By, Karlan

Abstract Background: CA125 is elevated in 80% of ovarian cancer cases and has proven utility in assessing response to therapy and prognosis. Unfortunately, CA125 is elevated in a variety of benign conditions and only in 50% of early stage ovarian cancers, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity unacceptable for population-based screening. Therefore, understanding factors that influence CA125 at presentation could provide important insights for interpreting CA125 values. Methods: Using pre-treatment CA125 and detailed epidemiologic data from 12 studies participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC), we evaluated factors previously reported to influence CA125 levels, including age, race, oral contraceptive use, parity, tubal ligation, endometriosis, body mass index (BMI), personal history of breast cancer, or a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. We used linear regression to estimate the association between each variable and CA125 probit scores, which we used to standardize values between studies. Secondary analyses included adjustment for histologic subtype. We also estimated the associations within each study using log-transformed CA125 as the outcome and estimated summary measures using random effects meta-analyses. Results: Of the 4417 cases included in the analysis, 2918 (66%) were serous, 227 (5%) were mucinous, 484 (11%) were endometrioid, and 258 (6%) were clear cell carcinomas. Median CA125 values varied between studies with a high of 831 U/mL and a low of 271 U/mL. We observed no association between race, oral contraceptive use, tubal ligation, endometriosis, prior breast cancer, and family history of breast cancer and pre-treatment CA125. However, we observed increased pre-treatment CA125 levels with older age (>70 vs. < 50, p=0.03), parity (p=0.01), number of children (p=0.02), obesity (BMI>30 vs. 21-25, p=0.03), and family history of ovarian cancer (p=0.05). Results were similar but attenuated when we calculated summary estimates of the association using meta-analysis of study specific estimates of the association with log-transformed CA125 rather than probit scores. Age and BMI remained predictive of pre-treatment CA125 values after adjustment for histologic subtype. Our data are limited by between site variability in CA125 assays; therefore, validation of these findings is needed with adjustment for type of assay used or in a study population in which all cases had pre-treatment CA125 values measured with the same assay. Conclusions: Despite these limitations, results from this analysis of over 4000 ovarian cancer cases suggest that age and body size may influence pre-treatment CA125 values. Citation Format: KL Terry, A Babic, BY Karlan, MT Goodman, D Lambrechts, F Heitz, K Matsuo, I McNeish, T Pejovic, S Kruger Kjaer, PM Webb, E Hogdall, EL Goode, DW Cramer, for the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Epidemiologic predictors of pre-treatment CA125 in women with ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 8-9, 2014; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2015;21(16 Suppl):Abstract nr AS13.

Abstract Background:BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The incomplete penetrance coupled with the variable age at diagnosis in carriers of the same mutation suggests the existence of genetic and nongenetic modifying factors. In this study, we evaluated the putative role of variants in many candidate modifier genes. Methods: Genotyping data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for known variants (n = 3,248) located within or around 445 candidate genes, were available through the iCOGS custom-designed array. Breast and ovarian cancer association analysis was performed within a retrospective cohort approach. Results: The observed P values of association ranged between 0.005 and 1.000. None of the variants was significantly associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, after multiple testing adjustments. Conclusion: There is little evidence that any of the evaluated candidate variants act as modifiers of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Impact: Genome-wide association studies have been more successful at identifying genetic modifiers of BRCA1/2 penetrance than candidate gene studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(1); 308–16. ©2014 AACR.