Cassar, Andrew

Background: Treatment options for refractory angina not amenable to revascularization are limited. Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization (ESMR) is a novel non-invasive application of low intensity shock waves that stimulates angiogenesis to improve ischemia. We aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of ESMR in patients with refractory angina. Methods: A single-arm multicenter U.S. prospective trial was implemented to assess safety and efficacy of ESMR therapy in patients with Class III/Class IV refractory angina. Each patient received 9 sessions of ESMR to ischemic areas over 9 weeks. Efficacy was assessed at baseline and 4 months after treatment by maximal treadmill exercise time and ischemic burden on pharmacological single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Safety was assessed by incidence of adverse events, electrocardiography, echocardiography, laboratory markers, and pain questionnaires. Results: Fifteen patients with medically refractory angina were enrolled. Exercise treadmill time from baseline to last follow-up after ESMR increased significantly (38%) by 122.3±156.9 seconds (319.8±157.2 vs. 422.1±183.3 seconds, p=0.016) (Figure 1). There was no difference in the mean summed stress score (SSS) on pharmacological-SPECT 4 months after treatment vs. baseline (17.8±14.9 vs. 21.2±15.3, p=0.233). However, SPECT SSS revealed that untreated areas had greater progression in ischemic burden vs. treated areas (3.69±6.2 vs. 0.31±4.5, p=0.038). There was no significant change in the mean summed echo score from baseline to post treatment (0.4±5.1, p=0.79).There were no changes in electrocardiography, echocardiographic parameters, or laboratory markers. No serious adverse events or complications occurred, and pain with ESMR was minimal (score of 0.5±1.2 to 1.1±1.2 out of 10). Conclusions: We find that ESMR is a safe and efficacious treatment which may be clinically feasible for patients with refractory angina pectoris.

Background: Health insurance coverage has been recently expanded to millions of Americans with the goal of improving access and quality of care. We evaluated long-term outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with different insurance types. Methods: From 2004 to 2010, 970 consecutive STEMI patients who presented to 29 hospitals in Minnesota, Iowa or Wisconsin were treated according to the Mayo STEMI protocol. Demographic, clinical, procedural, and long-term follow up data were prospectively collected. 953 patients were categorized into groups by insurance type - private insurance (PI, n=430), Medicare (MC, n=420), Medicaid (MD, n=68), and uninsured (UN, n=35). Results: Median duration of follow-up was 32 months, and mean ages (years) were 55±8 for PI, 75±10 for MC, 49±10 for MD, and 52±9 for UN (p<0.001). Compared to PI patients, MC and MD patients were more likely to have diabetes (both 21% vs 10%, p<0.001); MC patients had more renal failure (4% vs <1%, p=0.012) but UN patients did not differ significantly (DM 12% and CRF 0%). All groups had similar frequency of cardiogenic shock (PI 9%, MC 14%, MD 9%, UN 6%, p=0.08) and comparable door-to-balloon (in minutes(Q1,Q3): PI 69(54,107), MC 79(61,114), MD 83(55,124), UN 76(58,94), p=0.09) and door-to-needle times (in minutes(Q1,Q3): PI 26(19,34), MC 29 (21,39), MD 27(22,34), UN 17(13,21), p=0.06). MC patients had the highest incidence of in-hospital death (7.6%; p=0.003 vs PI 3.0%). Significant differences in all cause mortality between insurance groups were present on 5-year follow-up (Figure). After risk factor adjustment for age (HR 1.89 per decade, p<0.001), female sex (HR 1.16, p=0.40), diabetes (HR 1.89, p<0.001), peripheral artery disease (HR 2.06, p=0.004), heart failure (HR 1.40, p=0.14), cardiogenic shock (4.22, p<0.001) and renal failure (HR 1.62, p=0.20); insurance type was not an independent risk factor for death (p=0.26). When compared to PI, the hazard ratio for UN was associated with a trend for worse survival (HR 2.69, 95%CI 0.94, 7.67, p=0.06) while MC (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.55, 1.61, p=0.83) and MD patients (HR 1.37, 95%CI 0.52, 3.59, p=0.53) had similar survival after adjustment for covariates. Conclusion: Timeliness of reperfusion was similar across all insurance groups. After adjustment for baseline clinical variables, there was no significant difference in long-term survival according to insurance type.

ObjectivesTo determine the feasibility of automated co‐registration of angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to facilitate integration of these two imaging modalities in a synchronous manner.BackgroundIVUS provides cross‐sectional imaging of coronary arteries but lacks overview of the vascular territory provided by angiography. Co‐registration of angiography and IVUS would increase utility of IVUS in the clinical setting.MethodsForty‐nine consecutive patients undergoing surveillance for cardiac allograft vasculopathy with angiography and IVUS of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) were enrolled. A pre‐IVUS angiogram of the LAD was performed followed by an ECG‐triggered fluoroscopy (ECGTF) during IVUS pullback at 0.5 mm/s using an automatic pullback device. ECGTF was used to track the IVUS catheter during pullback and establish a spatial relationship to the pre‐IVUS angiogram. Angio‐IVUS co‐registration was performed with a research prototype (Siemens Healthcare, Germany) and accuracy was evaluated by distance mismatch between angiography and IVUS images at vessel bifurcations.ResultsMedian age was 54 (44.5, 67) years. The population was 82.6% male with minimal risk factors. The median (IQR) co‐registration distance mismatch measured at 108 bifurcations in 42 (85%) patients was 0.35 (0.00–1.16) mm. Seven patients were excluded due to inappropriate data acquisition (n = 3) and failure of tracking (n = 4), e.g., due to overlapping sternal wires. Estimated effective radiation dose for ECGTF was 0.09 mSv.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of angio‐IVUS co‐registration which may be used as a clinical tool for localizing IVUS cross‐sections along an angiographic roadmap. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Embolic protection devices are occasionally employed during endovascular interventions to prevent complications caused by embolic debris. However, these devices have imperfect efficacy, confer risk of endovascular trauma, and are expensive. We report a patient with giant cell arteritis and symptomatic axillary artery stenosis, with a perceived elevated risk of distal embolization during endovascular intervention. We describe a straightforward embolic protection technique of brachial pressure cuff inflation during endovascular intervention and aspiration of displaced thrombotic material from the static column of blood. This novel, effective, and cost-free technique could also be employed in other vascular beds during endovascular intervention.

Background— Sex-specific differences affect the evaluation, treatment, and prognosis of coronary artery disease. We tested the hypothesis that long-term outcomes of fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are different between women and men. Methods and Results— Consecutive 1090 patients, referred for PCI and undergoing FFR measurements at the Mayo Clinic between October 2002 and December 2009, were included in this registry study. Clinical events were compared between the sexes during a median follow-up of 50.9 months. Of all patients, women had higher FFR adjusted by visual coronary stenosis than men ( P =0.03). The Kaplan–Meier percent of major adverse cardiac events at 5 years was 35% in women and 38% in men ( P =0.54). Interestingly, in patients undergoing PCI with an FFR <0.75, the incidence of death or myocardial infarction was significantly higher in women than in men (hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.04–4.51; P =0.04). Moreover, compared with patients with FFR >0.80, deferral of PCI for those with FFR between 0.75 and 0.80 was associated with an increased rate of major adverse cardiac events, particularly death or myocardial infarction in women (hazard ratio, 3.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.56–6.74; P =0.002) and revascularization in men (hazard ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.66–4.54; P <0.001). Conclusions— Long-term outcome differs between women and men undergoing FFR-guided PCI. Our data suggest that the sex-based treatment strategy is necessary to further optimize prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.