Citations

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects all brain cells and has complex genomic and immunological alterations. Previous research discovered missense AD risk or protective variants in microglial genes ABI3 and PLCG2, respectively. Expression levels of these genes are altered in AD and can influence microglial function. This study aims to uncover protective, and risk microglial molecular signatures associated with these variants to determine their role in microglial subtypes and states in AD by single cell expression and functional studies. Method We generated microglia‐enriched snRNAseq data from donors harboring either AD protective PLCG2 or AD risk ABI3 missense mutations, or neither mutation. After standard snRNAseq QC, we performed differential expressed gene (DEG) analysis of all microglial cells between variant carriers and non‐carriers using MAST. We defined protective signature as genes that are both down in ABI3 and up in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. In contrast, risk signature genes are up in ABI3 and down in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. We investigated the conservation of protective and risk signatures across multiple datasets, including scRNAseq data from iPSC‐derived microglia cells carrying PLCG2 protective variant, snRNAseq data from AD‐resilient donors, and data from AD and other diagnostic groups across multiple brain regions sourced from external datasets. Result We obtained snRNAseq profiles of 35,000 microglia from AD variant carriers. Our DEG analysis among all microglia cells provided 227 microglial protective and 293 risk signature genes defined by these variants. Using integrated analysis of multiple internal and external datasets, we further narrowed down these signatures. We determined that these high‐confidence protective signature genes are downregulated in early AD, upregulated in late AD brains and positively‐correlated with protective variant load in in vitro models. In contrast, risk signature genes are upregulated in early AD, downregulated in late AD and resilient donors. Risk signature expression is decreased with protective PLCG2 variant load, and altered with Aβ treatment in in vitro models. Conclusion Our study uncovers microglia specific protective and risk signatures associated with AD using sn/scRNAseq datasets from multiple sources and models. These findings nominate novel immune targets and pathways with implications for microglial function in health and disease, and ultimately therapeutic potential.

Abstract Background Individual environmental exposures, the exposome, can play an influential role in the development and progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as AD. The protein components of the main AD neuropathologies, amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), can be measured using immunohistochemical and biochemical approaches. The main genetic risk factor for AD is the APOE e4 allele. APOE levels can also be measured in the brain. We hypothesize that social determinants of health, specifically alcohol and tobacco consumption, and the area deprivation index (ADI), could play a considerable role in severity of neuropathology and brain biochemical phenotypes of AD. Method We evaluated 478 neuropathologically characterized AD donors, from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank. 469 samples had available biochemical measures (APOE, Aβ40, Aβ42, tau, and phospho‐tau (Thr231)), collected across three isolated fractions (soluble (TBS), membrane‐bound (TX), and insoluble (FA)) of the superior temporal gyrus. Exposome variables were extracted from the available records. ADI from the Neighborhood Atlas® version from the year 2015 was obtained from de‐identified addresses. ADI, smoking and alcohol were available for 263 of these donors and were examined for association with biochemical measures using linear regression adjusting for age at death and sex. Result Higher ADI levels representing neighborhoods with increased deprivation, were nominally associated (β=0.006, p =0.01) with soluble levels of APOE. Alcohol consumption was associated with lower levels of membrane bound APOE (β=‐0.23, p =0.04). Analysis with neuropathological variables including CAA ( N =454), Braak ( N =454), Thal ( N =454), Hippocampal sclerosis ( N =453), Lewy bodies ( N =455) will also be performed. Conclusion Different components of the social exposome may impact levels of core AD proteins. Additional analyses in expanded cohorts to further explore the associations with neuropathology are ongoing. We expect that understanding how the social exposome impacts specific aspects of neurodegenerative diseases will provide key insights into underlying, potentially modifiable, mechanisms of disease.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) affects all brain cells and has complex genomic and immunological alterations. Previous research discovered missense AD risk or protective variants in microglial genes ABI3 and PLCG2 , respectively. Expression levels of these genes are altered in AD and can influence microglial function. This study aims to uncover protective, and risk microglial molecular signatures associated with these variants to determine their role in microglial subtypes and states in AD by single cell expression and functional studies. Method We generated microglia‐enriched snRNAseq data from donors harboring either AD protective PLCG2 or AD risk ABI3 missense mutations, or neither mutation. After standard snRNAseq QC, we performed differential expressed gene (DEG) analysis of all microglial cells between variant carriers and non‐carriers using MAST. We defined protective signature as genes that are both down in ABI3 and up in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. In contrast, risk signature genes are up in ABI3 and down in PLCG2 mutation‐carriers. We investigated the conservation of protective and risk signatures across multiple datasets, including scRNAseq data from iPSC‐derived microglia cells carrying PLCG2 protective variant, snRNAseq data from AD‐resilient donors, and data from AD and other diagnostic groups across multiple brain regions sourced from external datasets. Result We obtained snRNAseq profiles of 35,000 microglia from AD variant carriers. Our DEG analysis among all microglia cells provided 227 microglial protective and 293 risk signature genes defined by these variants. Using integrated analysis of multiple internal and external datasets, we further narrowed down these signatures. We determined that these high‐confidence protective signature genes are downregulated in early AD, upregulated in late AD brains and positively‐correlated with protective variant load in in vitro models. In contrast, risk signature genes are upregulated in early AD, downregulated in late AD and resilient donors. Risk signature expression is decreased with protective PLCG2 variant load, and altered with Aβ treatment in in vitro models. Conclusion Our study uncovers microglia specific protective and risk signatures associated with AD using sn/scRNAseq datasets from multiple sources and models. These findings nominate novel immune targets and pathways with implications for microglial function in health and disease, and ultimately therapeutic potential.

