Citations

The adult chronic pancreatitis (CP) working group, formed at the inception of the Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer (CPDPC), has developed a robust framework and infrastructure to conduct clinical, translational, and mechanistic studies of CP. At its core is PRO spective Evaluation of C hronic Pancreatitis for E pid E miologic and Translational Stu D ies (PROCEED), the first longitudinal cohort study of CP in US adults, launched in 2017. PROCEED has developed a well-annotated clinical data set of over 2000 deeply-phenotyped participants, a biorepository and an imaging repository. Investigators have published promising data on blood-based and imaging-based biomarkers of CP diagnosis and pain, which are awaiting validation. Clinical observations include classification of patients into mechanism-based pain phenotypes using responses to PROMIS questionnaires, prevalence and predictors of opioid use, prevalence of psychological comorbidity, and osteopathy in CP patients. Pilot clinical trials have evaluated the effect of oral indomethacin on pancreatic fluid prostaglandin E2 levels and Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic pain. Results of pilot trials have led to an ongoing definitive randomized clinical trial for CBT. The rich environment and resources have facilitated mentorship and academic development of many early-stage investigators. Investigators outside of the consortium have opportunities for collaboration. In the next 5 years, the working group plans to further strengthen the research platform, complete primary and key secondary analyses of PROCEED and ancillary studies, continue efforts to develop biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of CP, and complete ongoing clinical trials to address unanswered questions in the field.

Importance Stool metabolites influencing gut motility and sensation may contribute to fecal incontinence (FI). Objective The objective of this study was to test whether FI is associated with higher levels of butyrate and Clostridiales taxa in stool. Study Design Stool metabolites and microbiota were compared between 96 women with FI and 42 controls. FI frequency and subtype (urgency vs insensible) were measured using a 14-day bowel diary, St. Mark’s score, and the Accidental Bowel Leakage questionnaire. Metabolite analysis included targeted analysis (8 short-chain fatty acids including butyrate, 17 bile acids, and 8 tryptophan derivatives) and untargeted analysis. Stool microbiota were characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Multivariable and exploratory multiomics factor analysis were performed with statistical significance defined as false discovery rate (FDR) ≤0.10. Results The FI group had a higher proportion of Bristol stool types 2 and 6 than controls ( P = 0.005). The mean number of leaks for the FI group was 1.7 ± 1.7 per day, 38% had urgency FI, and 39% had insensible FI. There was no significant difference between groups in butyrate levels and Clostridiales taxa. Multiomics analysis identified glycerolipids (monoacylglycerols and diacylglycerols) associated with FI (FDR = 0.08). In addition, insensible FI was associated with glycerolipids, long-chain saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, phospholipids, and dipeptides (FDR = 0.08–0.09). The top weighted microbiota associated with these metabolites were Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae; however, these taxa were not directly associated with FI. Conclusion Butyrate and Clostridiales were not associated with FI. Novel stool metabolite signatures were identified, suggesting new biological pathways and potential therapeutic targets for FI.

Importance Preoperative and perioperative nivolumab improve event-free survival in resectable non–small cell lung cancer. The role of adjuvant nivolumab after upfront surgery is unknown. Objective To determine whether adjuvant nivolumab improves disease-free survival and overall survival in patients with resected non–small cell lung cancer with any tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and in those with at least 50% PD-L1 expression. Design, Setting, and Participants This open-label, randomized phase 3 study enrolled participants from May 2016 through September 2019, with median follow-up of 72.6 months at the data cutoff in December 2025. The study was conducted at 378 centers in the US National Clinical Trials Network. Patients were identified through a screening trial. Those with resected tumors at least 4 cm and/or who were lymph node positive (N1/N2) were eligible for inclusion after completion of planned standard adjuvant therapy if the tumor was adenocarcinoma without sensitizing sequence variants in EGFR and ALK or squamous cell carcinoma. Intervention Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive nivolumab 480 mg intravenously every 4 weeks for up to 1 year or standard care observation. Main Outcomes and Measures Co–primary end points were disease-free survival in the intention-to-treat population and in those with tumoral PD-L1 expression at least 50%. Overall survival was examined if the corresponding test of disease-free survival was statistically significant. Results A total of 466 patients (median age, 66 years; 241 [52%] male) were assigned to receive nivolumab and 469 (median age, 67 years; 245 [52%] male) to undergo standard care observation. The median duration of follow-up was 72.6 months. The trial was stopped for futility at 75% information. In the intention-to-treat population, median disease-free survival was 71.3 months with nivolumab and 68.8 months with observation (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.97 [97% CI, 0.79-1.20]; [95% CI, 0.81-1.17]; 1-sided P = .39). In the subset of participants with PD-L1 of at least 50%, median disease-free survival was 89.8 months with nivolumab and 78.5 months with observation (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.86 [98% CI, 0.55-1.34]; [95% CI, 0.59-1.25]; 1-sided P = .22). Conclusions and Relevance Adjuvant nivolumab was not associated with improved disease-free survival in patients with resected non–small cell lung cancer without sensitizing EGFR and ALK alterations when given after planned adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02595944

