited numerically better PFS (median PFS 11.2 vs 9.8 months, log-rank p = 0.03, adjusted HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.65-1.05, p = 0.12) and OS (31.1 vs 26.1 months, log-rank p = 0.07, adjusted HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.65-1.08, p = 0.16) compared to SLFN11 -high patients. No significant interaction was observed between treatment and SLFN11 expression in terms of PFS ( p = 0.69) and OS ( p = 0.44). In the Caris CODEai cohort, a better OS in SLFN11 -low patients than in SLFN11 -high patients was observed in irinotecan-treated patients ( N = 2906) (median OS, 25.5 vs 21.7 months, HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-1.00, p = 0.048). However, no significant difference in OS between SLFN11 -low and SLFN11-high was observed in oxaliplatin-treated patients ( N = 4428) (median OS, 39.5 vs 35.8 months, HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.90-1.06, p = 0.56). Conclusions: Low SLFN11 expression showed a potential for better prognosis in mCRC patients receiving irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapies. These findings are not consistently aligned with preclinical data and clinical evidence in other cancer types previously reported. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the biological role and clinical implication of SLFN11 in mCRC.

285 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown limited efficacy in colorectal cancer (CRC) outside of mismatch repair (MMR) deficient/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. Most CRC cases are MMR proficient /microsatellite stable and demonstrate resistance to ICIs, attributed to the tumor microenvironment. Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF1R), a regulator of tumor-associated macrophages, has emerged as a potential target due to its association with poor prognosis in CRC. Methods: Data from 433 metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were analyzed. CSF1R RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples and sequenced. Patients were divided into tertiles of CSF1R expression (high, medium, low). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on liver metastases, treatment type (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI), and MSI status. Results: Low CSF1R expression (CSF1R-L) was associated with significantly better survival outcomes. Median PFS was 12.9 months for CSF1R-L, compared to 11.2 and 9.2 months for CSF1R-M and CSF1R-H (p = 0.003). Median OS was 35.8 months for CSF1R-L versus 32.5 and 24.4 months for CSF1R-M and CSF1R-H (p = 0.00086). Stratification by liver metastases showed that CSF1R-L remained a strong prognostic factor only in patients with liver metastases. There were no significant survival differences based on CSF1R expression in bevacizumab-treated patients. However, in cetuximab-treated patients, CSF1R-L tumors had significantly longer PFS (12.9 vs 8.8 months, p = 0.037) and OS (35.8 vs 21.4 months, p = 0.002) than CSF1R-H tumors. Similarly, in FOLFOX-treated patients, CSF1R-L tumors showed longer PFS and OS (p = 0.018 and p = 0.013, respectively), and in FOLFIRI-treated patients, OS was significantly longer for CSF1R-L tumors (42.2 vs 24.7 months, p = 0.022) than CSF1R-H tumors. Conclusions: Our data suggests that CSF1R expression may serve as a prognostic biomarker in CRC, with lower expression potentially linked to improved survival, particularly in patients with liver metastases. These findings warrant further investigation of CSF1R as a possible prognostic and predictive biomarker, as well as a potential therapeutic target in CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT00265850 .

PURPOSE This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of onvansertib, a polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) inhibitor, in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) + bevacizumab for the second-line treatment of KRAS -mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled patients with KRAS -mutated mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil with or without bevacizumab. Patients received onvansertib (15 mg/m 2 once daily on days 1-5 and 15-19 of a 28-day cycle) and FOLFIRI + bevacizumab (days 1 and 15). The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and tolerability. Translational and preclinical studies were conducted in KRAS -mutant CRC. RESULTS Among the 53 patients treated, the confirmed ORR was 26.4% (95% CI, 15.3 to 40.3). The median DOR was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.4 to not reached). Grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 62% of patients. A post hoc analysis revealed that patients with no prior bevacizumab treatment had a significantly higher ORR and longer PFS compared with patients with prior bevacizumab treatment: ORR of 76.9% versus 10.0% (odds ratio of 30.0, P < .001) and median PFS of 14.9 months versus 6.6 months (hazard ratio of 0.16, P < .001). Our translational findings support that prior bevacizumab exposure contributes to onvansertib resistance. Preclinically, we showed that onvansertib inhibited the hypoxia pathway and exhibited robust antitumor activity in combination with bevacizumab through the inhibition of angiogenesis. CONCLUSION Onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI + bevacizumab showed significant activity in the second-line treatment of patients with KRAS -mutant mCRC, particularly in patients with no prior bevacizumab treatment. These findings led to the evaluation of the combination in the first-line setting (ClinicalTrails.gov identifier: NCT06106308 ).

Abstract Background A plant-based diet is associated with better survival among patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), but its association in metastatic CRC is unknown. Methods Using an National Cancer Institute–sponsored trial (CALGB/SWOG 80405), we included 1284 patients who completed validated food frequency questionnaires at the initiation of metastatic CRC treatment. We calculated 3 indices: overall plant-based diet index (PDI), which emphasized consumption of all plant foods while reducing animal food intake; healthful plant-based diet index (hPDI), which emphasized consumption of healthful plant foods such as whole grains, fruits, and vegetables; and unhealthful plant-based diet index (uPDI), which emphasized consumption of less healthful plant foods such as fruit juices, refined grains, and sugar-sweetened beverages. We estimated the associations of 3 indices (quintiles) with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results We observed 1100 deaths and 1204 progression events (median follow-up = 6.1 years). Compared with the lowest quintile, patients in the highest quintile of PDI had significantly better survival (hazard ratio [HR] for OS = 0.76 [0.62-0.94], Ptrend = .004; PFS = 0.81 [0.66-0.99], Ptrend = .09). Similar findings were observed for hPDI (HR for OS = 0.81 [0.65-1.01], Ptrend = .053; PFS = 0.80 [0.65-0.98], Ptrend = .04), whereas uPDI was not associated with worse survival (HR for OS = 1.16 [0.94-1.43], Ptrend = .21; PFS = 1.12 [0.92-1.36], Ptrend = .42). Conclusions Our study suggests that a plant-based diet, especially when rich in healthful plant foods, is associated with better survival among patients with metastatic CRC. The cause of survival benefits warrants further investigation.