Citations

Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel), a CD28-costimulated CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART19) product, was FDA-approved in 2020 after demonstrating remarkable efficacy in the pivotal ZUMA-2 trial of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). However, despite the impressive initial activity of CART19 cell therapy in MCL, most patients relapse within the first 3 years following treatment. Myeloid cells, such as monocytes and macrophages, have been demonstrated to be major inhibitors of other immune cells, including T cells. Growing evidence shows that monocytes and macrophages contribute to CART cell failure, although the exact mechanisms are not fully understood. To better understand the mechanisms contributing to CART treatment resistance in MCL, we first utilized brexu-cel products from patients with MCL on the ZUMA-2 trial to uncover their transcriptomic features by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) analysis. To understand if myeloid cells had negative impacts on clinical outcomes, we then analyzed autologous baseline peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples by scRNAseq. Our analyses of the brexu-cel samples revealed reduced response to IL-1β and its downstream signaling pathway as well as impaired T cell functions in non-responders. Transcriptomic analyses of the autologous baseline monocyte populations showed downregulation of IL-1β production and its associated pathways as well as upregulation of M2 phenotype-associated genes and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) in non-responder monocytes, implying a potential role of myeloid cells in CART resistance through impairment of IL-1 signaling in brexu-cel products. To validate our findings from the ZUMA-2 samples, we further studied the interactions between macrophages, MCL cells, and CART19 cells in preclinical models. First, CD28-costimulated CART19 cells generated from healthy donors were cocultured with JeKo-1, a CD19+ MCL cell line, and freshly isolated monocytes or ex vivo differentiated M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages were generated by incubating fresh monocytes with rhGM-CSF followed by coculturing with JeKo-1. CART19 antigen-specific proliferation was significantly inhibited by M2-like macrophages but not fresh monocytes (JeKo-1+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.00503). Transwell assays indicated that suppression by M2-like macrophages was contact-independent. Cytokine profile analysis of coculture supernatants showed significant elevation of IL-1ra in M2-like macrophage cocultures (JeKo-1+Mono+CART19 vs JeKo-1+M2+CART19, p=0.0292). This led us to hypothesize that M2-like macrophages inhibit CART19 by secreting IL-1ra to block IL-1 signaling in CART19. To test this hypothesis, we interrogated the role of IL-1ra in CART19. CART19 + JeKo-1 cocultures were supplemented with IL-1β + IL-1ra or IL-1β + IL-1ra + IL-1ra neutralizing antibody (neuAb). CART19 proliferation was improved by IL-1β (vehicle control vs IL-1β, p<0.0001). IL-1ra inhibited IL-1β-dependent CART19 proliferation (IL-1β vs IL-1β+IL1ra, p=0.0006), which was restored by IL-1ra neutralization (IL-1β+IL-1ra vs IL-1β+IL-1ra+IL-1ra neuAb, p=0.0215). Next, we assessed the impact of IL-1ra on CART functions in mouse MCL xenografts in the presence of M2-like macrophages. NOD-SCID-γ-/- (NSG) mice were subcutaneously injected with 0.5 million of human macrophages and 1 million of luciferase+ JeKo-1. Mice were then randomized once tumor engraftment was confirmed by bioluminescence imaging (BLI), followed by treatment with 2 million CART19 with 10 mg/kg IL-1ra neuAb or control IgG for 3 weeks. Combination of CART19 cells and IL-1ra neuAb led to improved antitumor activity based on BLI measurements compared to control IgG (IL-1ra neuAb vs control IgG, p=0.0058). Additionally, expression of IL-1RI, receptor of IL-1β and IL-1ra, was measured on T cells after coculturing CART19, JeKo-1, and M2-like macrophages. M2-like macrophages downregulated IL-1RI expression on CART cells, which might potentially desensitize CART response to IL-1β, resulting in further suppression in CART proliferation (JeKo-1+M2+CART19 vs JeKo-1+CART19, p=0.001). Overall, our study elucidates a potential mechanism of IL-1 pathway modulation mediated by myeloid cells in contributing to CART19 failure in MCL.

