Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

3480 citation(s) found for "Xu, Sarah C".

Web-Based Amblyopia Decision Support Tool
Summers, Allison I. , Hatch, S.W., Wiecek, Emily , Hribar, Michelle R. , Robinson, Julianne L., Chen, Angela M., Kulp, Marjean T., Chen, Debora M. Lee, Repka, Michael X., Roberts, Tawna L. , Wallace, David K. , Vricella, Marilyn, Chang, Steven, Stutz, Kathleen M., Beaulieu, Wesley T., Kraker, Raymond T., Cotter, Susan A., Holmes, Jonathan M., Weise, Katherine K., Pineles, Stacy L., (PEDIG), Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group, Hatt, Sarah R. , Chen, Angela M. , Kulp, Marjean Taylor , Repka, Michael X. , Wang, Jingyun, Beaulieu, Wesley T , Kraker, Raymond T. , Cotter, Susan A. , Holmes, Jonathan M.

JAMA Ophthalmology | May 7, 2026 | Volume: 144 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 545

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2026.1095 | PMID 42096234 Get It

Importance Amblyopia is the leading cause of monocular decreased best-corrected vision in children. Early detection and intervention are key for optimal treatment outcomes; however, limited access to pediatric eye specialists may hinder timely care and affect visual outcomes. Given the shortage of specialty-trained eye care professionals in the US, there is need to support comprehensive eye care professionals who are willing to examine and treat children with amblyopia. Objective A panel from the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group synthesized relevant literature and incorporated consensus opinion where direct evidence was lacking to create the Amblyopia Navigator Decision-Support Instrument, a free, web-based amblyopia decision support tool for eye care professionals. Evidence Review The decisions related to optimal diagnostic measures, pass/refer criteria, and management recommendations were informed by 147 publications. In areas where direct evidence was lacking, guidance was supplemented with clinical trial protocols or existing professional guidelines. When data were conflicting or unavailable, recommendations were established through committee consensus. A single reviewer independently performed standardized (though not systematic) literature reviews to avoid missing pertinent recent publications. Findings Presented are the process used, supporting evidence, and recommendations for testing methods, refractive correction, amblyopia treatment options, treatment adjustments, and monitoring schedules. Conclusions and Relevance Because amblyopia is common and typically responds well to treatment, decision support tools that optimize its management could increase access to pediatric eye care by facilitating earlier detection, enabling broader participation of primary eye care professionals, and ultimately improving visual outcomes. Through this work and the development of the forthcoming free, web-based application version, Amblyopia Navigator Decision-Support Instrument, the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group has created decision support tools designed to assist optometrists and ophthalmologists in the care of children aged 3 to 17 years with amblyopia.
Safety and efficacy of allogeneic CD19-directed CAR-T therapy CTX110 in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
McGuirk, Joseph P. , Ghobadi, Armin , Bachier, Carlos, Shaughnessy, Paul , Awan, Farrukh T. , Maakaron, Joseph E., Bishop, Michael R. , Ho, P. Joy , Tam, Constantine S., Dickinson, Michael J., Darrah, Justin , Ross, Ainsley, Williams, Leah M., Pan, Chenyi , Stevens, William N., Serwer, Laura, Nguyen, Thao, Terrett, Jonathan, Kalaitzidis, Demetrios, Ma, Anna, Xu, Huansheng, Benton, Mark, Weaver, Annie, Cohen, S, Awan, Farrukh T , Dickinson, Michael , Waller, Edmund K , Murthy, Hemant S , Maziarz, Richard Thomas , Cheah, Chan Yoon , Bishop, Michael Russell , McGuirk, Joseph , Ghobadi, Armin , Maakaron, Joseph E. , Dickinson, Michael , Waller, Edmund K. , Murthy, Hemant S. , Williams, Leah M. , Serwer, Laura , Terrett, Jonathan A. , Weaver, Alana M., Beaussant, Sarah cohen , Cheah, Chan Y.

