Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

312 citation(s) found for "Wu, Eileen".

An examination of atypical primary progressive aphasia variants
Boland, Sarah, Ali, Farwa , Martin, Peter R. , Graff‐Radford, Jonathan , Petersen, Ronald C. , Bigio, Eileen H. , Lowe, Val J. , Reichard, Ross R., Ertekin‐Taner, Nilüfer , Rademakers, Rosa , DeTure, Michael , Whitwell, Jennifer L. , Josephs, Keith A. , Botha, Hugo , Duffy, Joseph R. , Utianski, Rene L. , Machulda, Mary M. , Clark, Heather M. , Buciuc, Marina , Boeve, Bradley F. , Schwarz, Christopher G. , Senjem, Matthew L. , Reid, Robert I. , Jones, David T. , Knopman, David S. , Jack, Clifford R. , Ross, Owen A. , Dickson, Dennis W.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 31, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: S6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.055305 Get It

AbstractBackgroundThe Neurodegenerative Research Group (NRG) at Mayo clinic has followed patients with degenerative speech and/or language disorders for over a decade. In this presentation I will present data from this cohort to inform a broader discussion about the importance of apraxia of speech (AOS) and its subtypes, heterogeneity within the agrammatic PPA variant, and perils of mixed phenotypes.MethodWe reviewed the NRG database to identify patients who initially presented with isolated (PPAOS), AOS in conjunction with agrammatic aphasia (AOS‐PAA), isolated agrammatic aphasia (PAA), and patients who had PAA or AOS overlapping with another degenerative diagnosis. Data from the following clinical instruments were abstracted: WAB AQ (aphasia severity), UPDRS III (parkinsonism), WAB Praxis (ideomotor apraxia), and the MoCA (cognitive ability). We assessed the effect of baseline diagnosis and AOS subtype on these outcomes over time using Bayesian linear mixed effects models. We qualitatively reviewed longitudinal diagnostic trajectories. Preliminary analyses were done on available autopsy data.ResultPAA was associated with greater aphasia at baseline and more rapid decline; PPAOS was associated with normal language at baseline and slow decline; and PAA‐AOS with intermediate baseline aphasia and decline. However, for those with AOS longitudinal decline differed based on AOS subtype: prosodic PPAOS was associated with the slowest decline and phonetic PAA‐AOS with the fastest. Some patients met criteria for non‐PPA disorders during follow up. However, compared to patients who met criteria for these disorders at enrollment, the speech/language‐first patients remained qualitatively distinct, and neither resembled the cases that were mixed at onset. Preliminary autopsy data suggests that AOS is predictive of tau and that the specific tauopathy may be related to the initial syndrome and AOS subtype.ConclusionThe differences between PAA, PAA‐AOS and PPAOS suggest that these disorders should not be lumped. In fact, the longitudinal trajectories are sufficiently different that doing so would add noise to observational and interventional studies. Instead, more detailed phenotyping, including AOS subtype, can aid prognostication and may improve prediction of the underlying pathology. Finally, caution should be exercised when considering PPAOS and PPA patients for other FTLD diagnostic categories.
An ACVR1R375P pathogenic variant in two families with mild fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva
Kaplan, Frederick S. , Groppe, Jay C. , Xu, Meiqi , Towler, O. Will , Grunvald, Eduardo , Kallish, Staci , Mukaddam, Mona Al , Pignolo, Robert J. , Shore, Eileen M. , Shore, Eileen M , Kaplan, Frederick S , Grunvald, Eduardo , Kalunian, Kenneth

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | December 2, 2021 | Volume: 188 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 806-817

