Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

1838 citation(s) found for "Trust, L".

A Large-Scale Analysis of Genetic Variants within Putative miRNA Binding Sites in Prostate Cancer
Stegeman, Shane, Amankwah, Ernest K. , Klein, Kerenaftali, Kim, Donghwa , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Sellers, Thomas A. , Srinivasan, Srilakshmi , Eeles, Rosalind A. , Easton, Doug , Olama, Ali Amin Al , Benlloch, Sara, Muir, Kenneth , Wiklund, Fredrik, Grönberg, Henrik , Haiman, Christopher A. , Schleutker, Johanna , Nordestgaard, Børge G. , Travis, Ruth C. , Neal, David E. , Stanford, Janet L. , Blot, William J. , Thibodeau, Stephen N. , Maier, Christiane, Kibel, Adam S. , Brenner, Hermann , Kaneva, Radka , Teixeira, Manuel R. , BioResource, Australian Prostate Cancer, Clements, Judith A. , Batra, Jyotsna , Wahlfors, Tiina , Leongamornlert, Daniel , Southey, Melissa C. , Schumacher, Fredrick R. , Henrique, Rui , Hamdy, Freddie C. , Donovan, Jenny , Pashayan, Nora , Weischer, Maren , Saunders, Edward J. , Mitev, Vanio , Maia, Sofia , Tilley, Wayne D. , Thibodeau, Stephen, O’Mara, Tracy A. , Kote‐Jarai, Zsofia , Giles, Graham G. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Khaw, Kay‐Tee , Cybulski, Cezary , Cannon‐Albright, Lisa , BioResource, Australian Prostate Cancer, Spurdle, Amanda B. , Park, Jong Y. , Paulo, Paula , Teixeira, Manuel R , Eeles, Rosalind A , Southey, Melissa C , Donovan, Jenny L , Muir, Kenneth , Schleutker, Johanna , Travis, Ruth C , Pashayan, Nora , Lin, Hui-Yi , Brenner, Hermann , Pinto, Pedro , Batra, Jyotsna , Clements, Judith

Cancer Discovery | February 17, 2015 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 368-379

10.1158/2159-8290.cd-14-1057 | PMID 25691096 Get It

Abstract Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy among men worldwide. Genome-wide association studies have identified 100 risk variants for prostate cancer, which can explain approximately 33% of the familial risk of the disease. We hypothesized that a comprehensive analysis of genetic variations found within the 3′ untranslated region of genes predicted to affect miRNA binding (miRSNP) can identify additional prostate cancer risk variants. We investigated the association between 2,169 miRSNPs and prostate cancer risk in a large-scale analysis of 22,301 cases and 22,320 controls of European ancestry from 23 participating studies. Twenty-two miRSNPs were associated (P < 2.3 × 10−5) with risk of prostate cancer, 10 of which were within 7 genes previously not mapped by GWAS studies. Further, using miRNA mimics and reporter gene assays, we showed that miR-3162-5p has specific affinity for the KLK3 rs1058205 miRSNP T-allele, whereas miR-370 has greater affinity for the VAMP8 rs1010 miRSNP A-allele, validating their functional role. Significance: Findings from this large association study suggest that a focus on miRSNPs, including functional evaluation, can identify candidate risk loci below currently accepted statistical levels of genome-wide significance. Studies of miRNAs and their interactions with SNPs could provide further insights into the mechanisms of prostate cancer risk. Cancer Discov; 5(4); 368–79. ©2015 AACR. See related commentary by Yousef, p. 351 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 333
Not all IGHV3-21 chronic lymphocytic leukemias are equal: prognostic considerations
Agathangelidis, Andreas , Hadzidimitriou, Anastasia , Sutton, Lesley-Ann, Minga, Eva, Scarfò, Lydia , Davis, Zadie , Yan, Xiao‐Jie , Plevová, Karla , Sandberg, Yorick , Vojdeman, Fie Juhl , Boudjogra, Myriam, Τζένου, Τατιάνα , Chatzouli, Maria, Chu, Charles C. , Veronese, Silvio , Gardiner, Anne, Mansouri, Larry, Smedby, Karin E. , Pedersen, Lone Bredo , Moreno, Denis, Lom, Kirsten van, Giudicelli, Véronique , Francová, Hana Skuhrová, Nguyen‐Khac, Florence , Juliusson, Gunnar , Anagnostopoulos, Αchilles , Lefranc, Marie‐Paule , Facco, Monica , Trentin, Livio , Catherwood, Mark , Montillo, Marco , Geisler, Christian H., Pospı́šilová, Šárka , Oscier, David , Jelinek, Diane F., Darzentas, Nikos , Belessi, Chrysoula, Davi, Frédéric , Ghia, Paolo , Rosenquist, Richard , Σταματόπουλος, Κώστας , Baliakas, Panagiotis , Tsanousa, Athina , Shanafelt, Tait D. , Panagiotidis, Panagiotis T. , Angelis, Lefteris , Langerak, Anton W. , Chiorazzi, Nicholas , Ghia, Paolo , Rosenquist, Richard

