Moussa, Issam

Introduction: Clinical outcomes of FFR-guided PCI have been superior to those of angiographically guided PCI, with or without prior cardiac stress testing. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the accuracy of stress testing is inferior to that of FFR in determining the physiologic significance of angiographic coronary artery disease. Method: To that end, we studied 243 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography and FFR assessment between September 2010 and April 2013 at Mayo Clinic, Florida. Out of this group, we excluded 143 patients due to absence of stress testing in the preceding 6 months. We assessed demographics, coronary risk factors, symptoms, stress test variables, angiographic data, and FFR measurements. FFR values ≤0.80 were considered to be positive for ischemia. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of stress testing vs. FFR. Result: Out of the 100 patients included in the study, FFR was measured in the Left Main coronary artery in 3(3%), in the Left Anterior Descending artery (LAD) in 67(67%), in the left circumflex territory in 11(11%), in the Right Coronary Artery (RCA) in 18(18%). The diagnostic performance of stress testing vs. FFR is summarized in the table, with regards to presence of ischemia in any vascular territory and with regards to a specific vascular territory. Conclusion: Compared to FFR, cardiac stress testing has reasonable NPV but poor PPV in determining the presence of absence of overall ischemia in a given patient. Most concerning, however, is that stress testing has poor PPV and NPV when used to determine the site of ischemia in a specific vascular territory.

© 2016 Heart Rhythm Society, the American College of Cardiology Foundation, and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions

Background— The impact of changing demographics on causes of long-term death after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains incompletely defined. Methods and Results— We evaluated trends in cause-specific long-term mortality after index PCI performed at a single center from 1991 to 2008. Deaths were ascertained by scheduled prospective surveillance. Cause was determined via telephone interviews, medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates. Competing-risks analysis of cause-specific mortality was performed using 3 time periods of PCI (1991–1996, 1997–2002, and 2003–2008). Final follow-up was December 31, 2012. A total of 19 077 patients survived index PCI hospitalization, of whom 6988 subsequently died (37%, 4.48 per 100 person-years). Cause was determined in 6857 (98.1%). Across 3 time periods, there was a 33% decline in cardiac deaths at 5 years after PCI (incidence: 9.8%, 7.4%, and 6.6%) but a 57% increase in noncardiac deaths (7.1%, 8.5%, and 11.2%). Only 36.8% of deaths in the recent era were cardiac. Similar trends were observed regardless of age, extent of coronary disease, or PCI indication. After adjustment for baseline variables, there was a 50% temporal decline in cardiac mortality but no change in noncardiac mortality. The decline in cardiac mortality was driven by fewer deaths from myocardial infarction/sudden death ( P <0.001) but not heart failure ( P =0.85). The increase in noncardiac mortality was primarily attributable to cancer and chronic diseases ( P <0.001). Conclusions— This study found a marked temporal switch from predominantly cardiac to predominantly noncardiac causes of death after PCI over 2 decades. The decline in cardiac mortality was independent of changes in baseline clinical characteristics. These findings have implications for patient care and clinical trial design.