Background: Despite substantial improvements in early mortality (EM) for patients with systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL), rates remained high in the bortezomib-era, at approximately 25% (Muchtar et al. Blood. 2017). However, the therapeutic landscape in AL amyloidosis has changed with the ANDROMEDA trial, which led to the approval of daratumumab in combination with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (Dara-VCd) in the frontline setting. The incidence and predictors of EM in the context of daratumumab-based frontline therapy have not been studied. Methods: We performed an international multicenter retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with newly diagnosed AL treated with frontline Dara-VCd or Dara-Vd, and followed until 12/31/2023. EM was defined as death from any cause within 6 months of treatment initiation. Our primary objective was to identify the rate and significant predictors of EM. Univariate logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of EM, which were then included in a multivariate logistic regression model. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the best threshold values that discriminated EM rates for the following continuous variables: age, dFLC (involved-uninvolved), eGFR, NT-proBNP, albumin, and high-sensitivity Troponin-T (hs-TnT). Other variables tested in univariate analysis were the following: ECOG performance status, NYHA functional class, sex, race, light chain isotype, percent bone marrow plasma cells, status of the following cytogenetic abnormalities-t(11;14), +1q, hyperdiploidy, del(13q), high-risk translocations, and del(17p), and the number of organs involved (2 vs 1). To build the clinical prediction score, each variable was weighted according to the β coefficient (natural logarithm of odds ratio) obtained from the multivariable regression. The β coefficients were rounded to the nearest 0.5 and multiplied by 2 to obtain an even number. Results The study cohort included 335 AL patients treated with daratumumab-based frontline therapy (92.2% Dara-VCd, 7.8% Dara-Vd), with all surviving patients having at least 6 months of follow-up. The median age at diagnosis was 66.5 years (range, 59.4 - 71.3), and 6.7% (n = 22) were Non-Hispanic blacks. Median dFLC at diagnosis was 22.91 mg/dL (range, 0.2-1093.4), and median NT-proBNP was 2415 pg/mL (range, 13-70,000). Mayo 2004 stages IIIA/IIIB represented 44% of the total cohort, with 17% having ECOG ≥ 2 and 25.4% having NYHA Class III/IV symptoms. The cumulative incidence of EM was 10.7%, with the incidence in patients with Mayo 2004 stage I, II, IIIA, and IIIB being 0%, 8%, 12.5%, and 25% respectively. On univariate analysis with unadjusted odds ratio (OR), the following variables significantly predicted EM: Age ≥ 75 (OR=2.8, p=0.013) ECOG ≥ 2, (OR 4.9, p<0.001), NYHA Class ≥ III (OR=4.95, p<0.001), dFLC ≥9 mg/dL (OR, 10.18, p=0.023), eGFR <33 mL/min/1.73 m2 (OR=2.7, p=0.026), NT-proBNP >5276 pg/mL (OR=7.69, p <0.001), hs-TnT >70 ng/L (OR=5.88, p<0.001), and absence of t(11; 14) (OR=2.33, p=0.041). These variables were entered into multivariate regression, except for ECOG and NYHA, which were combined to create a single variable (values ranging from 0-8), and hs-TnT was dropped due to substantial missing data as centers used different troponin assays. NT-proBNP was rounded to 5300 pg/ml for ease of clinical application. Based on the multivariate analysis, the following scores were assigned to each variable: Age ≥75 (2.0), ECOG+NYHA (1.0 x combined score), NT-proBNP >5,300 pg/ml (2.0), and absence of t(11;14) (3.0). This led to a score ranging from 1-15, and two risk-groups: low-risk (score <9; 87.5%) and high-risk (score ≥9; 12.5%). The respective cumulative incidence of EM was 6.1% versus 50% (p<0.001). The c-index of the model was 0.725 (95% CI, 0.676-0.774). Conclusion: Using variables that are readily available in the clinic, we have developed a two-tiered risk-prediction model for EM in AL amyloidosis in the context of daratumumab-based frontline therapy. The model needs to be externally validated in an independent dataset.

Introduction/Background: Bispecific T cell engagers (TCE) targeting BCMA and CD3 induce deep hematologic responses in approximately 60% of heavily pre-treated multiple myeloma (MM) patients. There is an unmet need to overcome primary resistance, as this off-the-shelf therapy is readily available to patients with aggressive disease relapse and has the potential to be delivered in the community. We and others found that high tumor burden leads to primary resistance to TCE 1,2,3,4 and that combination with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) transiently improves responses yet exacerbates T cell exhaustion2. Here, we present preclinical strategies to overcome primary resistance which are tolerable and provide more durable responses specifically for the high tumor burden setting. Methods: We evaluated response and survival to a murine surrogate BCMA/CD3 TCE in the Vk*MYC immunocompetent mouse model of MM expressing human CRBN to investigate tumor burden as a mechanism underpinning primary resistance. We evaluated dosing methods and combination strategies with IMiDs or novel CELMoDs, checkpoint inhibitors, and dexamethasone to improve response rates while maintaining a manageable safety profile. Results: We investigated primary resistance in an expanded panel of Vk*MYC models reflecting differing genomic heterogeneity and confirmed that a threshold of tumor burden limits T cell activation and correlates with resistance to TCE. BCMA is cleaved from the tumor cell surface by gamma-secretase and thus, high density of shed BCMA may act as a sponge to BCMA TCE. However, we found that administration of gamma-secretase inhibitors, while stabilizing BCMA expression on MM cells, is not sufficient to