Blood | January 29, 2015 | Volume: 125 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 856-859

10.1182/blood-2014-09-600874 | PMID 25634617 Get It

Key Points CLL stereotyped subset #2 (IGHV3-21/IGLV3-21) is uniformly aggressive independently of somatic hypermutation status. The prognosis for non–subset #2/IGHV3-21 CLL resembles that of the remaining CLL cases with similar somatic hypermutation status.
An international consortium proposal of uniform response criteria for myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) in adults
Savona, Michael R. , Malcovati, Luca , Komrokji, Rami S. , Tiu, Ramón V., Mughal, Tariq I. , Orazi, Attilio , Kiladjian, Jean‐Jacques , Padron, Eric , Solary, Éric , Tibes, Raoul , Itzykson, Raphaël , Cazzola, Mario , Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P. , Fenaux, Pierre , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Gerds, Aaron T. , Sanz, Guillermo , Cervantes, Francisco , Germing, Ulrich, Cross, Nicholas C.P. , List, Alan F. , Mesa, Ruben, Mesa, Ruben A. , Niemeyer, Charlotte Marie , Germing, Ulrich , Gerds, Aaron T , Savona, Michael R , Komrokji, Rami S , Solary, Eric , Kiladjian, Jean-Jacques , Itzykson, Raphael , Malcovati, Luca , Cazzola, Mario , Sanz, Guillermo F , Orazi, Attilio , Cross, Nicholas C P

Blood | January 26, 2015 | Volume: 125 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1857-1865

10.1182/blood-2014-10-607341 | PMID 25624319 Get It

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are hematologically diverse stem cell malignancies sharing phenotypic features of both myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms. There are currently no standard treatment recommendations for most adult patients with MDS/MPN. To optimize efforts to improve the management and disease outcomes, it is essential to identify meaningful clinical and biologic end points and standardized response criteria for clinical trials. The dual dysplastic and proliferative features in these stem cell malignancies define their uniqueness and challenges. We propose response assessment guidelines to harmonize future clinical trials with the principal objective of establishing suitable treatment algorithms. An international panel comprising laboratory and clinical experts in MDS/MPN was established involving 3 independent academic MDS/MPN workshops (March 2013, December 2013, and June 2014). These recommendations are the result of this collaborative project sponsored by the MDS Foundation.
Phase III Open-Label Randomized Study of Eribulin Mesylate Versus Capecitabine in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With an Anthracycline and a Taxane
Awada, Ahmad , Twelves, Chris, Yelle, Louise, Perez, Edith A. , Velikova, Galina , Olivo, Martin, He, Yi, Dutcus, Corina E. , Cortés, Javier , He, Philip , Kaufman, Peter A. , Olivo, Martin S, Awada, Ahmad , He, Philip , Cortés, J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 21, 2015 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 594-601

