Back to Authors

Cohen, Mauricio G

0000-0003-2038-6070

Mayo Clinic

Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.

Citations 9

Hot topics in interventional cardiology: Proceedings from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions (SCAI) 2021 think tank
Naidu, Srihari S. , Baron, Suzanne J. , Eng, Marvin H. , Sathanandam, Shyam , Zidar, David A., Feldman, Dmitriy N. , Ing, Frank F. , Latif, Faisal , Lim, Michael J. , Henry, Timothy D. , Dangas, George , Hermiller, James, Daggubati, Ramesh , Ang, Lawrence , Box, Lyndon C., Caputo, Ronald , Cohen, Mauricio G. , Coylewright, Megan , Duffy, Peter L. , Goldsweig, Andrew M. , Hagler, Donald J. , Hawkins, Beau M., Hijazi, Ziyad M. , Jayasuriya, Sasanka, Klein, Andrew , Kliger, Chad , Mahmud, Ehtisham , Messenger, John C. , Parikh, Sahil A. , Shishehbor, Mehdi H. , Yakubov, Steven J. , Alvarez‐Breckenridge, Jennifer, Baird, Colleen, Baker, David, Berry, Charles H., Bhattacharya, Manisha, Bilazarian, Seth, Bowen, Rosanne, Brounstein, Kevin, Cameron, Cole, Culbertson, Casey , Díaz, P, Emanuele, Susan, Evans, Erin, Fletcher, Rob, Fortune, Tina, Gaiha, Priya, Govender, Devi, Gutfinger, Dan , Haggstrom, Kurt, Herzog, Andrea, Hite, Denise, Kalich, Bethany , Kirkland, Ann, Kohler, Toni, Laurisden, Holly, Livolsi, Kevin, Lombardi, Lois, Marhenke, Kevin, Meikle, Joie, Moat, Neil, Popma, J.J., Rangwala, Novena , Simonton, Chuck, Stokes, J. W., Taber, Margaret , Tieché, Christopher, Venditto, John, Zinn, Laurie, Dangas, George , Daggubati, Ramesh , Shah, Binita , Ang, Lawrence , Cohen, Mauricio G , Goldsweig, Andrew M , Hagler, Donald J , Morray, Brian H , Parikh, Sahil A , Shishehbor, Mehdi H , Szerlip, Molly , Yakubov, Steven J , Grines, Cindy L , Baron, Suzanne J , Rao, Sunil V. , Shah, Binita , Aronow, Herbert D. , Banerjee, Subhash , Justino, Henri , Li, Jun , Morray, Brian H. , Parikh, Sahil A. , Reilly, John P. , Secemsky, Eric A. , Grines, Cindy L. , Baker, David, Berry, Charles, Cavalcante, Rafael , Diaz, Pedro, Kohler, Toni, Lowe, Sarah, Mueller, Megan, Patarca, Roberto , Stokes, Jerry, West, Nick E.J.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | August 16, 2021 | Volume: 98 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 904-913

10.1002/ccd.29898 Get It

AbstractThe Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Think Tank is a collaborative venture that brings together interventional cardiologists, administrative partners, and select members of the cardiovascular industry community annually for high‐level field‐wide discussions. The 2021 Think Tank was organized into four parallel sessions reflective of the field of interventional cardiology: (a) coronary intervention, (b) endovascular medicine, (c) structural heart disease, and (d) congenital heart disease. Each session was moderated by a senior content expert and co‐moderated by a member of SCAI's Emerging Leader Mentorship program. This document presents the proceedings to the wider cardiovascular community in order to enhance participation in this discussion, create additional dialog from a broader base, and thereby aid SCAI, the industry community and external stakeholders in developing specific action items to move these areas forward.
Temporal trends of survival and utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with in‐hospital cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation
Patel, Nileshkumar, Kumar, Varun , Panakos, Andrew, Narayanan, Mahesh Anantha , Bhardwaj, Bhaskar , Arora, Shilpkumar , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Patel, Nileshkumar , Basir, Mir B. , Cohen, Mauricio G. , Kini, Annapoorna , Sharma, Samin K. , Dangas, George , O’Neill, William W. , Alfonso, Carlos E., Patel, Nileshkumar J , Atti, Varunsiri , Kumar, Varun , Anantha Narayanan, Mahesh , Patel, Nish , Basir, Mir B , Cohen, Mauricio G , Kini, Annapoorna S , Sharma, Samin K , Dangas, George