Blood Advances | May 5, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020123 | PMID 42085626 Get It

This multicenter, single-arm, phase 1/2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of CD19-directed allogeneic chimeric-antigen-receptor (CAR) immunotherapy CTX110 in adult patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Patients received 1 or 2 treatment courses: standard lymphodepletion, followed by 1 CTX110 infusion at dose levels (DLs) 1-4 (3-60 × 107 CAR T-cells; dose escalation, N=32), or 2 infusions at DL4 on days 1 and 35 (cohort expansion, N=31). Primary endpoints in dose escalation and cohort expansion were incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and objective response rate, respectively. CTX110 was administered to 63 heavily pretreated patients: 59% primary refractory, 43% with ≥3 prior treatment lines. Among 57 patients whose first infusion was DL≥3, rates of objective and complete response (CR) were 65% and 39%, respectively. Among 22 patients achieving CR, 5 (23%) had ongoing CR at data cutoff, with 15-50 (median 34) months follow-up. The 2-infusion regimen appeared to prolong response duration compared to 1 infusion (hazard ratio 0.65). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were reported in 54% and 13% of treated patients, respectively, including 2 grade ≥3 cases each. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (59%), and anemia and thrombocytopenia (35% each). Serious adverse events occurred in 32% of treated patients, including CRS (14%), ICANS (8%), and febrile neutropenia (6%). In this r/r NHL population, CTX110 was well-tolerated, resulting in clinically meaningful responses at DL≥3, with a second infusion demonstrating evidence of further clinical benefit. This trial (NCT04035434) was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov.
E-cigarette use in vehicles: factors associated with secondhand exposure and behaviour from a US young adult sample in 2024
Elizabeth, K. , Watkins, Joslynn A., Iskra, Madison L. , Koris, Kristiann , Graham, Amanda L. , Soule, Eric K. , Hair, Elizabeth C. , Do, Elizabeth K , Graham, Amanda L , Soule, Eric K , Hair, Elizabeth C , Cha, Sarah

Tobacco Control | May 5, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: tc-2025-059919

10.1136/tc-2025-059919 | PMID 42086323 Get It

Background This study investigates factors associated with electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and secondhand exposure in vehicles among US youth and young adults. Methods Data were collected from an online panel survey of individuals (N=3482, aged 15–25 years) from July to December 2024. Analyses included those who reported using any tobacco product in the past 30 days and answered items measuring exposure to (N=2600) and/or use of e-cigarettes in vehicles (N=2366). Logistic regression models assessed predictors of e-cigarette use and exposure in vehicles, including demographic, psychosocial and tobacco use characteristics. Results Among all participants, 67.1% reported e-cigarette use in the past 30 days. Of those reporting current e-cigarette use (N=2336), 60.6% reported using their e-cigarette/vape while travelling by car in the past 30 days. Of those who answered the question measuring exposure to e-cigarette use in vehicles (N=2600), 69.3% reported being in a vehicle where someone was using e-cigarettes. Higher nicotine dependence and residence in small metro and non-metro areas were associated with greater odds of using e-cigarettes in vehicles. Just meeting basic expenses or meeting needs with a little left, household tobacco use and residence in small metro areas were associated with greater odds of secondhand e-cigarette exposure. Discussion Public health interventions should place a strong focus on education and increasing public awareness of the health consequences of e-cigarette use in vehicles to protect bystanders from secondhand e-cigarette exposure.
Adipose‐derived and bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections for osteoarthritis: A scoping review
OLIVEIRA, LEONARDO P. , Lear, Aaron , Stokes, Derek , Chamberlain, Rachel, Agnew, Megan, Kliethermes, Stephanie, Sund, Sarah , Shapiro, Shane, Mautner, Kenneth, Stokes, Derek , Tiu, Timothy , Mautner, Kenneth R , Elphingstone, Joseph W. , Chamberlain, Rachel, Price, David, Agnew, Megan, Kliethermes‌, Stephanie , Christensen, Leslie , Mautner, Kenneth

PM&R | May 2, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/pmrj.70147 | PMID 42068232 Get It

