Citations

Background— The impact of changing demographics on causes of long-term death after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains incompletely defined. Methods and Results— We evaluated trends in cause-specific long-term mortality after index PCI performed at a single center from 1991 to 2008. Deaths were ascertained by scheduled prospective surveillance. Cause was determined via telephone interviews, medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates. Competing-risks analysis of cause-specific mortality was performed using 3 time periods of PCI (1991–1996, 1997–2002, and 2003–2008). Final follow-up was December 31, 2012. A total of 19 077 patients survived index PCI hospitalization, of whom 6988 subsequently died (37%, 4.48 per 100 person-years). Cause was determined in 6857 (98.1%). Across 3 time periods, there was a 33% decline in cardiac deaths at 5 years after PCI (incidence: 9.8%, 7.4%, and 6.6%) but a 57% increase in noncardiac deaths (7.1%, 8.5%, and 11.2%). Only 36.8% of deaths in the recent era were cardiac. Similar trends were observed regardless of age, extent of coronary disease, or PCI indication. After adjustment for baseline variables, there was a 50% temporal decline in cardiac mortality but no change in noncardiac mortality. The decline in cardiac mortality was driven by fewer deaths from myocardial infarction/sudden death ( P <0.001) but not heart failure ( P =0.85). The increase in noncardiac mortality was primarily attributable to cancer and chronic diseases ( P <0.001). Conclusions— This study found a marked temporal switch from predominantly cardiac to predominantly noncardiac causes of death after PCI over 2 decades. The decline in cardiac mortality was independent of changes in baseline clinical characteristics. These findings have implications for patient care and clinical trial design.

BackgroundWe sought to determine the utility of a magnetic navigation system (MNS) in treating a variety of coronary artery lesions including those that could not be revascularized with standard percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). MNS may add value in the treatment of tortuous arteries and bifurcation lesions; however its widespread adoption has lagged because of cost and a lack of clear advantage over conventional PCI. We performed a retrospective analysis to determine whether MNS improved procedural success for highly complex lesions.Methods and ResultsOne hundred and forty‐eight patients underwent treatment with MNS at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Clinical data, angiographic and procedural characteristics, lesion crossing success and outcomes were reviewed. Overall 133 patients underwent successful revascularization with 87% (143) of 164 lesions crossed using MNS alone. Another six lesions required a combination of MNS and conventional devices resulting in overall success of 91% (149/164). Eighteen complex lesions had previously failed PCI and 12 (67%) were successfully treated with MNS. Success after failed PCI was higher (88%) when a frequent user operated MNS, but occasional users also noted incremental success (30%). Twenty‐five chronic total occlusions were included amongst these 164 lesions, with observed antegrade MNS lesion crossing rates of 78% for regular and 14% for occasional users.ConclusionsMNS is a useful adjunct to performance of PCI. This specialized technology has a clear learning curve and can facilitate treatment of highly complex lesions. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Embolic protection devices are occasionally employed during endovascular interventions to prevent complications caused by embolic debris. However, these devices have imperfect efficacy, confer risk of endovascular trauma, and are expensive. We report a patient with giant cell arteritis and symptomatic axillary artery stenosis, with a perceived elevated risk of distal embolization during endovascular intervention. We describe a straightforward embolic protection technique of brachial pressure cuff inflation during endovascular intervention and aspiration of displaced thrombotic material from the static column of blood. This novel, effective, and cost-free technique could also be employed in other vascular beds during endovascular intervention.

Ultrasound (US) enhancement of plasmid-based gene transfer is an emerging technique. Our hypothesis was that two contrast agents (Optison and PESDA), and two US exposure modalities (dedicated continuous wave system and diagnostic scanner) may have different effects. Luciferase plasmid with or without contrast agent was added to vascular smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells, followed by US exposure. Luciferase activity was measured 24 h later. US exposure consistently induced higher transfection rates than all controls. PESDA was superior to Optison in both cell lines. In vitro, continuous wave and diagnostic US were not significantly different. In vivo, Lux and PESDA were injected into skeletal muscles of rats (IM or intra-arterial) followed or not by US exposure. In separate animals, adenovirus encoding for luciferase was injected IM and was not followed by US exposure. Gene transfer efficacy was 8–10 fold higher with US and PESDA than with plasmid alone, but 2 fold lower than with adenovirus. However, as opposed to adenovirus, US-enhanced plasmid gene transfer was highly localized to the injected muscle, with no expression at distal sites. Our results support the hypothesis that contrast agents and exposure modalities are not equivalent with regard to gene transfer efficacy.

Background— High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) has been identified as a predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Whether hsCRP is a useful biomarker for risk stratification in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention remains unknown. Methods and Results— We conducted a prospective study among 513 patients undergoing non-emergency percutaneous coronary intervention and examined the relationship between pre- and postprocedural hsCRP levels and outcomes. The patients were divided according to the median preprocedural hsCRP level (0.3 mg/dL). Patients with high hsCRP had significantly more adverse clinical characteristics. Preprocedural hsCRP level was an independent predictor of periprocedural myocardial infarction (odds ratio per doubling of hsCRP 1.15 [95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.31]; P =0.038). Unadjusted mortality (29.7% versus 9.9%; P <0.001) and the combined end point of death or myocardial infarction (36.5% versus 16.0%, P <0.001) during a follow-up of 5 years were markedly greater in patients with high preprocedural hsCRP. Similar relationships existed for postprocedural hsCRP. However, after multivariable adjustment, neither preprocedural hsCRP levels (hazard ratio per doubling 0.96 [0.92, 1.00]; P =0.066) nor postprocedural hsCRP levels (hazard ratio 0.98 [0.94, 1.02]; P =0.27) were significantly associated with mortality. Conclusions— High hsCRP is associated with a greater independent risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction, as defined by the universal definition, but is not an independent determinant of mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Our findings suggest that routine measurement of hsCRP in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice is unlikely to be beneficial.

Background— Coronary stents, drug-eluting stents in particular, have been linked to coronary epicardial endothelial dysfunction after implantation. However, less is known about their impact on coronary microvascular function and their long-term effects on the vasculature. Methods and Results— We evaluated 71 patients (mean age, 53.0±10.1 years) with chest pain and angiographically nonsignificant coronary artery disease 17.1±17.1 months after left anterior descending coronary artery stenting. Seventy-one age- and sex-matched patients (mean age, 53.0±10.3 years) with chest pain but no prior coronary intervention served as controls. Coronary blood flow in response to the endothelium-dependent vasodilator acetylcholine as well as the microvascular (endothelium-independent) coronary flow reserve in response to intracoronary adenosine were evaluated. Quantitative coronary angiography was used to study epicardial diameter changes to acetylcholine. Microcirculatory function was not significantly different between the stenting and control groups (median [interquartile range] coronary flow reserve, 2.9 [2.5–3.4] versus 3.0 [2.4–3.4] mL/min, P =0.24; change of coronary blood flow, 34.9% [−34.4% to 90.0%] versus 54.7% [−5.6% to 104.6%], P =0.18). Both groups exhibited epicardial endothelial dysfunction (−23.0% [−47.4% to −7.6%] versus −20.0% [−40.0% to 0.0%], P =0.4). Results did not differ between patients with drug-eluting stents (n=46) and patients with bare-metal stents (n=24). Conclusions— This study demonstrates that in patients with coronary arteries in which a stent has been placed, coronary microcirculatory and epicardial vascular function are not significantly different from that of an age- and sex-matched population with similar symptoms but nonsignificant coronary artery disease.