Kocakavuk, Emre

PURPOSE Age ≥40 years is regarded as a high-risk feature and an indication for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with lower-grade glioma in clinical practice guidelines. It is unclear whether age remains a relevant prognostic factor for contemporary definitions of lower-grade gliomas in the molecular era. METHODS The Prospective Gliomas Research (PROGRES) database contains individual patient-level data from 11 prospective clinical trials or observational registries of histologically defined lower-grade 2-3 oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma. We determined the association of age (18-39 years v ≥40 years) with progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 ( IDH1/2 ) status, using log-rank tests and Cox regression models. We validated our findings in a separate multi-institutional retrospective cohort (Retrospective Glioma Research [REGRES] database). RESULTS We identified 1,619 and 1,292 eligible patients in the PROGRES and REGRES cohorts, respectively. IDH -wildtype tumors were more common in patients 40 years and older (38% v 5%, odds ratio: 11.3 [95% CI, 6.5 to 19.7]). Age was associated with PFS in IDH -wildtype (5-year PFS for ≥40 v 18-39 years: 6% v 24%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.74 [95% CI, 1.21 to 2.50]) but not in IDH -mutant glioma (60% v 59%, HR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.05], P interaction < .001). In IDH -wildtype tumors, older age predicted aggressive molecular features, including TERT promoter mutation (65% v 28%), EGFR amplification (41% v 15%), and chromosome +7/–10 alteration (57% v 25%). In a pooled analysis of four clinical trials, age was not predictive of a benefit from chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for IDH -mutant glioma. CONCLUSION In the absence of additional clinical or molecular risk factors, age alone should not be considered an indication for administration or deferral of adjuvant treatment. Practice guidelines should be revised to reflect contemporary prognostic factors in the molecular era.

Abstract PURPOSE Age over 40 years is commonly regarded as a “high risk” feature and potential indication for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with lower grade glioma in most clinical practice guidelines. However, these recommendations are based on retrospective observations and their subsequent incorporation into legacy clinical trials. It is unclear whether age remains a relevant prognostic factor in the molecular era. METHODS The Prospective Gliomas Research [PROGRES] Database contains individual patient-level data from 11 prospective clinical trials or observational registries, including seven international trials from the RTOG, EORTC, or Alliance cooperative groups. We determined the association of age with progression-free survival (PFS) in low grade or anaplastic glioma, stratified by isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1/2) status. We validated our findings in a separate multi-institutional retrospective cohort (Retrospective Glioma Research [REGRES] Database). RESULTS We identified 1,619 and 1,271 eligible patients in the PROGRES and REGRES cohorts, respectively. IDH-wildtype tumors were more common in patients &gt;40 years (38% vs, 5%, odds ratio: 11.3 [95%CI 6.5 – 19.7]). Age was associated with PFS in IDH-wildtype (5-year PFS: 6% vs, 24%, P =.003) but not in IDH-mutant glioma (60% vs, 59%, P = 0.22, P value of interaction &lt;.001). In IDH-wildtype tumors, older age predicted aggressive molecular features, including TERT promoter mutation (65% vs, 28%), EGFR amplification (41% vs, 15%), and chromosome +7/-10 alteration (57% vs, 25%). Age was not predictive of a benefit from chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in IDH-mutant glioma. CONCLUSION Older age is a putative surrogate for IDH-wildtype status, but was not an independent predictor of progression in IDH-mutant lower grade glioma and did not predict benefit from chemoradiotherapy. In the absence of additional clinical or molecular risk factors, age alone should not be considered an indication for administration or deferral adjuvant treatment. Practice guidelines should be revised to reflect contemporary prognostic factors in the molecular era.

Abstract Oligodendroglioma is characterized by oligodendrocyte-like histology, mutation in the IDH genes, along with codeletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q. Treatment for oligodendrogliomas combines surgery, followed by observation, and chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy when tumors progress. Most oligodendrogliomas eventually recur with a more aggressive phenotype, leading to patient mortality but molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. To investigate the molecular trajectory of oligodendroglioma, we collected more than 270 longitudinal samples from over 130 oligodendroglioma patients, to perform whole genome or whole exome sequencing, bulk RNA, and single-nucleus RNA sequencing (n = 30 samples). Common mutations in IDH1/2, TERT promoter, CIC, and FUBP1 were observed. About half of the CIC and FUBP1 mutations occurred in the initial sample and persisted stably throughout recurrence. The majority of PIK3CA and PIK3R1 mutations were either shared or present in recurrences only implicating the PI3K pathway in oligodendroglioma recurrence. Mutational signature analysis revealed 34.5% of tumors treated with alkylating agents acquired SBS11/SBS31 associated hypermutation. By integrating signatures with clonality estimates, we approximated the timing of mutational processes and found that clonal timings of treatment related mutations correlate with the treatment administration date. We found that aging signature-related mutations were mostly clonal, and treatment signature-related mutations were more likely to be sub-clonal, supporting the late emergence of these mutations following treatment. We observed increased somatic copy number alterations in oligodendroglioma recurrences, reflected in notable chromosome 4 losses. Associating treatment with snRNAseq derived cellular states, we observed a significant increase in the fraction of proliferating stem-like cells in the hypermutator versus non-hypermutator recurrent samples. These findings shed light on the molecular changes occurring in oligodendrogliomas following treatment and provide insights that may aid in targeting treatment resistance.