Citations

Background: Venetoclax (Ven), a BCL2 inhibitor, has shown promising responses in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with t(11;14) and/or BCL2 expression. However, consistent benefit in clinical trials remain elusive. This report evaluates the efficacy and safety of Ven combination therapies, including in the non-t(11;14) subgroup, and examines the impact of secondary cytogenetic abnormalities (SGA) on outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included multiple myeloma (MM) patients without concurrent AL amyloidosis treated with Ven-based combinations at Mayo Clinic sites from January 2015 to December 2023. FISH data was collected at diagnosis and before venetoclax initiation to assess SGAs. Refractoriness was defined by progression on or within 60 days of stopping treatment. Patients refractory to at least one proteasome inhibitor (PI), immunomodulatory drug (ImiD), and anti-CD38 antibody were considered triple-class refractory (TCR). Ven combinations were grouped as: Daratumumab/CD38 antibody (Dara)-Ven based if received Dara ± other drugs, PI-Ven-based without Dara, Ven-dexamethasone (Ven-d), and other combinations (Ven-Misc). BCL2 expression in patients without t(11;14) was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from treatment initiation to disease progression or last follow-up. Results: We included 232 patients in this study. The median age at diagnosis of MM was 62 years (range 32-87), and the median age at initiation was 68 years (range 35-89). The median time from diagnosis of MM to initiation of Ven was 55 months (95% CI 28, 89 months), and the median follow-up from initiation of Ven-based treatment was 17.2 months (95% CI: 14, 22). Patients had received a median of 3 lines (IQR 4-6); 65% (n=152) of patients were TCR, 71% (n=163) had received autologous stem cell transplant and 7% (n=16) patients had received prior immune effector therapy prior to initiation of Ven-based therapy. The majority (83%, n=190) of the patients harbored a t(11;14); in the patients without t(11;14), a BCL2 expression by IHC was tested in 18 patients and positive in 17 patients. The most common Ven-based combinations included: Dara-Ven-d (19%, n=44), PI-Ven-d (30.2%, n=70), Ven-d (48.3%, n=112), Ven-misc (2.6%, n=6). The overall response rate for the entire cohort was 57% [64% for t(11;14) and 26% for non t(11;14), p<0.0001]. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 9.5 months (95% CI 8.5,13), and the duration of response was 18 months (95% CI 15.2-23.3). The median PFS was 11.8 months (95% CI 9.5-16.7) for patients harboring a t(11;14) compared to 2.9 months (95% CI 1.8, 8.4) for patients without a t(11;14), p<0.0001. Among the non-t(11;14) cohort with BCL2 expression, the median PFS was 1.8 months (95% CI: 1.2-4.2). Among the 190 patients with t(11;14), 18% (34/190) harbored deletion 17p and 32% (60/193) harbored a 1q gain/amplification (referred hereforth as 1q21+) at initiation of Ven-based therapy. In the cohort of patients with t(11;14), the presence of either del17p or 1q21+ (n=85/190) was associated with a significantly inferior PFS [median PFS 8.2 months (95% CI: 5.5,13)] vs. 15.1 months (95% CI: 11.6, 22), p=0.03. At the last follow-up,42 patients had ongoing treatment with ven-based combination. Most common reasons for discontinuation were progression (77% N=140), adverse effect (12%, n=22), patient/provider preference(9%, n=17); 2% (n=4) patients died without progression (3 infection, 1 unclear). The most commonly utilized maximum dose of venetoclax was 400 mg (42%); 15% (n=35) of patients required a dose reduction, and 23% (n=54) received a ramp-up. Tumor lysis syndrome was not noted in any patient. Infectious complications were noted in 23% (n=52). The estimated median OS from initiation of ven-based Rx was 34 months (95%CI 25-47). The estimated median OS for patients without a t(11;14) was 6.2 months (95% CI: 3.3-11.3) compared to 46 months (31.4-54.1), p<0.0001. In the t(11;14) subgroup, the 18-month OS rate was 79% for patients without 1q21+/del17p vs. 50% for patients with a 1q21+/del17p (p=0.002). Conclusion: Venetoclax-based regimens represent an important treatment option for patients harboring a t(11;14). The PFS in patients with BCL2 expression without t(11;14) was poor suggesting lack of efficacy of venetoclax-based regimens for that subgroup. Presence of concurrent del17p and/or 1q21+ with t(11;14) portends an inferior PFS.

Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) scan is the imaging modality of choice for initial staging and response assessment of follicular lymphoma (FL). Quantitative parameters such as standardized uptake value (SUV) have been investigated as putative prognosticators in FL, with high baseline SUVmax predicting aggressive disease. To date, there is no data to guide treatment choices in patients (pts) with high SUVmax but with no documented evidence of histologic transformation (HT). Specifically, it remains unclear whether anthracycline-containing regimens, such as R-CHOP, are more beneficial than R-Bendamustine (BR) in these pts. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy of frontline R-CHOP and BR in newly diagnosed FL pts based on the SUVmax at baseline PET (bPET). Patients and Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven FL1-2 and FL3A who had a bPET scan and who received either first-line R-CHOP or BR within 6 months of diagnosis between 2002 and 2022 were evaluated. Analysis was restricted to pts with age < 70 years to reduce confounding of age with treatment selection. Cohorts included were the FOLL12 (n=562, Luminari et al JCO 2022) and the R-chemotherapy arm of the RELEVANCE (n=216, Morschhauser et al NEJM 2018) clinical trials, the prospectively enrolled Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) and the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) cohorts (n=288) and a retrospective cohort from 13 Australian centers (n=219). Choice of chemotherapy regimen was per treating physician. Maintenance was per protocol (FOLL12/RELEVANCE) or per treating physician (MER/LEO/Australia). Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as time from treatment initiation to progression, relapse, retreatment or death; both were censored at 72 months due to varying follow-up across cohorts. SUVmax was grouped by tertile within each cohort to account for potential differences in SUVmax distributions and patient populations across cohorts. Kaplan Meier curves and multivariable Cox models cohort-stratified and adjusted for clinical factors (FLIPI, ECOG PS, age, grade 3A) were used to evaluate outcomes. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (IQR 49-64). 651 (51%) pts were treated with R-CHOP and 634 (49%) with BR. Within the study cohorts, there was a prevalence of cases receiving BR compared to R-CHOP in the Australian (90% vs 10%) and MER/LEO (68% vs 32%) cohorts, while the opposite was observed in the RELEVANCE (16% vs 84%) and FOLL12 (37% vs 63; p<0.001) trials. Pts receiving R-CHOP were slightly younger (median 56 vs 58 years, p=0.005), more frequently had grade 3A (17% vs 7%, p<0.001), elevated LDH (27% vs 22%, p=0.029), bulky disease > 7 cm (44% vs 37%, p=0.019), lower ECOG PS (PS >1 7% vs 13%, p<0.001), and higher rate of high risk FLIPI (37% vs 30%, p=0.005). Baseline SUVmax was slightly lower in R-CHOP (median 10.7, IQR 7.9-14.9) vs BR (median 11.0, IQR 8.2-14.2) treated pts (p=0.0045). At a median follow-up of 56 months (range, 1-72 months), 415 pts (32%) had an event and 103 (8%) died. Higher SUVmax was not associated with EFS (middle tertile HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.76-1.22; upper tertile HR=0.86, 95% CI 0.68-1.09; p=0.45) or OS (middle tertile HR=1.28, 95% CI 0.80-2.05; upper tertile HR=0.97, 95% CI 0.59-1.59; p=0.44) in multivariable models stratified on cohort and adjusted for treatment and clinical factors. We then compared outcomes by treatment within tertiles of SUVmax. In multivariable models, R-CHOP had modestly inferior EFS to BR in low (HR=1.27, 95% CI 0.84-1.93) and middle tertiles (HR=1.49, 95% CI 0.99-2.25), and modestly superior OS to BR in low (HR=0.59, 95% CI 0.23-1.47) and middle (HR=0.79, 95% CI 0.37-1.71) tertiles. Both EFS (HR=1.06, 95% CI 0.71-1.58) and OS (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.45-2.30) for R-CHOP were similar to BR in the highest tertile. No comparisons identified a statistically significant benefit for either therapy in multivariable models when evaluating SUVmax tertile subsets. Conclusions: In this large multicenter study of newly diagnosed FL pts with bPET who received frontline immunochemotherapy, higher baseline SUVmax was not associated with inferior outcomes after adjusting for treatment and clinical factors. Within the caveats of retrospective studies and confounding of treatment selection, these data provide no clear insights for SUVmax-based therapy selection in first-line follicular lymphoma pts treated with immunochemotherapy.

