Kaufman, Peter A.

PURPOSE Imlunestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader designed to deliver continuous ER target inhibition, including in ESR1- mutant breast cancer. This phase Ia/b trial determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of imlunestrant, as monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapy, in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer. The ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) ABC experience is reported here. METHODS An i3+3 dose-escalation design was used, followed by dose expansions of imlunestrant as monotherapy or in combination with abemaciclib with or without aromatase inhibitor (AI), everolimus, or alpelisib. Imlunestrant was administered orally once daily and with the combination partner per label. RESULTS Overall, 262 patients with ER+/HER2– ABC were treated (phase Ia, n = 74; phase Ib, n = 188). Among patients who received imlunestrant monotherapy (n = 114), no dose-limiting toxicities or discontinuations occurred. At the RP2D (400 mg once daily), patients (n = 51) reported grade 1-2 nausea (39.2%), fatigue (39.2%), and diarrhea (29.4%). Patients at RP2D had received previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i; 92.2%), fulvestrant (41.2%), and chemotherapy (29.4%) for ABC and achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.3). Among patients who received imlunestrant + abemaciclib (n = 42) and imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI (n = 43), most (69.4%) were treatment-naïve for ABC; all were CDK4/6i-naïve. Patients treated with imlunestrant + everolimus (n = 42)/alpelisib (n = 21) had received previous CDK4/6i (100%), fulvestrant (34.9%), and chemotherapy (17.5%) for ABC. No new safety signals or interactions with partnered drugs were observed. The mPFS was 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to not available) for imlunestrant + abemaciclib and was not reached for imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI. The mPFS with imlunestrant + everolimus/alpelisib was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 19.1)/9.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 11.1). Antitumor activity was evident regardless of ESR1 mutation status. CONCLUSION Imlunestrant, as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapy, had a manageable safety profile with evidence of preliminary antitumor activity in ER+/HER2– ABC.

5589 Background: Imlunestrant is a next-generation oral SERD designed to deliver continuous estrogen receptor (ER) target inhibition aimed to improve outcomes for patients (pts) with ER+ cancers. In the first-in-human Phase 1a/1b EMBER trial (NCT04188548), imlunestrant showed favorable safety, pharmacokinetics, and clinical benefit in pre-treated pts with ER+ advanced breast cancer or EEC. Here, we report updated imlunestrant monotherapy data and the first clinical data of imlunestrant + abemaciclib in ER+ EEC pts from EMBER. Methods: Eligible pts had ER+ EEC previously treated with (or deemed inappropriate for) platinum-containing chemotherapy. Prior fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitor therapy was not allowed. In Phase 1a, pts received imlunestrant alone, and in Phase 1b, pts were randomized (1:1) to imlunestrant alone or with abemaciclib. Plasma samples were collected at baseline (all pts) and at cycle 2 (monotherapy pts) for ctDNA analysis (Guardant 360 assay) to correlate with clinical benefit. Primary endpoints were RP2D of imlunestrant monotherapy and in combination. Secondary endpoints included safety, tolerability, and overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR: complete or partial response, or stable disease ≥24 weeks), and progression-free survival (PFS) using RECIST v1.1. Results: Overall, 72 pts were treated; 39 pts received monotherapy (33 at 400mg [RP2D] and 6 at 800mg po daily) and 33 pts received imlunestrant (29 at 400mg and 4 at 800mg po daily) + abemaciclib (150mg po twice daily). Baseline characteristics, safety, and preliminary efficacy are presented (Table). For monotherapy, the most common TEAEs (all grade/grade 3) were nausea (36%/3%), diarrhea (26%/0), urinary tract infection (26%/3%), and abdominal pain (21%/8%). For imlunestrant + abemaciclib, the most common TEAEs (all grade/grade 3) were diarrhea (88%/3%), nausea (67%/0), fatigue (49%/9%) and anemia (46%/12%). In the monotherapy arm, pts with deeper (≥ 50%) declines in ctDNA variant allele frequency had a higher CBR (4/7 vs 4/17). Conclusions: Imlunestrant, as monotherapy or with abemaciclib, appears safe and tolerable with preliminary evidence of efficacy in pts with metastatic ER+ EEC. Clinical trial information: NCT04188548 . [Table: see text]

