Citations

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the fertility preservation (FP) utilization rate among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients at the Transgender and Intersex Specialty Care Clinic (TISCC) within the Mayo Clinic? SUMMARY ANSWER The rate of utilization of FP services by TGD patients at Mayo Clinic’s TISCC was determined to be 6.62%. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY TGD patients encounter several barriers when pursuing FP, which may contribute to a lower utilization rate of these services. These barriers include financial constraints and lack of insurance coverage, as well as societal and healthcare provider attitudes; TGD individuals face discrimination or lack of understanding, making it uncomfortable or difficult to discuss FP options. Additionally, there continues to be a lack of inclusive policies and support within healthcare systems that can further impede access to FP services for TGD individuals. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study was executed in two phases. In the first phase, a retrospective cohort study was completed with TGD patients who provided electronic health record (EHR) research authorization from Mayo Clinic’s TISCC in Rochester, MN between 1 January 2015 and 30 July 2021. Search terms related to FP were used to determine the FP utilization rate among this patient population. In the second phase of the study, two sets of patients, (i) patients who were included in the cohort study in Phase 1, and (ii) members of JASMYN, a community organization specializing in care and wellness coordination for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) teens and young adults in North Florida. Individuals were invited to participate in a qualitative interview exploring their cumulative healthcare experiences accessing gender-affirming care. Interviews were conducted from January 2023 to June 2023. Interviews examined participants’ perceptions of FP options, motivations for pursuing FP, and barriers to accessing both gender and fertility care. When applicable, participants also discussed their experiences pursuing FP and reflected on their satisfaction with their fertility and family planning decisions. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In phase 1, a total of N = 1189 patients sought care from Mayo Clinic’s TISCC in Rochester, MN. Out of these patients, N = 589 patients provided research authorization and were included in the retrospective cohort study. The study team assessed whether FP terms were mentioned in each patient’s EHR, and whether patients scheduled and attended appointments with either the Department of Reproductive Endocrinology or the Department of Urology. FP search terms included sperm cryopreservation, sperm extraction, sperm aspiration, testicular tissue cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, embryo cryopreservation, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. In phase 2, N = 36 participants were interviewed, with N = 25 participants recruited from Mayo Clinic’s TISCC in Rochester, MN, and N = 11 participants recruited from JASMYN in Jacksonville, FL. Participants recruited from the Mayo Clinic participated in a video-call-based interview and those enrolled from JASMYN were interviewed in person. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The study team observed a 6.62% utilization rate of FP services among N = 589 patients (median age: 28 years; age range: 8–78 years) included in the retrospective cohort study. N = 39 patients completed FP, with N = 14 receiving these services at other institutions before seeking care with the TISCC at Mayo Clinic. N = 25 patients pursued FP services within the Mayo Clinic. Patients with testes were more likely to complete FP via sperm cryopreservation when compared to the utilization of egg cryopreservation among patients with ovaries. Participants who completed an interview in Phase 2 (median age 27 years; age range: 22–80 years) reflected on their decision on whether to preserve their fertility and what factors influenced these decisions, and how their satisfaction with this decision has changed over their lifespan. The major themes reported here include the desire for biological children, planning gender care around fertility desires, conversations about FP options, physical and psychosocial barriers to pursuing FP, reflections on personal FP decisions, and reflections on having to make decisions about FP at a young age. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION All participants who completed an interview have done so voluntarily; as such, there is a possibility of selection and recall bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Findings suggest that there is a need for more structured conversations around FP when TGD patients seek medical and surgical gender-affirming care. Accessibility, including financial barriers and limited insurance coverage, continues to limit the utilization of FP services among TGD patients. Increased affordability through insurance coverage may additionally improve FP utilization. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This project was funded by the Mayo Clinic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS), grant number UL1TR002377. This project was also supported by Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Grant Number TL1TR002380 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Felicity Enders reports grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality paid to her institution; speakers’ fees for lectures or presentations from Mount Sinai, University of Washington, University of Minnesota, University of Rochester, Cincinnati University, the National Institutes of Health, Duke University, Wake Forest University, the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Johns Hopkins University; travel support from the Association for Clinical and Translational Science and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; and an unpaid leadership role on the Board of Directors of the Association for Clinical and Translational Science. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Abstract Background Anti‐M antibodies were described as rarely eliciting hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in pregnancy. More recent literature, primarily from Asia, reports severe HDFN attributed to maternal anti‐M. The objective of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the frequency and/or severity of anti‐M HDFN among subjects who self‐report as Asian compared to non‐Asian. Methods Retrospective data were collected from 18 sites. Fetuses/neonates affected by HDFN were categorized as unaffected, mild, moderate, or severe based on clinical management and outcomes. Results Anti‐M was identified in 557 obstetric patients. Among 332 neonates with complete data for analysis, anti‐M was detected in isolation during the pregnancies of 210 (63.3%) neonates; 198 (94.3%) were unaffected by HDFN. The overall frequency of HDFN was 6.5% (2/31) in Asian patients and 5.6% (10/179) in non‐Asian patients. The frequency of severe HDFN was 6.5% (2/31) among Asian patients and 0.6% (1/179) among non‐Asian patients. Among non‐Asian patients, eight (4.5%) were mild and one (0.6%) was moderate. Of 63 pregnancies with anti‐M and ABO incompatibility, 6 (9.5%) were associated with mild HDFN and 57 (90.5%) were unaffected. Of 49 pregnancies with anti‐M and non‐ABO antibody(s), 6 (12.2%) were associated with mild HDFN and 43 (87.8%) were unaffected. One case (10.0%) of HDFN (mild) occurred in the presence of anti‐M, additional antibody(s), and ABO incompatibility. Conclusion In this study, severe anti‐M HDFN was rare in non‐Asian subjects. There is a signal that Asian patients are at greater risk for severe anti‐M HDFN.

Abstract Objectives Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory disease of the large intestine characterized by chronic diarrhea, normal‐appearing colonic mucosa on endoscopy, and abnormal inflammatory histopathology. While it is a common cause of chronic diarrhea in adults, MC is infrequently reported in children, and data on its presentation, treatment, and outcomes remain limited. This study aimed to analyze single‐center experience and conduct a literature review on pediatric MC. Methods A retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic electronic health records from 2013 to 2024 was performed. Children (≤18 years) diagnosed with MC were included. Demographics, clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes were collected. A systematic review of pediatric MC literature was completed. Results MC was diagnosed in 42 children (median age 12.5 years; Q1–Q3 7.25–14.75), with 28 (67%) females. Systematic review identified 29 studies with 258 children with MC (mean age 10 years, standard deviation [SD] 4.9). At Mayo Clinic, treatment varied among providers, and budesonide as monotherapy or in combination was most effective. In the literature, the most commonly used treatments included 5‐aminosalicylates (5‐ASA, 36%) and budesonide (31.5%). Combination therapy with budesonide plus a biologic or mesalamine appeared to be the most effective therapy, followed by budesonide monotherapy and corticosteroids. Mucosal remission rate was highest with corticosteroids, followed by budesonide. Mean recurrence rate across all treatments was 69%. Biologics (vedolizumab, infliximab) and bismuth showed the lowest recurrence rates. Conclusion Budesonide, either alone or in combination, appears to be most commonly used and effective in treating pediatric MC, but recurrence rates remain high after therapy discontinuation.