overcome high tumor burden-driven resistance to TCE. We previously reported the combinatorial activity of BCMA TCE with IMiDs and revealed a role for tumor-extrinsic effects of IMiDs in allowing mice with a high tumor burden to transiently respond to BCMA-TCE before T cell exhaustion prevailed2. To build on that combination strategy, we first hypothesized that the addition of a PD1 checkpoint inhibitor could reduce T cell exhaustion that occurs in response the BCMA-TCE in the resistant setting. We found that this triple combination provides more persistent activation and expansion of cytolytic T cells and sustains remission but leads to toxic cytokine release syndrome and early mortality in half of the cohort. Next, to address the acute toxicity from the hyperactivated T cell response and reduce tumor burden, we combined the triple combination with dexamethasone (Dex). To our surprise, concurrent Dex, even in the absence of IMiDs/CELMoDs, boosts responses to TCE. We observe that Dex moderates T cell proliferation in response to the TCE and leads to a moderate sustained cytokine production (IFN-γ, TNF, and IL-2R) systemically and in the bone marrow compared with a high transient burst seen with TCE alone or the concurrent treatment with IMiD + PD1 blockade. We determined that incremental step-up TCE dosing allows the combination of IMiDs or CELMoDs (iberdomide or mezigdomide) with Dex to be completely tolerated. To investigate whether delivering IMiD or CELMoDs before or during TCE administration altered efficacy, we tested pre-treatment with IMiDs/CELMoDs + Dex compared with concurrent dosing and found pre-treatment led to superior durable responses. Pre-treatment with iberdomide + Dex followed by step-up dosed TCE generated 100% response rate and the highest overall survival in subjects bearing a high tumor burden. This was accompanied by a more favorable T cell profiling over time, with limited expansion of regulatory T cells and reduced accumulation of exhausted T cells. Conclusion: Modelling the dosing and combination strategies of a BCMA-TCE in our immunocompetent system has allowed us to understand the dynamic changes in T cell fitness that are required for effective, tolerable, and durable TCE therapy for MM. We illustrate how improvements to TCE therapy mitigate T cell exhaustion and overcome primary resistance, and importantly, suggest a strong immunotherapeutic strategy for MM patients with challenging-to-treat actively progressing disease. 1. Lee et al., Nat Med 29, 2295-2306 (2023) 2. Meermeier et al. Blood Cancer Discov. 2021 Jul;2(4):354-369. 3. Rees et al. Blood Cancer J. 2024 Jul 23;14(1):122. 4. Girgis et al. Blood Adv. 2023 Feb 28;7(4):644-648

INTRODUCTION While prognostic understanding (PU) is important for all patients (pts) considering hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), it may be particularly important for older (>65 years), medically infirm, and/or frail pts deciding whether to undergo allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT). This abstract reports on PU and concordance with transplant physician (hereafter MD) PU for pts participating in an ongoing seamless, phase II-III randomized clinical trial (ACE-BMT) comparing 4-arms: a pt-administered comorbidity management intervention (CM), specialist-administered palliative care (PC), a combined arm of CM and PC to standard of care. Here we report preliminary data on the concordance between pt and MD PU on the chance of cure 1-year (yr) post allo-HCT. METHODS Pt PU was compared to MD PU (gold standard) to determine concordance. MD and pt answers were compared on a single validated question asked at enrollment to the study (typically 2 weeks prior to HCT). Both pts and MD's estimated the chance of cure 1 yr after allo-HCT by selecting one of six possible response options: very good (more than 90%), good (75-90%), better than 50% (50-74%), worse than 50% (25-49%), bad (10-24%) or very bad (less than 10%). PU was “concordant” or “accurate” if MD and pt selected the same response option. Pts with discordant PU were labeled “pessimistic” if the pt selected a response option with a lower chance of cure than the MD (and “optimistic” if a higher chance). Response options were further simplified to greater than or less than 50% chance of cure and MD and pt PU were compared again. Descriptive statistics, chi-square for categorical and t-tests for continuous variables were used. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between pt prognostic concordance and pt socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS All pts consented to date were included (n=358), except those who did not answer the prognosis question (n=61). 54.2% (n=194) had HCT-Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) of ≥3, 67.9% (n=243) were older than 65 yrs and 4.5% (n=16) were frail, defined by walk speed <0.8 m/s. Median age was 68 yrs (range 20-80). 39.7% (n=141) were female. 89.9% (n=322) identified as White, 4.2% (n=15) Asian, and 1% each as Black/African American and Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander. 5.3% (n=19) identified Hispanic. 11.5% (n=44) had high school education or less. 54.1% (n=183) made less than $100,000/yr. 40.1% (n=136) had acute myelogenous leukemia, 25.4% (n=86) had high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and 10.6% (n=36) had a myeloproliferative cancer. 72.1% (n=245) had matched, 82.5% (n=283) unrelated and 95.0% (n=36) peripheral blood allo-HCT. 9% (n=31) had KPS of 100%, 35% (n=121) KPS 90%, and 47.5% (n=147) KPS 80%. Pts reported having a very good, good, better than 50%, worse than 50% and bad/very bad chance of cure 1 yr post allo-HCTL 34.4% (n=123), 30.7% (n=110), 26.0% (n=93), 7.3% (n=26) and 1.7% (n=6), respectively. 