Background: Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare indolent disease with a median overall survival (OS) of more than 10 years, although a proportion of patients may develop aggressive histology transformation. In a previous report from this large, international dataset, the 10-year cumulative incidence of transformation was 17% (95% 13-21) and in another study of 186 patients, the 10-year cumulative incidence was 14%Click or tap here to enter text.. In this report, we focus on risk factors for transformation as well as clinical characteristics and outcomes of transformed SMZL (tSMZL). Patients and methods: Adults diagnosed with SMZL in 2000-2018 were identified through regional or nationwide population-based registries or from hospital registries. Only patients likely to have SMZL as defined by Matutes et al. were included. Those with discordant lymphoma and/or transformation at diagnosis were excluded. Medical records were reviewed by local clinicians with experience in hematology/oncology, and detailed information on clinical characteristics, treatment lines, and outcomes was collected. Only histologically confirmed high-grade transformations (HT) were included. OS was defined as the time from transformation to death or censoring at last follow-up. Additional analyses stratified by treatment exposure prior to HT and treatment of HT were conducted. Multivariable Cox analyses were performed to determine clinicopathological features associated with transformation and OS. Results: Out of 940 patients with SMZL, 111 developed HT during a median follow-up of 9.1 years. The median time from diagnosis to HT was 3.4 years with an interquartile range of 1.6-7.4 years. Median age at HT was 71 years. Patients with HT shared similar baseline characteristics to those without in terms of age at diagnosis (66.4 vs 67.6), f:m ratio (1.5 vs 1.1) and ECOG ³2 (7.2% vs 7.4%). The 5-yr OS from the time of HT was 42% (CI 95%, 32-54). Of the 111 patients with tSMZL, a complete treatment history from SMZL diagnosis until HT was available for 88 included in the following analyses. By the time of HT, 46 had not received any prior systemic therapy (37 only splenectomy, 9 no therapy), 6 patients had received rituximab alone or combined with splenectomy, and 36 patients had received chemotherapy alone or as part of combined modality treatment. In a uni- and multivariable models for HT, we assessed age, treatment at diagnosis, sex, extra-hilar lymphadenopathy, and extranodal involvement. In both the uni- and multivariable model, age >70 (HR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.4), immediate treatment including splenectomy (HR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.05-3.6), and extra-hilar lymphadenopathy (HR 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.3) were associated with higher HT hazard, while extranodal involvement (HR 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06-0.84) was associated with a lower HT hazard. At the time of first-line treatment, multivariable analysis revealed similar results and with no association between risk of transformation and treatment strategy (i.e splenectomy alone, rituximab monotherapy or chemotherapy with /without rituximab or splenectomy, and other). At the time of HT, patients who had been previously treated with chemotherapy had an inferior 5-year OS of 24% (95%CI: 13-44%) versus 54% (95%CI: 41-71%) for those who had not received chemotherapy prior to HT. In contrast, there was no difference in the survival of patients that transformed less than or more than 24 months from diagnosis with 5-year OS after HT of 35% (95%CI 20-60%) and 45% (95%CI, 33-61%) respectively. In a multivariable Cox regression analyses of age at time of HT, sex, time since last treatment <24 months, chemo-exposure in previous treatment lines and anthracycline-containing therapy (+/-R) at the time of HT, only prior chemo-exposure was borderline associated with poorer OS (HR 1.8, 95%CI: 0.9-3.5). Conclusion: Patients with SMZL face a notable risk of developing tSMZL over time. Patients in need of immediate treatment at first SMZL diagnosis, age >70 and extrahilar lymphadenopathy had a higher risk of tSMZL and outcomes at the time of HT were poor if patients had been exposed to prior chemotherapy after adjustment for age, sex, and time since last treatment.

Background: Overall survival rates now exceed 90% for children, adolescents, and young adults with cHL, but patients with slow early response (SER) to front-line chemotherapy are at an increased risk of relapse. The approaches used historically to treat patients with SER included dose intensification and radiotherapy (RT), which can be associated with long-term toxicity. The open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-667study (NCT03407144) is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of consolidation with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with or without RT followed by pembrolizumab maintenance in patients with cHL and SER to front-line chemotherapy. The study includes 2 groups: patients with low-risk cHL (stage IA, IB, or IIA without bulky disease) and patients with high-risk cHL (stage IIEB-IVB). Prior analysis of the high-risk group showed that consolidation with pembrolizumab plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone/prednisolone, and dacarbazine (COPDAC-28) followed by pembrolizumab maintenance had manageable safety and promising activity in patients with high-risk cHL and SER to front-line vincristine, etoposide, prednisone/prednisolone, and doxorubicin (OEPA). Here, we present updated results for patients with high-risk cHL and SER to OEPA. Methods: Patients eligible for the high-risk group were aged 3-25 years and had newly diagnosed stage IIEB, IIIEA, IIIEB, IIIB, IVA, or IVB cHL; measurable disease; and a Lansky Play-Performance Scale (aged <16 years) or a Karnofsky Performance Status (aged ≥16 years) score of ≥50. All patients in the high-risk group received 2 cycles of OEPA followed by early response assessment (PET and CT/MRI). Patients with a rapid early response (ie, Deauville score [DS] 1-3) received nonstudy therapy. Patients with a SER (ie, DS 4 or 5) received consolidation therapy with pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg up to 200 mg (aged 3-17 years) or 200 mg (aged 18-25 years) IV Q3W plus COPDAC-28 for 4 cycles. Patients then underwent late-response assessment (LRA; PET and CT/MRI). Patients with PET-positive disease at LRA (ie, DS 4 or 5) received RT (28.8 Gy) to late PET-positive residua. Patients with PET-negative disease (ie, DS 1-3) received no RT. All patients received maintenance pembrolizumab for up to 17 cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR) per Cheson 2007 IWG criteria. Secondary end points included the rate of PET negativity after consolidation and safety. Results: 84 patients with high-risk cHL and SER to front-line OEPA received consolidation with pembrolizumab plus COPDAC-28. Median time from treatment allocation to data cutoff (Feb 29, 2024) was 24.3 months (range, 5.7-48.4). As of the data cutoff, 55 patients had completed consolidation and maintenance therapy, 20 were ongoing, and 9 had discontinued treatment (due to adverse events [AE], n = 3; progressive disease, n = 2; withdrawal by patient, n = 2; complete response [CR], n = 1; physician decision, n = 1). Patients received a median of 17 doses of pembrolizumab (range, 2-17) and the median time on pembrolizumab was 11.1 months (range, 0.5-11.8). The median age of patients was 14 years (range, 4-22), 78 (93%) were aged 3-17 years, 45 (54%) were male, 44 (52%) had bulky disease, and 53 (63%) had Ann Arbor stage IV disease. Of 84 patients who received consolidation, 80 (95%) had an LRA. The ORR among these patients was 99% (95% CI, 93-100; 57 CR and 22 partial response). 56 patients (70%) with a LRA were PET negative by BICR; 55 (69%) were PET negative by investigator review and did not receive RT. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 61 patients (73%); grade 3 or 4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 16 patients (19%). Three patients (4%) discontinued treatment due to treatment-related AEs. No patients died due to treatment-related AEs. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 10 patients (12%). Conclusion: After additional follow up, consolidation with pembrolizumab plus COPDAC-28 with or without RT followed by pembrolizumab maintenance continued to demonstrate promising activity and manageable safety in patients with high-risk cHL and SER to front-line OEPA. Among the 80 patients with an LRA, 70% were PET negative by BICR and 69% were PET negative by investigator review and were spared RT. These results continue to support pembrolizumab plus COPDAC-28 consolidation as a treatment option that may augment response in patients with high-risk CHL and SER to front-line OEPA.

Introduction: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) have a higher risk of developing other malignancies compared to the general population (Greene et al, J NCI 1978). Chemoimmunotherapy has previously been the mainstay of treatment and was associated with increased rates of other cancers (OC) (Thompson et al, Blood 2023). Targeted therapies such as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) and BCL2 inhibitors were approved in the frontline setting in 2016 and 2019, respectively, and are now the standard of care for initial therapy (Shanafelt et al, NEJM 2019; Fischer et al, NEJM 2019). This study aims to compare the incidence of OC in patients with CLL/SLL treated with frontline therapies or managed with active surveillance. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control analysis of patients diagnosed with CLL/SLL during or after 2016 using the Department of US Veteran Affairs Central Cancer Registry (VACCR). Cases were patients with CLL/SLL diagnosed with incident OC, excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers. Frontline treatment with chemoimmunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies alone, or targeted therapies, such as BTKi or BCL2 inhibitor, was the exposure of interest compared to patients on active surveillance. Patients were followed until date of OC, death, or last follow up. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize continuous and categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk of developing OC while adjusting for potential confounders. Results: We identified 5244 patients with CLL/SLL who met inclusion criteria. Median follow up was 3.19 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.61-5.14). The median age at diagnosis of CLL/SLL was 71.7 years (IQR 66.1-77.3) and most patients were white (78%) and male (97%). 3,460 (66%) patients were managed with active surveillance and 1,784 (34%) patients required frontline treatment: 1,318 (25%) targeted therapy, 329 (6%) chemoimmunotherapy, and 137 (3%) monoclonal antibodies alone. In patients treated with targeted therapies, patients were treated with ibrutinib (776, 59%), acalabrutinib (246, 19%), zanubrutinib (129, 10%), venetoclax (164, 12%), or combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax on a clinical trial (3, <1%). 505 (10%) patients were diagnosed with OC and 4739(90%) patients did not develop OC during the follow up period after diagnosis of CLL/SLL. Types of OC observed included neoplasms of the lung (120, 24%), prostate (105, 21%), gastrointestinal tract (72, 14%), hematologic malignancies (68, 13%), melanoma (45, 9%), kidney and bladder (43, 9%), head and neck (16, 3%), and other/unknown (36, 7%). More patients with OC had a history of tobacco use compared to those diagnosed with CLL/SLL without OC (70% vs 54%, p<0.0001). Fewer patients with OC had a history of alcohol use (60% vs 67%, p<0.0001). In a logistic regression analysis adjusted for age at diagnosis of CLL, race, and tobacco and alcohol use patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy had a higher risk of OC compared to those on observation (OR 2.4, 95% CI: 1.7-3.3, p<0.0001) whereas patients treated with targeted therapies or monoclonal antibodies alone did not have a higher risk of OC (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4 and OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.8-2.6, respectively) compared to the patients on active surveillance. A higher proportion of patients with OC were deceased compared to those without OC, 219/505 (43%) vs 1261/4739 (27%), respectively (p<0.0001) at cutoff date. Similar analyses of occurrence of OC in patients followed at tertiary centers including MD Anderson in Houston, Texas and Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota are ongoing and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Initial treatment with targeted therapies or monoclonal antibodies alone was not associated with an increased risk of OC in US veterans diagnosed with CLL/SLL during and after 2016. However, initial treatment with chemoimmunotherapy was associated with a significant increase of OC compared to patients with CLL/SLL managed with active surveillance.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) commonly occurs during initiation of bispecific T-cell engaging therapy (BsAbs) for multiple myeloma (MM) (NEJM 2022;387:495, NEJM 2022;387:2232, Nat Med 2023;29:2259). Pre-medications, step-up dosing (SUD), and monitoring minimize high-grade toxicity risk, while protocolized outpatient (OP) management of BsAbs and toxicities could reduce resource utilization and improve patient satisfaction. At Mayo Clinic, SUD, clinical assessment and grade 1 CRS management occurs primarily as an OP for patients with MM receiving BsAbs. This study aims to assess the current OP management practices of BsAbs and related toxicities including patient outcomes, admission rates, and resource utilization. Patients with MM who received SUD from August 23, 2023, to March 29, 2024, were included. Baseline demographics, patient outcomes, and CRS management details are summarized. Resource utilization outcomes included level of care, length of hospital stay (LOS), and high-cost drug administration. 38 patients received MM BsAbs during the study timeframe. 34 patients initiated OP SUD (teclistamab n=17 and talquetamab n= 17). The median age was 71 years, 59% were male, 82% were white, and 88% had Medicare coverage. Median number of prior lines of therapy was 6. There were 317 OP encounters with a median of 10 encounters per patient. Of these, 72% were planned in-person assessments, 5% were unplanned clinic visits for potential toxicity-related symptom assessment, and 20% were phone visits that obviated in-person assessment. 66 of 68 doses of talquetamab (total of 1,628 mg) and 48 of 50 doses of teclistamab (total of 2,048 mg) were administered and billed in the OP setting. 24 patients (71%) that initiated OP SUD developed CRS (grade 1 n=16, grade 2 n=7). Management of the initial CRS event included steroids and acetaminophen, with or without tocilizumab. 2,600 mg of tocilizumab administered in the OP setting. Recurrent CRS was seen in 5 patients and also treated entirely OP. 4 patients developed ICANS (grade 1 n=3, grade 3 n=1). Hospitalization following OP SUD initiation occurred in 18 (53%) patients at some point during treatment. Indications included grade 2 CRS (n=6), ICANS (grade 1 n=3), refractory CRS (n=7), infection (n=1), GI bleed (n=1), planned observation for comorbidities or prior CRS (n=2), loss of caregiver (n=1), atrial fibrillation (n=1), heart failure (n=1), and pain crisis (n=1). Median LOS was 2 days. Recurrent admission occurred in 41% and median LOS was also 2 days for subsequent admissions. Two patients were admitted to the intensive care unit for hypotension or arrhythmia. 1 patient required dialysis. In total for SUD during the study time frame, 51 mg of teclistamab, 176 mg of talquetamab, and 8,240 mg of tocilizumab were billed under an IP encounter, which likely was due to inpatient administration or hospital admission within 72 hours of receiving the OP SUD. This descriptive study of our OP BsAb management practice demonstrated that 47% of patients remained OP, even with a CRS event. The CRS rate did not surpass those in landmark clinical trials and aligns with real-world data previously reported (Blood Cancer J 2024;14:35.). Availability and use of patient monitoring capabilities along with lack of sentinel outcomes emphasizes the safety of an OP BsAb practice. Drivers of financial burdens and savings include location and reimbursement of high-cost drugs and admission rates. Median LOS was less than half of what's anticipated with inpatient SUD. Inpatient administration of high-cost drugs can be more costly compared to OP due to associated medical costs and insufficient reimbursement in a population primarily insured by Medicare which reimburses inpatient mediations based on the Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) unless the medication has New Technology Add on Payment (NTAP). Using expected Medicare reimbursement rates and wholesale acquisition costs while excluding variable DRG reimbursement and NTAP impacts for teclistamab, the total net revenue improvement for shifting use of all teclistamab, talquetamab, and tocilizumab OP is $115,004 for the period analyzed (CMS.gov 2024). In conclusion, OP management of patients undergoing SUD for MM BsAbs is safe and has substantial reductions in resource utilization and costs.