1027 Background: Imlunestrant is a next-generation, oral SERD designed to deliver continuous ER-target inhibition. In the first-in-human Phase 1a/b EMBER study (NCT04188548), imlunestrant demonstrated favourable safety, PK, and clinical benefit when administered as monotherapy or with targeted therapy in ER+, HER2- aBC. Here we present clinical data of imlunestrant with HER2 targeted therapy, in patients (pts) with ER+, HER2+ aBC enrolled in EMBER. Methods: Pts were randomized to imlunestrant (400mg po daily) + trastuzumab (H), with or without (±) abemaciclib (Part C) or received maintenance treatment with imlunestrant + H + pertuzumab (P) (Part E), at standard doses in 21-day cycles. Key eligibility (Part C): ≥ 2 prior HER2 directed regimens, no prior CDK4/6i or fulvestrant; (Part E): received 1st line induction taxane chemotherapy (any duration) + H + P, without disease progression and ≤1 prior therapy for aBC. Key endpoints included safety, PK, ORR, CBR and PFS. Results: Overall, 45 pts with ER+/HER2+ aBC received the following combinations: imlunestrant + H (n=18), imlunestrant + H + abemaciclib (n=21; 1 pt received 800 mg imlunestrant), and imlunestrant + H + P (n=6). Baseline characteristics, safety, and preliminary efficacy are presented below (Table). Most TEAEs were grade 1-2. Common TEAEs with imlunestrant + H were fatigue (33%) and nausea (28%); with imlunestrant + H + abemaciclib were diarrhea (100%), neutropenia (57%), fatigue (52%) and nausea (48%); and with imlunestrant + H + P were diarrhea (50%) and arthralgia (50%). Imlunestrant PK was consistent with those previously reported with no drug-drug interactions observed with the combinations. From Part C, sequencing of baseline plasma ctDNA samples (n=37) identified prevalent mutations in TP53 (49%), PIK3CA (30%), ESR1 (24%), and GATA3 (14%). Clinical activity of imlunestrant in this ER+/HER2+ population, while based on small numbers, is promising. Conclusions: Imlunestrant in combination with trastuzumab ± abemaciclib or pertuzumab was well tolerated, showed no drug-drug interactions, and demonstrated preliminary antitumor activity in pts with ER+/HER2+ aBC. Clinical trial information: NCT04188548 . [Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose: To identify potential predictors of response and resistance mechanisms in patients with hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) treated with the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor abemaciclib ± endocrine therapy (ET), baseline and acquired genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were analyzed and associated with clinical outcomes. Experimental Design: MONARCH 3: postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC and no prior systemic therapy in the advanced setting were randomly assigned to abemaciclib or placebo plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). nextMONARCH: women with HR+, HER2− metastatic breast cancer that progressed on/after prior ET and chemotherapy were randomly assigned to abemaciclib alone (two doses) or plus tamoxifen. Baseline and end-of-treatment plasma samples from patients in MONARCH 3 and nextMONARCH (monotherapy arms) were analyzed to identify somatic genomic alterations. Association between genomic alterations and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was assessed. Results: Most patients had ≥1 genomic alteration detected in baseline ctDNA. In MONARCH 3, abemaciclib+NSAI was associated with improved mPFS versus placebo+NSAI, regardless of baseline alterations. ESR1 alterations were less frequently acquired in the abemaciclib+NSAI arm than placebo+NSAI. Acquired alterations potentially associated with resistance to abemaciclib ± NSAI included RB1 and MYC. Conclusions: In MONARCH 3, certain baseline ctDNA genomic alterations were prognostic for ET but not predictive of abemaciclib response. Further studies are warranted to assess whether ctDNA alterations acquired during abemaciclib treatment differ from other CDK4/6 inhibitors. Findings are hypothesis generating; further exploration is warranted into mechanisms of resistance to abemaciclib and ET. See related commentary by Wander and Bardia, p. 2008

