Citations

Abstract Background Coronary artery disease (CAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are commonly associated. Co-treatment with multiple anti-thrombotic agents can increase the risk of bleeding. Purpose We sought to evaluate patient-centered outcomes in patients with AF on double therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to patients with standard triple therapy, [a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy]. Methods We performed an extensive systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting outcomes of patients receiving double therapy with DOACs compared to triple therapy with VKAs in patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patient-centered outcomes were the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNB), all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and stroke. Results Four randomized controlled trials (9602 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with significantly lower ISTH major bleeding/ CRNB (RR - 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67-0.82, p < 0.00001, I2 = 11%). There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy outcomes, including myocardial infarction (RR- 0.99, 95% CI :0.79-1.25, p = 0.96, I2 = 0%), stent thrombosis (RR - 0.97, 95% CI: 0.6-1.55, p = 0.89, I2 = 0%), ischemic stroke (RR - 0.76, 95% CI: 0.5-1.15, p = 0.19, I2 = 0%), all-cause mortality (RR - 1.06, 95% CI: 0.85-1.31, p = 0.61, I2 = 0%) and MACE (RR - 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91-1.22, p = 0.97, I2 = 0%). Conclusion Compared with triple therapy with VKAS, double therapy with DOACs is associated with a reduced risk of bleeding and is as effective in patients with AF undergoing PCI. Abstract Figure.

Introduction: The right ventricle (RV) strain measured by speckle tracking (RVS) is a novel method of assessing RV function. We compared RVS to RV fractional area change (FAC%), tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion (TAPSE) and Doppler tissue imaging-derived peak systolic velocity (S’) in the assessment of right ventricular (RV) systolic function measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients who underwent cardiac MRI between Jan 2012- Dec 2017 and a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) within 1 month of the MRI with no interval event. Baseline clinical characteristics and MRI parameters were extracted from chart review. Echocardiographic parameters were measured prospectively. TTE parameters including RVS, TAPSE, S’ and FAC% were tested for accuracy to identify impaired RV EF (EF <45% & <30%) using receiver operator curves. Results: The study cohort included 500 patients with mean age 55 yr ± 18 and right ventricular systolic pressure 33.7 ± 13.6 mmHg. The area under ROC for RVS was 0.69 (95% CI 0.63 – 0.75) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.70 – 0.88) to predict RVEF <45% & RVEF <30% respectively. The RV FAC % had second highest accuracy of predicting RVEF among all the TTE parameters tested in study. Conclusion: Right ventricular strain is the most accurate echocardiographic method to detect impaired right ventricular systolic function when using MRI as the gold standard.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None Background Cardiac Power Index (CPI) is an integrative hemodynamic measure of cardiac pumping capability and is the product of the simultaneously measured mean arterial pressure (MAP) and cardiac output (CO). In patients with aortic stenosis (AS), MAP is not reflective of mean systolic left ventricular (LV) pressure due to the transvalvular gradient. Non-invasive assessment of mean systolic LV pressure is challenging in severe aortic stenosis. CPI assessed using systemic MAP was previously shown to predict survival post transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Purpose We evaluated the utility of a gradient adjusted CPI in predicting survival post TAVR compared to CPI alone Methods A retrospective study was performed including patients undergoing TAVR with 1 year follow-up. Baseline demographics, clinical, and echocardiographic data were abstracted from a cohort of 1,011 patients. CPI was calculated, (CO x MAP)/ (451 x BSA) Watts/m2. Gradient adjusted CPI was calculated using an augmented MAP i) adding aortic valve mean gradient(AVMG) to systolic blood pressure (CPI1); ii) adding aortic valve maximal instantaneous gradient to systolic blood pressure (CPI2) and iii) adding AVMG to MAP (CPI3). Patient survival score was calculated using a step up technique to identify the cut off value for CPI and gradient adjusted CPI to identify, where the maximum difference in mortality occurred. Multivariate cox-regression analysis was performed to adjust for baseline covariates. Receiver operator curves(ROC) for CPI and gradient adjusted CPI were calculated to predict survival post TAVR. Results The mortality rate at 1 yr was 16%. Mean age and AVMG of survivors was 81 +/- 9 yrs and 43 +/-14 mmHg vs 80 +/-9 yrs and 42 +/- 13 mmHg in the deceased group. Proportion of female patients was similar in both groups (p = 0.7). Patients in the deceased group at baseline had a higher prevalence of chronic lung disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure within 2-weeks of procedure, higher STS-PROM score, lower serum albumin level, higher prevalence of moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation, higher right ventricular systolic pressure and higher prevalence of dialysis. Both CPI and gradient adjusted CPI were independently associated with survival at 1 year. The area under ROC for CP, CP1, CP2 and CP3 were 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 - 0.72), 0.65 (95% CI 0.60 – 0.70), 0.66 (95% CI 0.61 – 0.71) and 0.63 (95% CI 0.58 – 0.68) respectively. Conclusion Gradient adjusted CPI did not improve accuracy of predicting post TAVR survival at 1 year compared to CPI alone. Abstract P339 Figure. Area under ROC

AbstractBackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are commonly associated. Cotreatment with multiple antithrombotic agents can increase the risk of bleeding. We sought to evaluate patient‐centered outcomes in patients with AF on double therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to patients with standard triple therapy, [a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy].MethodsWe performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes of patients receiving double therapy with DOACs compared to triple therapy with VKAs in patients with AF undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patient‐centered outcomes were the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (CRNB), all‐cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke.ResultsFour RCTs (9602 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Compared to VKAs, DOACs were associated with significantly lower ISTH major bleeding/ CRNB (RR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67‐0.82, P < .00001, I2 = 11%). There were no statistically significant differences in the efficacy outcomes, including myocardial infarction (RR: 0.99, 95% CI :0.79‐1.25, P = .96), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.6‐1.55, P = .89), ischemic stroke (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.5‐1.15, P = .19), all‐cause mortality (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.85‐1.31, P = .61), and MACE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.91‐1.22, P = .97).ConclusionCompared with triple therapy with VKAS, double therapy with DOACs is associated with a reduced risk of bleeding and is as effective in patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Abstract Introduction Systolic right ventricular (RV) function has prognostic significance both in acquired and congenital heart diseases. However accurate assessment of RV ejection fraction (EF) with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains challenging due to the complex geometric shape of the RV. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the gold standard modality for assessment of RV function; however the cost and availability limits the regular use of MRI in clinical practice. The RV strain measured by speckle tracking (RVS) is a novel method of assessing RV EF. Purpose The purpose of the study was to assess the accuracy of RVS compared RV fractional area change (FAC%), tricuspid annular peak systolic excursion (TAPSE) and Doppler tissue imaging-derived isovolumic acceleration and peak systolic velocity (S') at the lateral tricuspid annulus in the assessment of impaired RV EF. Methods We retrospectively identified patients who had a cardiac MRI between 2012- 2017 and only included patients with a TTE within 1 month of the MRI for our final analysis. Baseline characteristics, TTE and MRI parameters were extracted from chart review. RV strain was measured retrospectively using ECHOINSIGHT software. Four TTE parameters including RVS, TAPSE, S' and FAC% were tested for accuracy to identify impaired RV EF (defined as EF<45%) using receiver operator curves. Results The study cohort included 500 patients with mean age 55 yr ± 18 and right ventricular systolic pressure 33.7±13.6 mmHg. The proportion of female gender, diabetes, hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea were 38%, 15.6%, 43% & 19.8% respectively. The area under ROC for TAPSE, S', FAC% and RVS were 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51–0.65, p=0.03), 0.59 (95% CI 0.52–0.66, p=0.03), 0.67 (95% CI 0.61–0.73, p=0.03) and 0.70 (0.64–0.76, p=0.03) for assessing RV EF <45%. Conclusion Right ventricular strain most accurately detected impaired right ventricular ejection fraction as obtained by MRI. Acknowledgement/Funding None

Abstract Background Based on previously published data, routine myocardial perfusion imaging in diabetics is not recommended. Selecting patients with diabetes and high risk cardiovascular features could be important to improve the yield of physiologic assessment of the coronary arteries disease and subsequently patient outcome. Purpose We posed the question whether nuclear stress testing has a better yield by selecting diabetic individuals with known vascular disease. Methods We analyzed records for 15,392 diabetics from 1996 to 2009 with and without vascular disease. Vascular disease is defined as carotid vascular disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, or peripheral arterial disease. There was 2457 myocardial perfusion studies performed within 2 years of the vascular evaluation. We studied the results of these stress testing in each group and evaluated for the presence of myocardial ischemia. Multivariate Cox proportional regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals after adjusting for age, gender. Results Of those who underwent myocardial perfusion studies 1819 were diabetic with vascular disease group A (mean age 67.8, 70.5% female) and 638 were diabetic without vascular disease group B (mean age 64.5 years, 67.1% female). There was at least one reversible defect suggest myocardial ischemia in 225 and 758 studies in group A and B respectively. Comparing outcome based on the presence of myocardial ischemia in group A without vascular disease, those with vascular disease did have an increased risk of myocardial infarction (adjusted HR: 1.630, 95% CI: 1.281–2.074) and death (adjusted HR: 1.646, 95% CI: 1.413–1.918). Conclusion Myocardial perfusion imaging is a reasonable test in patients with diabetes and vascular disease. The presence of myocardial ischemia is more common and is associated with worse cardiovascular outcome. Acknowledgement/Funding None