10.1002/ajmg.a.62585 | PMID 34854557 Get It

AbstractGenetic variants are vital in informing clinical phenotypes, aiding physical diagnosis, guiding genetic counseling, understanding the molecular basis of disease, and potentially stimulating drug development. Here we describe two families with an ultrarare ACVR1 gain‐of‐function pathogenic variant (codon 375, Arginine > Proline; ACVR1R375P) responsible for a mild nonclassic fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) phenotype. Both families include people with the ultrarare ACVR1R375P variant who exhibit features of FOP while other individuals currently do not express any clinical signs of FOP. Thus, the mild ACVR1R375P variant greatly expands the scope and understanding of this rare disorder.
Genomic Profiling of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Classifies Molecular Groups with Distinct Pathogenic Phenotypes and Clinical Outcomes
Bustoros, Mark , Sklavenitis‐Pistofidis, Romanos , Boyle, Eileen M. , Neuse, Carl Jannes , Chavda, Selina J , Boehner, Cody J. , Rahmat, Mahshid , Zhitomirsky, Benny , Dutta, Ankit K. , Trippa, Lorenzo , Casneuf, Tineke, Boyle, Eileen M , Sklavenitis-Pistofidis, Romanos , Anand, Shankara K. , Redd, Robert , Tai, Yu‐Tzu , Dunford, Andrew , Stewart, Chip , Kastritis, Efstathios , Walker, Brian A. , Davies, Faith E. , Dimopoulos, Meletios Α. , Bergsagel, P. Leif , Yong, Kwee , Morgan, Gareth J. , Aguet, François , Getz, Gad , Ghobrial, Irene M.

Blood | November 23, 2021 | Volume: 138 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 723-723

10.1182/blood-2021-150767 Get It

Abstract Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy commonly preceded by the asymptomatic stage smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). MM is characterized with significant genomic heterogeneity of chromosomal gains and losses (CNVs), translocations, and point mutations (SNVs); alterations that are also observed in SMM patients. However, current SMM risk models rely solely on clinical markers and do not accurately capture progression risk. While incorporating some genomic biomarkers improves prediction, using all MM genomic features to comprehensively stratify patients may increase risk stratification precision in SMM. Methods: We obtained a total of 214 patient samples at SMM diagnosis. We performed whole-exome sequencing on 166 tumors; of these, RNA sequencing was performed on 100. Targeted capture was done on 48 additional tumors. Upon binarization of DNA features, we performed consensus non-negative matrix factorization to identify distinct molecular clusters. We then trained a random forest classifier on translocations, SNVs, and CNVs. The predicted clinical outcomes for the molecular subtypes were further validated in an independent SMM cohort of 74 patients. Results: We identified six genomic subtypes, four with hyperdiploidy (>48 chromosomes, HMC, HKR, HNT, HNF) and two with IgH translocations (FMD, CND) (Table 1). In multivariate analysis accounting for IMWG (20-2-20) clinical risk stages, high-risk (HMC, FMD, HKR) and intermediate-risk (HNT, HNF) genetic subtypes were independent predictors of progression (Hazards ratio [HR]: 3.8 and 5.5, P = 0.016 and 0.001, respectively). The low-risk, CND subtype harboring translocation (11;14) was enriched for the previously defined CD-2 MM signature defined by the B cell markers CD20 and CD79A (FDR = 0.003 ), showed upregulation of CCND1, E2F1, and E2F7 (FDR = 0.01, 0.0004, 0.08), and was enriched for G2M checkpoint, heme metabolism, and monocyte cell signature (FDR = 0.003, 0.003, 0.003, respectively). The FMD subtype with IgH translocations (4;14) and (14;16) was enriched for P53, mTORC1, unfolded protein signaling pathways and plasmacytoid dendritic cell signatures (FDR = 0.01, 0.005, 0.008, respectively). The HKR tumors were enriched for inflammatory cytokine signaling, MYC target genes, T regulatory cell signature, and the MM proliferative (PR) signatures (FDR = 0.02, 0.03, 0.007, 0.02, respectively). The APOBEC mutational signature was enriched in HMC and FMD tumors (P = 0.005), while there was no statistical difference across subtypes in the AID signature. The median follow-up for the primary cohort is 7.1 years. Median TTP for patients in HMC, FMD, and HKR was 3.8, 2.6, and 2.2 years, respectively; TTP for HNT and HNF was 4.3 and 5.2, respectively, while it was 11 years in CND patients (P = 0.007). Moreover, by analyzing the changes in MM clinical biomarkers over time, we found that patients from high-risk subgroups had higher odds of developing evolving hemoglobin and monoclonal protein levels over time (P = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively); Moreover, the absolute increase in M-protein was significantly higher in patients from the high-risk genetic subtypes at one, two, and five years from diagnosis (P = 0.001, 0.03, and 0,01, respectively). Applying the classifier to the external cohort replicated our findings where intermediate and high-risk genetic subgroups conferred increased risk of progression to MM in multivariate analysis after accounting for IMWG staging (HR: 5.5 and 9.8, P = 0.04 and 0.005, respectively). Interestingly, within the intermediate-risk clinical group in the primary cohort, patients in the high-risk genetic subgroups had increased risk of progression (HR: 5.2, 95% CI 1.5 - 17.3, P = 0.007). In the validation cohort, these patients also had an increased risk of progression to MM (HR: 6.7, 95% CI 1.2 - 38.3, P = 0.03), indicating that molecular classification improves the clinical risk-stratification models. Conclusion: We identified and validated in an independent dataset six SMM molecular subgroups with distinct DNA alterations, transcriptional profiles, dysregulated pathways, and risks of progression to active MM. Our results underscore the importance of molecular classification in addition to clinical evaluation in better identifying high-risk SMM patients. Moreover, these subgroups may be used to identify tumor vulnerabilities and target them with precision medicine efforts. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bustoros: Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Casneuf: Janssen: Current Employment. Kastritis: Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis Pharma: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Walker: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau. Davies: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Dimopoulos: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Bergsagel: Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: human CRBN mouse; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Yong: BMS: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Morgan: BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Getz: IBM, Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Scorpion Therapeutics: Consultancy, Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial: AbbVie, Adaptive, Aptitude Health, BMS, Cellectar, Curio Science, Genetch, Janssen, Janssen Central American and Caribbean, Karyopharm, Medscape, Oncopeptides, Sanofi, Takeda, The Binding Site, GNS, GSK: Consultancy.
Survival in Young-Onset Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Findings From Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405
Lipsyc-Sharf, Marla , Zhang, Sui , Ou, Fang‐Shu , McCleary, Nadine J. , Niedzwiecki, Donna , Chang, I-Wen, Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Blanke, Charles D. , Piawah, Sorbarikor , Bainter, Tiffany M., Fuchs, Charles S. , Innocenti, Federico , Goldberg, Richard M. , Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A. , Ng, Kimmie , Van Loon, Katherine , Venook, Alan P , Nixon, Andrew B , Goldberg, Richard M , O'Reilly, Eileen M , Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A , Ng, Kimmie , Ou, Fang-Shu , Niedzwiecki, Donna , Ma, Chao , Loon, Katherine Van , Venook, Alan P. , Mayer, Robert J. , Nixon, Andrew B. , O’Reilly, Eileen M.

