Back to Authors

Ismail-Khan, Roohi

0000-0002-1301-6736

Mayo Clinic

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.

Citations 2

Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and in Combination With Targeted Therapy in Estrogen Receptor–Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Phase Ia/Ib EMBER Study
Jhaveri, Komal , Lim, Elgene , Jeselsohn, Rinath , Cynthia, X. , Hamilton, Erika , Osborne, Cynthia R. , Bhave, Manali Ajay, Kaufman, Peter A. , Beck, J. Thaddeus , Manso, Luís , Parajuli, Ritesh , Wang, Hwei-Chung, Tao, Jessica J. , Harnden, Kathleen , Yonemori, Kan , Dhakal, Ajay , Neven, Patrick , Aftimos, Philippe , Pierga, Jean‐Yves , Lu, Yen‐Shen , Larson, Timothy , Jerez, Yolanda , Sohn, Joohyuk , Saura, Cristina , Bardia, Aditya , Sammons, Sarah , Bacchion, Francesca , Li, Yujia , Estrem, Shawn T. , Nguyen, Bastien , Ismail‐Khan, Roohi , Smyth, Lillian M. , Beeram, Muralidhar , Jhaveri, Komal L , Ma, Cynthia , Hamilton, Erika P , Manso Sanchez, Luis , Im, Seock-Ah , Harnden, Kathleen , Yonemori, Kan , Dhakal, Ajay , Neven, Patrick , Aftimos, Philippe , Pierga, Jean-Yves , Lu, Yen-Shen , Larson, Timothy , Sideras, Kostandinos , Sohn, Joohyuk , Kim, Sung-Bae , Saura, Cristina , Bardia, Aditya , Sammons, Sarah L , Li, Yujia , Nguyen, Bastien , Ismail-Khan, Roohi , Smyth, Lillian , Beck, Joseph T , Im, Seock‐Ah , Sideras, Kostandinos , Yuen, Eunice , Rodrik-Outmezguine, Vanessa S.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 35 | Pages: 4173-4186

10.1200/jco.23.02733 Get It

PURPOSE Imlunestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor (ER) degrader designed to deliver continuous ER target inhibition, including in ESR1- mutant breast cancer. This phase Ia/b trial determined the recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of imlunestrant, as monotherapy and in combination with targeted therapy, in ER-positive (ER+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and endometrial endometrioid cancer. The ER+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) ABC experience is reported here. METHODS An i3+3 dose-escalation design was used, followed by dose expansions of imlunestrant as monotherapy or in combination with abemaciclib with or without aromatase inhibitor (AI), everolimus, or alpelisib. Imlunestrant was administered orally once daily and with the combination partner per label. RESULTS Overall, 262 patients with ER+/HER2– ABC were treated (phase Ia, n = 74; phase Ib, n = 188). Among patients who received imlunestrant monotherapy (n = 114), no dose-limiting toxicities or discontinuations occurred. At the RP2D (400 mg once daily), patients (n = 51) reported grade 1-2 nausea (39.2%), fatigue (39.2%), and diarrhea (29.4%). Patients at RP2D had received previous cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i; 92.2%), fulvestrant (41.2%), and chemotherapy (29.4%) for ABC and achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 7.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.3). Among patients who received imlunestrant + abemaciclib (n = 42) and imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI (n = 43), most (69.4%) were treatment-naïve for ABC; all were CDK4/6i-naïve. Patients treated with imlunestrant + everolimus (n = 42)/alpelisib (n = 21) had received previous CDK4/6i (100%), fulvestrant (34.9%), and chemotherapy (17.5%) for ABC. No new safety signals or interactions with partnered drugs were observed. The mPFS was 19.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to not available) for imlunestrant + abemaciclib and was not reached for imlunestrant + abemaciclib + AI. The mPFS with imlunestrant + everolimus/alpelisib was 15.9 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 19.1)/9.2 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 11.1). Antitumor activity was evident regardless of ESR1 mutation status. CONCLUSION Imlunestrant, as monotherapy or in combination with targeted therapy, had a manageable safety profile with evidence of preliminary antitumor activity in ER+/HER2– ABC.
Cardiovascular Care of the Oncology Patient During COVID-19: An Expert Consensus Document From the ACC Cardio-Oncology and Imaging Councils
Baldassarre, Lauren A. , Yang, Eric H. , Cheng, Richard K. , DeCara, Jeanne M. , Liu, Jennifer E. , Rudski, Lawrence , Strom, Jordan B. , Barac, Ana , Bucciarelli‐Ducci, Chiara , Lenneman, Carrie , Villarraga, Hector R. , Ismail‐Khan, Roohi , Ky, Bonnie , Leja, Monika, Scherrer‐Crosbie, Marielle , Liu, Jennifer E , Rudski, Lawrence G , Strom, Jordan B , Thavendiranathan, Paaladinesh , Barac, Ana , Zaha, Vlad G , Bucciarelli-Ducci, Chiara , Ellahham, Samer , Deswal, Anita M , Lenneman, Carrie , Villarraga, Hector R , Blaes, Anne H , Ismail-Khan, Roohi , Ky, Bonnie , Scherrer-Crosbie, Marielle , Yang, Eric , Cheng, Richard , Dent, Susan , Blaes, Anne

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | November 3, 2020 | Volume: 113 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 513-522

10.1093/jnci/djaa177 Get It

Abstract In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the Cardio-Oncology and Imaging Councils of the American College of Cardiology offers recommendations to clinicians regarding the cardiovascular care of cardio-oncology patients in this expert consensus statement. Cardio-oncology patients—individuals with an active or prior cancer history and with or at risk of cardiovascular disease—are a rapidly growing population who are at increased risk of infection, and experiencing severe and/or lethal complications by COVID-19. Recommendations for optimizing screening and monitoring visits to detect cardiac dysfunction are discussed. In addition, judicious use of multimodality imaging and biomarkers are proposed to identify myocardial, valvular, vascular, and pericardial involvement in cancer patients. The difficulties of diagnosing the etiology of cardiovascular complications in patients with cancer and COVID-19 are outlined, along with weighing the advantages against risks of exposure, with the modification of existing cardiovascular treatments and cardiotoxicity surveillance in patients with cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic.