Back to Authors

Demidenko, Eugene

0000-0002-6584-1148

Mayo Clinic

Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Citations 1

Alternating 17β-Estradiol and Aromatase Inhibitor Therapies Is Efficacious in Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Endocrine-Resistant ER+ Breast Cancer
Schwartz, Gary N. , Kaufman, Peter A. , Marotti, Jonathan D. , Chamberlin, Mary D. , Arrick, Bradley A. , Makari‐Judson, Grace , Goetz, Matthew P. , Soucy, Shannon M. , Kolling, Fred , Demidenko, Eugene , Miller, Todd W. , Giridhar, Karthik V , Marotti, Jonathan D , Chamberlin, Mary D , Arrick, Bradley A , Makari-Judson, Grace , Goetz, Matthew P , Soucy, Shannon M , Kolling, Fred , Demidenko, Eugene , Miller, Todd W , Giridhar, Karthik V.

Clinical Cancer Research | May 15, 2023 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 15 | Pages: 2767-2773

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0112 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Strategies to implement estrogen therapy for advanced estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer are underdeveloped. Preclinical data suggest that cycling treatment with 17β-estradiol followed by estrogen deprivation can control tumor growth long-term. Patients and Methods: Postmenopausal women with advanced ER+/HER2− breast cancer with recurrence or progression on ≥ 1 antiestrogen or aromatase inhibitor (AI)-based therapy were eligible. Patients received 17β-estradiol (2 mg orally, three times a day) for 8 weeks followed by AI (physician's choice) for 16 weeks, alternating treatments on an 8-week/16-week schedule until disease progression. Patients then optionally received continuous single-agent treatment until a second instance of disease progression. Endpoints included 24-week clinical benefit and objective response per RECIST, and tumor genetic alterations. Results: Of 19 evaluable patients, clinical benefit rate was 42.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), 23.1%–63.9%] and objective response rate (ORR) was 15.8% (95% CI, 5.7%–37.9%). One patient experienced a grade 3 adverse event related to 17β-estradiol. Among patients who received continuous single-agent treatment until a second instance of disease progression, clinical benefit was observed in 5 of 12 (41.7%) cases. Tumor ER (ESR1) mutations were found by whole-exome profiling in 4 of 7 (57.1%) versus 2 of 9 (22.2%) patients who did versus did not experience clinical benefit from alternating 17β-estradiol/AI therapy. The only two patients to experience objective responses to initial 17β-estradiol had tumor ESR1 mutations. Conclusions: Alternating 17β-estradiol/AI therapy may be a promising treatment for endocrine-refractory ER+ breast cancer, including following progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors or everolimus. Further study is warranted to determine whether the antitumor activity of 17β-estradiol differs according to ESR1 mutation status.