Abstract Background Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), characterized by the accumulation of amyloid‐beta in the cerebrovasculature, affects blood vessel integrity leading to brain hemorrhages and an accelerated cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) patients. Our previous genome‐wide association study (GWAS) identified a LINC‐PINT splice variant associated with lower CAA levels in individuals without the APOE e4 allele and higher levels of LINC‐PINT expression in the brain of AD donors. In this study, we expand our GWAS to include additional donors with AD and those lacking significant AD neuropathology (non‐AD), with available CAA scores. Method In our prior study we assessed 853 AD donors. We expanded this by addition of genetic data from 550 AD and 502 non‐AD donors from the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank, scored for CAA. We performed QC and imputation (TOPMED) of all datasets. We conducted GWAS in AD only ( N = 1,363), non‐AD only, and all donors ( N = 1,865) by testing imputed variant dosages for association with square root transformed CAA using linear regression, adjusting for relevant covariates. To assess associations in the context of major CAA risk factors, we performed interaction analysis with APOEe4 presence and sex; and pursued stratified analyses. Result Variants at the APOE locus were identified as the most significant in our study. In addition, several other variants approached genome‐wide significance after adjusting for AD neuropathology (Braak stage and Thal phase). T he LINC‐PINT splice variant remained associated with lower CAA scores in AD donors without the APOEe4 risk allele. To enhance the robustness of our findings, we are pursuing further expansion of our study cohort to include other available datasets. To explore putative functional consequences of key variants we are collecting peripheral gene expression measures in participants from Mayo Clinic with neuroimaging measures including microhemorrhages. Conclusion We expect this study will provide further insights into the genetic architecture underlying risk for CAA, both in the context of significant AD pathology, and without. Characterization of genetic variants and their functional outcomes may lead to new avenues of research aimed at identifying biomarkers and therapies to treat CAA, a common co‐pathology in those with and without AD.