91.1% (n=326) of pts felt they had a >50% chance of being cured 1 yr post allo-HCT. MD answers were missing for 159/358 (44.4%) pts. MDs reported pt had a very good, good, better than 50%, worse than 50% and bad/very bad chance of being cured 1 yr post allo-HCT, 3.0% (n=6), 6.5% (n=13), 52.8% (n=105), 35.7% (n=71) and 2% (n=4) respectively. 62.3% (n=124) of MDs felt the pt had a >50% chance of being cured 1 yr post allo-HCT. For the subset of pts with MD prognostic data (n=199), pt's PU was concordant 20.6% (n=41) of the time when compared across all 6 response options. Overall, 71.9% (n=143) of pts erred toward optimism, while 7.5% (n=15) of pts were pessimistic. 60.8% of MD and pts agreed on prognosis when dichotomized to better or worse than 50% chance of being cured 1 yr post allo-HCT. Prognostic concordance was not significantly associated with any pt socio-demographic factors, HCT-CI or KPS via descriptive statistics or regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS In this prospective randomized trial focusing on a population of older, medically infirm, and/or frail pts receiving allo-HCT, pts' PU was not concordant with MD prognosis approximately 80% of the time. While some pts were pessimistic, the majority overestimated the likelihood they would be cured of disease compared to MD estimates. Future studies should investigate the true accuracy of both MD and pt prognosis, as well as how to improve communication about prognosis and pt PU (if inaccurate based on best available information) prior to HCT.

Primary resistance to BCMA-directed bispecific antibodies (BCMA-BsAb) is a major clinical hurdle despite their outstanding efficacy for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Primary resistance has been linked clinically to patient characteristics including tumor burden. Our previous work in the immunocompetent Vk*MYC model of MM credentialed that tumor burden also correlates with resistance to a murine BCMA-BsAb, which we addressed through drug combinations with MM backbone agents. Pairing the BsAb with cyclophosphamide (Cy) was well-tolerated, reversed primary resistance, reshaped an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and led to durable responses with immunosurveillance in all but the most aggressive settings. Here, we aimed to improve the BCMA-BsAb and Cy combination strategy with a goal of curing models representing clinically relevant Cy-refractory aggressive settings, by adding T cell checkpoint blockade. Despite a lack of single agent activity of checkpoint inhibitors in MM (and in our models), PD1 and TIGIT are relevant targets as their expression on T cells correlates with both primary and acquired resistance to BCMA-directed cell therapies. Our team hypothesized that blockade of either PD1 or TIGIT with concurrent BCMA-BsAb and Cy would deepen anti-MM responses and provide a more durable immunotherapy regimen by sustaining activation of the T cell repertoire. Methods: We preclinically tested the ability of two weeks of concurrent dosing of BCMA-BsAb with Cy, checkpoint inhibitors targeting either PD1 or TIGIT, or the triple combination to overcome primary resistance and improve survival in a Cy-resistant transplantable Vk*MYC model of MM. We followed the response longitudinally in the blood, and in the bone marrow and spleen after complete responses were achieved at five weeks. Results: The double combination of a checkpoint inhibitor to the BCMA-BsAb was well-tolerated and abolished primary resistance, yet, failed to provide curative responses. Whereas the triple combination with either PD1 or TIGIT blockade remained safe, provided robust initial responses that overcame primary resistance and resulted in durable complete and curative responses in the entire cohort. These survival benefits represent significant improvements over control combinations tested here but also over all historical preclinical anti-MM therapy tested in our models to date. Both PD1 and TIGIT blockade with Cy/BCMA-BsAb triple combinations delivered a similar multiphasic potent anti-tumor response. This response was first characterized by highly effective T cell-mediated lysis of the tumor, as evidenced by deep reduction of M-spike after two weeks of treatment. As we previously published, the addition of Cy to BCMA-BsAb rapidly reshapes the TME by depleting Tregs and exhausted T cells and brings naive T cells to the tumor. However, we observed elevated T cell checkpoint expression at times of BsAb-relapse in aggressive models, suggesting that blockade of these pathways may help sustain T cell activation. Indeed, the ensuing T cell response in the triple combination gradually builds and encourages a pool of less terminally differentiated T cells to proliferate to allow for a more sustained response with repeat dosing. For the first time, we observe that the triple combination significantly engages the CD4 T cell compartment, which can be essential for a complete anti-tumor response. At the time of complete response, single cell analysis displays that T cells retained in the BM were less exhausted and defined by elevated CCR2 expression, a known marker of activated memory T cells, suggestive of ongoing immunosurveillance. Conclusions: Here we demonstrated through controlled in vivo experimentation how the addition of Cy reverts primary resistance to BCMA-BsAb by reshaping the TME in our Cy-insensitive preclinical model. Adding checkpoint inhibitors targeting TIGIT or PD1 further improves the durability of BsAb and Cy combination to cure all mice in these cohorts, by critically lysing the tumor, resetting the suppressive TME, and instigating a gradual, multiphasic, and sustained anti-MM T cell response. The concurrently delivered triple combination is well tolerated and provides optimal temporal control of MM especially in a preclinical model reflecting primary resistance mediated by high tumor burden and may have translational benefit to MM patients.