Abstract Introduction: Pathological complete response (pCR) is a strong prognostic marker, but survival outcomes comparing treatment to control do not reliably align with treatment-control differences in pCR rates in breast cancer. A novel Bayesian hierarchical framework models treatments within trials, allowing us to predict treatment effects on distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) from pCR with greater accuracy. Methods: We analyzed 12 neoadjuvant breast cancer trials (6,000 patients, all HR/HER2 subtypes; including I-SPY2). The framework of Burzykowski, Molenberghs & Buyse (2005) is extended to a novel arm-based hierarchical structure providing a distribution of pCR and DRFS treatment effects controlling for subtype (HR/HER2), N and T stage, grade, and calendar year. Three held-out trials (877 patients; 26 regimens; med follow-up >4 years) validate predictions of DRFS treatment benefit from pCR. All data was used to estimate treatment-effect correlation and the surrogate threshold effect (STE). Analyses were repeated for Residual Cancer Burden Index (binary RCB01, continuous RCB). Results: Predicted probability of DRFS benefit closely matched actual DRFS follow-up (mean absolute error 0.06; Pearson r = 0.9). Across all trials, pCR showed moderate surrogacy (ρ = 0.82, R2 = 0.67). A 60% increase in pCR odds achieves ≥95% probability of DRFS benefit (STE = OR of 1.60). RCB outperforms pCR across all metrics, with 92% sensitivity and 93% specificity for detecting DRFS benefit in 26 validation regimens (Table 1). Conclusion: This novel Bayesian meta-analytic framework reveals that pCR, RCB01 and continuous RCB reliably predict survival benefit across heterogeneous trials, with RCB performing the best in an external validation. This provides a statistical foundation for accelerated approval decisions using robust early biomarkers in modern neoadjuvant trial designs by accurately predicting survival at the treatment arm level. Citation Format: Keli S. Santos-Parker, Jessica R. Santos-Parker, W. Fraser Symmans, Laura J. Esserman, Christina Yau, Angie DeMichele, Laura van't Veer, Doug Yee, Fabien Reyal, Helena Earl, Jean Abraham, David Cameron, Peter Hall, Judy Boughey, Matthew Goetz, Gabe Sonke, Miguel Martín, Sara López-Tarruella, Priyanka Sharma, Rachel Freiberg, Jane Perlmutter, Aditya Bardia, Martin Eklund, Rachel Freiberg, Lajos Pusztai. A novel statistical framework for surrogate endpoint prediction of survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1401.

Abstract Background: Despite the decline in overall mortality and incidence of cancer in the US population, the burden of cancer is still high, especially in underserved and under-researched populations. A major contributor to poor cancer outcomes is the absence of dedicated efforts utilizing scientifically rigorous approaches and implementation strategies to optimize participant enrollment and accrual in clinical trials. The Connecting Patient Populations to Clinical Trials (CP2CT) program implements innovative multilevel interventions to enhance clinical trial awareness and optimize referral pathways that facilitate patient enrollment. The CP2CT Data, Evaluation, and Coordinating Center (DECC) supports its data and evaluation activities, and coordinates a learning collaborative towards mitigating the key barriers of cancer burden in all populations. Methods: Using an implementation science-informed approach, the DECC deployed coordinated strategies over three years: (1) administrative structuring through streamlined governance, centralized reporting, and stakeholder integration; (2) data standardization via Common Data Elements (CDEs), a cross-network REDCap system, and a multi-institution Data Transfer Agreement (DTA); (3) evaluation infrastructure through a Network Logic Model, evaluation plan, standardized constructs, and a Process Evaluation Plan with tools; (4) learning supports through an internal website and expanded Speaker Series; and (5) site-level implementation facilitation through structured visits. Results: In collaboration with the CP2CT Network and NCI, the DECC’s achievements span four domains: (1) Administrative: built infrastructure, deployed centralized reporting platforms, coordinated key meetings, and strengthened community integration. (2) Data: standardized collection, secured network-wide data sharing through the DTA, enabled harmonized multi-site reporting, and advanced groundwork for interoperability and scientific value. (3) Program Evaluation: linked CP2CT activities to measurable outcomes through a Network-wide Logic Model, guided evaluation, established shared evaluation language, and launched a transferable Process Evaluation framework. (4) Learning Collaborative: developed a centralized resource hub, expanded the Speaker Series, and advanced authorship transparency with the CP2CT Publication Policy. < Conclusion: The CP2CT DECC has established a sustainable, scalable infrastructure that integrates administrative coordination, standardized data collection, robust program evaluation, and a collaborative learning environment. These efforts enhance clinical trial awareness, optimize referral pathways, and provide a transferable model for improving participant enrollment and scientific rigor across national research networks, ultimately addressing disparities in cancer outcomes. Citation Format: Laura E. Lectora, Cristina J. Orozco, Holly A. Thorson, Timethia Bonner, Robert R. Freimuth, Jennifer G. Le-Rademacher, Folakemi T. Odedina. Building a national network coordination center for clinical trials: Early implementation outcomes from the CP2CT DECC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 899.

