Shen, Juan

Background: Overall survival rates now exceed 90% for children, adolescents, and young adults with cHL, but patients with slow early response (SER) to front-line chemotherapy are at an increased risk of relapse. The approaches used historically to treat patients with SER included dose intensification and radiotherapy (RT), which can be associated with long-term toxicity. The open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-667study (NCT03407144) is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of consolidation with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without RT followed by pembrolizumab maintenance in patients with cHL and SER to front-line chemotherapy. The study includes 2 groups: patients with low-risk cHL (stage IA, IB, or IIA without bulky disease) and patients with high-risk cHL (stage IIEB-IVB). Prior analysis of the high-risk group showed that consolidation with pembrolizumab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone/prednisolone, and dacarbazine (COPDAC-28) followed by pembrolizumab maintenance had manageable safety and promising activity in patients with high-risk cHL and SER to front-line vincristine, etoposide, prednisone/prednisolone, and doxorubicin (OEPA). Here, we present updated results for patients with high-risk cHL and SER to OEPA. Methods: Patients eligible for the high-risk group were aged 3-25 years and had newly diagnosed stage IIEB, IIIEA, IIIEB, IIIB, IVA, or IVB cHL; measurable disease; and a Lansky Play-Performance Scale (aged <16 years) or a Karnofsky Performance Status (aged ≥16 years) score of ≥50. All patients in the high-risk group received 2 cycles of OEPA followed by early response assessment (PET and CT/MRI). Patients with a rapid early response (ie, Deauville score [DS] 1-3) received nonstudy therapy. Patients with a SER (ie, DS 4 or 5) received consolidation therapy with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg up to 200 mg (aged 3-17 years) or 200 mg (aged 18-25 years) IV Q3W plus COPDAC-28 for 4 cycles. Patients then underwent late-response assessment (LRA; PET and CT/MRI). Patients with PET-positive disease at LRA (ie, DS 4 or 5) received RT (28.8 Gy) to late PET-positive residua. Patients with PET-negative disease (ie, DS 1-3) received no RT. All patients received maintenance pembrolizumab for up to 17 cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Cheson 2007 IWG criteria. Secondary end points included the rate of PET negativity after consolidation and safety. Results: 84 patients with high-risk cHL and SER to front-line OEPA received consolidation with pembrolizumab plus COPDAC-28. Median time from treatment allocation to data cutoff (Feb 29, 2024) was 24.3 months (range, 5.7-48.4). As of the data cutoff, 55 patients had completed consolidation and maintenance therapy, 20 were ongoing, and 9 had discontinued treatment (due to adverse events [AE], n = 3; progressive disease, n = 2; withdrawal by patient, n = 2; complete response [CR], n = 1; physician decision, n = 1). Patients received a median of 17 doses of pembrolizumab (range, 2-17) and the median time on pembrolizumab was 11.1 months (range, 0.5-11.8). The median age of patients was 14 years (range, 4-22), 78 (93%) were aged 3-17 years, 45 (54%) were male, 44 (52%) had bulky disease, and 53 (63%) had Ann Arbor stage IV disease. Of 84 patients who received consolidation, 80 (95%) had an LRA. The ORR among these patients was 99% (95% CI, 93-100; 57 CR and 22 partial response). 56 patients (70%) with a LRA were PET negative by BICR; 55 (69%) were PET negative by investigator review and did not receive RT. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 61 patients (73%); grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 16 patients (19%). Three patients (4%) discontinued treatment due to treatment-related AEs. No patients died due to treatment-related AEs. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 10 patients (12%). Conclusion: After additional follow up, consolidation with pembrolizumab plus COPDAC-28 with or without RT followed by pembrolizumab maintenance continued to demonstrate promising activity and manageable safety in patients with high-risk cHL and SER to front-line OEPA. Among the 80 patients with an LRA, 70% were PET negative by BICR and 69% were PET negative by investigator review and were spared RT. These results continue to support pembrolizumab plus COPDAC-28 consolidation as a treatment option that may augment response in patients with high-risk CHL and SER to front-line OEPA.