Introduction: Phase I trials are designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of new treatments. Review of adverse events (AEs) experienced by trial participants is a critical aspect of these early phase trials. Current practice for safety and tolerability data collection is for clinicians to evaluate AEs using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Past work has demonstrated that clinicians may miss or underreport symptomatic AEs. The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE) is an item library of questions for patients to self-report symptomatic AEs in clinical trials that is complementary to the CTCAE. PRO-CTCAE offers a patient-centric method for capturing symptomatic AEs, which may be missed or underreported by clinicians. The PRO-CTCAE library includes questions using patient friendly terms to assess frequency, severity, and interference of symptomatic AEs on 0-4 verbal descriptor scales (e.g., severity is rated by patients as none, mild, moderate, severe, or very severe). The goal of the current work was to demonstrate how to incorporate AE information from PRO-CTCAE and CTCAE into a Phase I dose review report. Methods: We used data from a Phase I clinical trial of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Therapy was administered on 28-day cycles. Patients completed questionnaires on an electronic device on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of the first cycle of treatment. Through iterative feedback from clinicians and statisticians, we developed an example dose review report. The report summarized data for one dose level in which 4 patients were treated. These 4 patients comprised the first patient cohort enrolled in the available Phase I clinical trial. The report was intended to be representative of the type of report that would be reviewed to make a decision about the next dose level for a new cohort of patients. Results: The final dose review report included narratives for each patient generated by the statistical team based on patient-reported and physician-graded AEs in cycle 1, tabular summaries integrating CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE, and novel graphical presentation of PRO-CTCAE and CTCAE, including swimmer plots and butterfly plots for symptoms listed as dose limiting toxicity criteria. In this cohort, 3/4 (75%) patients had at least one grade 3+ AE, as assessed by CTCAE, and 4/4 (100%) patients had at least one score 3 symptomatic AE, as assessed by PRO-CTCAE. All 4/4 (100%) patients had at least one reported symptom on the PRO-CTCAE that was not captured by CTCAE or was reported at a lower grade by CTCAE. Multiple versions of the example dose review report were presented to the study team and iterative feedback was solicited from clinicians and statisticians. Feedback highlighted the usefulness of narratives and patient-level graphical displays. Narratives within the dose review report were refined to focus on treatment emergent AEs, minimizing text and succinctly presenting baseline symptoms where relevant. Symptom-level graphics of combined PRO-CTCAE scores and CTCAE grades were preferred over graphics consolidating data for multiple symptoms. Final graphics and report will be presented. Conclusions: We demonstrated that PRO-CTCAE, which captures patient-reported symptoms, complements traditional AE reporting and that reporting PRO-CTCAE and CTCAE jointly in a Phase I dose level report can provide a more complete picture of safety and tolerability in the Phase I setting.