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | February 21, 2019 | Volume: 94 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 578-587

10.1002/ccd.28138 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPulseless ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) is the initial rhythm in a third of in‐hospital cardiac arrest patients. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device use remains poorly understood in this population.MethodsWe conducted an observational analysis of temporal trends in the utilization of MCS in VT/VF IHCA between January 2008 and December 2014 utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Using multivariable analysis, we assessed factors associated with MCS use and survival to discharge.ResultsAmong 151,628 hospitalizations with VT/VF IHCA, 14,981 (9.9%) received MCS. Intra‐aortic balloon pump (IABP) was the most commonly used MCS (9.1%). From 2008 to 2014, there was significant increase in the utilization of MCS (8.7–11%; ptrend < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, there was 12‐fold increase and three‐fold increase in the utilization of PVAD and ECMO respectively; however, there was no significant change in the use of IABP. Over the seven‐year sample period, there was significant increase in the overall survival to hospital discharge (35.4–43.5%; ptrend < 0.0001). Survival to hospital discharge increased in both MCS and non‐MCS groups.ConclusionThere was significant increase in utilization of MCS after VT/VF IHCA during the study period. IABP was the most commonly utilized MCS. The survival to hospital discharge increased in the overall study population including both MCS and non‐MCS groups. Future studies are needed to identify patient population most likely to benefit from the use of MCS after VT/VF IHCA.
Perforated balloon technique: A simple and handy technique to combat no‐reflow phenomenon in coronary system
Patel, Tejas , Shah, Sanjay , Gulati, Rajiv , Kwan, Tak , Cohen, Mauricio G. , Pancholy, Samir , Cohen, Mauricio G , Pancholy, Samir B

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | December 27, 2017 | Volume: 92 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 890-894

10.1002/ccd.27477 Get It

AbstractObjectiveExamining the efficacy and outcomes of intracoronary (IC) instillation of adenosine using a novel perforated balloon technique (PBT) to combat no‐reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS).BackgroundOccurrence of no‐reflow during PCI is a serious adverse prognostic event and inability to re‐establish better flow is associated with poor outcomes. Several pharmacological and non‐pharmacological interventions have been used to treat this situation. This series describes the use of PBT for IC adenosine administration and its effects on outcomes during real world interventional practice.MethodsSubjects comprised of 24 patients with ACS (out of a total of 1,634 patients undergoing PCI between January 2016 and June 2017) in whom we used PBT for IC administration of adenosine to treat coronary no‐reflow.ResultsPBT for IC adenosine instillation was used in 24 (1.5%) of 1,634 patients undergoing PCI. TIMI grade III flow was established in 21 patients (87.5%). In two patients (8.3%) TIMI grade II flow was established and in one patient (4.2%) we were unsuccessful.ConclusionWe demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a novel strategy for adenosine instillation in the distal coronary bed, the PBT. This technique enables rapid and cost‐effective treatment of no‐reflow phenomenon during PCI for ACS.
Management Strategies and Outcomes of ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Transferred After Receiving Fibrinolytic Therapy in the United States
Patel, Nish , Patel, Nileshkumar, Thakkar, Badal, Singh, Vikas , Arora, Shilpkumar , Patel, Nilay , Savani, Chirag, Deshmukh, Abhishek , Thadani, Udho, Badheka, Apurva O., Fonarow, Gregg C. , Cohen, Mauricio G. , Alfonso, Carlos , Cohen, Mauricio G

Clinical Cardiology | January 19, 2016 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 9-18

