Citations

Abstract Description PBC is an archetypal autoimmune disease where the dominant autoantigen is mitochondrial PDC-E2. Hitherto, PBC treatment has been neither specific nor directed toward restoration of tolerance. CNP-104, a tolerogenic nanoparticle encapsulating PDC-E2, is hypothesized to restore tolerance to pathogenic T cells. We conducted a Phase 2a First-in-Human randomized controlled trial of CNP-104 in PBC patients unresponsive/intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid. The 42 enrolled subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive two doses of CNP-104 or placebo (PBO) one week apart and were followed for 120 days to assess safety and treatment durability. CNP-104 was safe and well-tolerated. Compared to PBO, the CNP-104 group had a reduced percentage of antigen-specific Th17 T cells and increased antigen-specific tolerogenic CD8+ T cell counts (TIGIT, GARP). ALP, ALT, and total bilirubin were similar between groups. Clinically relevant effects on albumin levels, liver stiffness, and the rate of change in 5-year UK-PBC risk for liver outcomes were improved in the CNP-104 group compared to PBO. This trial is limited by small size and data variability. Induction of antigen-specific T cell tolerance, shown by reduced Th17 cells and increased TIGIT and GARP cells correlates with improved liver stiffness, albumin, and UK-PBC. These findings suggest the CNP-104 tolerogenic mechanism of action translates to clinical benefits. These data support future studies with this unique therapeutic platform to treat PBC. Topic Categories Therapeutic Approaches to Autoimmunity (THER)

Abstract Description Neurons upregulate MHC Class I during infection and neuroinflammation associated with demyelinating diseases, allowing them to present both self and foreign antigens to CD8+ T cells. We hypothesized that ablation of neuronal MHC I expression reduces neural antigen-specific CD8+ T cell recruitment to demyelinated CNS and reduces neuron loss. We have previously shown that demyelination induces expression of MHC Class I on neurons and axons, allowing neuron-specific neoantigens to be presented to CD8+ T cells, leading to neuroinflammatory damage. Elevated MHC-I and β2-microglobulin expression in white and grey matter tissue from MS patients further supported the role of CD8+ T cells in neuronal injury. Here we demonstrate that neuron specific β2-microglobulin ablation in the B6 MOG35-55 EAE model of multiple sclerosis reduces disease progression and severity via clinical scoring. Our preliminary findings suggest that MHC-I ablation may reduce peripheral activation and CNS recruitment of neural antigen-specific CD8+ T cells as well as CD8+ T cell-mediated neurodegeneration in in the context of demyelinating disease. Future studies are aimed at generating a humanized mouse model reconstituted with patient immune cells to understand the role of MHC I expression in neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes. Specifically, using this model, we will characterize brain infiltrating T cells from patients with CNS autoimmune disease and suspected T cell involvement. Funding Sources Generous donation from Don and Fran Herdrich. Topic Categories Neuroimmunology (NEUR)

ABSTRACT We present the case of a 28‐year‐old right‐handed woman with medically refractory focal epilepsy. Her seizure semiology and electroencephalography (EEG) indicated a seizure onset zone in the right central‐parietal area. However, both MRI and PET scans were unremarkable, showing no focal lesions or areas of altered metabolism. Intracranial monitoring, with extensive evaluation of both hemispheres, confirmed the seizure onset zone in the right central‐parietal region. This area not only served as the site of seizure onset but also encompassed the primary sensory cortex.

Abstract Background DNA methylation profiling can be used to robustly predict postsurgical outcomes and response to radiotherapy (RT) for meningioma patients. To allow for seamless integration of these complementary models into clinical practice, a practical framework is needed. Methods We leveraged a cohort of nearly 2000 surgically-treated meningiomas with DNA methylation profiling and clinical outcomes data. Existing methylation-based prediction models were dichotomized to yield four risk groups: low and high recurrent risk, each with RT sensitive and resistant subgroups. Risk groups were correlated with progression-free survival in the context of existing biomarkers including extent of resection and WHO grade. Results We first demonstrated that all risk groups benefit from gross total resection. All “high-risk, RT sensitive” tumors (n = 306, 15.7%) also benefited from adjuvant RT: after GTR, median PFS increased from 4.68 (4.13-9.48) years to not reached (P = .003); after subtotal resection (STR), from 2.12 (1.59-3.02) to 4.09 (3.41-not reached) years (P = .004). “Low-risk, RT sensitive cases” (n = 1207, 61.8%) also benefited from RT after STR (median PFS 7.39 (6.66-12.8) vs. 16.53 (10.35-not reached) years, P = .03), suggesting that RT be considered in these patients. Neither “low-risk RT resistant” (n = 84, 4.3%) nor “high-risk RT resistant” (n = 356, 18.2%) cases benefited from RT, and the latter group was associated with universally poor outcomes. Conclusions We identify methylation-defined risk groups of meningioma for which additional benefit is gained from adjuvant RT, leading to a clinical decision-making framework for straightforward integration of molecular models into clinical practice.