Background The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) defines progression of disease (PD) in multiple myeloma by the increase in serum or urine paraprotein beyond a certain threshold. With more common use of serial bone marrow-based measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment, some patients will evolve with increase in MRD burden without meeting IMWG criteria for PD and no consensus exist on the best approach for this circumstance. Understanding the implication of increasing MRD burden is particularly relevant in patients with NDMM treated with quadruplet therapy (QUAD, consisting of a PI, an IMiD, an anti-CD38 mAb and dexamethasone) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), since most will reach MRD negativity. Methods We analyzed a large dataset of patients with NDMM patients treated with QUADs + ASCT +/- QUAD consolidation +/- single or dual-agent maintenance and monitored with serial MRD assessment by next-generation sequencing (clonoSEQ®) at end of induction, post ASCT, post consolidation and at least yearly thereafter. The dataset was built from clinical trial participants and from patients receiving standard care under an institutional guideline. MRD progression (MRD-P) was arbitrarily defined as quantitative increase in MRD burden by at least 1 log10 above the nadir. Treatment modification in the event of MRD-P without IMWG-defined PD was at discretion of treating physician. For patients with MRD-P without concomitant PD we describe cumulative incidence of PD after MRD-P. To contextualize the clinical implications of MRD-P, we describe survival free of failure of second line therapy (SFF2T), defined as time from progression event (MRD-P or PD not preceded by MRD-P) until occurrence of IMWG-defined PD or death on second line therapy, regardless of whether second line was initiated due to MRD-P or subsequent IMWG-defined PD. Results Among the 216 patients, 113 (52%) were clinical trial participants, median age was 61 years (IQR 56-68), 21% age 70 or older, 32% were non-White, 57% male, 38% had MM with 1 high risk chromosome abnormality [HRCA, gain/amp 1q, t(4;14), t(14:16), del(17p)], 15% had 2+HRCA. Median duration of follow up is 39.5 months, and 966 MRD datapoints were assessed. Overall, 83% of patients achieved sCR, 78% achieved MRD negativity at 10-5, 68% at the 10-6 threshold, and 56% ceased therapy after confirmed MRD negativity. Forty-nine patients had MRD-P(N=19) or PD not preceded by MRD-P (N=30). Patients with MRD-P or PD not preceded by MRD-P often had 1 or more HRCA (73.7% and 82.8%), International staging system III (36.8% and 30.0%), and high LDH at diagnosis (31.6% and 23.3%). Median time from onset of therapy to MRD-P was 24.4 mo (IQR 12.6-35.8) and to PD not preceded by MRD-P was 23.2 mo (IQR 18.4-29.4). Among the 19 patients with MRD-P, 12 (63%) were on observation at time of MRD-P, 2 were receiving single agent lenalidomide, 5 were receiving a QUAD, 17 (89%) had previously obtained MRD negativity at <10-5 including 10 (53%) who had also achieved MRD negativity at 10-6. Upon detection of MRD-P, 12 (63%) pts changed therapy, all to a monoclonal antibody-containing triplet or quadruplet regimen. Yet, median time from MRD-P to PD was 10.1 months. Patients with MRD-P had 1-year SFF2T of 55.6%, in contrast to 35.0% for patients with PD not preceded by MRD-P. OS 2-year from progression event was 78.0% for MRD-P and 53.9% for PD not preceded by MRD-P. Conclusions In the context of NDMM treated with QUAD + ASCT, MRD-P indicates imminent IMWG-defined PD, and is driven by a thriving plasma cell population unlikely to be controlled by reinstitution of anti-CD38 mAb-based combinations. Outcomes of patients with MRD-P are similar to those of patients with IMWG-defined PD. These findings challenge the paradigm of IMWG-defined PD and paraprotein measurability as minimal parameters for change in therapy and introduction of agents with new mechanisms of action.

Background: Cure rates for children, adolescents, and young adults with cHL are high, but patients with a slow early response (SER) to front-line chemotherapy are at an increased risk of relapse compared with patients who have a rapid early response (RER). To avoid long-term toxicity while optimizing outcomes, treatment for pediatric cHL is now shifting to a response-adapted approach. KEYNOTE-667 (NCT03407144) is an open-label phase 2 study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy consolidation with or without radiotherapy (RT) followed by pembrolizumab maintenance in patients with cHL and SER to front-line chemotherapy. The study includes 2 groups of patients: those with low-risk cHL (stage IA, IB, and IIA without bulky disease) and those with high-risk cHL (stage IIEB-IVB cHL). Prior analysis of the low-risk group showed that consolidation with pembrolizumab plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) and RT followed by maintenance pembrolizumab had manageable safety and promising antitumor activity in patients with low-risk cHL and SER to front-line doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). We present updated results for patients with low-risk cHL and SER to ABVD. Methods: Patients eligible for the low-risk group were aged 3-25 years and had newly diagnosed stage IA, IB, or IIA cHL without bulky disease, measurable disease, and a Lansky Play-Performance Scale score of ≥50 (aged <16 years) or a Karnofsky Performance Status score of ≥50 (aged ≥16 years). All patients in the low-risk group received 2 cycles of ABVD followed by early response assessment (PET and CT/MRI). Patients with a RER (ie, Deauville score [DS] 1-3) received nonstudy therapy. Patients with SER (ie, DS 4 or 5) received consolidation with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg up to 200 mg (aged 3-17 years) or 200 mg (aged 18-25 years) IV Q3W plus 2 cycles of AVD. Patients then underwent late response assessment (LRA; PET and MRI/CT). All patients with SER received involved-site RT: 21.6 Gy for