Morales, Fabio Molina

Background: Cure rates for children, adolescents, and young adults with cHL are high, but patients with a slow early response (SER) to front-line chemotherapy are at an increased risk of relapse compared with patients who have a rapid early response (RER). To avoid long-term toxicity while optimizing outcomes, treatment for pediatric cHL is now shifting to a response-adapted approach. KEYNOTE-667 (NCT03407144) is an open-label phase 2 study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy consolidation with or without radiotherapy (RT) followed by pembrolizumab maintenance in patients with cHL and SER to front-line chemotherapy. The study includes 2 groups of patients: those with low-risk cHL (stage IA, IB, and IIA without bulky disease) and those with high-risk cHL (stage IIEB-IVB cHL). Prior analysis of the low-risk group showed that consolidation with pembrolizumab plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) and RT followed by maintenance pembrolizumab had manageable safety and promising antitumor activity in patients with low-risk cHL and SER to front-line doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD). We present updated results for patients with low-risk cHL and SER to ABVD. Methods: Patients eligible for the low-risk group were aged 3-25 years and had newly diagnosed stage IA, IB, or IIA cHL without bulky disease, measurable disease, and a Lansky Play-Performance Scale score of ≥50 (aged <16 years) or a Karnofsky Performance Status score of ≥50 (aged ≥16 years). All patients in the low-risk group received 2 cycles of ABVD followed by early response assessment (PET and CT/MRI). Patients with a RER (ie, Deauville score [DS] 1-3) received nonstudy therapy. Patients with SER (ie, DS 4 or 5) received consolidation with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg up to 200 mg (aged 3-17 years) or 200 mg (aged 18-25 years) IV Q3W plus 2 cycles of AVD. Patients then underwent late response assessment (LRA; PET and MRI/CT). All patients with SER received involved-site RT: 21.6 Gy for complete PET response (ie, DS 1-3) or 30.6-36 Gy for partial PET response (ie, DS 4 or 5). All patients received maintenance pembrolizumab for up to 17 cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Cheson 2007 IWG criteria. Secondary end points included PET negativity after consolidation and safety. Results: 78 patients with low-risk cHL received front-line ABVD. As of the data cutoff date (February 29, 2024), 10 of 78 patients had SER to ABVD and received consolidation with pembrolizumab plus AVD; 4 had completed consolidation and maintenance, 1 was continuing to receive treatment, and 5 had discontinued because of complete response (CR). Median time from allocation to data cutoff was 19.9 months (range, 5.6-44.8). Patients had received a median of 11.5 doses of pembrolizumab (range, 5-17) and the median time on pembro was 7.4 months (range, 3.5-11.3). The median age of patients was 16 years (range, 7-20), 6 (60%) were male, and 8 (80%) had Ann Arbor stage II disease. Of 10 patients who received consolidation, all (100%) had an LRA. The ORR was 100% (95% CI, 69-100; 9 CR and 1 partial response). Six patients (60%) were PET negative by BICR. Seven patients (70%) were PET negative by investigator review, all of whom received a reduced dose of RT. During consolidation, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 8 patients (80%); grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 4 patients (40%). No patients discontinued or died due to treatment-related AEs. Seven patients (67%) had pembrolizumab-related AEs, 3 of whom (30%) had a grade 3 event (vomiting, lymphocyte count decreased, white blood cell count decreased). Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 3 patients (30%; all grade 1 or 2 hypothyroidism). Conclusion: After additional follow-up, consolidation withpembrolizumab plus AVD and RT followed by pembrolizumab maintenance continued to demonstrate promising activity and manageable safety in patients with low-risk cHL and SER to ABVD. Of patients with a LRA, 60% were PET negative by BICR; 70% of patients were PET negative by investigator review and received a reduced dose of RT. These results support further evaluation of pembrolizumab plus AVD consolidation as a treatment option for patients with low-risk CHL and SER to front-line ABVD.