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | October 8, 2021 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 427-435

10.1093/jnci/djab200 | PMID 34636852 Get It

Abstract Background The incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer (yoCRC) is increasing. It is unknown if there are survival differences between young and older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods We studied the association of age with survival in 2326 mCRC patients enrolled in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and SWOG 80405 trial, a multicenter, randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy plus biologics. The primary and secondary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively, which were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared among younger vs older patients with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on Cox proportional hazards modeling, adjusting for known prognostic variables. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Of 2326 eligible subjects, 514 (22.1%) were younger than age 50 years at study entry (yoCRC cohort). The median age of yoCRC patients was 44.3 vs 62.5 years in patients aged 50 years and older. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between yoCRC vs older-onset patients (median = 27.07 vs 26.12 months; adjusted HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.10; P = .78). The median PFS was also similar in yoCRC vs older patients (10.87 vs 10.55 months) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% CI = 0.92 to 1.13; P = .67). Patients younger than age 35 years had the shortest OS with median OS of 21.95 vs 26.12 months in older-onset patients with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% CI = 0.81 to 1.44; Ptrend = .93). Conclusion In this large study of mCRC patients, there were no statistically significant differences in survival between patients with yoCRC and CRC patients aged 50 years and older.
Cortical and subcortical pathological burden and neuronal loss in an autopsy series of FTLD-TDP-type C
Kawles, Allegra , Nishihira, Yasushi, Gill, Nathan , Minogue, Grace , Keszycki, Rachel , Coventry, Christina , Spencer, Callen, Lilek, Jaclyn , Ajroud, Kaouther , Coppola, Giovanni , Rademakers, Rosa , Rogalskı, Emily , Weıntraub, Sandra , Zhang, Hui , Flanagan, Margaret E. , Bigio, Eileen H. , Mesulam, M.‐Marsel, Geula, Changiz , Gefen, Tamar , Coventry, Christina , Rademakers, Rosa , Weintraub, Sandra , Mesulam, M-Marsel , Feldman, Alex, Mao, Qinwen