Abstract Backgroud. Breast cancer (BC) is the most common and deadly cancer in women worldwide. Emerging evidence highlights the role of gut microbiota in modulating breast cancer risk, treatment response, and recurrence through various mechanisms, including the production of biologically active compounds and metabolites. These non-viable microbial products and metabolic byproducts from probiotic fermentation, known as postbiotics, exert beneficial effects on the host without the need for live microorganisms. Postbiotics derived from Lacticaseibacillus species represent a novel class of therapeutics with potential anti-cancer properties. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic effects of an innovative postbiotic product (iPB), developed through sequential fermentation of L.paracasei NPB01 and L.rhamnosus GG, in BC experimental models. Methods. The following cell lines were used to represent main BC subtypes: MCF7 cells (ER+/HER2), MDA-MB-231 (triple negative breast cancer), SKBR3 (HER2+). MCF-10A (normal breast epithelial cells), Caco-2 (enterocytes), and peripheral mononuclear blood cells (PBMC) were used as control. Cell viability was assessed by colony formation assay. Apoptosis was evaluated using Annexin V/7-AAD staining, HLA class I surface expression by flow cytometry, and cancer cells migration by wound healing assay. Results. iPB exposure resulted in >50% colony formation reduction in MCF7, >30% in MDA-MB-231 and >40% in SKBR3 cells starting from 0.5 mg/ml for 72 h (p<0.01). iPB increased early and late apoptotic cell rate in all BC cell lines starting from 0.5 mg/ml for 72 h. On the contrary, iPB exposure up to 5 mg/ml for 120 h did not affect cell viability in control cells (MCF-10A, Caco-2, PBMC). 1.20 to 1.30 fold increase in HLA class I expression was observed in all BC cell lines after the exposure with iPB starting from the dose of 0.5 mg/ml for 72 h. A less intense HLA class I expression increase was observed in control cells after the iPB exposure. Cell migration process and inflammatory cytokines response were inhibited by the iPB exposure in all BC cell models. Conclusions. iPB reduces cell viability and cell migration in all main BC phenotypes. These effects parallel with HLA class I surface expression increase in all BC cell phenotypes, potentially enhancing immunogenicity. These findings suggest that iPB may represent a promising novel agent in BC treatment and prevention. Citation Format: Roberto Berni Canani, Chiara Luongo, Laura Pisapia, Franca Oglio, Roberta Di Santillo, Alessia Gaeta, Chiara Scocco, Marco Michelini, Vittoria Mauriello, Alessia Cadavere, Camilla Messuri, Saranya Chumsri, Dawn Mussallem. Postbiotic based on sequential fermentation of L.paracasei NPB01 and L.rhamnosus GG exerts antitumor activities against breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 312.