Introduction: GOLCA is a potential first-in-class CELMoDTM agent for the treatment of lymphoma, purposefully designed to target the proteins Ikaros/Aiolos to produce dual immunomodulatory and anti-tumor activity, with preferential distribution to lymphoid organs. Pharmacodynamic data in pts with R/R FL show that, combined with RTX, the immunomodulatory effects of GOLCA are significantly increased (Chavez et al, EHA 2024, #1132). GOLCA as monotherapy (mono) and + RTX has been shown to be well-tolerated and effective in pts with R/R DLBCL (Chavez et al, ASH 2023, #4496) and R/R FL (Chavez et al, EHA 2024, #1132). Here, we report 30 mo follow up of pts with R/R FL who received GOLCA mono, and updated safety/efficacy of GOLCA + RTX from the ongoing Phase 1/2 CC-99282-NHL-001 study (NCT03930953). Methods: Pts with R/R FL with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (L) received GOLCA mono at different dosing schedules during part A (dose exploration) and GOLCA ± RTX at 0.2 mg or 0.4 mg days (d) 1-14 every 28 d (q28d) in part B (dose expansion). Total treatment duration with GOLCA was up to 2 years or until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity, whichever occurred first. The efficacy-evaluable population consisted of pts completing ≥ 1 cycle of GOLCA and having baseline tumor assessment and ≥ 1 post-baseline tumor assessment or clinical progression or disease-related death. Results: As of May 31, 2024, 63 pts with R/R FL have enrolled: GOLCA mono (n = 19) at various dosing schedules and GOLCA + RTX at 0.2 mg (n = 22) or 0.4 mg (n = 22) on d1-14 q28d schedule. The median time from diagnosis to first dose of GOLCA was 68 mo (range, 23-136) and 59 mo (range, 15-309) in GOLCA mono and + RTX cohorts, respectively. The median number of prior therapies received was 4 (range, 2-11), and 3 (range, 1-12) in GOLCA mono and + RTX cohorts, respectively. In the GOLCA mono and + RTX cohorts, 9/19 (47%) and 13/43 (30%) pts had received prior lenalidomide (len)-based therapy, with 5/9 and 7/13 having len-refractory disease, respectively. In the GOLCA + RTX cohort, 10/43 (23%) had prior CAR T cell therapy and 6/43 (14%) had prior anti-CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody with or without CAR T cell therapy. In the GOLCA + RTX-treated safety population (n = 43), the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was similar across 0.2 and 0.4 mg dose levels (DL). The most frequent grade (G) 3+ TEAEs were neutropenia (44%) and anemia (12%). The incidence of febrile neutropenia was 7%. Serious adverse events occurred in 30% of pts, with febrile neutropenia and pneumonia being the most common, in 2 pts (5%) each, as well as pulmonary embolism in 1 pt. Neutropenia led to GOLCA dose interruption in 4 pts (9%) and dose reduction in 1 pt (2%). No pts discontinued treatment because of GOLCA-related TEAEs. Non-hematological TEAEs (e.g., GI toxicity, rash, fatigue) were all low-grade (except 1 pt with G3 fatigue). There were no new safety signals identified for GOLCA mono (part A) at the 30-mo follow up period. In the efficacy-evaluable population, at a median follow up of 6 mo (range 3-18), the ORR and CRR in the GOLCA + RTX cohort (n = 29) were 57% and 29% at 0.2 mg dose (n = 14) and 93% and 67% at 0.4 mg dose (n = 15), respectively. The median time to response was 2 mo (first response assessment). At the 0.4 mg DL of GOLCA + RTX, consistent responses were seen in pts at 2L/3L and 4L+, including in those with prior exposure to len-based therapies and/or T-cell-redirecting therapy. At the 0.4 mg DL, 12/14 (86%) pts remained in response at the time of data cut-off. In pts receiving GOLCA mono across different dose schedules in part A (n = 12), ORR and CRR were 67% and 42%, respectively. Responses were durable, with median DOR of 22 mo (range, 2-51) at a median follow up of 30 mo. 33% of pts (4/12) have completed 2 yrs of protocol defined GOLCA treatment and remain in response at the 1 yr post-treatment follow-up period, without requiring any intervening treatment. Conclusions: GOLCA 0.4 mg + RTX was well tolerated and highly active in heavily pre-treated pts with R/R FL, including those with prior exposure to len-based therapies and/or T-cell-redirecting therapies. Treatment with fixed-duration GOLCA mono led to durable responses including a subset of pts remaining treatment free, without progression at extended follow up. These data further support development of GOLCA + RTX as a fixed-duration, chemotherapy-free, outpatient treatment option in pts with R/R FL, and also pts with newly diagnosed advanced stage FL (NCT06425302).

