Davidge-Pitts, Caroline

Abstract Background The first international clinical standards of care for the gender-diverse population were formulated in the late 1970s. In the last 15 years, multiple subspecialty societies within the United States have developed clinical care guidelines for those with gender dysphoria, including gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and surgical treatments. To date, there are no pathology- and laboratory medicine–specific recommendations in the United States for the gender-diverse population. Content This document outlines pathology- and laboratory medicine–specific recommendations for providing optimal care to the gender-diverse population, with a predominant focus on the adult population. The scope of this document focuses on the following 5 topics: (a) reference intervals and interpretation of laboratory tests impacted by use of GAHT (testosterone for transgender men; estradiol with or without antiandrogens for transgender women), focusing on those stably on GAHT for 6 months or longer; (b) transfusion medicine considerations for the gender-diverse patient population, (c) consideration of gender diversity in autopsy and death investigation, (d) interpretation of histology from tissues that are impacted by GAHT and surgical procedures; and (e) pathology and laboratory medicine informatics challenges and opportunities. Summary A relatively small group of laboratory tests is significantly impacted by GAHT. The histology of some tissues shows changes attributable to GAHT or to nonhormonal medical procedures. Autopsy and transfusion medicine practices for the gender-diverse population currently lack standardization, although this is evolving. The landscape of pathology informatics related to gender diversity is complicated by varying electronic health record and laboratory informatics systems functionality.

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the fertility preservation (FP) utilization rate among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) patients at the Transgender and Intersex Specialty Care Clinic (TISCC) within the Mayo Clinic? SUMMARY ANSWER The rate of utilization of FP services by TGD patients at Mayo Clinic’s TISCC was determined to be 6.62%. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY TGD patients encounter several barriers when pursuing FP, which may contribute to a lower utilization rate of these services. These barriers include financial constraints and lack of insurance coverage, as well as societal and healthcare provider attitudes; TGD individuals face discrimination or lack of understanding, making it uncomfortable or difficult to discuss FP options. Additionally, there continues to be a lack of inclusive policies and support within healthcare systems that can further impede access to FP services for TGD individuals. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study was executed in two phases. In the first phase, a retrospective cohort study was completed with TGD patients who provided electronic health record (EHR) research authorization from Mayo Clinic’s TISCC in Rochester, MN between 1 January 2015 and 30 July 2021. Search terms related to FP were used to determine the FP utilization rate among this patient population. In the second phase of the study, two sets of patients, (i) patients who were included in the cohort study in Phase 1, and (ii) members of JASMYN, a community organization specializing in care and wellness coordination for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) teens and young adults in North Florida. Individuals were invited to participate in a qualitative interview exploring their cumulative healthcare experiences accessing gender-affirming care. Interviews were conducted from January 2023 to June 2023. Interviews examined participants’ perceptions of FP options, motivations for pursuing FP, and barriers to accessing both gender and fertility care. When applicable, participants also discussed their experiences pursuing FP and reflected on their satisfaction with their fertility and family planning decisions. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS In phase 1, a total of N = 1189 patients sought care from Mayo Clinic’s TISCC in Rochester, MN. Out of these patients, N = 589 patients provided research authorization and were included in the retrospective cohort study. The study team assessed whether FP terms were mentioned in each patient’s EHR, and whether patients scheduled and attended appointments with either the Department of Reproductive Endocrinology or the Department of Urology. FP search terms included sperm cryopreservation, sperm extraction, sperm aspiration, testicular tissue cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, embryo cryopreservation, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. In phase 2, N = 36 participants were interviewed, with N = 25 participants recruited from Mayo Clinic’s TISCC in Rochester, MN, and N = 11 participants recruited from JASMYN in Jacksonville, FL. Participants recruited from the Mayo Clinic participated in a video-call-based interview and those enrolled from JASMYN were interviewed in person. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The study team observed a 6.62% utilization rate of FP services among N = 589 patients (median age: 28 years; age range: 8–78 years) included in the retrospective cohort study. N = 39 patients completed FP, with N = 14 receiving these services at other institutions before seeking care with the TISCC at Mayo Clinic. N = 25 patients pursued FP services within the Mayo Clinic. Patients with testes were more likely to complete FP via sperm cryopreservation when compared to the utilization of egg cryopreservation among patients with ovaries. Participants who completed an interview in Phase 2 (median age 27 years; age range: 22–80 years) reflected on their decision on whether to preserve their fertility and what factors influenced these decisions, and how their satisfaction with this decision has changed over their lifespan. The major themes reported here include the desire for biological children, planning gender care around fertility desires, conversations about FP options, physical and psychosocial barriers to pursuing FP, reflections on personal FP decisions, and reflections on having to make decisions about FP at a young age. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION All participants who completed an interview have done so voluntarily; as such, there is a possibility of selection and recall bias. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Findings suggest that there is a need for more structured conversations around FP when TGD patients seek medical and surgical gender-affirming care. Accessibility, including financial barriers and limited insurance coverage, continues to limit the utilization of FP services among TGD patients. Increased affordability through insurance coverage may additionally improve FP utilization. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This project was funded by the Mayo Clinic Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Mayo Clinic Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCaTS), grant number UL1TR002377. This project was also supported by Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Grant Number TL1TR002380 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Felicity Enders reports grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality paid to her institution; speakers’ fees for lectures or presentations from Mount Sinai, University of Washington, University of Minnesota, University of Rochester, Cincinnati University, the National Institutes of Health, Duke University, Wake Forest University, the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Johns Hopkins University; travel support from the Association for Clinical and Translational Science and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; and an unpaid leadership role on the Board of Directors of the Association for Clinical and Translational Science. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Abstract Aims Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is used by some transgender individuals (TG), who comprise 1.4% of US population. However, the effects of GAHT on electrocardiogram (ECG) remain unknown. The objective is to assess the effects of GAHT on ECG changes in TG. Methods and results Twelve-lead ECGs of TG on GAHT at the Mayo Clinic were inspected using a validated artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm. The algorithm assigns a patient’s ECG male pattern probability on a scale of 0 (female) to 1 (male). In the primary analysis, done separately for transgender women (TGW) and transgender men (TGM), 12-lead ECGs were used to estimate the male pattern probability before and after GAHT. In a subanalysis, only patients with both pre- and post-GAHT EGCs were included. Further, the autopopulated PR, QRS, and QTc intervals were compared before and after GAHT. Among TGW (n = 86), the probability (mean ± SD) of an ECG male pattern was 0.84 ± 0.25 in the pre-GAHT group, and it was lowered to 0.59 ± 0.36 in the post-GAHT group (n = 173, P < 7.8 × 10−10). Conversely, among TGM, male pattern probability was 0.16 ± 0.28 (n = 47) in the pre-GAHT group, and it was higher at 0.41 ± 0.38 in the post-GAHT group (n = 53, P < 2.4×10−4). The trend persisted in the subanalysis. Furthermore, both the PR (P = 5.68 × 10−4) and QTc intervals (P = 6.65×10−6) prolonged among TGW. Among TGM, the QTc interval shortened (P = 4.8 × 10−2). Conclusion Among TG, GAHT is associated with ECG changes trending towards gender congruence, as determined by the AI algorithm and ECG intervals. Prospective studies are warranted to understand GAHT effects on cardiac structure and function.