Abstract BACKGROUND STELLAR was a phase III randomized, open-label trial of eflornithine (ornithine decarboxylase inhibitor) with lomustine versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA). We previously reported an overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of the combination in the patients with grade 3 IDH-mutant astrocytoma. Here we report updated OS and PFS outcomes based on additional molecular classification and blinded independent central review (BICR). METHOD Eligibility included: age ≥ 18 years, AA (2016 WHO criteria) with first recurrence ≥ 6 months after radiation, KPS ≥ 70, and no imaging findings consistent with grade 4 glioblastoma. Patients received eflornithine (2.8 g/m2 TID Q 2/3 weeks) with lomustine (90 mg/m2 Q 6 weeks) (Arm A) or lomustine alone (110 mg/m2 Q 6 weeks) (Arm B). Primary endpoint was OS. RESULTS Updated molecular data resulted in re-classification of the 343 AA patients enrolled into 3 WHO 2021 defined tumor subtypes, 196 tumors were IDHmut, CDKN2A/B intact, consistent with diagnosis of astrocytoma, IDHmut, WHO grade 3, 33 tumors had CDKN2A/B loss consistent with astrocytoma, IDHmut, WHO grade 4, 106 tumors were IDHwt consistent with diagnosis of glioblastoma, IDHwt, WHO grade 4. Updated results strengthen initial conclusion that eflornithine plus lomustine resulted in significant survival benefit in the astrocytoma, IDHmut, WHO grade 3 group (mOS 34.9 vs, 23.5 months, HR = 0.64, stratified log rank p =0.0136). PFS with eflornithine was also improved (15.8 vs, 7.2 months, HR = 0.57, stratified log rank p =0.0113). BICR demonstrated a high correlation between investigator and centrally determined PFS (p=0.0305), and high correlation between OS and PFS (p=.0001). CONCLUSION The clinically meaningful OS and PFS benefits observed with eflornithine in the molecularly defined 2021 WHO CNS grade 3 astrocytomas is further confirmed and expanded based on additional molecular classification and BICR of PFS.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib is the first FDA-approved MEK1/2 inhibitor for both adults and children (≥2y) with symptomatic NF1-PN. In ReNeu, symptomatic improvement and PN volume reductions were observed at the earliest assessments (~91 and ~152 days, respectively) and were sustained. This analysis evaluated time to first onset and resolution of commonly reported TRAEs in the ReNeu trial. METHODS Data cutoff (DCO) was September 20, 2023. Median time to first onset and resolution (days) for common TRAEs (≥15%) were evaluated for prepubescents (≥2 to <12y, n=32), postpubescents (≥12 to <18y, n=24), younger adults (≥18 to ≤50y, n=48), and older adults (>50y, n=10). RESULTS Common TRAEs were mostly grades 1 to 2 (83%). In prepubescents, median day (range) of onset was 32 (14, 263) for vomiting, 71 (19, 386) for dermatitis acneiform, 123 (1, 663) for diarrhea, 124 (52, 775) for paronychia, and 127 (2, 663) for nausea. For postpubescents, median day (range) of onset was 8 (1, 438) for diarrhea, 8 (2, 574) for nausea, 12 (1, 252) for dermatitis acneiform, 28 (2, 354) for vomiting, and 110 (43, 245) for paronychia. In younger adults, median day (range) of onset was 5 (1, 352) for nausea, 8 (2, 15) for dermatitis acneiform, 9 (2, 73) for diarrhea, and 29 (1, 264) for vomiting. For older adults, median day (range) of onset was 4 (1, 286) for diarrhea, 9 (2, 15) for nausea, and 13 (2, 38) for dermatitis acneiform. Time to resolution was variable between TRAEs and among patients in all age groups; 90% resolved completely by DCO. Among all patients, 18 had a TRAE of asymptomatic ejection fraction decrease, with all but one resolving by DCO. CONCLUSIONS Overall, common TRAEs arose before treatment benefits and were generally resoluble by DCO. Proactively managing TRAEs may improve treatment experience and adherence.

