Back to Authors

Johnson, Stephen

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Clinical Trial: Multi‐Strain Probiotic Improves Bile Acid Profile, Microbiome, and Metabolomic Parameters in Patients With History of Bile Acid Malabsorption—A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Matar, Ayah , Carlson, Paula, Busciglio, Irene, Johnson, Stephen, Mars, Ruben A., Kashyap, Purna C., Harmsen, W.S., Camilleri, Michael , Damianos, John A , Matar, Ayah , Jencks, Kara J. , Camilleri, M , Damianos, John , Busciglio, Irene, Johnson, Stephen, Mars, Ruben A. , Kashyap, Purna

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | July 23, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1111/apt.70876 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Bile acid (BA) malabsorption (BAM) is a common cause of chronic diarrhoea and may occur in some patients due to abnormalities of the gut microbiota. Effects of probiotics on faecal secretory BAs, particularly the primary BA, chenodeoxycholic acid, are unclear. Aim/Methods We conducted a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of the De Simone formulation 8‐strain probiotic in 24 patients previously diagnosed with BAM. Patients were randomized to 3 weeks of the probiotic (900 billion bacteria) or placebo (maltose), both administered three times daily. Symptoms, serum 7 α C4, faecal primary BAs, intestinal permeability by 13 C‐mannitol‐lactulose test (0.1 and 1 g of the sugars respectively) over 24 h, faecal short chain fatty acids (SCFA), microbiome, and metabolome were assessed at baseline and post‐intervention. Results Data from 22 patients were included. Probiotic supplementation was associated with a significant decrease in % faecal primary BAs (chenodeoxycholic acid and cholic acid) with median change from baseline −5.7 [IQR −10.3, 0.9]% compared to 9.8 [IQR 0.2, 20.6]% on placebo ( p = 0.012). The faecal microbiome was significantly different in the probiotic group after intervention, driven by probiotic‐specific species. There were no significant differences in symptoms, intestinal permeability, or SCFA. However, there was a numerical difference in the changes from baseline in 0‐2 h 13 C‐mannitol excretion −1.9 [−13.9, 4.2] mg for the probiotic and 1.0 (−0.5, 12.7) mg for placebo ( p = 0.084). Conclusions The De Simone formulation probiotic induced significant microbiome and metabolome changes in patients with BAM, ultimately leading to a decrease in % faecal primary BAs and possible reduction in intestinal permeability. Clinical Trials.gov registration NCT #06609148, January 2, 2025.
Abstract TU205: The Effect of Physical Activity on the Gut Microbiome in Prediabetes: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Demmer, Ryan, Pope, Zachary, Avenido, Francis Ryan, Mitchell, Nathan, Hubbard, Paige Richmond, Johnson, Stephen, McDonough, DJ, Rydell, Sarah, Johnson, Abigail, Pereira, Mark, Demmer, Ryan T. , Pope, Zachary , Mitchell, Nathan R , Hubbard, Paige F. Richmond, Johnson, Stephen, Sharma, Shweta , Rydell, Sarah A.

Circulation | April 30, 2026 | Volume: 153 | Issue: Suppl_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/cir.153.suppl_1.tu205 Get It

Objective: To test the effect of physical activity on the gut microbiome and circulating short chain fatty acids among sedentary overweight/obese adults with prediabetes. We hypothesized that randomization to increased physical activity would result in gut microbiome changes. Methods: \We randomized 77 adults with prediabetes and a sedentary lifestyle into one of two groups: 1) Intervention Group: Invited to engage in home-based moderate intensity walking 3x/week for 30 minutes/session in weeks 1-4 and for 45 minutes/session during weeks 5-8 of the 8-week intervention; or 2) Control Group: Maintained habitual physical activity levels. We performed metagenomic sequencing from stool collected at baseline, week 4, and week 8, with short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) measured from serum collected at baseline and week 8. Taxonomic and functional profiling were performed on the metagenomic reads; alpha diversity metrics were subsequently derived. Linear regression assessed the difference in change between the intervention and control groups for alpha-diversity and SCFA levels. Results: We screened 1,533 participants for eligibility and consented 132. Of these, 87 entered the run-in phase and 77 were randomized. Participants were 51.4±8.9 years old, 87.7% female, and 74% non-Hispanic White. Mean fasting glucose was 103.3±13.2 while mean BMI was 34.4±5.7. In comparison to the control group, the intervention group experienced decreased alpha diversity as characterized by Shannon, Richness, and Faith’s diversity indices by week 8 of the intervention (P<0.05). SCFA levels trended towards improvement in the intervention group, but the results were not statistically significant. Functional analysis of KEGG ontologies revealed themes consistent with a microbiome with enhanced metabolic activity and host-relevant metabolic signaling (Figure). Conclusions: Randomization to a walking intervention resulted in modest gut microbiome changes among adults with overweight/obesity and prediabetes.
The Effect of Physical Activity on the Gut Microbiome in Prediabetes: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial
Avenido, Francis Ryan R., Mitchell, N. Reed, Hubbard, Paige F. Richmond, Johnson, Stephen, Sharma, Shweta, McDonough, Daniel J. , Rydell, Sarah A. , Pereira, Mark, Pereira, Mark A. , Sharma, Shweta , McDonough, Daniel J , Pereira, Mark A , Demmer, Ryan T. , Pope, Zachary , Avenido, Francis Ryan, Johnson, Stephen, Johnson, Abigail J.

Diabetes Obesity and Cardiometabolic CARE | March 16, 2026 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 219-229

10.2337/doc25-0067 Get It

OBJECTIVE To test the effect of physical activity on the gut microbiome and circulating short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) among sedentary adults with prediabetes and overweight or obesity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In a pilot and feasibility trial, we randomized 77 adults with prediabetes and a sedentary lifestyle into one of two groups: 1) intervention: invited to engage in home-based moderate-intensity walking 3×/week for 30 min/session in weeks 1–4 and for 45 min/session during weeks 5–8 of the 8-week intervention; or 2) control: maintained habitual physical activity levels. We performed metagenomic sequencing from stool collected at baseline, week 4, and week 8, with SCFAs measured from serum collected at baseline and week 8. Taxonomic and functional profiling was performed on the metagenomic reads; α-diversity metrics were subsequently derived. Linear regression assessed the difference in change between the intervention and control groups for α-diversity and SCFA levels. RESULTS We screened 1,533 participants for eligibility and consented 132. Of these, 87 entered the run-in phase, and 77 were randomized. Participants were mean (SD) 51.4 (8.9) years old, 87.7% female, and 74% non-Hispanic White. Mean fasting glucose was 103.3 (13.2) mg/dL, while mean BMI was 34.4 (5.7) kg/m2. Compared with the control group, the intervention group experienced decreased α-diversity as characterized by Shannon, Richness, and Faith diversity indices by intervention week 8 (P &lt; 0.05). Changes in SCFA levels were not statistically significant different in intervention versus control. CONCLUSIONS Randomization to a walking intervention resulted in modest gut microbiome changes among adults with overweight or obesity and prediabetes.