10.1002/clc.22491 Get It

ABSTRACTFibrinolytic therapy is still used in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when the primary percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be provided in a timely fashion. Management strategies and outcomes in transferred fibrinolytic‐treated STEMI patients have not been well assessed in real‐world settings. Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2008 to 2012, we identified 18 814 patients with STEMI who received fibrinolytic therapy and were transferred to a different facility within 24 hours. The primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal bleeding, bleeding requiring transfusion, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), length of stay, and cost. The patients were divided into 3 groups: those who received medical therapy alone (n = 853; 4.5%), those who underwent coronary artery angiography without revascularization (n = 2573; 13.7%), and those who underwent coronary artery angiography with revascularization (n = 15 388; 81.8%). Rates of in‐hospital mortality among the groups were 20% vs 6.6% vs 2.1%, respectively (P < 0.001); ICH was 8.5% vs 1.1% vs 0.6%, respectively (P < 0.001); and gastrointestinal bleeding was 1.1% vs 0.4% vs 0.4%, respectively (P = 0.011). Multivariate analysis identified increasing age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and ICH as the independent predictors of not performing coronary artery angiography and/or revascularization in patients with STEMI initially treated with fibrinolytic therapy. The majority of STEMI patients transferred after receiving fibrinolytic therapy undergo coronary angiography. However, notable numbers of patients do not receive revascularization, especially patients with cardiogenic shock and following a cardiac arrest.
Utilization of catheter‐directed thrombolysis in pulmonary embolism and outcome difference between systemic thrombolysis and catheter‐directed thrombolysis
Patel, Nish , Patel, Nileshkumar, Agnihotri, Kanishk, Panaich, Sidakpal , Thakkar, Badal, Patel, Achint , Savani, Chirag, Patel, Nilay , Arora, Shilpkumar , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Bhatt, Parth , Cohen, Mauricio G. , Tafur, Alfonso , Elder, Mahir, Mohamed, Tamam, Attaran, Ramak R., Schreiber, Theodore , Badheka, Apurva O., Alfonso, Carlos , Grines, Cindy L. , Panaich, Sidakpal S , Cohen, Mauricio G

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | August 26, 2015 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1219-1227

10.1002/ccd.26108 Get It

ObjectiveThe aim of the study was to assess the utilization of catheter‐directed thrombolysis (CDT) and its comparative effectiveness against systemic thrombolysis in acute pulmonary embolism (PE).BackgroundContemporary real world data regarding utilization and outcomes comparing systemic thrombolysis with CDT for PE is sparse.MethodsWe queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2012 using the ICD‐9‐CM diagnosis code 415.11, 415.13, and 415.19 for acute PE. We used propensity score analysis to compare outcomes between systemic thrombolysis and CDT. Primary outcome was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary outcome was combined in‐hospital mortality and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).ResultsOut of 110,731 patients hospitalized with PE, we identified 1,521 patients treated with thrombolysis, of which 1,169 patients received systemic thrombolysis and 352 patients received CDT. After propensity‐matched comparison, primary and secondary outcomes were significantly lower in the CDT group compared to systemic thrombolysis (21.81% vs. 13.36%, OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36–0.85, P value = 0.007) and (22.89% vs. 13.36%, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34–0.80, P value = 0.003), respectively. The median length of stay [7 days, interquartile range (IQR) (5–9 days) vs. 7 days, IQR (5–10 days), P = 0.17] was not significant between the two groups. The CDT group had higher cost of hospitalization [$17,218, IQR ($12,272–$23,906) vs. $23,799, IQR ($17,892–$35,338), P < 0.001]. Multivariate analysis identified increasing age, saddle PE, cardiopulmonary arrest, and Medicaid insurance as independent predictors of in‐hospital mortality.ConclusionsCDT was associated with lower in‐hospital mortality and combined in‐hospital mortality and ICH. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Response to Letter Regarding Article “Impact of Annual Operator and Institutional Volume on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes: A 5-Year United States Experience (2005–2009)”
Badheka, Apurva O., Patel, Nileshkumar, Grover, Peeyush , Singh, Vikas , Patel, Nilay , Arora, Shilpkumar , Chothani, Ankit , Mehta, Kathan , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Savani, Ghanshyambhai T., Patel, Achint , Panaich, Sidakpal , Shah, Neeraj , Brown, Michael, Mohamad, Tamam , Makkar, Raj , Schreiber, Theodore , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Cohen, Mauricio G. , Rathod, Ankit D. , Grines, Cindy L. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Panaich, Sidakpal S , Cohen, Mauricio G

Circulation | August 3, 2015 | Volume: 132 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/circulationaha.115.015221 Get It