10.1200/jco.2013.52.4892 | PMID 25605862 Get It

Purpose This phase III randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00337103) compared eribulin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Women with MBC who had received prior anthracycline- and taxane-based therapy were randomly assigned to receive eribulin or capecitabine as their first-, second-, or third-line chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease. Stratification factors were human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) status and geographic region. Coprimary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Median OS times for eribulin (n = 554) and capecitabine (n = 548) were 15.9 and 14.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.00; P = .056). Median PFS times for eribulin and capecitabine were 4.1 and 4.2 months, respectively (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.25; P = .30). Objective response rates were 11.0% for eribulin and 11.5% for capecitabine. Global health status and overall quality-of-life scores over time were similar in the treatment arms. Both treatments had manageable safety profiles consistent with their known adverse effects; most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Conclusion In this phase III study, eribulin was not shown to be superior to capecitabine with regard to OS or PFS.
Reliability of magnetic resonance elastography using multislice two‐dimensional spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging (SE‐EPI) and three‐dimensional inversion reconstruction for assessing renal stiffness
Low, Gavin , Owen, Nicola , Joubert, Ilse , Patterson, Andrew J. , Graves, Martin J. , Glaser, Kevin J. , Alexander, Graeme , Lomas, David J.

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | December 24, 2014 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 844-850

10.1002/jmri.24826 | PMID 25537823 Get It

BackgroundTo evaluate the reliability of MRE using a spin‐echo echo‐planar imaging (SE‐EPI) renal MRE technique in healthy volunteers.MethodsInstitutional review board approved prospective study in which all participants provided written informed consent. Sixteen healthy volunteers comprising seven males and nine females with a median age of 35 years (age range: 23 to 59 years) were included. Coronal 90 Hz and 60 Hz MRE acquisitions were performed twice within a 30‐min interval between examinations. Renal MRE reliability was assessed by (i) test–retest repeatability, and (ii) inter‐rater agreement between two independent readers. The MRE‐measured averaged renal stiffness values were evaluated using: intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland‐Altman and the within‐subject coefficient of variation (COV).ResultsFor test–retest repeatability, Bland‐Altman showed a mean stiffness difference between examinations of 0.07 kPa (95% limits of agreement: −1.41, 1.54) at 90 Hz and 0.01 kPa (95% limits of agreement: −0.51, 0.53) at 60 Hz. Coefficient of repeatability was 1.47 kPa and 0.52 kPa at 90 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively. The within‐subject COV was 13.6% and 7.7% at 90 Hz and 60 Hz, respectively. ICC values were 0.922 and 0.907 for test–retest repeatability and 0.998 and 0.989 for inter‐rater agreement, respectively (P < 0.001).ConclusionSE‐EPI renal MRE is a reliable technique. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:844–850.
Screening for celiac disease in the general population and in high‐risk groups
Card, Tim , Kaukinen, Katri , Bai, Julio C. , Zingone, Fabiana , Sanders, David S. , Ludvigsson, Jonas F. , Murray, Joseph A.

United European Gastroenterology Journal | December 19, 2014 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 106-120