Background: Pediatric patients (pts) with low-risk cHL achieve high cure rates with standard chemo. However, those with a SER to front-line chemo are at higher risk of relapse than pts with a rapid early response (RER). Current treatment options are also associated with long-term toxicities such as secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and pulmonary and gonadal toxicity. Novel treatment approaches are needed to optimize outcomes while minimizing long-term toxicity. KEYNOTE-667 (NCT03407144) is an open-label, phase 2 study that included an analysis of safety and efficacy of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) induction in pediatric pts with low-risk cHL followed by consolidation with pembro plus AVD and involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) and pembro maintenance in those with SER to front-line ABVD. We present an interim analysis of pts with low-risk cHL enrolled in this trial. Methods: Eligible pts were 3-25 y old and had newly diagnosed stage IA, IB, or IIA cHL without bulky disease, measurable disease per investigator assessment, and a Lansky Play-Performance Scale ≥50 (aged <16 y) or a Karnofsky score of ≥50 (aged ≥16 y). Pts initially received 2 cycles of induction with ABVD. Response was then assessed by PET/MRI/CT (early response assessment). Pts with RER received nonstudy therapy per treating physician. Pts with SER (Deauville score [DS], 4 or 5) received consolidation with pembro 2 mg/kg up to 200 mg IV Q3W (3-17 y) or 200 mg IV Q3W (18-25 y) in combination with 2 cycles of AVD followed by a late response assessment (LRA) with PET/MRI/CT. All pts with a SER then received ISRT (21.6 Gy for pts with a complete PET response [DS, 1-3]; 30.6-36 Gy for pts with a partial PET response [DS, 4 or 5]) plus maintenance pembro Q3W for up to 17 cycles. Primary end point was ORR by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Cheson 2007 IWG criteria in pts with SER determined at any time after starting pembro and before start of new anticancer therapy. Secondary end points included rate of PET negativity after consolidation, EFS, OS, and safety. Results: 73 pts with low-risk cHL were enrolled, 9 of whom had SER to ABVD induction. 64 pts had a RER and received nonstudy treatment. At data cutoff (March 1, 2023), 2 of 9 pts (22%) with SER had completed consolidation and maintenance therapy, 5 (56%) were ongoing, and 2 (22%) had discontinued, both because of complete response. Median time from enrollment to data cutoff was 8.7 mo (range, 2.2-32.9). Median age was 16 y (range, 7-20), 5 pts (56%) were male, 2 (22%) had Ann Arbor stage I disease, and 7 (78%) had Ann Arbor stage II disease. Pts with SER had received a median of 8 doses of pembro (range, 1-17); median time on pembro was 4.8 mo (range, <0.1-11.3). Of 9 pts who received consolidation therapy with pembro plus AVD, 6 (67%) had a LRA (3 are still in consolidation and have not reached the LRA timepoint), of whom 3 (50%) were PET negative by BICR (2 [33%] were PET negative by investigator review). Of 73 pts who received ABVD induction, 66 (90%) had an AE regardless of causality. 33 pts (45%) experienced grade 3/4 AEs, most commonly (≥10%) neutrophil count decreased (n = 19; 26%) and neutropenia (n = 9; 12.3%). One pt experienced grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Twelve pts (16%) had serious AEs. No pts discontinued treatment or died because of AEs. Treatment-related AEs due to ABVD induction occurred in 59 pts (81%), with grade 3/4 events in 31 (42%). Of the 9 pts with SER to ABVD induction who received consolidation and maintenance therapy, 7 (78%) experienced an AE regardless of causality. Two pts (22%) had grade 3/4 AEs. No serious AEs were reported during consolidation and maintenance therapy, and no pts discontinued treatment or died because of AEs. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 6 pts (67%) who received consolidation and maintenance therapy; with grade 3/4 events in 2 pts (22%). Six pts (67%) experienced AEs related to pembro; most commonly (≥3 pts) anemia, nausea, vomiting (n = 3 each [33%]). Two pts experienced grade 3/4 AEs related to pembro (vomiting, white blood cell count decreased). One pt (11%) experienced an immune-mediated AE (grade 2 hyperthyroidism). Conclusion: Early results from the low-risk cHL cohort of KEYNOTE-667 suggest that induction therapy with ABVD and consolidation with pembro plus AVD had a manageable safety profile. Among the relatively small number of pts with a SER to ABVD, 50% with a LRA had a PET-negative response by BICR and received a reduced dose of RT.