Influence of hospital volume on outcomes of percutaneous atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale closure: A 10‐years us perspective
Singh, Vikas , Badheka, Apurva O., Patel, Nileshkumar, Chothani, Ankit , Mehta, Kathan , Arora, Shilpkumar , Patel, Nilay , Deshmukh, Abhishek , Shah, Neeraj , Savani, Ghanshyambhai T., Manvar, Sohilkumar, Thakkar, Badal, Panchal, Vinaykumar , Palacios, Igor F. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , Cohen, Mauricio G. , Marchena, Eduardo de , Rathod, Ankit D. , Patel, Jay N. , Rihal, Charanjit S. , O’Neill, William W. , Cohen, Mauricio G

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | December 22, 2014 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1073-1081

10.1002/ccd.25794 Get It

Background: Contemporary data regarding percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect/patent foramen ovale (ASD/PFO) are lacking. We evaluated the current trends in utilization of ASD/PFO closure in adults and investigated the effect of annual hospital volume on in‐hospital outcomes. Methods: We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between the years 2001 and 2010 using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD‐9‐CM) procedure code for percutaneous closure of ASD/PFO with device. Hierarchical mixed effects models were generated to identify the independent multivariate predictors of outcomes. Results: A total of 7,107 percutaneous ASD/PFO closure procedures (weighted n = 34,992) were available for analysis. A 4.7‐fold increase in the utilization of this procedure from 3/million in 2001 to 14/million adults in 2010 in US (P < 0.001) was noted. Overall, percutaneous ASD/PFO closure was associated with 0.5% mortality and 12% in‐hospital complications. The utilization of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) increased 15 fold (P < 0.001) during the study period. The procedures performed at the high volume hospitals [2nd (14–37 procedures/year) and 3rd (>38 procedures/year) tertile] were associated with significant reduction in complications, length of stay and cost of hospitalization when compared to those performed at lowest volume centers (<13 procedures/year). Majority (70.5%) of the studied hospitals were found to be performing <10 procedures/year hence deviating from the ACC/AHA/SCAI clinical competency guidelines. Conclusions: Low hospital volume is associated with an increased composite (mortality and procedural complications) adverse outcome following ASD/PFO closure. In the interest of patient safety, implementation of the current guidelines for minimum required annual hospital volume to improve clinical outcomes is warranted. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Adoption of Radial Access and Comparison of Outcomes to Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Feldman, Dmitriy N. , Swaminathan, Rajesh V. , Kaltenbach, Lisa A., Baklanov, Dmitri , Kim, Luke K. , Wong, S. Chiu, Minutello, Robert M. , Messenger, John C. , Moussa, Issam , Garratt, Kirk N. , Piana, Robert N. , Hillegass, William B. , Cohen, Mauricio G. , Gilchrist, Ian C. , Rao, Sunil V. , Cohen, Mauricio G , Gilchrist, Ian C

Circulation | June 10, 2013 | Volume: 127 | Issue: 23 | Pages: 2295-2306

10.1161/circulationaha.112.000536 Get It

Background— Radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (r-PCI) is associated with reduced vascular complications; however, previous reports have shown that <2% of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures in the United States are performed via the radial approach. Our aims were to evaluate temporal trends in r-PCI and compare procedural outcomes between r-PCI and transfemoral PCI. Methods and Results— We conducted a retrospective cohort study from the CathPCI registry (n=2 820 874 procedures from 1381 sites) between January 2007 and September 2012. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the adjusted association between r-PCI and bleeding, vascular complications, and procedural success, using transfemoral PCI as the reference. Outcomes in high-risk subgroups such as age ≥75 years, women, and patients with acute coronary syndrome were also examined. The proportion of r-PCI procedures increased from 1.2% in quarter 1 2007 to 16.1% in quarter 3 2012 and accounted for 6.3% of total procedures from 2007 to 2012 (n=178 643). After multivariable adjustment, r-PCI use in the studied cohort of patients was associated with lower risk of bleeding (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.49–0.54) and lower risk of vascular complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.31–0.50) in comparison with transfemoral PCI. The reduction in bleeding and vascular complications was consistent across important subgroups of age, sex, and clinical presentation. Conclusions— There has been increasing adoption of r-PCI in the United States. Transradial PCI now accounts for 1 of 6 PCIs performed in contemporary clinical practice. In comparison with traditional femoral access, transradial PCI is associated with lower vascular and bleeding complication rates.