Abstract Purpose: Strategies to implement estrogen therapy for advanced estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer are underdeveloped. Preclinical data suggest that cycling treatment with 17β-estradiol followed by estrogen deprivation can control tumor growth long-term. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with advanced ER+/HER2− breast cancer with recurrence or progression on ≥ 1 antiestrogen or aromatase inhibitor (AI)-based therapy were eligible. Patients received 17β-estradiol (2 mg orally, three times a day) for 8 weeks followed by AI (physician's choice) for 16 weeks, alternating treatments on an 8-week/16-week schedule until disease progression. Patients then optionally received continuous single-agent treatment until a second instance of disease progression. Endpoints included 24-week clinical benefit and objective response per RECIST, and tumor genetic alterations. Results: Of 19 evaluable patients, clinical benefit rate was 42.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 23.1%–63.9%] and objective response rate (ORR) was 15.8% (95% CI, 5.7%–37.9%). One patient experienced a grade 3 adverse event related to 17β-estradiol. Among patients who received continuous single-agent treatment until a second instance of disease progression, clinical benefit was observed in 5 of 12 (41.7%) cases. Tumor ER (ESR1) mutations were found by whole-exome profiling in 4 of 7 (57.1%) versus 2 of 9 (22.2%) patients who did versus did not experience clinical benefit from alternating 17β-estradiol/AI therapy. The only two patients to experience objective responses to initial 17β-estradiol had tumor ESR1 mutations. Conclusions: Alternating 17β-estradiol/AI therapy may be a promising treatment for endocrine-refractory ER+ breast cancer, including following progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors or everolimus. Further study is warranted to determine whether the antitumor activity of 17β-estradiol differs according to ESR1 mutation status.

Abstract Background: In MONARCH 2, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant significantly improved median progression-free survival (PFS, 16.4 vs 9.3 months, hazard ratio [HR], 0.553) and overall survival (OS, 46.7 vs 37.3 months; HR, 0.757) compared with placebo plus fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive (HR-positive), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-negative) advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients who were endocrine therapy (ET) resistant, regardless of menopausal status. Here, we report findings in the premenopausal subgroup of the MONARCH 2 trial. Methods: The premenopausal subgroup included patients with natural menstrual bleeding who received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist at least 4 weeks prior to study treatment start date and for the entire study duration. Of the 669 patients enrolled in the MONARCH 2 trial, 114 were premenopausal (abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, n=72; placebo plus fulvestrant, n=42), and were included in this analysis. The primary objective was investigator-assessed PFS and secondary objectives were OS, objective response rate, and safety and tolerability. Exploratory analyses included time to second disease progression (PFS2), time to chemotherapy (TTC), and chemotherapy-free survival (CFS). Results: At the primary objective cutoff (14 February, 2017), median PFS was not reached for the abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm versus 10.52 months for the placebo plus fulvestrant arm (HR, 0.415; 95% CI, 0.246-0.698). At the pre-specified OS interim cutoff (20 June, 2019), median PFS was 28.6 months in the abemaciclib plus fulvestrant arm compared with 10.26 months in the placebo plus fulvestrant arm (HR, 0.477; 95% CI, 0.302-0.755). OS benefit was observed in the abemaciclib plus fulvestrant compared to fulvestrant alone (HR, 0.689; 95% CI, 0.379-1.252, median, not reached vs 47.3 months). Improvements were also observed for the exploratory outcomes of PFS2 (HR, 0.599), TTC (HR, 0.674), and CFS (HR, 0.642) with the addition of abemaciclib to fulvestrant. The safety profile was generally consistent with results disclosed previously. Conclusions: Results of the premenopausal subgroup in the MONARCH 2 trial were consistent with the improved clinical outcomes observed in the intent-to-treat population. The analysis provides support for the use of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (with ovarian suppression) as an effective treatment option for premenopausal patients with HR+, HER2- ABC who are ET-resistant. Clinical trial registration: NCT02107703. Registered 08 April 2014- Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02107703

