Back to Authors

Nishikawa, Tomomi

Mayo Clinic

National Cancer Center Hospital East

Citations 2

Clinical impact of R0 resection after chemotherapy in initially unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of the ARCAD database.
Ando, Koji, Misumi, Toshihiro, Bando, Hideaki, Nishikawa, Tomomi, Maughan, Tim, Díaz-Rubio, E E, Sugihara, Kenichi , Maehara, Yoshihiko, Andre, Thierry, Shi, Qian, Gramont, Aimery De, Yoshino, Takayuki, Oki, Eiji, Ando, Koji , Misumi, Toshihiro , Bando, Hideaki , Nishikawa, Tomomi, Maehara, Yoshihiko , André, Thierry , Shi, Qian , Gramont, Aimery de , Yoshino, Takayuki , Oki, Eiji

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2026 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2026.44.16_suppl.e15557 Get It

e15557 Background: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), systemic chemotherapy can enable conversion surgery in a subset of patients with initially unresectable disease. Although R0 resection considered a key determinant of long-term survival, its clinical impact across heterogeneous trial populations and treatment strategies remains insufficiently defined. We aimed to clarify the survival benefit of R0 resection after first-line chemotherapy using large-scale individual patient data. Methods: Using the ARCAD database, which comprises 67 randomized clinical trials and approximately 47,000 patients, we conducted a pooled analysis of individual patient data from six first-line randomized clinical trials (COIN, COIN-B, 03-TTD-01, ATOM, SOFT and PARADIGM) for which data on R0 resection were available. Patients with initially unresectable mCRC and available surgical data were categorized into three groups: R0 resection, non-R0 resection, and no surgery. All R0 cases were included, comprising liver-only, lung-only, combined liver and lung metastases, and peritoneal dissemination or other metastatic sites. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and performance status. Pre-specified subgroup analyses examined the consistency of outcomes according to tumor response, metastatic site, primary tumor sidedness, RAS status, and targeted therapy class. Results: Among 4,445 eligible patients, 263 underwent R0 , 233 underwent non-R0 resection, and 3,949 received no surgical intervention. The R0 resection group comprised patients with liver-only metastases (n = 176), lung-only metastases (n = 23), and combined liver and lung metastases (n = 27). R0 resection was associated with significantly improved OS and PFS compared with both non-R0 resection and no surgery. These survival benefits were consistently observed across key clinical subgroups, including patients achieving complete or partial response to chemotherapy, those with liver or lung metastases, left- and right-sided primary tumors, and both RAS wild-type and mutant disease. Importantly, the benefit of R0 resection was maintained irrespective of anti-EGFR– or anti-VEGF–based first-line therapy. Conclusions: R0 resection following systemic chemotherapy is strongly associated with durable survival benefits in patients with initially unresectable mCRC across diverse clinical settings. These findings support the pivotal role of conversion strategies and highlight the importance of multidisciplinary evaluation to identify appropriate candidates for curative-intent resection.
Associations between early tumor shrinkage/depth of response and survival from the ARCAD database
Bando, Hideaki , Takeda, Yuriko , Misumi, Toshihiro , Nishikawa, Tomomi, Wakabayashi, Masashi , Yamazaki, Kentaro , Oki, Eiji , Douillard, Jean‐Yves , Punt, Cornelis J. A. , Koopman, Miriam , Bokemeyer, Carsten , Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Maehara, Yoshihiko , Gramont, Aimery de, Yoshino, Takayuki , Van Cutsem, Eric , Venook, Alan P , Lenz, Heinz-Josef , Maehara, Yoshihiko , André, Thierry , Shi, Qian , De Gramont, Aimery , Yoshino, Takayuki , Oki, Eiji , Bando, Hideaki , Cutsem, Eric Van , Venook, Alan P. , André, Thierry , Shi, Qian , Gramont, Aimery de

JNCI Cancer Spectrum | April 26, 2025 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jncics/pkaf042 Get It

Abstract Background Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response have emerged as potential prognostic indicators in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). However, their associations with overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS), and postprogression survival in patients receiving anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies or bevacizumab remain unclear. Methods We analyzed 3219 treatment-naive patients with RAS wild-type metastatic CRC from 8 randomized studies (CRYSTAL, OPUS, PRIME, CAIRO2, CALGB80405, WJOG4407G, ATOM, PARADIGM) in the Aid and Research in Digestive Cancerology database. Early tumor shrinkage was defined as a 20% or more reduction in tumor size at 8 ± 2 weeks, whereas depth of response was assessed by maximum tumor shrinkage at nadir. Cox regression models evaluated the associations of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response with overall survival, PFS, and postprogression survival, adjusting for confounders. A 2-sided test was conducted with a significance level of .05. Results Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response substantially stratified overall survival, PFS, and postprogression survival outcomes across all treatment groups. Early tumor shrinkage positivity was associated with improved overall survival, PFS, and postprogression survival in anti-EGFR and bevacizumab-based therapies, with a trend toward better outcomes in the anti-EGFR group. The depth of response analysis revealed optimal cutoff values of 0.55 for anti-EGFR–based therapy and 0.47 for bevacizumab-based therapy to achieve a median overall survival of approximately 32 months. Conclusions Early tumor shrinkage and depth of response serve as valuable prognostic markers in RAS wild-type metastatic CRC, particularly for patients treated with anti-EGFR antibodies. These findings highlight the potential role of early tumor shrinkage and depth of response in guiding treatment strategies and improving outcomes for patients with CRC.