Numerous definitions have been proposed for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) after coronary revascularization. The universal definition for MI designates post procedural biomarker thresholds for defining percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)‐related MI (type 4a) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)‐related MI (type 5) which are of uncertain prognostic importance. In addition, for both MI types cTn is recommended as the biomarker of choice, the prognostic significance of which is less well validated than CK‐MB. Widespread adoption of a MI definition not clearly linked to subsequent adverse events such as mortality or heart failure may have serious consequences for the appropriate assessment of devices and therapies, may affect clinical care pathways, and may result in misinterpretation of physician competence. Rather than employing an MI definition sensitive for small degrees of myonecrosis (the occurrence of which, based on contemporary large‐scale studies, are unlikely to have important clinical consequences), it is instead recommended that a threshold level of biomarker elevation which has been strongly linked to subsequent adverse events in clinical studies be used to define a “clinically relevant MI.” The present document introduces a new definition for "clinically relevant MI" after coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) which is applicable for use in clinical trials, patient care, and quality outcomes assessment. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background— Radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (r-PCI) is associated with reduced vascular complications; however, previous reports have shown that <2% of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures in the United States are performed via the radial approach. Our aims were to evaluate temporal trends in r-PCI and compare procedural outcomes between r-PCI and transfemoral PCI. Methods and Results— We conducted a retrospective cohort study from the CathPCI registry (n=2 820 874 procedures from 1381 sites) between January 2007 and September 2012. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the adjusted association between r-PCI and bleeding, vascular complications, and procedural success, using transfemoral PCI as the reference. Outcomes in high-risk subgroups such as age ≥75 years, women, and patients with acute coronary syndrome were also examined. The proportion of r-PCI procedures increased from 1.2% in quarter 1 2007 to 16.1% in quarter 3 2012 and accounted for 6.3% of total procedures from 2007 to 2012 (n=178 643). After multivariable adjustment, r-PCI use in the studied cohort of patients was associated with lower risk of bleeding (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.49–0.54) and lower risk of vascular complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.50) in comparison with transfemoral PCI. The reduction in bleeding and vascular complications was consistent across important subgroups of age, sex, and clinical presentation. Conclusions— There has been increasing adoption of r-PCI in the United States. Transradial PCI now accounts for 1 of 6 PCIs performed in contemporary clinical practice. In comparison with traditional femoral access, transradial PCI is associated with lower vascular and bleeding complication rates.

ObjectivesIdeally, guidewires used during peripheral vasculature (PV) interventions could serve both as a therapy delivery platform and a diagnostic tool for real‐time vessel sizing (2‐in‐1 function).BackgroundVascular imaging modalities, like intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), used during lower PV interventions, can improve outcomes versus angiographic assessment alone, but are rarely used due to added time, cost, and required clinical training/interpretation.MethodsA 0.035″ bodied 0.035″ conductance guidewire (CGW) is described here as a vascular navigation and diagnostic real‐time PV sizing tool. When attached to a console, the CGW creates a safe, electric field to determine vascular size through simultaneous voltage measurements.ResultsThe CGW showed functionality as a workhorse guidewire on the bench (torqueability and trackability equivalent to a Wholey guidewire) and in vivo (over‐the‐wire stent deployment in domestic swine and first‐in‐man study with no major adverse events). Validation of CGW sizing versus the true diameter and IVUS was completed in 4–10 mm diameter phantoms on the bench and in swine and showed virtually no bias with excellent repeatability and accuracy (i.e., CGW repeatability: swine phantom bias = 0.03 ± 0.09 mm (1.3% error). CGW vs. true diameter: in vivo bias = 0.14 ± 0.15 mm (2.7% error). IVUS vs. true diameter: swine phantom bias = 0.01 ± 0.36 mm (4.7% error). CCW vs. IVUS: swine phantom bias = 0.13 ± 0.26mm (3.8% error)).ConclusionsReal‐time, accurate, and safe PV dimension assessment and therapy‐delivery (2‐in‐1 function) is possible using a novel workhorse 0.035″ bodied CGW. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Aims: The NCDR CathPCI Registry collects detailed clinical, process-of-care and outcomes data for patients undergoing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the USA. The registry contributes to quality of care by providing data feedback on a wide range of performance metrics to participating centres and by facilitating local and national quality improvement efforts. Interventions: No treatments are mandated, participating centres receive routine quality-of-care and outcomes performance feedback reports and access to a quality dashboard for personalized performance reports. Population: Patients undergoing cardiac catheterization and PCI are retrospectively identified. No informed consent is required, as data are anonymised. From inception in 1998, more than 12 million records have been submitted from 1577 participating US centres. Baseline data: Approximately 250 fields encompassing patient demographics, medical history and risk factors, hospital presentation, initial cardiac status, procedural details, medications, laboratory values, and in-hospital outcomes. Linkages with outside sources of data have permitted longitudinal outcomes assessment in some cases. Centre personnel enter the data into the registry, in some cases facilitated by software vendors. There are non-financial incentives for centre participation. Data completeness is noteworthy with most fields missing at rates less than 5%. A comprehensive data quality program is employed to enhance data validity. Endpoints: Main outcome measures include quality process metrics and in-hospital patient outcomes. Data are available for research by application to: http://www.ncdr.com