520 Background: Targeted therapy using trastuzumab (an anti-HER-2 receptor monoclonal antibody) has significantly improved survival in breast carcinoma patients (pts), but determining which pts will respond to this therapy remains a challenge. We previously reported (Miller DV, ASCO 2004 abstract #568) a subset of pts with breast cancers demonstrating focal HER-2 amplified clones (FHAC) amidst otherwise nonamplified tumor cells by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. These accounted for 21% of the HER-2 amplified but immunohistochemistry (IHC) negative cases and 30% of the HER-2 amplified but IHC equivocal cases. The clinical significance of this phenomenon was unclear at that time. We now report the disease-free survival (DFS) data on 91 FHAC pts with a comparison to the diffusely amplified (DA) cases in this trial group. Methods: Breast tumors were evaluated for HER-2 gene amplification using PathVysion™. FHAC cases demonstrated 2–40% of cells with >10 HER-2 signals and HER-2:CEP17 ratio >5.0, regardless of the overall HER-2:CEP17 ratio. Patient and disease characteristics were compared using chi-square tests. Cox regression models compared DFS between pts randomized to arms A (standard chemotherapy) and C (standard chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab) within 91 FHAC and 1571 DA cases. Median follow up was 4.0 years. Results: Age, race, menopausal status, surgical procedure, nodal status, histologic type and grade, and tumor size, were not significantly different between pateints with FHAC and DA. Pateints with FHAC had more frequent hormone receptor positivity compared to DA cases (66% vs 50%; p = 0.004). Hazard ratios between pts with FHAC and DA showed that both groups of pts had similar DFS (A: HR = 0.86, p = 0.65; C: HR = 0.72, p = 0.57). Hazard ratios between arms within FHAC and DA groups demonstrated similar benefit from trastuzumab in each group (FHAC: HR = 0.50, p = 0.30; DA: HR = 0.59, p < 0.0001). Results remained consistent when including hormone receptor status in the model. Conclusions: Based on a small number (n = 91) of pts with FHAC, benefit from trastuzumab appears to be similar whether the population of HER-2 amplified cells with breast carcinomas is focal or diffuse. [Table: see text]

TPS2573 Background: Brain metastases, most commonly derived from melanoma, lung and breast cancers, are the most common brain tumor, with approximately 200,000 cases diagnosed annually in the United States. Median survival is on the order of months. For patients with clinically symptomatic brain metastases, approximately half succumb due to intracranial progression. In preclinical work, we demonstrated that brain metastases and primary tumors are often genetically distinct with frequent alterations in the CDK and PI3K pathway (Brastianos, Carter et al. Cancer Discovery 2015). Methods: We are currently accruing to a prospective multi-arm phase II study of CDK, PI3K/mTOR, and NTRK/ROS1 inhibitors in patients with brain metastases harboring alterations associated with sensitivity to these inhibitors (abemaciclib, paxalisib and entrectinib), respectively. Patients with new, recurrent or progressive brain metastases are eligible for this trial. Previously obtained tissue from brain metastases and extracranial sites (primary or extracranial metastases) are screened for the presence of these alterations, and if present in both tumor sites, patients will receive the appropriate corresponding targeted treatment. Screening is carried out with the SNaPshot NGS assay, which is a fully validated clinical test designed and developed at the MGH Center for Integrated Diagnostics. The primary endpoint of response rate (RR) in the central nervous system as per RANO criteria will be evaluated separately for each inhibitor, stratified by histology within each arm. There will be 21 evaluable patients assigned to each of the CDK and PI3K inhibitor and tumor type cohorts (breast, lung and other) and 10 patients assigned to the NTRK/ROS1 inhibitor cohort (lung) for a total of 136 evaluable patients. Although current systemic therapy for brain metastases is often ineffective, we hypothesize that targeted therapies will demonstrate efficacy in patients harboring the appropriate mutations. This study represents a novel individualized therapeutic approach in brain metastases, a disease with a critical need for effective therapy. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; Genentech, Kazia Therapeutics Limited, Eli Lilly; Clinical trial information: NCT03994796 .