Abstract PURPOSE Age over 40 years is commonly regarded as a “high risk” feature and potential indication for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with lower grade glioma in most clinical practice guidelines. However, these recommendations are based on retrospective observations and their subsequent incorporation into legacy clinical trials. It is unclear whether age remains a relevant prognostic factor in the molecular era. METHODS The Prospective Gliomas Research [PROGRES] Database contains individual patient-level data from 11 prospective clinical trials or observational registries, including seven international trials from the RTOG, EORTC, or Alliance cooperative groups. We determined the association of age with progression-free survival (PFS) in low grade or anaplastic glioma, stratified by isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1/2) status. We validated our findings in a separate multi-institutional retrospective cohort (Retrospective Glioma Research [REGRES] Database). RESULTS We identified 1,619 and 1,271 eligible patients in the PROGRES and REGRES cohorts, respectively. IDH-wildtype tumors were more common in patients >40 years (38% vs, 5%, odds ratio: 11.3 [95%CI 6.5 – 19.7]). Age was associated with PFS in IDH-wildtype (5-year PFS: 6% vs, 24%, P =.003) but not in IDH-mutant glioma (60% vs, 59%, P = 0.22, P value of interaction <.001). In IDH-wildtype tumors, older age predicted aggressive molecular features, including TERT promoter mutation (65% vs, 28%), EGFR amplification (41% vs, 15%), and chromosome +7/-10 alteration (57% vs, 25%). Age was not predictive of a benefit from chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in IDH-mutant glioma. CONCLUSION Older age is a putative surrogate for IDH-wildtype status, but was not an independent predictor of progression in IDH-mutant lower grade glioma and did not predict benefit from chemoradiotherapy. In the absence of additional clinical or molecular risk factors, age alone should not be considered an indication for administration or deferral adjuvant treatment. Practice guidelines should be revised to reflect contemporary prognostic factors in the molecular era.

Importance Treatment for cognitive dysfunction due to postacute sequelae of long COVID (ie, symptoms of fatigue, malaise, weakness, confusion that persist beyond 12 weeks after an initial COVID infection) remains a significant unmet need. Objective To test evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for improving cognitive symptoms in persons with long COVID. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a 5-arm, multicenter, randomized clinical trial of 3 remotely delivered interventions conducted between August 17, 2023, and June 10, 2024. The study took place at 22 trial sites and included the screening of individuals with cognitive long COVID. Interventions Participants were randomized to 1 of 5 arms: adaptive computerized cognitive training (BrainHQ [Posit Science]), cognitive-behavioral rehabilitation involving both group and individual counseling sessions (PASC-Cognitive Recovery [PASC-CoRE]) paired with BrainHQ, and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) paired with BrainHQ. Two comparator arms were included as follows: unstructured computer puzzles and games (active comparator) and sham tDCS paired with BrainHQ. The interventions occurred 5 times per week over 10 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures Cognitive and behavioral in-person assessments were performed at baseline, midintervention, at the end of intervention, and 3 months after the end of the intervention. The primary outcome measure was the modified Everyday Cognition Scale 2 (ECog2) completed at the end of the intervention compared to the baseline visit based on participant self-report looking back over the prior 7 days. Results A total of 378 individuals were screened, from which there were 328 participants (median [IQR] age, 48.0 [37.0-58.0] years; 241 female [73.5%]; race: 15 Asian [4.6%], 47 Black [14.3%], and 235 White [71.6%]; ethnicity: 52 Hispanic [15.9%]). None of the 3 active interventions demonstrated benefits on the modified ECog2 in the intention-to-treat population by the end of the intervention period. The adjusted differences in mean change were 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs active comparator, 0.0 (95% CI, −0.2 to 0.2) for tDCS-active + BrainHQ vs tDCS-sham + BrainHQ, and 0.1 (95% CI, −0.1 to 0.3) for PASC-CoRE + BrainHQ vs BrainHQ alone. Secondary participant-reported outcomes and neuropsychological tests showed no differential benefits for any treatment arm. All 5 arms demonstrated some improvements over time on the modified ECog2 and on secondary outcomes. There were no serious adverse events attributable to the interventions. Conclusions and Relevance This phase 2 randomized clinical trial failed to demonstrate differential benefits for online cognitive training, a structured cognitive rehabilitation program, and tDCS for cognitive long COVID. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). To date, no large-scale efforts have focused on brain tumor genetics within this region. This study aimed to assess and map the current neuro-oncology capacity in SSA, including workforce availability and existing services for brain tumor registries and biobanks. The results represent the final analysis representing respondents from 70 healthcare institutions. Methods This cross-sectional study utilized an online survey to collect data from healthcare professionals involved in CNS tumor care across SSA through the Society for Neuro-Oncology SSA (SNOSSA). The survey gathered information on the availability of neuro-oncology practitioners, neuropathology and molecular diagnostic capacity, brain tumor management, cancer registries, and biobanking of specimens. Purposive sampling was used to identify participants, with the questionnaire provided in English, French, and Swahili. Results A total of 145 respondents from 22 countries and 70 healthcare institutions participated. Among the 70 institutions, neurosurgery was available in 89%, anatomic pathology in 74%, and medical oncology in 71%. For radiologic evaluation, 64% of institutions reported having both CT and MRI, while 17% had CT only. Molecular testing through IHC or NGS was available in 46% of institutions. Multidisciplinary tumor boards for CNS cases were present in 86% of institutions. General cancer registries were available in 66% of institutions, while 29% had brain tumor-specific registries, and 10% maintained brain tumor biorepositories. Conclusion This study provides a comprehensive summary of the neuro-oncology capacity in SSA. Next steps are to reach out to institutions who have registries and determine what data are being collected, with the hopes of defining a set of common elements to expand registry efforts across SSA. Similarly, to reach out to institutions that have ongoing brain tumor biobanks and CT/MRI capacity to determine what infrastructure exists.