Abstract Background: Multidisciplinary research networks often face challenges in harmonizing metrics and measures across participating sites, limiting the ability to aggregate data and generate generalizable insights. To address this barrier within the Connecting Patient Populations to Clinical Trials (CP2CT) Network, the Data, Evaluation, and Coordinating Center (DECC) coordinated the establishment of a unified framework that supports comparable evaluation and enhances the scientific impact of network-wide activities. Methods: Consensus was developed through a structured, iterative, and collaborative process: (1) drafting initial constructs, metrics, measures, and benchmarks informed by Network site materials and relevant literature; (2) soliciting qualitative and quantitative feedback from Network sites via Basecamp, an innovative online collaborative workspace for construct development; (3) conducting open dialogue sessions followed by systematic review and integration of site feedback; and (4) refining all elements through repeated feedback cycles until no further modifications were requested. Each iteration strengthened the clarity, coherence, and scientific precision of the final constructs. Results: A total of seven constructs were incorporated into the consensus-development process: clinical trials referral, clinical trials accrual, participants’ awareness of clinical trials, participants’ knowledge of clinical trials, providers’ awareness of NCI-supported clinical trials, providers’ engagement with NCI-supported clinical trials, and providers’ referral to NCI-supported clinical trials. For each construct, the Network established a conceptual definition (broad description of the construct), an operational definition (specification of how the construct is measured or observed), benchmarks (standards for assessing performance), metrics (quantitative indicators of performance), and measures (tools used to quantify inputs, processes, or outcomes). Common measures were developed for two constructs—clinical trials accrual and participants’ knowledge of clinical trials. Although full consensus was not achieved across all four Network sites for every construct, at least three sites reached consensus for the remaining five constructs. Conclusion: This consensus-building initiative resulted in the development of a unified, scientifically grounded framework. By harmonizing key elements related to clinical trial referral, accrual, awareness, knowledge, and provider engagement, the Network has established foundational tools that enable cross-site data comparability and facilitate more rigorous assessment of efforts to connect diverse patient populations to clinical trials. This framework positions the Network to inform strategies that improve equitable clinical trial participation. Citation Format: Folakemi T. Odedina, Jennifer Le-Rademacher, Robert Freimuth, Cristina Orozco, Laura Lectora, Timethia Bonner, Holly Thorson, Connecting Patient Populations to Clinical Trials(CP2CT) Program Evaluation Work Group, Connecting Patient Populations to Clinical Trials(CP2CT) Steering Committee. Development of and consensus building towards shared metrics, measures and benchmarks for the connecting patient populations to clinical trials (CP2CT) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 860.

Abstract Background: Primary Cardiac Lymphoma (PCL) is an exceptionally rare malignancy. While clinical case reports have postulated an association with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), large-scale epidemiological data corroborating this link are limited. Objective: To determine whether HIV is associated with increased prevalence of PCL in a large, nationally representative sample of US hospitalizations. Methods: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019, representing approximately 35 million unweighted hospitalizations. Hospitalizations were identified using a proxy definition for PCL, requiring ICD-10-CM codes for both cardiomyopathy (I42.*) and extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (i.e., C83.39, C85.99). HIV status was identified using codes B20-B24 and Z21. We compared the prevalence of PCL in hospitalizations with versus without HIV and calculated odds ratios using Fisher’s Exact Test, reporting corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) and p-values. Results: We identified 569 hospitalizations meeting our operational definition for PCL out of 34,955,252 total discharges. The prevalence of PCL was significantly higher among hospitalizations with HIV (6.2 per 100,000) compared with those without HIV (1.6 per 100,000; p < 0.0001). HIV was associated with a 3.86-fold increased odds of PCL (OR: 3.86; 95% CI: 2.23-6.70; p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In this nationwide analysis of 35 million hospitalizations, HIV was strongly associated with a higher prevalence of PCL. Hospitalizations with HIV had nearly 4-fold higher odds of PCL, as defined by co-occurrence of cardiomyopathy and extranodal lymphoma, compared with hospitalizations without HIV. This population-level finding evinces the association previously suggested in clinical case reports. Citation Format: Omar Hozayen, Jay Hozayen, Benjamin Behers, Christoph Stephenson-Moe, Maha Hameed, Matthew Miller, Laura De Jesus Herrera, Anas Abu Jad, Rheiner Kammer, Mohab Idriss, Ahmed Aboutaleb, Bashar Roumia, Patricia Riano, Nicolas Riveros Neira, Brooke Hartenstein, Robert Taylor, Manuel Rosario Espinal, Brett M. Behers, Alya Hozayen, Mohamed Ibrahim, Karen Hamad. Primary cardiac lymphoma and HIV: A nationwide analysis of hospitalizations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 215.