Abstract Context Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals have greater access to genital surgery (GS) with improved insurance coverage and access to trained surgeons and interdisciplinary gender-affirming providers. Objective To determine perioperative medical and behavioral health outcomes in transfeminine (TF) individuals undergoing GS, with use of a specific gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) algorithm based on individualized risk factor assessment. Methods In this retrospective observational cohort study, we collected preoperative and postoperative data from 183 TF individuals at a single tertiary referral center from 2017 to 2022, grouping patients by those who continued estradiol (Group 1) vs those who had temporarily discontinued estradiol for 2 to 6 weeks preoperatively (Group 2). Data included clinical and biochemical assessment, GAHT regimens, validated behavioral health measures, and postoperative complications. Main outcomes included venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence, non-VTE postoperative complication incidence, and change in behavioral health assessments. Results The majority of individuals continued estradiol perioperatively (Group 1; 138 [75.4%]). Individuals who temporarily held estradiol preoperatively (Group 2; 45 [24.6%]) were statistically older (P < .01), had higher incidence of cardiometabolic comorbidities (P < .01), and higher Caprini scores (P < .01). Group 1 was statistically more likely to use oral estradiol (P < .01). One episode (0.05%) of VTE occurred (Group 1). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications or behavioral health measures between groups. Conclusion An individualized algorithm for preoperative hormone management for TF GS resulted in perioperative continuation of GAHT for the majority of individuals without significantly increasing the risk for postoperative surgical complications, while maintaining stable behavioral health measures perioperatively.

Abstract In this retrospective study, BRAF mutation status did not correlate with disease extent or (event-free) survival in 156 adults with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. BRAFV600E was associated with an increased incidence of second malignancies, often comprising hematological cancers, which may be clonally related.