Abstract Background Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and cell‐based treatments including adipose‐derived and bone marrow aspirate have been sought by the lay and medical community as treatment options. Objective To perform a scoping review of published literature on cell‐based injections allowed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of osteoarthritis to synthesize existing evidence and identify research gaps for future evaluation. Methods A comprehensive search of five databases was executed from inception through January 2, 2025. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were original research studies written in English on Food and Drug Administration‐allowed cell‐based treatments in adults with osteoarthritis of any joint. Results The database search yielded 4257 unique records. After screening, 84 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 9996 patients and a total of 10,508 procedures. The primary research study designs were cohort studies ( n = 62), focused on treatment of knee osteoarthritis ( n = 63), and described bone marrow aspirate ( n = 42) and adipose‐derived ( n = 42) treatments. Postprocedure monitoring ranged from 6 weeks to 5 years, with most studies ≤1 year ( n = 59). Patient‐reported outcomes were reported in 83 of 84 studies; few provided imaging outcomes including magnetic resonance imaging ( n = 9) or radiographs ( n = 2). Conclusion This review identified limited randomized controlled trials, limited studies outside the knee, limited description of cell‐based treatments, and treatment protocols, along with inconsistent patient‐reported outcomes limited to 1 year in most studies. We propose establishing reporting guidelines in research on cell‐based therapies.
A Survey-Based Study of Reproductive Health Practices by Immunologists of the Clinical Immunology Society in Patients with Inborn Errors of Immunity
Galant-Swafford, Jessica , Gans, Melissa, Huangpo, Tracy, Han, Sarah, Ward, Brant, Vinh, Donald, Chapdelaine, Hugo, Ackerman, Kevin, Rosenberg, Daniel, Squire, Jacqueline, Hobson, Jessica, Jongco, Art, Ahmed, Aisha, Ale, Hanadys, Kim, Vy, Barmettler, Sara , Piazza, Megan, Pachul, Jessica Willett, Fernandes, Monica, Nguyen, Ashley, Freeman, Catherine , Schutt, Madeline, Raje, Nikita , Bayer, Diana, Gunderman, Lauren, Trujillo, Vivian Hernandez-, Freeman, Alexandra, Gans, Melissa D. , Ward, Brant R. , Vinh, Donald Cuong , Chapdelaine, Hugo , Rosenberg, Daniel L. , Almarzooqi, Farida , Peng, Xiao P. , Ale, Hanadys , Kim, Vy Hong-Diep, Piazza, Megan S. , Gunderman, Lauren M. , Hernandez-Trujillo, Vivian Pilar, Hajjar, Joud

Journal of Human Immunity | May 1, 2026 | Volume: 2 | Issue: CIS2026 | Pages: No page available

10.70962/cis2026abstract.20 Get It

Introduction Individuals with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are increasingly reaching reproductive age, yet guidance on fertility preservation, genetic counseling, medication adjustments in pregnancy and breastfeeding, monitoring for complications, and multidisciplinary coordination is lacking. This joint effort between two committees of the Clinical Immunology Society (CIS), the Women of the Clinical Immunology Society (WCIS) and the Adult Immune Deficiency Committee (AID) survey aimed to characterize current reproductive care practices for IEI patients. Methods A survey was disseminated to 809 CIS members. The response rate was 6.43% (52 respondents). The 24-item questionnaire addressed management of pregnancy in IEI, medications adjustment, participation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) care and fertility preservation, and maternal/neonatal outcomes. Results Because survey items were optional, the number of respondents varies by question. Forty-two participants completed core items: 64% (27/42) allergists/immunologists, 71% (30/42) practicing at academic centers, and 48% (20/42) with >50% immunology-focused practices. Most respondents (78%, 41/52) currently or previously cared for pregnant/planning IEI patients. Preconception counseling was common (90%, 37/41), yet only 2% (1/41) have access to a formal reproductive multidisciplinary team. Among clinicians involved in HSCT care, 45% (13/29) referred patients for fertility preservation. More than half, 52% (22/42), observed reduced fertility in IEI patients, and 56% (20/36) observed adverse maternal outcomes. Medication management varied: 61% (24/39) discontinued known teratogenic medications, and 64% (25/39) adjusted dosing during pregnancy. Regarding immunoglobulin replacement therapy, 79% adjusted dosing based on IgG levels and 42% increased dosing by trimester. Conclusions This CIS survey reveals practice variability and notable gaps in reproductive health support for individuals with IEIs. Due to the relatively low response rate, generalizability across providers and practice settings is challenging. However, the results of this survey suggest that although most clinicians provide preconception counseling and manage IgG and immunomodulatory therapy during pregnancy, formal multidisciplinary structures are rare. High rates of reported fertility concerns and maternal complications underscore the need for enhanced collaboration with obstetrics/gynecology and the development of structured, evidence-based, multidisciplinary guidelines for reproductive care in IEI. Tabular data are included as downloadable supplement files.
Continuing Medical Education Questions: May 2026
Umar, Sarah B.

