Caldwell, Stephen H.

Abstract Description PBC is an archetypal autoimmune disease where the dominant autoantigen is mitochondrial PDC-E2. Hitherto, PBC treatment has been neither specific nor directed toward restoration of tolerance. CNP-104, a tolerogenic nanoparticle encapsulating PDC-E2, is hypothesized to restore tolerance to pathogenic T cells. We conducted a Phase 2a First-in-Human randomized controlled trial of CNP-104 in PBC patients unresponsive/intolerant to ursodeoxycholic acid. The 42 enrolled subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive two doses of CNP-104 or placebo (PBO) one week apart and were followed for 120 days to assess safety and treatment durability. CNP-104 was safe and well-tolerated. Compared to PBO, the CNP-104 group had a reduced percentage of antigen-specific Th17 T cells and increased antigen-specific tolerogenic CD8+ T cell counts (TIGIT, GARP). ALP, ALT, and total bilirubin were similar between groups. Clinically relevant effects on albumin levels, liver stiffness, and the rate of change in 5-year UK-PBC risk for liver outcomes were improved in the CNP-104 group compared to PBO. This trial is limited by small size and data variability. Induction of antigen-specific T cell tolerance, shown by reduced Th17 cells and increased TIGIT and GARP cells correlates with improved liver stiffness, albumin, and UK-PBC. These findings suggest the CNP-104 tolerogenic mechanism of action translates to clinical benefits. These data support future studies with this unique therapeutic platform to treat PBC. Topic Categories Therapeutic Approaches to Autoimmunity (THER)

Patients with cirrhosis have abnormal coagulation indices such as a high international normalized ratio and low platelet count, but these do not correlate well with periprocedural bleeding risk. We sought to develop a consensus among the multiple stakeholders in cirrhosis care to inform process measures that can help improve the quality of the periprocedural management of coagulopathy in cirrhosis. We identified candidate process measures for periprocedural coagulopathy management in multiple contexts relating to the performance of paracentesis and upper endoscopy. An 11-member panel with content expertise was convened. It included nominees from professional societies for interventional radiology, transfusion medicine, and anesthesia as well as representatives from hematology, emergency medicine, transplant surgery, and community practice. Each measure was evaluated for agreement using a modified Delphi approach (3 rounds of rating) to define the final set of measures. Out of 286 possible measures, 33 measures made the final set. International normalized ratio testing was not required for diagnostic or therapeutic paracentesis as well as diagnostic endoscopy. Plasma transfusion should be avoided for all paracenteses and diagnostic endoscopy. No consensus was achieved for these items in therapeutic intent or emergent endoscopy. The risks of prophylactic platelet transfusions exceed their benefits for outpatient diagnostic paracentesis and diagnostic endosopies. For the other procedures examined, the risks outweigh benefits when platelet count is >20,000/mm 3 . It is uncertain whether risks outweigh benefits below 20,000/mm 3 in other contexts. No consensus was achieved on whether it was permissible to continue or stop systemic anticoagulation. Continuous aspirin was permissible for each procedure. Clopidogrel was permissible for diagnostic and therapeutic paracentesis and diagnostic endoscopy. We found many areas of consensus that may serve as a foundation for a common set of practice metrics for the periprocedural management of coagulopathy in cirrhosis.

Disorders of the mesenteric, portal, and hepatic veins and mesenteric and hepatic arteries have important clinical consequences and may lead to acute liver failure, chronic liver disease, noncirrhotic portal hypertension, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Although literature in the field of vascular liver disorders is scant, these disorders are common in clinical practice, and general practitioners, gastroenterologists, and hepatologists may benefit from expert guidance and recommendations for management of these conditions. These guidelines represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. Key concept statements based on author expert opinion and review of literature and specific recommendations based on PICO/GRADE analysis have been developed to aid in the management of vascular liver disorders. These recommendations and guidelines should be tailored to individual patients and circumstances in routine clinical practice.