complete PET response (ie, DS 1-3) or 30.6-36 Gy for partial PET response (ie, DS 4 or 5). All patients received maintenance pembrolizumab for up to 17 cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Cheson 2007 IWG criteria. Secondary end points included PET negativity after consolidation and safety. Results: 78 patients with low-risk cHL received front-line ABVD. As of the data cutoff date (February 29, 2024), 10 of 78 patients had SER to ABVD and received consolidation with pembrolizumab plus AVD; 4 had completed consolidation and maintenance, 1 was continuing to receive treatment, and 5 had discontinued because of complete response (CR). Median time from allocation to data cutoff was 19.9 months (range, 5.6-44.8). Patients had received a median of 11.5 doses of pembrolizumab (range, 5-17) and the median time on pembro was 7.4 months (range, 3.5-11.3). The median age of patients was 16 years (range, 7-20), 6 (60%) were male, and 8 (80%) had Ann Arbor stage II disease. Of 10 patients who received consolidation, all (100%) had an LRA. The ORR was 100% (95% CI, 69-100; 9 CR and 1 partial response). Six patients (60%) were PET negative by BICR. Seven patients (70%) were PET negative by investigator review, all of whom received a reduced dose of RT. During consolidation, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 8 patients (80%); grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 4 patients (40%). No patients discontinued or died due to treatment-related AEs. Seven patients (67%) had pembrolizumab-related AEs, 3 of whom (30%) had a grade 3 event (vomiting, lymphocyte count decreased, white blood cell count decreased). Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 3 patients (30%; all grade 1 or 2 hypothyroidism). Conclusion: After additional follow-up, consolidation withpembrolizumab plus AVD and RT followed by pembrolizumab maintenance continued to demonstrate promising activity and manageable safety in patients with low-risk cHL and SER to ABVD. Of patients with a LRA, 60% were PET negative by BICR; 70% of patients were PET negative by investigator review and received a reduced dose of RT. These results support further evaluation of pembrolizumab plus AVD consolidation as a treatment option for patients with low-risk CHL and SER to front-line ABVD.

Introduction: Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a group of rare diseases characterized by persistent hypereosinophilia in the blood and/or tissues, causing organ damage and dysfunction. This retrospective observational cohort study described the real-world disease burden and clinical characteristics of patients with idiopathic HES (I-HES) or lymphocytic HES (L-HES). Methods: Records of patients with I-HES or L-HES were collected from the TriNetX Linked Electronic Health Records (EHR) plus Claims Network, a database of de-identified EHR-derived data linked to closed claims data from healthcare organizations throughout the United States. Included patients had a first diagnostic record of HES (ICD-10-CM D72.11) between January 1st 2022 and September 12th 2023 and had continuous 12-month enrollment prior to their first HES diagnosis (index date), with gaps of up to 45 days permitted. Patients were excluded if they had myeloprolifertive or secondary reactive variant of HES, or an eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis diagnosis after their HES diagnosis. Baseline was defined as the 12-month period prior to the index date, and Year 1 was defined as the 12-month period after the index date. Analyses were descriptive. Results: At the index date, patients with I-HES or L-HES (N=53) had a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 41.6 (21.4) years, with nine (17.0%) patients aged less than 18 years, 15 (28.3%) of Black or African American race, and 27 (50.9%) of White race. The proportion of males was 60.4% (n=32). Prior to receiving an I-HES or L-HES diagnosis, 47.2% of patients either had an asthma diagnosis or were receiving inhaled corticosteroids or short-acting β2-agonist treatment but without a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Other common morbidities prior to I-HES/L-HES diagnosis were dorsalgia (28.3%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (20.8%), and hypertensive disease (20.8%). Amongst eosinophilic conditions, unspecified eosinophilia was recorded in 35.8% of patients and eczema was recorded in 18.9% of patients. In patients at baseline (N=53) and during Year 1 (n=19), the mean (SD) number of organ systems with HES signs and/or symptoms was 3.2 (2.3) and 2.7 (1.8), respectively. At baseline, 15.1% and 37.7% of patients had 3 or ≥4 organ systems, respectively, with I-HES or L-HES signs and/or symptoms; during Year 1, the proportion of patients with 3 or ≥4 organ systems with I-HES or L-HES signs and/or symptoms was 31.6% each. At baseline, I-HES and L-HES signs, symptoms and morbidities were most prevalent in the pulmonary system (60.4%), followed by the ears, nose and throat (41.5%), cardiovascular (35.8%), gastrointestinal (34.0%), cardiac (30.2%), and cutaneous (30.2%) systems. Compared with baseline, the proportion of patients during Year 1 with I-HES or L-HES signs, symptoms and morbidities was slightly higher for the pulmonary (63.2%) and cutaneous (36.8%) systems, and lower in the ears, nose and throat (36.8%), cardiovascular (31.6%), gastrointestinal (21.1%), and cardiac (26.3%) systems. Common I-HES and L-HES signs, symptoms and morbidities at the index date included: runny nose (34.0%), chest pain (32.1%), cough (32.1%), asthma (30.2%), dyspnea (28.3%), abdominal pain (24.5%), arthralgia (22.6%), eczema (18.9%), and heart palpitations (18.9%). Conclusion: I-HES and L-HES were associated with multiple morbidities and organ system involvement, indicating a high disease burden at the time of diagnosis. While I-HES and L-HES are primarily hematological disorders of hypereosinophilia, many other clinical specialties may diagnose and manage patients with these disorders.