Abstract Background Most existing biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) inform on core AD pathologies in the central nervous system, namely amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration (ATN). However, molecular disease mechanisms underlying AD are complex and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for cost‐effective blood‐based biomarkers that reflect brain molecular changes in AD beyond ATN. Method Using peripheral blood transcriptome data from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging(MCSA) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, we identified genes associated with AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnosis, cognitive, and harmonized neuroimaging measures in two cohorts, followed by meta‐analysis. We identified consensus gene co‐expression modules in MCSA and ADNI using WGCNA and assessed the association between module eigengenes and aforementioned measures. Using seven bulk brain RNAseq cohorts, we confirmed the preservation of coexpression modules across blood and brain. Enrichment analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) terms and cell‐types were performed using significant and/or hub genes. The MCSA transcriptome was further deconvoluted to obtain cell‐type proportions and cell‐type specific expression. Result Blood transcriptome modules M5 and M8 are upregulated in AD/MCI and associate with worse cognition, whereas M1, M10, M13, M16, and M21 are downregulated in AD/MCI and associate with better cognition. M17 associates with more microhemorrhages. Cell‐type enrichment analysis revealed that M5 is enriched in basophils, monocytes, and neutrophils; M8 in monocytes and neutrophils; M13 in natural kills cells; M17 in megakaryocytes; M21 in B cells. GO analysis shows broad consistency with the cell‐type enrichment analysis. M1, 5, and 8 are preserved in the brain network modules. From these modules, we prioritized transcripts significantly associated with at least one AD‐related phenotype in both blood and brain. Cell‐type deconvolution analysis shows that prioritized transcripts in M1 associate with better cognition and higher metabolic activity in B cells. Conclusion We identified blood transcripts and modules associated with AD/MCI, cognition, or neuroimaging, with three preserved in brain networks. These three modules represent centrally linked peripheral molecular signatures that can reveal perturbed brain pathways and cell level transcriptional changes in AD/MCI. We aim to further investigate the prioritized transcripts in additional datasets to establish them as potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) is pathologically characterized by the presence of extracellular amyloid beta plaques and intracellular tau tangles. Related disorders share aspects of AD pathology including progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), a tauopathy, and pathologic aging (PA) defined by presence of amyloid but not tau. We hypothesize that there are shared, and distinct, brain molecular changes associated with amyloid and tau protein levels in AD and related disorders and that identifying these will provide novel insights into disease pathogenesis. Methods We collected brain multiomics measures (genetic, transcriptomic, epigenomic, proteomic and metabolomic) from donors diagnosed with AD, PSP, PA and controls. Following quality control and normalization, omics measures were tested for association with disease diagnosis and amyloid and tau neuropathology using regression models adjusting for relevant covariates. Association with biochemical measures of core AD proteins were also assessed in a subset of AD cases. Gene sets were evaluated for enrichment of cellular pathways and cell type signatures. Results We found remarkably conserved transcriptomic changes associated with AD and PSP, and downregulation of myelination pathway genes in both diseases. Among PSP cases, we found divergent patterns of transcriptional associations with distinct tau lesions. In a cohort of AD cases, we found broad transcriptional and epigenetic dysregulation associated with levels of tau protein, but not amyloid beta. Conversely a genetic analysis implicated more variants associated with amyloid levels than tau. Conclusion Multi‐omics studies across various proteinopathies can identify convergent and divergent molecular signatures that are candidates for shared therapeutic targets and disease differentiating biomarkers.

Objective Lewy body disease (LBD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the accumulation of misfolded α‐synuclein in the brain. Neuroinflammation has long been implicated in LBD pathogenesis, and recent genetic studies in Parkinson's disease (a clinical manifestation of LBD) have shown consistent association with the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) gene complex. Here, we assessed whether variation in HLA alleles influences neuropathological burden in a neuropathologically‐defined series of LBD cases. Methods We conducted a comprehensive analysis of HLA allelic variants in a cohort of 539 LBD cases of European descent from the Mayo Clinic brain bank. High‐resolution whole‐genome sequencing was used, and the HLA alleles of each sample were called using the HLA*LA tool and assessed for association with neuropathological outcomes. Results Our analysis identified 1 significant ( P < 3.43 × 10 −5 ) and 4 suggestive ( P < 0.001) associations between certain HLA alleles and specific neuropathological outcomes in LBD, suggesting a potential role for HLA‐mediated immune mechanisms in disease progression and subtype differentiation. Specifically, HLA‐DPB1*06:01 was significantly associated with lower Lewy body counts in the parahippocampal gyrus ( P = 3.30 × 10 −5 ), with weaker and suggestive associations observed in the middle frontal ( P = 1.80 × 10 −4 ) and inferior parietal gyrus ( P = 6.33 × 10 −4 ). Additionally, although only suggestive, HLA‐DRB1*11:01 correlated with a lower Thal amyloid phase ( P = 1.56 x 10 −4 ), and HLA‐B*15:01 correlated with an increased risk of diffuse LBD ( P = 7.58 x 10 −4 ). Interpretation This study provides a detailed evaluation of the relationship between HLA alleles and LBD pathology, highlighting the importance of immune‐related genetic factors in the etiology of LBD. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:492–501