Brain | September 30, 2021 | Volume: 145 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1069-1078

10.1093/brain/awab368 | PMID 34919645 Get It

Abstract The TDP-43 type C pathological form of frontotemporal lobar degeneration is characterized by the presence of immunoreactive TDP-43 short and long dystrophic neurites, neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, neuronal loss and gliosis and the absence of neuronal intranuclear inclusions. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration-TDP-type C cases are commonly associated with the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia or behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Here, we provide detailed characterization of regional distributions of pathological TDP-43 and neuronal loss and gliosis in cortical and subcortical regions in 10 TDP-type C cases and investigate the relationship between inclusions and neuronal loss and gliosis. Specimens were obtained from the first 10 TDP-type C cases accessioned from the Northwestern Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia, n = 7; behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, n = 3). A total of 42 cortical (majority bilateral) and subcortical regions were immunostained with a phosphorylated TDP-43 antibody and/or stained with haematoxylin–eosin. Regions were evaluated for atrophy, and for long dystrophic neurites, short dystrophic neurites, neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, and neuronal loss and gliosis using a semiquantitative 5-point scale. We calculated a ‘neuron-to-inclusion’ score (TDP-type C mean score – neuronal loss and gliosis mean score) for each region per case to assess the relationship between TDP-type C inclusions and neuronal loss and gliosis. Primary progressive aphasia cases demonstrated leftward asymmetry of cortical atrophy consistent with the aphasic phenotype. We also observed abundant inclusions and neurodegeneration in both cortical and subcortical regions, with certain subcortical regions emerging as particularly vulnerable to dystrophic neurites (e.g. amygdala, caudate and putamen). Interestingly, linear mixed models showed that regions with lowest TDP-type C pathology had high neuronal dropout, and conversely, regions with abundant pathology displayed relatively preserved neuronal densities (P < 0.05). This inverse relationship between the extent of TDP-positive inclusions and neuronal loss may reflect a process whereby inclusions disappear as their associated neurons are lost. Together, these findings offer insight into the putative substrates of neurodegeneration in unique dementia syndromes.
Effect of Probiotics on Incident Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Critically Ill Patients
