Virk, Mrigender

Importance Recent case reports suggest that B antigen–containing blood products may be associated with anaphylactic transfusion reactions in recipients with preformed immunoglobulin E to galactose- α -1,3-galactose (alpha-gal). Objective To test the association of local alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) prevalence and allergic transfusion reaction (ATR) in patients with blood type O. Design, Setting, and Participants In this international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study at academic medical centers, sites were assigned to AGS high- or low-prevalence clusters based on the known geographic distribution of AGS. Data were collected on platelet or plasma transfusions and ATRs during 2020 to 2024. Consecutive patients receiving platelet or plasma transfusions were included. Exposures Patients with blood type O who received B or AB units and patients with blood type O who received O units (reference group) in AGS high- and low-prevalence clusters were compared. Main Outcomes and Measures Before data collection, the hypothesis was that if transfusion-related alpha-gal syndrome (TRAGS) is a true clinical entity, excess ATRs to group B or AB units would be detected in AGS high-prevalence regions exclusively. The main measure was the overall risk ratio (RR) for ATRs to B or AB plasma or platelets in AGS high- vs low-prevalence clusters. Results In total, 558 823 platelet and plasma transfusions at 40 sites in 5 countries were analyzed, of which ATRs occurred in 1744 transfusions (0.3%). In the US AGS high-prevalence cluster (9 sites), significantly more ATRs of any severity occurred among patients with blood type O who received B or AB units vs patients with blood type O who received O units (overall RR, 3.93; 95% CI, 2.96-5.21; P < .001). In contrast, in the primary analysis of the AGS low-prevalence cluster (15 sites), excess ATRs to B or AB units were not detected. In subgroup analyses among patients with blood type O receiving B units, the RR for moderate to severe ATRs was 9.14 (95% CI, 5.39-15.52; P < .001) in the AGS high-prevalence cluster vs 2.15 (95% CI, 1.34-3.47; P = .002) in the AGS low-prevalence cluster. Outside the US, a signal consistent with TRAGS was not detected. Conclusions and Relevance This cohort study provides provocative epidemiologic evidence that TRAGS may be a unique manifestation of AGS and a previously unrecognized risk associated with transfusion. In AGS high-prevalence regions, blood collectors and hospital transfusion services should consider approaches to preventing severe ATRs from B or AB plasma or platelet units.

Abstract Background Anti‐M antibodies were described as rarely eliciting hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) in pregnancy. More recent literature, primarily from Asia, reports severe HDFN attributed to maternal anti‐M. The objective of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the frequency and/or severity of anti‐M HDFN among subjects who self‐report as Asian compared to non‐Asian. Methods Retrospective data were collected from 18 sites. Fetuses/neonates affected by HDFN were categorized as unaffected, mild, moderate, or severe based on clinical management and outcomes. Results Anti‐M was identified in 557 obstetric patients. Among 332 neonates with complete data for analysis, anti‐M was detected in isolation during the pregnancies of 210 (63.3%) neonates; 198 (94.3%) were unaffected by HDFN. The overall frequency of HDFN was 6.5% (2/31) in Asian patients and 5.6% (10/179) in non‐Asian patients. The frequency of severe HDFN was 6.5% (2/31) among Asian patients and 0.6% (1/179) among non‐Asian patients. Among non‐Asian patients, eight (4.5%) were mild and one (0.6%) was moderate. Of 63 pregnancies with anti‐M and ABO incompatibility, 6 (9.5%) were associated with mild HDFN and 57 (90.5%) were unaffected. Of 49 pregnancies with anti‐M and non‐ABO antibody(s), 6 (12.2%) were associated with mild HDFN and 43 (87.8%) were unaffected. One case (10.0%) of HDFN (mild) occurred in the presence of anti‐M, additional antibody(s), and ABO incompatibility. Conclusion In this study, severe anti‐M HDFN was rare in non‐Asian subjects. There is a signal that Asian patients are at greater risk for severe anti‐M HDFN.