10.1177/2050640614561668 | PMID 25922671 Get It

Background Celiac disease (CD) occurs in approximately 1% of the Western population. It is a lifelong disorder that is associated with impaired quality of life (QOL) and an excessive risk of comorbidity and death. Objectives To review the literature on screening for CD in relation to the current World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for mass screening. Methods We performed a PubMed search to identify indexed papers on CD screening with a publication date from 1900 until 1 June 2014. When we deemed an abstract relevant, we read the corresponding paper in detail. Results CD fulfills several WHO criteria for mass screening (high prevalence, available treatment and difficult clinical detection), but it has not yet been established that treatment of asymptomatic CD may reduce the excessive risk of severe complications, leading to higher QOL nor that it is cost‐effective. Conclusions Current evidence is not sufficient to support mass screening for CD, but active case‐finding may be appropriate, as we recognize that most patients with CD will still be missed by this strategy. Although proof of benefit is still lacking, screening for CD may be appropriate in high‐risk groups.
Performance of automated scoring of ER, PR, HER2, CK5/6 and EGFR in breast cancer tissue microarrays in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium
Howat, William , Blows, Fiona M., Provenzano, Elena , Brook, Mark N. , Morris, Lorna , Gazińska, Patrycja , Johnson, Nicola, McDuffus, Leigh‐Anne, Miller, Jodi L. , Sawyer, Elinor J. , Pinder, Sarah E. , Deurzen, Carolien H. M. van , Sironen, Reijo , Visscher, Daniel W., Caldas, Carlos , Daley, Frances , Coulson, Penny , Sanders, Joyce , Wesseling, Jelle , Fagerholm, Rainer, Blomqvist, Carl , Ali, H. Raza , Dawson, Sarah‐Jane , Figueroa, Jonine D. , Lissowska, Jolanta , Brinton, Louise A. , Mannermaa, Arto, Kataja, Vesa , Kosma, Veli‐Matti , Brock, Ian W., Reed, Malcolm , Devillee, Peter, Mesker, Wilma E. , Seyaneve, Caroline M, Menéndez, Primitiva, Bolla, Manjeet K. , Easton, Douglas F. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Pharoah, Paul D.P., Sherman, Mark E., García‐Closas, Montserrat , Visscher, Daniel, Jones, J. Louise , Broeks, Annegien , Nevanlinna, Heli , Heikkilä, Päivi , Mannermaa, Arto, Cox, Angela , Cross, Simon S. , Couch, Fergus J. , Olson, Janet E. , Hollestelle, Antoinette , Benı́tez, Javier , Pérez, José Ignacio Arias , Lissowska, Jolanta , Caldas, Carlos , García-Closas, Montserrat , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Figueroa, Jonine D , Sawyer, Elinor J

The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research | December 4, 2014 | Volume: 1 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 18-32

10.1002/cjp2.3 | PMID 27499890 Get It

AbstractBreast cancer risk factors and clinical outcomes vary by tumour marker expression. However, individual studies often lack the power required to assess these relationships, and large‐scale analyses are limited by the need for high throughput, standardized scoring methods. To address these limitations, we assessed whether automated image analysis of immunohistochemically stained tissue microarrays can permit rapid, standardized scoring of tumour markers from multiple studies. Tissue microarray sections prepared in nine studies containing 20 263 cores from 8267 breast cancers stained for two nuclear (oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor), two membranous (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and epidermal growth factor receptor) and one cytoplasmic (cytokeratin 5/6) marker were scanned as digital images. Automated algorithms were used to score markers in tumour cells using the Ariol system. We compared automated scores against visual reads, and their associations with breast cancer survival. Approximately 65–70% of tissue microarray cores were satisfactory for scoring. Among satisfactory cores, agreement between dichotomous automated and visual scores was highest for oestrogen receptor (Kappa = 0.76), followed by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Kappa = 0.69) and progesterone receptor (Kappa = 0.67). Automated quantitative scores for these markers were associated with hazard ratios for breast cancer mortality in a dose‐response manner. Considering visual scores of epidermal growth factor receptor or cytokeratin 5/6 as the reference, automated scoring achieved excellent negative predictive value (96–98%), but yielded many false positives (positive predictive value = 30–32%). For all markers, we observed substantial heterogeneity in automated scoring performance across tissue microarrays. Automated analysis is a potentially useful tool for large‐scale, quantitative scoring of immunohistochemically stained tissue microarrays available in consortia. However, continued optimization, rigorous marker‐specific quality control measures and standardization of tissue microarray designs, staining and scoring protocols is needed to enhance results.
Phase I Trial of Cyclophosphamide as an Immune Modulator for Optimizing Oncolytic Reovirus Delivery to Solid Tumors
Roulstone, Victoria , Khan, Khurum , Pandha, Hardev , Rudman, Sarah , Gill, George M., Melcher, Alan , Vile, Richard G. , Harrington, Kevin J. , Bono, Johann S. de , Spicer, James , Coffey, Matt C. , Melcher, Alan A , Harrington, Kevin , de Bono, Johann