1055^ Background: Key properties of QoL instruments in a clinical trial setting are reliability, the ability to detect a change, and content validity. Using data from the Study 301 phase III breast cancer trial, we report here content validity and ability to detect a change for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomized to 21-day cycles of either eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 8, or capecitabine 1.25 g/m2BID orally on Days 1-14. QoL questionnaires were completed at baseline and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Objective tumor response was evaluated (complete response [CR]; partial response [PR]; stable disease [SD]; progressive disease [PD]). Univariate and multivariate longitudinal analyses using weighted generalized estimating equations were employed to assess the responsiveness of the QoL scales to objective tumor response. Results: 1,102 patients were randomized (554 eribulin, 548 capecitabine). Global health status (GHS)/QoL scores were low at baseline (55). GHS/QoL scores were highest for patients with CR (70.8), followed by those patients with PR (63.5), SD (60.5), and PD (58.1). Physical functioning followed the same pattern: CR (98.3); PR (79.1); SD (72.8); PD (71.0). Role and social functioning scores were also responsive. Pain increased, while fatigue and body image worsened, with poorer tumor responses. Using the weighted generalized estimating equations, there were improvements in physical (34.78; p<0.01), cognitive (27.29; p<0.01), and social (22.04; p<0.01) functioning, and future perspective 11.47 (p<0.01), in patients who responded (CR and PR) to treatment compared with non-responders. Pain decreased significantly by 28.62 (p<0.01) on a 0-100 scale. Patients who responded also gained appetite and had fewer breast symptoms. Conclusions: These results suggest content validity of the EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires as they correlate with changes in objective tumor assessments. Clinical trial information: NCT00337103.

520 Background: There is considerable interest in developing HER2 testing criteria for adjuvant H. We used the 21-gene assay to examine the relationship of HER2 mRNA to benefit from H. Methods: N9831 compared adjuvant chemotherapy AC-T to concurrent chemotherapy-trastuzumab AC-TH in stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer. Recurrence Score (RS) and HER2 mRNA expression were determined by Oncotype DX (neg<10.7, equiv 10.7 to <11.5, and pos ≥11.5 log2 expression units). Cox regression was used to assess the association of HER2 expression with H benefit for distant recurrence. Results: Median follow-up: 7.4 yrs. Of 1,940 total pts, 901 had consent and sufficient tissue. HER2 by RT-PCR was neg in 130 (14%), equiv in 85 (9%), and pos in 686 (76%) pts. Concordance between HER2 assessments was 95% for RT-PCR vs central IHC (>10% + cells = +), 91% for RT-PCR vs central FISH (≥2.0 = pos) and 94% for central IHC vs central FISH. In the primary analysis, the association of HER2 expression with H benefit was marginally non-significant (P=0.057). In hormone receptor pos pts (local IHC) the association was significant (P=0.002). The association was nonlinear with the greatest estimated benefit at lower and higher HER2 mRNA expression levels. The observed treatment benefit in low HER2 pts was not due to imbalance between arms in RS and individual gene expression values. Conclusions: Concordance among HER2 assessments by central IHC, FISH, and RT-PCR was high. Association of HER2 mRNA expression with H benefit was marginally non-significant. A consistent benefit of trastuzumab irrespective of mHER2 levels was observed in the pts with either IHC+ or FISH+ tumors. Benefit was observed in pts with high HER2 by RT-PCR but also observed for the small groups of pts with negative results by quantitative RT-PCR or FISH (Table). Plausible mechanisms for this observation will be discussed. [Table: see text]