Cha, Sarah

Background This study investigates factors associated with electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and secondhand exposure in vehicles among US youth and young adults. Methods Data were collected from an online panel survey of individuals (N=3482, aged 15–25 years) from July to December 2024. Analyses included those who reported using any tobacco product in the past 30 days and answered items measuring exposure to (N=2600) and/or use of e-cigarettes in vehicles (N=2366). Logistic regression models assessed predictors of e-cigarette use and exposure in vehicles, including demographic, psychosocial and tobacco use characteristics. Results Among all participants, 67.1% reported e-cigarette use in the past 30 days. Of those reporting current e-cigarette use (N=2336), 60.6% reported using their e-cigarette/vape while travelling by car in the past 30 days. Of those who answered the question measuring exposure to e-cigarette use in vehicles (N=2600), 69.3% reported being in a vehicle where someone was using e-cigarettes. Higher nicotine dependence and residence in small metro and non-metro areas were associated with greater odds of using e-cigarettes in vehicles. Just meeting basic expenses or meeting needs with a little left, household tobacco use and residence in small metro areas were associated with greater odds of secondhand e-cigarette exposure. Discussion Public health interventions should place a strong focus on education and increasing public awareness of the health consequences of e-cigarette use in vehicles to protect bystanders from secondhand e-cigarette exposure.

Background This study examines the geographic representativeness of people who smoke, among newly registered users of a free digital tobacco cessation program (‘EX’). Methods User-provided ZIP codes from EX® Program registrants were mapped to Rural Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC). Reach Ratios (ReRas) and 95% confidence intervals were used to determine the extent to which geographic representation in EX was proportionate to their representation in the national population of individuals who smoke, as obtained from the United States National Survey of Drug Use and Health (2018-2020). Under- and overrepresentation was demonstrated by ReRas <1 or >1, respectively. Joinpoint regression analyses were used to determine significant changes in trend for ReRas from 2013 to 2020. Results Individuals who reported smoking residing in nonmetro rural areas were significantly overrepresented in 2018 [ReRa = 1.18 (95% CI: 1.15, 1.23)], 2019 [ReRa = 1.10 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.13)], and 2020 [ReRa = 1.10 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.13)]. Individuals who reported smoking from small metro areas were also overrepresented from 2018 to 2020 [ReRas = 1.09 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.11); 1.06 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.08), and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.08), respectively] and individuals who reported smoking from large metro areas were underrepresented during the same time frame [ReRas = 0.87 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.89); 0.92 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.94), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.94), respectively]. ReRas for large metro areas decreased from 2013 to 2018 (annual percentage change, APC = −3.26; 95% CI: −6.69, −1.91). ReRas for non-metro areas increased from 2013 to 2017 (APC = 7.35; 95% CI: 4.10, 17.63). Conclusions Results suggest that individuals that smoke residing in nonmetro rural areas and small metro areas are proportionally reached by a digital tobacco cessation program. However, there continues to be an underrepresentation of individuals who smoke from large metro areas, which warrants further study.

ImportanceE-cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco product among adolescents. Despite known harms of nicotine exposure among teens, there are no empirically tested vaping cessation interventions.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of a text message program for nicotine vaping cessation among adolescents with assessment-only control.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA parallel, 2-group, double-blind, individually randomized clinical trial with follow-ups at 1 and 7 months after randomization was conducted from October 1, 2021, to October 18, 2023. Participants were recruited via social media ads; the intervention was delivered via text message; and assessments were completed online or by telephone. Eligible individuals were US residents aged 13 to 17 years who reported past 30-day e-cigarette use, were interested in quitting within 30 days, and owned a mobile phone with an active text message plan. To optimize study retention, all participants received monthly assessments via text message about e-cigarette use.InterventionsAssessment-only controls (n = 744) received only study retention text messages. Intervention participants (n = 759) also received an automated, interactive text message program for vaping cessation that delivers cognitive and behavioral coping skills training and social support.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was self-reported 30-day point-prevalence abstinence from vaping at 7 months analyzed as intention-to-treat, with missingness coded as vaping.ResultsAmong n = 1503 adolescents randomized, average age was 16.4 (SD, 0.8) years. The sample was 50.6% female, 42.1% male, and 7.4% nonbinary/other; 10.2% Black/African American, 62.6% White, 18.5% multiracial, and 8.7% another race; 16.2% Hispanic; 42.5% sexual minority; and 76.2% vaped within 30 minutes of waking. The 7-month follow-up rate was 70.8%. Point-prevalence abstinence rates were 37.8% (95% CI, 34.4%-41.3%) among intervention participants and 28.0% (95% CI, 24.9%-31.3%) among control participants (relative risk, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.17-1.57]; P &amp;lt; .001). No baseline variables moderated the treatment-outcome relationship. There was no evidence that adolescents who quit vaping transitioned to combustible tobacco products.Conclusions and RelevanceA tailored, interactive text message intervention increased self-reported vaping cessation rates among adolescents recruited via social media channels.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04919590