Clinical Cancer Research | November 26, 2014 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1305-1312

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1770 | PMID 25424857 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Reovirus is a wild-type oncolytic virus that is ubiquitous in the environment; most patients are therefore preimmune. Therapeutic administration leads to an increase in neutralizing antireovirus antibody (NARA) titer. We hypothesized that if NARA limited reovirus antitumor activity, the effect might be attenuated by coadministration of cyclophosphamide. Experimental design: In a phase I study, patients with advanced cancer received cyclophosphamide 3 days before intravenous reovirus serotype 3 Dearing (RT3D). The primary objective was to reduce the resulting rise in NARA titer. Cyclophosphamide dose was escalated from 25–1,000 mg/m2 through nine cohorts; we aimed to define a well-tolerated immunomodulatory dose. Results: The combination was well tolerated in 36 patients, with grade 3/4 toxicities only seen at or above the maximum tolerated dose of cyclophosphamide, which was 800 mg/m2 combined with reovirus. Immunosuppressive effect, defined as maintaining NARA titer rise below a predefined threshold, was observed in only one patient. Furthermore, despite expected myelosuppression seen at higher cyclophosphamide doses, no changes in T-cell subsets, including Tregs, occurred with dose escalation. Viable virus was detected in association with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from 14% of patients 10 days after the last RT3D injection, despite high plasma NARA titer, demonstrating a potential mechanism for prolonged evasion of neutralization by reovirus. Conclusions: Coadministration of cyclophosphamide with reovirus is safe, but does not attenuate host antiviral responses. Alternative immunomodulation approaches should be explored, but association with PBMCs may allow reovirus to persist and evade even high levels of neutralizing antibodies. Clin Cancer Res; 21(6); 1305–12. ©2014 AACR.
Classification of failure of limb salvage after reconstructive surgery for bone tumours
Ruggieri, Pietro , Windhager, Reinhard , Funovics, Philipp T. , Gibbons, C. L. M. H. , Hornicek, Francis J. , Temple, H. Thomas , Letson, G. Douglas , Henderson, Eric R. , O’Connor, Mary I. , Guo, Wei , Ruggieri, Pietro

The Bone & Joint Journal | November 4, 2014 | Volume: 96-B | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1436-1440