Johnstone, Jennie , Meade, Maureen O. , Lauzier, François, Duan, Erick , Dionne, Joanna C. , Heels‐Ansdell, Diane , Thabane, Lehana , Lamarche, Daphnée , Zytaruk, Nicole , Mehta, Sangeeta , Dodek, Peter , McIntyre, Lauralyn , Karachi, Tim , Henderson, William R. , Wood, Gordon , Ovakim, Daniel , Herridge, Margaret S. , Granton, John , Wilcox, M. Elizabeth , Goffi, Alberto , Niven, Daniel J. , Lamontagne, François , D’Aragon, Frédérick , St.-Arnaud, Charles, Ball, Ian, Nagpal, Dave , Girard, Martin , Aslanian, Pierre, Charbonney, Emmanuel , Sligl, Wendy , Adhikari, Neill K. J. , Marquis, François, Archambault, Patrick , Khwaja, Kosar , Kristof, Arnold S. , Kutsogiannis, James, Paunovic, Bojan, Reeve, Brenda , Lellouche, François , Hosek, Paul, Tsang, Jennifer , Binnie, Alexandra , Trop, Sébastien, Loubani, Osama , Hall, Richard , Cirone, Robert, Reynolds, Steve, Lysecki, Paul, Golan, Eyal, Cartin‐Ceba, Rodrigo , Cook, Deborah, Group, Prevention of Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (PROSPECT) Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials, Wallace, Christine, Sobhi, Gita, Johnstone, Jennie, Lauzier, François, Cook, Deborah, Centoanti, John, Lamarche, Daphne, Laupacis, Andreas, Roberts, Robin, Brun‐Buisson, Christian , Reynolds, Steve, Willems, Sue, Sekhon, Tina , Dodek, Peter, Ayas, Najib , Agda, Maria, Alcuaz, Victoria, Ashley, Betty-Jean, Brewer, Kelsey, Palmer, Janice L. , Brown, Glen, Pavan, Mara, Greisdale, Donald, Foster, Denise , Logie, Suzie, Yip, Judy, Auld, F. C., Carney, Gayle, FLEMING, R.Y. Declan, Good, Jennifer, Manhas, Mandeep, Boyd, Karin, Dheere, Jane, Stelfox, Tom, Couillard, Philippe , Doig, Christopher J. , Booth, Joshua , Codan, Cassidy, Ruddell, Stacy, Cameron, C. Blake, Edison, Rhonda, Mina, Breanna, Berthiaume, Luc , Gaudet, Jonathan, Kutsiogiannis, Jim, Chowdhury, Raiyan, Davidow, Jon, Johnston, Curt, Johnston, Richard , Macala, Kim, Marcushamer, Sam, Markland, D., Matheson, Doug, Payton-Gay, Damian, Zygun, David, Hewer, Tayne, Thompson, Pat, Ge, Maggie, Hall, Janny, Matenchuk, Sharon, Baig, Nadia, McCoshen, Lorena, Alexandropoulos, Katrina, Bain, Sherri, Brandt, Michelle , Constable, Cathy, Douglas, K., Maharaj, Shaleen, Travers, Sabrina, Zarychanski, Ryan, Lys, Justin, Marten, Nicole, Bhairo, Audrey, Ferenes, Halyna, Kozak, Beata, Verrier, Debra, McLaughlin, Dawn-Lee, Blouw, Marcus , Smith, Heather , Gutieror, Oliver, Wingfield, Sherri Lynn, Boyle, M A, Hrabi, Debbie, MacDonald, Chantal, Bento, Karen, Davis, Megan , Dechert, William , Longo, Barbara, Mullen, Courtney, Skrzpek, Elysia, Wierenga, Laurenne, Abuzaiter, Wesam, Amorim, Lynda, Bauer, Rosemarie, Damota, Rachel, Ho, Hoang, Macdougall, Nicole, Thornewell, Mary, Tran, Lara , Visocchi, Jennifer, Hosek, Paul, Plaxton, Bill, Armstong, Catherine, Ellis, Janelle, Fisk, Kayla, Gabnouri, Melissa, Gordon, Emilie, Haegens, Rebecca, Halford, Lisa, Hillis, Brooklyn, Jesso, Rebecca, McLaren, Jennifer , McMillan, Elliot, Pelkmans, Mariska, Rekman, Matthew, Sinkovitis, Sylvia, Truong, Monica, White, Michelle C. , Bates, Noah, Bryden-Cromwell, Susan, Cameron, Colleen, Deen, A. Gamal El, DiGiovanni, Sheri, Foss, Anders, Lee, E. H. , MacGregor, Heidi, Galbraith, Esther, McArthur, Robyn, Mcgregor, J., Miller, Keith R. , Morris, Sharon, Parker, Shelley, Smith, Candice