American Journal of Gastroenterology | May 1, 2026 | Volume: 121 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1069-1069

10.14309/ajg.0000000000004006 Get It

At‐home visual acuity in children using a custom iPhone application compared with standardized in‐office visual acuity testing
Roberts, Tawna L. , Bothun, Erick D. , Zhu, Yufeng, Henderson, Robert J. , Boyle, Nicole M, Leske, David A. , Wernimont, Suzanne M., Marino, Carrie E, Manh, Vivian M. , Youngerman, Jillian M, Qayum, Jennifer N, Srinivasan, Gayathri , Titelbaum, Jenna R. , Crouch, Eric R. , Colburn, Jeffrey, Esposito, Christina , Zeto, V Lori, Connolly, Katie, Bhakta, Rita M, Lorenzana, Ingryd J., McDowell, Paula, Beaulieu, Wesley T, Kraker, Raymond T, Holmes, Jonathan M, Pineles, Stacy L., Weise, Katherine K., Cotter, Susan A, Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Beaulieu, Wesley T , Kraker, Raymond T , Hatt, Sarah R. , Raghuram, Aparna , McDowell, Paula S., Kraker, Raymond T. , Holmes, Jonathan M. , Cotter, Susan A.

Optometry and Vision Science | May 1, 2026 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ovs2.70040 | PMID 42062237 Get It

ABSTRACT Purpose To validate a custom smartphone application for at‐home visual acuity (VA) measurement in children. Methods A total of 452 children aged 3–17.5 years participated. Certified examiners measured in‐office test–retest VA (logMAR) using gold‐standard Amblyopia Treatment Study HOTV (3‐to‐6‐year‐olds, younger cohort) or electronic Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (7‐to‐17.5‐year‐olds, older cohort) protocols at 3–4.5 m and app‐based VA at 1.5 m. Caregivers measured at‐home app‐based VA at 1.5 m. Results Comparing at‐home app‐based with gold‐standard VA, in eyes 20/40 or better, 95% (143/151) and 93% (91/98) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = −0.03, older = −0.04; 95% limits‐of‐agreement half‐width (LOA): younger = ±0.26, older = ±0.22). In eyes 20/50 or worse, 66% (42/64) and 75% (76/101) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.11, older = 0.13, LOA: younger = ±0.50, older = ±0.51). Comparing in‐office app‐based VA with gold‐standard VA, in eyes 20/40 or better, 98% (160/164) and 94% (99/105) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = −0.03, older = −0.03; LOA: younger = ±0.22; older = ±0.24). In eyes 20/50 or worse, 85% (60/71) and 91% (101/111) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.04; older = 0.04; LOA: younger = ±0.39; older = ±0.24). For gold‐standard test–retest, in eyes 20/40 or better, 99% (163/164) and 99% (104/105) of the younger and older cohorts had retest within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.00; older = 0.01; LOA: younger = ±0.17; older = ±0.11). For 20/50 or worse, 92% (66/72) and 100% (111/111) in the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.01; older = 0.02; LOA: younger = ±0.35; older = ±0.15). Conclusions Our app demonstrated good concordance with the gold standard at home and in the office for eyes with VA of 20/40 or better. However, concordance decreased considerably for eyes with VA 20/50 or worse, particularly at home.
Abstract TU205: The Effect of Physical Activity on the Gut Microbiome in Prediabetes: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Demmer, Ryan, Pope, Zachary, Avenido, Francis Ryan, Mitchell, Nathan, Hubbard, Paige Richmond, Johnson, Stephen, McDonough, DJ, Rydell, Sarah, Johnson, Abigail, Pereira, Mark, Demmer, Ryan T. , Pope, Zachary , Mitchell, Nathan R , Hubbard, Paige F. Richmond, Johnson, Stephen, Sharma, Shweta , Rydell, Sarah A.

Circulation | April 30, 2026 | Volume: 153 | Issue: Suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/cir.153.suppl_1.tu205 Get It