9007 Background: Since transition to virtual interviews, application and interview inflation have increased the work burden of GME recruitment. In 2021, AAMC ERAS implemented a process that allows applicants to assign signals to top programs of interest. There is a paucity of guidance on optimal use of ERAS signals (ES), resulting in apprehension and uncertainty amongst applicants and program directors (PD). For the 2026 ERAS cycle, Hematology/Oncology programs (HOP) had the option to participate in ES, in which applicants are provided 5 gold (G) signals and 15 silver (S) signals. First-hand knowledge on how ES was utilized by HOP, as well as PD perceptions about ES, may guide best practices on ES. Methods: During the ASCO Oncology Training Program Leadership Retreat in November 2025, an anonymous survey, assessing HOP utilization and perception of ES, and the impact of ES on recruitment practices, was launched. One PD from each HOP was invited to complete the survey while onsite. Results: 88 HOP (46% of ACGME HOP) are represented. 97% (n=85) utilized ES. Of HOP who used ES, 74% are academic. 32% are small (1-9 fellows), 43% medium (10-19 fellows), and 25% large (20+ fellows). 79% received 400+ applications. 69% reviewed applications without signals but gave higher consideration to signaled applicants. 25% only reviewed applications with signals. 28% used ES when creating rank list; 45% think ES utilization is appropriate during ranking. 85% reported ES did not alter their approach to applicants requiring visa sponsorship. 78% felt ES made the interview selection process easier. 66% were more satisfied with this year’s recruitment process compared to years without ES. The most requested change to ES was reduction of allowed signals, especially silver. 98% will use ES next year. Conclusions: Despite limited knowledge on ES impact on recruitment, nearly all surveyed HOP participated in ES this past year and will continue. Most HOP view ES positively though many desire changes, particularly with the number of signals. Most HOP consider all applications regardless of ES. However, some HOP with larger applicant pool are using ES as inclusion criteria for interview consideration. Signals are a strong predictor for interview invitation when internal selection criteria are met. The “borderline” applicant may be the greatest benefactor from ES, viewed similarly to the non-signaled applicant who meets internal selection criteria. Sharing PD perspectives and real-life data from this year’s ES process breeds opportunities for further improvement and increased confidence with ES. Likelihood HOP offer interview invitation based on quality of application and signals (%, n=85). Internal Selection Criteria Signal Extremely Likely Likely Neutral Unlikely Extremely Unlikely Met G 73 22 5 0 0 S 42 47 8 2 1 None 8 27 24 22 19 Nearly met G 4 35 39 19 3 S 0 9 52 28 11 Not met G 0 2 12 41 45 S 1 1 6 30 62

631 Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) women with breast cancer who have not completed their desired childbearing pre-diagnosis may be more likely to decline adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) and/or to temporarily or permanently stop ET to pursue pregnancy. Fertility counseling and use of fertility preservation strategies (e.g., oocyte/embryo cryopreservation) might impact these decisions. Methods: In the Valuing Opinions and Insights from Cancer Experiences (VOICE) Study, we investigated whether use of fertility preservation strategies were associated with ET initiation and early discontinuation amongst AYAs with fertility concerns. Eligible females were diagnosed with stage 1–3 estrogen-receptor positive breast cancer at age 15-39 during 2013-2022 and responded to a survey in 2023-2024. Those who reported that they had not completed their desired family size or had been unsure about having completed their desired family size at the time of their cancer diagnosis were categorized as having had fertility concerns. ET initiation was defined as 2+ ET prescription fills within 18 months after diagnosis. Among ET initiators, we assessed early discontinuation (defined as lack of ET prescription fill over any 180 day period until 5 years after their first ET fill date). Due to inadequate power, we did not model the relationship between oocyte/embryo cryopreservation and ET initiation. However, we did have power to assess the association between oocyte/embryo cryopreservation and ET discontinuation using multivariable Cox regression to calculate Hazard Ratios (HR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). HRs for discontinuation were adjusted for age at diagnosis, stage, study site, diagnosis year, income, and children before diagnosis (yes/no). Results: Among 518 AYA breast cancer survivors, 56% (N = 290) had fertility concerns at diagnosis. Of these 290, 41% had 1+ child before diagnosis, 90% received fertility counseling, 27% froze eggs or embryos, and 10% had 1+ child after diagnosis. The majority (89%) initiated ET. Among the 32 who did not initiate ET, 7 (22%) reported that fertility concerns impacted that decision. Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation was used by 26% of ET initiators and 34% of ET non-initiators. Among the 258 ET initiators, 89 (35%) discontinued ET early. Compared to those who did not use fertility preservation strategies, patients who froze oocytes/embryos were more likely to discontinue ET (HR 1.89; 95% CI 1.18–3.05). Among those who discontinued ET, 19% had 1+ child after diagnosis (compared to 2% among those who did not discontinue ET). Conclusions: This study confirmed prior studies showing that many AYAs with breast cancer have fertility concerns, and these concerns may impact decisions about ET. In our analysis, those who cryopreserved oocytes/embryos were more likely to discontinue ET early, and a higher proportion who discontinued ET had 1+ live birth after breast cancer.