Background: Pediatric patients (pts) with low-risk cHL achieve high cure rates with standard chemo. However, those with a SER to front-line chemo are at higher risk of relapse than pts with a rapid early response (RER). Current treatment options are also associated with long-term toxicities such as secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and pulmonary and gonadal toxicity. Novel treatment approaches are needed to optimize outcomes while minimizing long-term toxicity. KEYNOTE-667 (NCT03407144) is an open-label, phase 2 study that included an analysis of safety and efficacy of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) induction in pediatric pts with low-risk cHL followed by consolidation with pembro plus AVD and involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) and pembro maintenance in those with SER to front-line ABVD. We present an interim analysis of pts with low-risk cHL enrolled in this trial. Methods: Eligible pts were 3-25 y old and had newly diagnosed stage IA, IB, or IIA cHL without bulky disease, measurable disease per investigator assessment, and a Lansky Play-Performance Scale ≥50 (aged <16 y) or a Karnofsky score of ≥50 (aged ≥16 y). Pts initially received 2 cycles of induction with ABVD. Response was then assessed by PET/MRI/CT (early response assessment). Pts with RER received nonstudy therapy per treating physician. Pts with SER (Deauville score [DS], 4 or 5) received consolidation with pembro 2 mg/kg up to 200 mg IV Q3W (3-17 y) or 200 mg IV Q3W (18-25 y) in combination with 2 cycles of AVD followed by a late response assessment (LRA) with PET/MRI/CT. All pts with a SER then received ISRT (21.6 Gy for pts with a complete PET response [DS, 1-3]; 30.6-36 Gy for pts with a partial PET response [DS, 4 or 5]) plus maintenance pembro Q3W for up to 17 cycles. Primary end point was ORR by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Cheson 2007 IWG criteria in pts with SER determined at any time after starting pembro and before start of new anticancer therapy. Secondary end points included rate of PET negativity after consolidation, EFS, OS, and safety. Results: 73 pts with low-risk cHL were enrolled, 9 of whom had SER to ABVD induction. 64 pts had a RER and received nonstudy treatment. At data cutoff (March 1, 2023), 2 of 9 pts (22%) with SER had completed consolidation and maintenance therapy, 5 (56%) were ongoing, and 2 (22%) had discontinued, both because of complete response. Median time from enrollment to data cutoff was 8.7 mo (range, 2.2-32.9). Median age was 16 y (range, 7-20), 5 pts (56%) were male, 2 (22%) had Ann Arbor stage I disease, and 7 (78%) had Ann Arbor stage II disease. Pts with SER had received a median of 8 doses of pembro (range, 1-17); median time on pembro was 4.8 mo (range, <0.1-11.3). Of 9 pts who received consolidation therapy with pembro plus AVD, 6 (67%) had a LRA (3 are still in consolidation and have not reached the LRA timepoint), of whom 3 (50%) were PET negative by BICR (2 [33%] were PET negative by investigator review). Of 73 pts who received ABVD induction, 66 (90%) had an AE regardless of causality. 33 pts (45%) experienced grade 3/4 AEs, most commonly (≥10%) neutrophil count decreased (n = 19; 26%) and neutropenia (n = 9; 12.3%). One pt experienced grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Twelve pts (16%) had serious AEs. No pts discontinued treatment or died because of AEs. Treatment-related AEs due to ABVD induction occurred in 59 pts (81%), with grade 3/4 events in 31 (42%). Of the 9 pts with SER to ABVD induction who received consolidation and maintenance therapy, 7 (78%) experienced an AE regardless of causality. Two pts (22%) had grade 3/4 AEs. No serious AEs were reported during consolidation and maintenance therapy, and no pts discontinued treatment or died because of AEs. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 6 pts (67%) who received consolidation and maintenance therapy; with grade 3/4 events in 2 pts (22%). Six pts (67%) experienced AEs related to pembro; most commonly (≥3 pts) anemia, nausea, vomiting (n = 3 each [33%]). Two pts experienced grade 3/4 AEs related to pembro (vomiting, white blood cell count decreased). One pt (11%) experienced an immune-mediated AE (grade 2 hyperthyroidism). Conclusion: Early results from the low-risk cHL cohort of KEYNOTE-667 suggest that induction therapy with ABVD and consolidation with pembro plus AVD had a manageable safety profile. Among the relatively small number of pts with a SER to ABVD, 50% with a LRA had a PET-negative response by BICR and received a reduced dose of RT.