Objective: To test the effect of physical activity on the gut microbiome and circulating short chain fatty acids among sedentary overweight/obese adults with prediabetes. We hypothesized that randomization to increased physical activity would result in gut microbiome changes. Methods: \We randomized 77 adults with prediabetes and a sedentary lifestyle into one of two groups: 1) Intervention Group: Invited to engage in home-based moderate intensity walking 3x/week for 30 minutes/session in weeks 1-4 and for 45 minutes/session during weeks 5-8 of the 8-week intervention; or 2) Control Group: Maintained habitual physical activity levels. We performed metagenomic sequencing from stool collected at baseline, week 4, and week 8, with short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) measured from serum collected at baseline and week 8. Taxonomic and functional profiling were performed on the metagenomic reads; alpha diversity metrics were subsequently derived. Linear regression assessed the difference in change between the intervention and control groups for alpha-diversity and SCFA levels. Results: We screened 1,533 participants for eligibility and consented 132. Of these, 87 entered the run-in phase and 77 were randomized. Participants were 51.4±8.9 years old, 87.7% female, and 74% non-Hispanic White. Mean fasting glucose was 103.3±13.2 while mean BMI was 34.4±5.7. In comparison to the control group, the intervention group experienced decreased alpha diversity as characterized by Shannon, Richness, and Faith’s diversity indices by week 8 of the intervention (P<0.05). SCFA levels trended towards improvement in the intervention group, but the results were not statistically significant. Functional analysis of KEGG ontologies revealed themes consistent with a microbiome with enhanced metabolic activity and host-relevant metabolic signaling (Figure). Conclusions: Randomization to a walking intervention resulted in modest gut microbiome changes among adults with overweight/obesity and prediabetes.
Generalizable spinal cord multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation across MRI contrasts, protocols, and centers
Benveniste, Pierre‐Louis , Létourneau‐Guillon, Laurent , Araújo, David , Fetco, Dumitru , Hori, Masaaki , Kamiya, Kouhei , Messina, Steven, Audoin, Bertrand , Blezek, Daniel, Brisset, Jean‐Christophe , Charlson, Erik, Chen, Michelle , Demortière, Sarah , Edan, Gilles , Filippi, M, Kerbrat, Anne , Kirschke, J, Labauge, Pierre, Liu, Yaou, Mainero, Caterina , Medina, Nilser Laines , Reich, Daniel S. , Shepherd, Timothy M. , Smith, Seth A. , Talbott, Jason, Tauhid, Shahamat , Treaba, Constantina A. , Cohen-Adad, Julien, Fetco, Dumitru , Hori, Masaaki , Audoin, Bertrand , Bakshi, Rohit , Bannier, Elise , Blezek, Daniel , Brisset, Jean-Christophe , Callot, Virginie , Chen, Michelle , Ciccarelli, Olga , Edan, Gilles , Filippi, Massimo , Granberg, Tobias , Granziera, Cristina , Hemond, Christopher C , Keegan, B Mark , Kerbrat, Anne , Kirschke, Jan , Kollind, Shannon H , Lee, Lisa Eunyoung , McGinnis, Julian , Laines Medina, Nilser , Mühlau, Mark , Nair, Govind , O'Grady, Kristin P , Oh, Jiwon , Ouellette, Russell , Reich, Daniel S , Rocca, Maria A , Smith, Seth A , Stawiarz, Leszek , Tam, Roger , Traboulsee, Anthony , Treaba, Constantina Andrada , Valsasina, Paola , Yiannakas, Marios , Cohen-Adad, Julien , Guillon, Laurent Letourneau , Chougar, Lydia , Messina, Steven A. , Tsagkas, Charidimos , Blezek, Daniel J. , Ciccarelli, Olga , Filippi, Massimo , Keegan, B. Mark , Labauge, Pierre , Lee, Lisa Eunyoung , Nair, Govind , O’Grady, Kristin P. , Prat, Alexandre , Rocca, Maria A. , Talbott, Jason F. , Tam, Roger , Lombaert, Hervé

Multiple Sclerosis Journal | April 24, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 598-613

10.1177/13524585261427333 | PMID 42028790 Get It

Background/Objectives: Characterizing spinal cord multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions in MRI is critical for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment evaluation. However, current automated approaches for lesion detection and segmentation are typically designed for specific MRI contrasts or acquisition sites, limiting their generalizability in real-world clinical settings where imaging protocols vary widely. This work proposes a robust multi-site, multi-contrast segmentation framework for spinal cord lesions. Methods: The segmentation model was trained and evaluated on a large-scale dataset comprising 4428 annotated images from 1849 persons with MS across 23 imaging centers, encompassing six MRI contrasts (T1w, T2w, T2*w, PSIR, STIR, and UNIT1) acquired at 1.5 tesla (T), 3 T, and 7 T. Results: Likert-type assessment performed by neuroradiologist ratings demonstrated superior generalization of the model compared to existing contrast-specific pipelines ( p < 0.01). Additional experiments evaluated robustness across spinal levels, acquisition resolutions, binarization thresholds, and quantitative evaluation on external labeled datasets. Conclusions: The proposed model can achieve accurate and reliable spinal cord MS lesion segmentation across heterogeneous MRI data, addressing a key barrier to clinical translation. The model is available in the Spinal Cord Toolbox v7.2 and higher. Code repository: https://github.com/ivadomed/seg-sc-ms-lesion-multicontrast