Background Venetoclax + hypomethylating agent (Ven-HMA) therapy has demonstrated improved outcomes in elderly/unfit patients with newly-diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND-AML) (N Engl J Med 2020;383). However, ~50% of patients who respond to Ven-HMA, eventually relapse (Am J Hematol 2024;99). In the current study we examined the prognostic contribution of gene mutations, karyotype, measurable residual disease (MRD) status and clinical risk factors for relapse in patients with ND-AML treated with Ven-HMA therapy. Methods Our study population of ND-AML was retrospectively recruited from Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL), after institutional review board approval and based on documentation of complete remission with/without count recovery (CR/CRi) following Ven-HMA therapy. Relapse-free survival was determined from the time of remission to relapse or last follow-up. Survival analysis was censored for transplant. The 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria was used to assign cytogenetic risk and classify treatment response (Blood 2022;140). Standard statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro (Version 17.0.0). Results 247 ND-AML patients treated with Ven-HMA (median age 73 years, 62% male, 64% de novo) who achieved CR (n=153), or CRi (n=94) were included. MRD by multiparameter flow cytometry (sensitivity 0.01%) performed at the time of CR/CRi, was negative in 117 (70%) of 166 informative cases. ELN cytogenetic risk categories at diagnosis included favorable 2%, intermediate 69%, or adverse 29%. Mutations involved TET2 21%, SRSF2 21%, TP53 19%, ASXL1 18%, DNMT3A 18%, NPM1 17%, IDH2 15%, RUNX1 15%, K/NRAS 12%, IDH1 8%, FLT3-ITD 7%, and DDX41 in 6% of informative cases. Relapse was documented in a total of 99 (40%) patients who achieved CR (39%) or CRi (41%) after a median remission duration of 6 months (1-31). Patients that relapsed within the first-year vs those that did not, were more likely to be males (75% vs 55%), MRD positive (44% vs 24%), and harbor TP53 mutations (23% vs 16%). Univariate analysis for RFS identified male gender (12 vs 29 months; p=0.02), secondary AML (10 vs 21 months; p<0.01), adverse karyotype (9 vs 22 months; p<0.01), TP53 mutations (6 vs 18 months, p<0.01) and MRD positive remission (13 months vs not reached; p<0.01) as risk factors for relapse; on the other hand, IDH2 mutations (not reached vs 15 months; p<0.01) were associated with a lower risk of relapse. Multivariable analysis confirmed male gender (HR 2.2), TP53 mutations (HR 3.0) and MRD positive remission (HR 1.7) as unfavorable predictors of relapse. Subsequently, in a three-tiered relapse prediction model, RFS was significantly inferior in the presence of three risk factors (male gender, TP53 mutations, MRD positive remission) (n=10, median 4 months), vs two (n=34, median 10 months) vs ≤ 1 risk factor (n=122, median 31 months) (p<0.01); 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 100%, 56%, and 26% in the presence of three, two and ≤ 1 risk factors, respectively. 50 of 99 (65%) patients received salvage therapy which included cladribine-cytarabine-Ven (n=19), intensive induction chemotherapy (n=9), FLT3 inhibitors (n=5), Ven-HMA-FLT3 inhibitor (n=1), IDH1/2 inhibitors (n=5), glasdegib-cytarabine (n=4), gemtuzumab (n=3), lenalidomide (n=1), or investigational therapies (n=3); in addition, Ven-HMA was resumed in 14 patients in whom treatment had been discontinued for a median of 5 months (2-12). Overall, 20 (31%) of patients achieved second CR/CRi and response rates were similar with intensive vs less intensive therapy (CR/CRi; 44% vs 29%; p=0.37). Median follow up after relapse was 3.4 months (1-66), during which 73 (74%) deaths, and 4 (5%) ASCT were recorded. Median transplant-censored survival was 4.2 months (1-year; 22%), and inferior in patients with adverse karyotype (median 4.6 vs 3.4 months; p=0.02), and TP53 mutations (3.6 vs 4.4; p=0.11); on the other hand, male gender (3.5 vs 6.8 months; p=0.51), MRD positive remission (4.6 vs 4.2; p=0.56), and IDH2 mutations (6.7 vs 4.2; p=0.28), did not influence post-relapse survival. Conclusions The current study identifies male gender, TP53 mutations, and MRD status as powerful predictors of relapse and proposes a relapse prediction model for ND-AML patients receiving Ven-HMA therapy. Furthermore, relapse following Ven-HMA was associated with uniformly poor outcomes, regardless of salvage treatment strategy.