Introduction Relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is very aggressive, with a historically low complete response (CR) rate (Blood. 2017; 130[16]:1800-1808). Recent research has focused on achieving complete and durable responses in this population, which translate to improvements in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results from the randomized, global, phase 3 ECHELON-3 study (NCT04404283) demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in OS, PFS, and objective response rate with brentuximab vedotin (BV) combined with lenalidomide (Len) and rituximab (R; BV+Len+R) vs placebo+Len+R in patients (pts) with R/R DLBCL after ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Here, we present subgroup analyses in pts with a best overall response (BOR) of CR (n=67). Methods Pts in the study were randomized (1:1) to receive BV (1.2 mg/kg) or placebo every 3 weeks, in combination with R (375 mg/m2) and Len (20 mg) once daily. In these subgroup analyses, eligible pts had a BOR of CR and some ended study treatment and received any subsequent anticancer therapy. BOR was assessed by investigators according to the Lugano 2014 classification. Duration of response was defined as the time from the start of the first documented CR to the first documented tumor progression per Lugano 2014 or death. Pts who initiated a subsequent nonpalliative anticancer therapy were censored at the most recent prior response assessment. Subsequent nonpalliative anticancer therapies were defined as any systemic therapy received after the end of study treatment. P values are descriptive. Results Of the 112 pts in the BV+Len+R group, 45 (40.2%) had a BOR of CR. Of the 118 pts in the placebo+Len+R group, 22 (18.6%) had a BOR of CR. The median duration of CR was 18.9 months (95% CI, 11.1 months-not estimable [NE]) with BV+Len+R vs not reached (NR) with placebo+Len+R (hazard ratio [HR], 0.527; 95% CI, 0.200-1.389; P=.1891). The median time to CR was 1.58 months (range, 1.2-7.3 months) with BV+Len+R and 1.61 months (range, 0.7-4.6 months) with placebo+Len+R. With a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the median OS in pts with a BOR of CR was 31.5 months (95% CI, 20.3 months-NE) in the BV+Len+R group vs NR in the placebo+Len+R group (HR, 1.044; 95% CI, 0.331-3.298; P=.9407). Median PFS in pts with a BOR of CR was 21.5 months (95% CI, 12.6 months-NE) in the BV+Len+R group vs NR (95% CI, 5.4 months-NE) in the placebo+Len+R group (HR, 0.6333; 95% CI, 0.256-1.567; P=.3198). Results of NR in the placebo+Len+R group are likely attributable to limited follow-up and small sample size. Additional data on baseline characteristics of pts who had CR will be presented. Of the 45 pts with CR in the BV+Len+R group, 42 (93.3%) received no subsequent anticancer therapy. Of the 22 pts with CR in the placebo+Len+R group, 17 (77.3%) received no subsequent anticancer therapy. Conclusions BV doubled the CR rate in pts with R/R DLBCL compared with placebo, and outcomes in pts with CR were durable, with only 6.7% of pts treated with BV+Len+R receiving subsequent systemic anticancer therapy, compared with 22.7% of pts treated with placebo+Len+R receiving subsequent therapy. Overall, BV+Len+R demonstrated a survival benefit in the ECHELON-3 study and is a promising option to achieve complete and durable responses in third- or later-line therapy for pts with R/R DLBCL.

BACKGROUND Our knowledge of how the genomic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is impacted by the selective pressure imposed by chemotherapy and targeted agents remains incomplete. We hypothesize that the extent of clonal evolution, baseline transcriptional state, and the overall and clone-specific growth kinetics of CLL will vary under native conditions or following exposure to chemotherapy and targeted therapy. METHODS We report the systematic genomic analysis of leukemia-normal whole-exome sequencing (WES) of 420 samples collected from 170 patients who were >65 years of age with treatment-naïve CLL. The treatment-cohort consisted of 83 patients who received ibrutinib (420mg daily) and 40 patients who received chlorambucil (0.5 mg/kg up to maximum 0.8 mg/kg, on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, up to 12 cycles) as part of the RESONATE-2 trial (NCT01722487). The ‘watch and wait’ (WW) cohort comprised 47 age-matched patients whose samples originated from the CLL Research Consortium and were untreated for their CLL during sampling. Sampling occurred at baseline and at day 300, and/or day 600, following initiation of therapy or following a diagnosis of CLL for those in the WW cohort. The WW cohort had more cases with a mutated IGHV (72% vs 40%), del17p (14% vs 0%), and del13q (72% vs 45%) when compared to the treatment cohort. Baseline CLL RNA-seq data were available for 150 patients. We used PhylogicNDT to reconstruct the clonal architecture from WES. By determining the fraction of cancer cells with each mutation (cancer cell fraction [CCF]) and their multiplicities (number of DNA molecules carrying a mutation per cancer cell), subclones were identified through clustering of CCFs of mutational events across samples from each patient. This allowed us to estimate the phylogenetic relationships and significant clonal shifts (defined as a distribution shift of CCF in a subclone of >95% between two timepoints, corresponding to a median ΔCCF of 18%) for each patient's CLL and to relate these shifts to somatic and clinical features. RESULTS In total, we identified 791 subclonal clusters across the three patient cohorts (ibrutinib = 406, chlorambucil = 189, WW = 196). We observed higher rates of significant clonal shifts between any two time points in patients exposed to chlorambucil (68%, q=0.008) and ibrutinib (77%, q<0.0001) when compared to patients on WW (36%). There was no significant difference in the number of patients exhibiting a clonal shift between those receiving ibrutinib and chlorambucil (q=0.3). More patients treated with ibrutinib (54%, q=0.0002) and chlorambucil (50%, q=0.004) harbored a clone that reduced in size than those on WW (17%). More patients treated with ibrutinib (71%, q<0.0002) and chlorambucil (55%, q=0.12) possessed at least one clone that increased in size during therapy than patients receiving WW (34%). In ibrutinib-treated patients, SF3B1 mutations (q=0.13, 14% vs 5%) and XPO1 mutations (q=0.13, 5% vs 0.3%) were enriched in subclones that significantly reduced over the complete time period. We also observed more BIRC3 mutations in subclones that had a significant shift in CCF when compared to subclones that remained stable over time (q=0.2, 5% vs 2%). Consistent with the overall study, with 8 years of follow-up in this patient subset, long-term progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in the patients treated with ibrutinib when compared to chlorambucil (P<0.0001). This PFS benefit was also seen regardless of subclonal growth patterns. Using baseline RNA-seq data, we identified 7 of the 8 recently defined CLL expression clusters (EC), that were identified in the context of chemoimmunotherapy for CLL (Knisbacher et al. Nat Gen 2022), and could recapitulate the relationship to outcomes in individuals treated with chlorambucil. However, despite the larger cohort, no significant relationship between EC clusters and PFS were observed in ibrutinib-treated patients, suggesting that a distinct predictive baseline transcriptional signature may be present in ibrutinib-treated patients. CONCLUSION Our analyses highlight the need to interrogate the molecular features of CLL in relation to the impact of therapeutic selective pressure imposed by BTK inhibition, which appear distinct from exposure to chemotherapy. Ongoing analyses aim to identify relationships between patterns of growth and subclonal growth rates molecular and clinical features.

Introduction: Systems-based hematology (SBH) is an emerging field focused on improving hematology care delivery through quality improvement (QI) and health systems science (HSS). However, a universal definition and standardized training curriculum are lacking. This study aimed to explore experts' perspectives on defining SBH, identify core knowledge and skills, and discuss challenges and opportunities in developing a curriculum. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight hematologists who have expertise in SBH through practical experience, scientific publications, and serve on related committees for the American Society of Hematology. These interviews were automatically transcribed through Microsoft Teams. Thematic analysis, using both inductive and deductive coding, was employed to identify themes and subthemes from the verbatim interview transcripts. This was accomplished with a large language model (LLM; Google Gemini Advanced, June 2024). Results: In combination, these semi-structured interviews lasted approximately 400 minutes and generated 231 pages of transcript text with 63117 words for analysis. Five main themes and associated subthemes were identified. (1) Defining SBH: experts highlighted the lack of a universal definition for SBH, emphasizing the reason it is often defined by its functions, such as improving healthcare delivery, ensuring appropriate use of resources, and addressing disparities in care. They often compared SBH to other fields like antimicrobial stewardship or implementation science to illustrate its expansive role and scope. (2) The Role and Scope of SBH: experts described SBH as encompassing a broad range of activities, including improving healthcare delivery, implementing QI initiatives, conducting pragmatic research, and advocating for policy changes at various levels. They emphasized the importance of data-driven approaches and collaboration with other healthcare professionals. (3) Training and Education in SBH: the lack of formal training programs and curricula for SBH was a recurring theme. Experts suggested that a comprehensive curriculum should include QI methodologies, implementation science, clinical informatics, health economics, leadership skills, and hematology-specific examples and case studies. They proposed various delivery methods, including asynchronous online modules, virtual workshops, and in-person sessions, targeting hematology fellows, junior faculty, and other healthcare professionals involved in hematology care. They unanimously agreed that a SBH curriculum could borrow heavily from an established HSS curriculum but should incorporate hematology-specific examples. (4) Challenges and Barriers to Implementing SBH: experts identified several challenges, including the lack of awareness and recognition of SBH among healthcare professionals and administrators, resource constraints, and the need for institutional buy-in. They also highlighted the technical difficulty of measuring and demonstrating the value of SBH interventions, particularly in terms of cost savings and improved patient outcomes. (5) The Future of SBH: despite the challenges, experts expressed optimism about the future of SBH, predicting its growing importance and expanding scope, including malignant hematology, community practice, and pediatrics. They envisioned SBH playing a crucial role in addressing rising healthcare costs, quality concerns, and disparities in care. They also anticipated the integration of new technologies like artificial intelligence, “virtual” care delivery, and molecular genetics into SBH practice. Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the current state of SBH and the need for a standardized curriculum. The findings can inform the development of educational resources and training programs to equip future practitioners with the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively practice SBH and improve hematology care delivery. This study also sheds light on the utility of qualitative research within SBH and the emerging analytical tools that will require further exploration and standardization (e.g., LLM prompt engineering).