Abstract Introduction We determined whether a tobacco cessation intervention targeting brief perioperative abstinence (“quit for a bit”) increased engagement of surgical patients with treatment compared with an intervention targeting long-term postoperative abstinence (“quit for good”). Aims and Methods Surgical patients who smoke were stratified according to intended duration of postoperative abstinence, and then randomized within strata to receive either a “quit for a bit” or a “quit for good” intervention. Both employed initial brief counseling and short message service (SMS) to deliver treatment up to 30 days after surgery. The primary outcome of treatment engagement was defined as the rate at which subjects actively responded to system requests delivered via SMS. Results The engagement index did not differ between intervention groups (median [25th, 75th] of 23.7% [8.8, 46.0] for “quit for a bit” group (n = 48) and 22.2% [4.8, 46.0] for “quit for good” group (n = 50), p = .74), nor did the proportion of patients continuing SMS use after study completion (33% and 28%, respectively). Exploratory abstinence outcomes on the morning of surgery and 7 and 30 days after surgery did not differ between groups. Program satisfaction was high in both groups and did not differ. There was no significant interaction between intended abstinence duration and any outcome, ie, alignment of intent with intervention did not affect engagement. Conclusions Tobacco cessation treatment delivered via SMS was well accepted by surgical patients. Tailoring an SMS intervention to focus on the benefits of short-term abstinence for surgical patients did not increase engagement in treatment or perioperative abstinence rates. Implications Treatment of surgical patients for tobacco use is efficacious and reduces postoperative complications. However, implementation in clinical practice has proved challenging, and new methods of engaging these patients in cessation treatment are needed. We found that tobacco use treatment delivered via SMS was feasible and well utilized by surgical patients. Tailoring an SMS intervention to focus on the benefits of short-term abstinence for surgical patients did not increase engagement in treatment or perioperative abstinence rates. Clinical Trial Number NCT03839043. Registry URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03839043

AbstractAimsTo evaluate the effectiveness of a combined internet and text message intervention for smoking cessation compared with an internet intervention alone. The text message intervention was optimized for engagement in an earlier multiphase optimization (MOST) screening phase.DesignA parallel, two‐group, individually randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted in a MOST confirming phase. Recruitment spanned December 2018 to March 2019. Follow‐up was conducted at 3 and 9 months, beginning March 2019 and ending January 2020.SettingUnited States: a digital study conducted among new registrants on a free tobacco cessation website.ParticipantsEligible individuals were 618 adult current smokers in the United States, age 18 years or older who signed up for text messages during website registration (67.2% female, 70.4% white).InterventionsThe treatment arm (WEB+TXT; n = 311) received access to the website and text messaging. The control arm (WEB; n = 307) received access to the website alone.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was self‐reported 30‐day point prevalence abstinence (ppa) at 9 months post‐randomization analyzed under intent to treat (ITT), counting non‐responders as smoking. Secondary outcomes included 3‐month measures of 30‐day ppa, intervention engagement and intervention satisfaction.FindingsAbstinence rates at 9 months were 23.1% among WEB+TXT and 23.2% among WEB (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.69–1.45; P = 0.99). WEB+TXT increased engagement with 5 of 6 interactive features (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.26–0.47, all P < 0.001) and repeat website visits (48.7% vs 38.9%, SMD = 0.14, P = 0.02). Satisfaction metrics favored WEB+TXT (satisfied: 96.3% vs 90.5%, SMD = 0.17, P = 0.008; recommend to friend: 95.9% vs 90.1%, SMD = 0.16, P = 0.028).ConclusionsA randomized controlled trial found no evidence that a combined internet and text message intervention for smoking cessation compared with an internet intervention alone increased 9‐month abstinence rates among adult current smokers in the United States, despite evidence of higher levels of intervention engagement and satisfaction at 3 months.