Abstract INTRODUCTION We investigated associations of plasma proteins with blood‐based amyloid/tau/neurodegeneration/inflammation (A/T/N/I) biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS Plasma proteomics and clinical data from the Indiana AD Research Center ( N = 498) were used. Association analysis of plasma proteins with blood A/T/N/I biomarkers as well as diagnosis was performed, followed by replication in an independent cohort ( N = 323), network analysis, pathway enrichment, and machine learning classification to identify proteins and pathways related to AD risk. RESULTS We identified 35 proteins associated with AD, 20 of which were replicated in the independent cohort. We identified 150, 448, and 219 proteins associated with T/N/I biomarkers, respectively, revealing biomarker‐specific pathways. Network analysis identified two modules associated with T/N/I biomarkers, preserved in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and their enriched pathways. The classification model of proteins effectively differentiated AD (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.930). CONCLUSION Our findings suggest dysregulated plasma proteins and pathways in AD, enhancing our understanding of molecular mechanisms and diagnostic strategies for AD. Highlights Plasma proteins were identified as being associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and plasma biomarkers. The identified proteins were replicated in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) proteomics. The identified proteins were associated with AD biomarker‐specific pathways. The identified proteins improved the performance of the AD classification. Protein network analysis identified network modules and their enriched pathways.

Abstract INTRODUCTION African American (AA) individuals are underrepresented in biomarker studies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Biomarkers that reflect the heterogeneity of AD and achieve the greatest accuracy across populations are sorely needed. METHODS Untargeted proteome measurements were obtained using the SomaScan 7k platform to identify novel plasma biomarkers for AD in AA participants with clinical diagnoses of AD dementia ( n = 181) and cognitively unimpaired (CU, n = 142). Machine learning was used to identify a set of plasma proteins that yielded the best classification accuracy. RESULTS A set of 36 proteins achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 to classify AD dementia versus CU, a 16% improvement over age, sex, and apolipoprotein E ( APOE) . This finding was replicated in multiple plasma and brain datasets (AUCs 0.73–0.97). Our findings underscore the importance of matrisome and cerebrovascular dysfunction in AD pathophysiology. DISCUSSION This study demonstrates the potential of biomarker discovery through untargeted plasma proteomics and machine learning. Highlights Conducted large‐scale plasma proteomics in Alzheimer's disease (AD) versus cognitively unimpaired controls. Machine learning biomarker discovery was replicated in an independent cohort. Novel set of proteins distinguishes AD versus controls with high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.94). Achieved reproducibility across multiple replication cohorts (AUC = 0.73–0.97). Network analyses implicates matrisome biology and cerebrovascular dysfunction.

SUMMARY Tau aggregates propagate through the brain in a prion-like manner in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other tauopathies, but the molecular identity and functional partners of the seeding-competent Tau species remain poorly defined. Here, we present an unbiased proteomic profiling of a high-molecular-weight (HMW) Tau-seed isolated from AD patient brains. We contrast this interactome with that of a biochemically similar, seeding-incompetent HMW-Tau species from age-matched healthy controls. Despite comprising less than 5% of total Tau in the brain, Tau-seed associates with a distinct set of proteins enriched in synaptic, mitochondrial, and vesicle-trafficking functions. Cross-species functional screening in Drosophila and mouse models identifies interactors that modulate Tau toxicity and seeding. Spatially resolved analysis of postmortem AD brains reveals heterogenous co-deposition of these proteins with Tau aggregates, suggesting functionally distinct Tau-seed complexes. Together, this dataset provides a framework for understanding selective Tau-seed toxicity and identifies candidate regulators of Tau propagation with therapeutic potential.