10.1302/0301-620x.96b11.34747 | PMID 25371453 Get It

Previous classification systems of failure of limb salvage focused primarily on endoprosthetic failures and lacked sufficient depth for the effective study of the causes of failure. In order to address these inadequacies, the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) formed a committee to recommend revisions of the previous systems. The purpose of this study was to report on their recommendations. The modifications were prepared using an earlier, evidence-based model with subclassification based on the existing medical literature. Subclassification for all five primary types of failure of limb salvage following endoprosthetic reconstruction were formulated and a complementary system was derived for the failure of biological reconstruction. An additional classification of failure in paediatric patients was also described. Limb salvage surgery presents a complex array of potential mechanisms of failure, and a complete and precise classification of types of failure is required. Earlier classification systems lacked specificity, and the evidence-based system outlined here is designed to correct these weaknesses and to provide a means of reporting failures of limb salvage in order to allow the interpretation of outcome following reconstructive surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1436–40.
Candidate Genetic Modifiers for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers
Peterlongo, Paolo , Chang-Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B., Schmutzler, Rita K., Simard, Jacques , Soucy, Penny, Eeles, Rosalind A. , Easton, Douglas F. , Hamann, Ute, Wilkening, Stefan, Chen, Bowang , Rookus, Matti A. , Schmidt, Marjanka K. , Baan, Frederieke H. van der , Spurdle, Amanda B. , Walker, Logan C. , Lose, Felicity , Maia, Ana-Teresa , Montagna, Marco , Matricardi, Laura , Lubiński, Jan , Jakubowska, Anna , Gómez, E. , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I., Nathanson, Katherine L. , Rebbeck, Timothy R., Arun, Banu K., Karlan, Beth Y., Oršulić, Sandra , Lester, Jenny, Chung, Wendy K., Miron, Alex, Southey, Melissa C. , Goldgar, David E., Janavičius, Ramūnas , Dorfling, Cecilia M., Rensburg, Elizabeth J. van , Ding, Yuan Chun , Neuhausen, Susan L., Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Gerdes, Anne‐Marie , Ejlertsen, Bent , Jønson, Lars, Osório, Ana , Martínez-Bouzas, Cristina, Benı́tez, Javier , Conway, Edye E., Blazer, Kathleen R. , Weitzel, Jeffrey N. , Manoukian, Siranoush , Peissel, Bernard , Zaffaroni, Daniela , Scuvera, Giulietta, Barile, Monica, Ficarazzi, Filomena , Mariette, Frédérique, Fortuzzi, Stefano , Viel, Alessandra , Giannini, Giuseppe , Papi, Laura , Martayan, Aline , Tibiletti, Maria Grazia , Radice, Paolo , Vratimos, Athanassios, Fostira, Florentia, Donaldson, Alan, Brewer, Carole, Foo, Claire, Evans, D. Gareth , Frost, Debra, Eccles, Diana , Brady, Angela, Adlard, Julian , Walker, Lisa, Izatt, Louise , Side, Lucy E., Rogers, Mark T., Porteous, Mary, Morrison, Patrick J., Platte, Radka, Davidson, Rosemarie, Hodgson, Shirley V. , Ellis, Steve, Cole, Trevor, EMBRACE, on behalf of, Claes, Kathleen , Maerken, Tom Van, Meindl, Alfons , Gehrig, Andrea, Sutter, Christian , Engel, Christoph , Niederacher, Dieter , Plendl, Hansjoerg, Kast, Karin, Rhiem, Kerstin, Ditsch, Nina , Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda, Wappenschmidt, Barbara , Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Paillerets, Brigitte Bressac–de , Buecher, Bruno , Delnatte, Capucine, Houdayer, Claude , Coupier, Isabelle, Barjhoux, Laure, Venat‐Bouvet, Laurence , Boutry‐Kryza, Nadia, Sinilnikova, Olga M., Caron, Olivier , Mazoyer, Sylvie , Belotti, Muriel, Collaborators, on behalf of GEMO Study, Piedmonte, Marion, Friedländer, Michael , Rodriguez, Gustavo C., Copeland, Larry J. , Hoya, Miguel de la , Segura, Pedro Pérez, Nevanlinna, Heli , Aittomäki, Kristiina, Os, Theo A.M. van, Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E.J., Hout, Annemarie H. van der, Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline, Ausems, Margreet G.E.M. , Doorn, Helena C. van , Collée, Margriet , HEBON, on behalf of, Oláh, Edith , Dı́ez, Orland , Blanco, Ignacio , Lázaro, Conxi , Brunet, Joan , Feliubadaló, Lídia , Cybulski, Cezary, Durda, Katarzyna, Jaworska–Bieniek, Katarzyna, Sukiennicki, Grzegorz, Arason, Aðalgeir , Chiquette, Jocelyne , Teixeira, Manuel R. , Olswold, Curtis, Lindor, Noralane M. , Offit, Kenneth, Corines, Marina, Jacobs, Lauren , Robson, Mark E. , Zhang, Liying , Vijai, Joseph , Berger, Andreas, Singer, Christian F., Rappaport, Christine , Kaulich, Daphne Geschwantler, Pfeiler, Georg , Tea, Muy-Kheng M., Phelan, Catherine M., Greene, Mark H. , Mai, Phuong L., Rennert, Gad , Mulligan, Anna Marie , Glendon, Gord , Tchatchou, Sandrine, Andrulis, Irene L., Bojesen, Anders , Pedersen, Inge Søkilde , Thomassen, Mads , Jensen, Uffe Birk , Laitman, Yael , Rantala, Johanna, Wachenfeldt, Anna von , Ehrencrona, Hans , Askmalm, Marie Stenmark, Borg, Åke , Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B., McGuffog, Lesley, Barrowdale, Daniel , Healey, Sue, Lee, Andrew , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Investigators, on behalf of KConFab, Antoniou, Antonis C. , Friedman, Eitan , Durocher, Francine , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I. , Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline , Thorne, Heather , Stenmark‐Askmalm, Marie , Wang, Xianshu , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Moysich, Kirsten B. , Rudolph, Anja , Nussbaum, Robert L. , Domchek, Susan M. , Arun, Banu , By, Karlan, Chung, Wendy K. , Buys, Saundra S. , Garber, Judy E. , Cook, Jackie A , Tischkowitz, Marc D. , Barwell, Julian , Kennedy, Michael John , Ellis, Steve, EMBRACE, on behalf of, Godwin, Andrew K. , Meindl, Alfons , Steinemann, Doris , Arnold, Norbert , Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Stoppa‐Lyonnet, Dominique , Damiola, Francesca , Golmard, Lisa , Pujol, Pascal , Collaborators, on behalf of GEMO Study, Meijers‐Heijboer, Hanne , Vreeswijk, Maaike P.G. , Hoogerbrugge, Nicoline, HEBON, on behalf of, Gronwald, Jacek , Couch, Fergus J. , Szabo, Csilla I. , Singer, Christian F , Mai, Phuong L., Toland, Amanda Ewart , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Investigators, on behalf of KConFab, Nevanlinna, H , Peterlongo, Paolo , Rennert, Gad , Spurdle, Amanda B , Teixeira, Manuel R , van Rensburg, Elizabeth J , Eccles, Diana , Moysich, Kirsten , de la Hoya, Miguel , Diez, Orland , Radice, Paolo , Weitzel, Jeffrey N , Claes, Kathleen B M , Adlard, Julian , Brunet, Joan , Eeles, Rosalind A , Ehrencrona, Hans , Evans, D Gareth , Joseph, Vijai , Matricardi, Laura , Olopade, Olufunmilayo I , Southey, Melissa C , Jakubowska, Anna , Schmidt, Marjanka K , Nathanson, Katherine L , Friedlander, Michael , Arason, Adalgeir , Barrowdale, Daniel , Benitez, Javier , Engel, Christoph , Lazaro, Conxi , Montagna, Marco , Robson, Mark , Viel, Alessandra , Simard, Jacques , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Feliubadaló, Lidia , Gómez-García, Encarna B , Hansen, Thomas van Overeem , Manoukian, Siranoush , Lubinski, Jan , Rhiem, Kerstin

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | October 22, 2014 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 308-316

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0532 | PMID 25336561 Get It

Abstract Background:BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The incomplete penetrance coupled with the variable age at diagnosis in carriers of the same mutation suggests the existence of genetic and nongenetic modifying factors. In this study, we evaluated the putative role of variants in many candidate modifier genes. Methods: Genotyping data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for known variants (n = 3,248) located within or around 445 candidate genes, were available through the iCOGS custom-designed array. Breast and ovarian cancer association analysis was performed within a retrospective cohort approach. Results: The observed P values of association ranged between 0.005 and 1.000. None of the variants was significantly associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, after multiple testing adjustments. Conclusion: There is little evidence that any of the evaluated candidate variants act as modifiers of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Impact: Genome-wide association studies have been more successful at identifying genetic modifiers of BRCA1/2 penetrance than candidate gene studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(1); 308–16. ©2014 AACR.