A. , Stoglow, Joanna, Tung, Jennifer , Vos, Melissa , Hand, Lori, Klotz, Lisa, Sabev, Alexandra, Savija, Nevena , Guyatt, Paige, Cosentino, Deanna, Lourenco, Diane, Misina, Julie, Berlingieri, Joseph, Skitch, Steven , Campbell, Tracy , Basheer, Hala, Bruder, Kathy, Cheng, Jane, Qureshi, Kaiser, Infantino, C. A. González, Karachi, Timothy, Alghuroba, Mashari, Khaled, Alia , Millen, Tina, Vaisler, Ryan, Biljan, Maya, Cosentino, Deane, Marriott, Brittany, Muscedere, John, Boyd, Gordon, D`Arsigny, Christine, Drover, John, Erb, Jason , Parker, Chris M., Sibley, Stephanie , Boyd, Tracy, Georgescu, Ilinca, Hunt, Miranda , Muscedere, D., Baker, Cathy, Engel, Jennifer, Fleming, Jennifer , Roderick, Lisa, Silk, Shelley, Spencer, Marcy, Tryon, Michelle, Nagpal, Dave, Ball, Ian, Sharpe, Michael D., Bentall, Tracey, Sturt-Smith, Jessica, Ellis, T.M., Muylaert, Mindy, Paczkowski, Cindy, Campbell, Eileen, Imervoski, Susie, Ovsenek, Athena, Rondinelli, Rebecca, Longfield, Teresa, Moyer, Amy, Norris, F. H., Sumpton, Janice, Teterycz, Karina, Lapinsky, Stephen E. , Munshi, Laveena, Brown, Maedean, Giacomino, Brittany, Jakab, Marnie, Kraguiljac, Alan, Shah, Sumesh, Tamberg, E., Cheng, Doret, Han, Andrew , Leung, Holly, Mantas, Ioanna, Rodrigues, Hilary, Wyllie, Andew, Carmargo, Mercedes, Richter, Beverly, Caporuscio, Rita, Falvo, Rachel Kressner, Fleming, Dimitra, Maxwell, Carmelina, Plantic, Karmen, McIntyre, Lauralyn, Pagliarello, Giuseppe, D`Egidio, Gianni, English, Shane, Hartwick, Mike, Hooper, Jonathan C., Kubelik, D., Meggison, Hilary , Patel, Rakesh , Po, Joseph, Rosenberg, Erin, Gomes, Brigette, Leclair, Lianne, Porteous, Rebecca , Reddie, Shawna, Watpool, Irene , Cox, Marianne, Fraser, Kathy, Kuhn, Jennifer, Richard, Susanne, Weir, Sherry, Cardinal, Pierre , Jones, Gwynne, Microys, Sherissa, Sarti, Aimee , Seely, Andrew , Acres, Shelley, Mietitis, Sydney, Montroy, Kaitlyn, Aikens, Wendy, Dugal, Anne-Marie, Soth, Mark, Alhazanni, Waleed, Clarke, France, Copland, Mary, Hoad, Neala, Sheers, M., Takaoka, Alyson, Zytaruk, Nicole, Connolly, Christa, Davis, Denise, Gallinas, Tracy, Lee-Yoo, Jean, Lukinuk, Connie, Musielak, Leia, Pavunkovic, Nancy, Pelayo, Joy, Phillips, Kaitlyn , Pracsovics, Catherine, Raimondo, Julia, Stankus, Vida, Wright, Angela, Young, Crystal , Cirrone, Rob, Kavikondala, Kanthi, Pellerin, Axelle, Tomat, Laura, Carter, Jeff , Jani, J., Yaets, Brendan, Hodder, Jennifer, Khalid, Imrana, Lee, Julie , Salway, Kurtis D., Sandhu, Gyan, Santos, Marlene, Smith, Orla, Wang, Melissa, Dewhurst, Norman, Dowbenka, Ann, Kosinski, Ann, Parsons, Laura, Proceviat, J, Ramonas, Gitana, Yuen, Mae, Amaral, Andre , Fowler, Rob, Scales, Damon C. , Marinoff, Nicole, Pérez, Adic, Wang, Jane , Hatzifilalithis, Katrina, Iazzetta, John, Kolos, Chrys, Quinton, Ingrid, Herridge, Margaret, Archer, Jaimie, Fraser, Brooke , Geen-Smith, Cheryl, Matté, Andrea, Robles, Priscilla, Urrea, Cristian, Ascroft, Jane, Haji, Fatima , Ming, Jie , Suen, Matthew , Walid, Muhammad, Westlund, Jill M., McCredie, Victoria , Wilcox, Elizabeth , Farías, Paulina , Kosky, Barbara, Pugliese, Christina, Stenyk, Lia, Walczak, Karolina, Ae, Kyung, Kaur, Rajvinder , Lui, Jane , Mateo, Sophia, Pham, Nga, Heslegrave, Ronald J. , Panchbhaya, Zaynab, Sharman, Kim, Goel, Rakhi, Kozluk, Kim, Labelle, Julianne, Marsonia, Hina, Scott, Cecillia, Aslanian, P., Bélisle, Sylvain, Denault, André , Guimond, Jean‐Gilles, Halwagi, Antoine, Hebert, Paul L. , Kolan, Christopher, Mancebo, Jordi , Robillard, Nicholas , Benettaib, Fatna, Boumahni, Dounia, Caporuscio, Casey Bourdeau, Cantin, M, Côté-Gravel, Virginy, Ghamraoui, Ali, Lebrasseur, Martine, Courville, Lancelot Legendre, Lorio, S., Madrid, Maria Trinidad, Poitras, Nicole, Rigal, Romain, Salamé, Maya, Tran, V.K., Bacon, Katie, Boudreau, Nathalie , Carvajal, Cecilia, Gauthier, Lyne, Gendron, Julie, Jean, Karine, Laforest, Louise, Lembo, Antonietta, Lim, S. H., Pagé, France, Pelletier, L, Rodrigue, Marie-Christine, Bellemare, Jean-François, Bordeleau, Simon, Drouin, Christine, Duhaime, Benoit, Laberge, Ann, Lechance, Philippe, Deblois, Estel, Dionne, Maude, Lavoie, Lise, Michel, Isabelle, Pépin, A., Poulin, S., Anctil, Sarah, Marchand, Louis-Étienne , Roy, Robin, St-Arnaud, Charles , Quiroz, Héctor, Bérard, Dominique, Leclair, Marc-André, Bolduc, Virginie, Carbonneau, Élaine, Marchand, Joannie, Masse, Marie-Hélène , Cloutier, Sylvie , Guay, M, Morin, Line, Nicolson, J. T., Paquette, Isabelle, Théberge, France, Lamarche, Yoan , LeGuillan, Soazig, Serri, Karim , Verdant, Colin , Beaulieu, Yanick, Bellemare, Patrick, Rico, Philippe, Bernard, Françis , Giasson, Marc, Brunette, Véronique, Cavayas, Alexandros, Lévesque, Émilie, Labikova, Halina, Palacios, Julia , Langlois, Marie-Ève, Williams, Virginie, Nguyễn, Thùy Anh , Phaneuf, Valérie, Wang, Han Tin, Toupin, Francis, Ahern, Stéphane P., Laufer, Brian, Brosseau, Marc, Dul, Pauline, Harvey, Johanne, Inthanavong, Lotthida, Tassy, Danaë, Assayag, Helen, Bachand, M., Bétournay, Marysa, Daoust, Karine, Goyette, Kristine, Lessard, Ariane, Quach, Marceline, Barriault, Danny, Bellemare, David, Boivin, Anick, Breton, S., Cloutier, Ève, Daigle, Marjorie, Delisle-Thibeault, Charles, Giannakouros, Panagiota, Grenier, Stéphanie, Guilbault, Gabrielle, Léger, Caroline, Trembley, Marie-Claude, Gaudreau, Julie, Grégoire, Claire, Labbé, Véronique, Laprise-Rochette, Ariane, Ouellet, Caroline, Samson, Mélanie , Simoneau, Marie-David, Tourcotte, Virginie, Tran, Tuong-Vi, Lellouche, François, Sia, Ying Tung, Simon, Mathieu, Bouchard, Pierre-Alexandre, Lizotte, Patricia, Châteauvert, Nathalie, Grenier, T, Khwaja, Kosar, Deckelbaum, Dan, Gursahaney, Ash, Hornstein, David, Jayaraman, Dev , Razek, Tarek , Salasidis, Robert, Zanelli, Patrizia, Alam, Norine , Doerksen, Tonia, Matte, Gilbert, Robert, Marie‐France, Goldberg, Peter, Hatzakorzian, Roupen , Shahin, Jason , Qureshi, Salman, Campisi, Josie, Botan, Vasilica, Capilnean, Anissa, Corey, A. E., Gagné, Annick, Mian, J N, Normandin, Kathleen, Hall, Rick , Green, Robert, Gillis, Diana, Julien, Lisa, Magennis, Laura, Mitterer, Tamara, Arsenault, Joanna, Bruce-Payne, Kim, Gallant, Patti, Oeckler, Richard A. , Anderson, Brenda J., Liedl, Lavonne M., Meade, Laurie, Weist, Sueanne, Bartoo, Anna, Bauer, Debbie, Brickley, Vince, Bridges, S. Louis , Brunn, G.J., Eickstaedt, Jennifer E., Bergerson, Jill, Showalter, Sandy, Manley, Melissa, Taylor, Robert, Cryton, Margaret, Fowler, K. T., Krause, Katie, O`Brien, Jackie, Tow, Marianne, Ma, John, Moore, Kaitlin MS, Al‐Dawood, Abdulaziz, Tlayjeh, Haytham , Ghanem, Alaaeldien, Hassanien, Ahmad, Sharkawi, Ashraf El, Humaid, Felwa Bin, Alanizi, Hala, Alanizy, Nadyah, Bogami, Njoud Al, Muhaidib, Mohammed, Gramish, Jawaher , Alsomali, Randa, Devera, Nora, Villafranca, M.C. Muñoz, Fowler, Robert , Thabane, Lehana , Lauzier, François, Marshall, John C. , Arabi, Yaseen M. , Surette, M G , English, Shane , Rochwerg, Bram , Stelfox, Henry T. , Muscedere, John , Ball, Ian, Williamson, David R. , Friedrich, Jan O. , Kutsogiannis, Demetrios James , Zarychanski, Ryan , Taylor, Robert, Cook, Deborah, Group, Prevention of Severe Pneumonia and Endotracheal Colonization Trial (PROSPECT) Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials, Johnstone, Jennie, Lauzier, François, Cook, Deborah, Oczkowski, Simon J. W. , Bowdish, Dawn M. E. , Reynolds, Steve, Dodek, Peter, Ashley, Betty Jean, Palmer, Janice, Sekhon, Mypinder S. , Auld, Fiona, Fleming, R.Y.Declan, Stelfox, Tom, Parhar, Ken Kuljit S. , Cameron, Candice, Martin, Anne , Thompson, Pat, Bagshaw, Sean M. , Brandt, Michelle, Douglas, Kari, Zarychanski, Ryan, Valente, Maria, Olafson, Kendiss P. , Smith, Heather, Abuzaiter, Wesam, Hosek, Paul, Fisk, Kayla M., McLaren, Jennifer, White, Michelle, Deen, Aminah, Lee, Esther, McGregor, Julie, Miller, Keith, Morris, Sharon, Vos, Melissa, Belley‐Côté, Emilie P. , Shaikh, Sameer, Qureshi, Kaiser, Muscedere, John, D`Arsigny, Christine, Maslove, David M. , Fleming, Jennifer, Spencer, Marcy, Nagpal, Dave, Ball, Ian, Bosma, Karen J. , Alexander, Michelle, Norris, Faith, Munshi, Laveena , Grewal, Gagan , McIntyre, Lauralyn, D`Egidio, Gianni, English, Shane, Hooper, Jonathan, Kyeremanteng, Kwadwo , Neilipovitz, David , Cox, Marianne, Fraser, Kathy, Kuhn, Jennifer, MacLeod, Rob , Rose, Dawn, Kim, John S. , Beinum, Amanda van , Fetzer, Susan, Clarke, France J. , Sheers, Melissa, Zytaruk, Nicole, Davis, Denise, Eaton, Catherine, Lukinuk, Connie, Wright, Angela, Khalid, Imrana, Lee, Julie, Lee, Yoon Min , Cuthbertson, Brian H. , Kaur, Navjot , Herridge, Margaret, Chen, Daniel Tzu-Hsuan , Haji, Fatima, Ming, Jie, Farias, Paulina, Kaur, Rajvinder, Pham, Tam Thi , Goel, Rakhi, Carrier, François Martin , Chassé, Michaël , Hébert, Paul, Kolan, Christophe , Boumahni, Dounia, Ghamraoui, Ali, Lebrasseur, Martine, Lorio, Stéphanie, Laforest, Louise, Lim, Sothun, Morrissette, Jennifer, Pagé, France, Dionne, Maude, Michel, Isabelle, Pépin, Alexandre, Poulin, Sandrine, Cloutier, Sylvie, Nicolson, Jessie, Paquette, Isabelle, Harvey, Johanne, Inthanavong, Lotthida, Daoust, Karine, Turgeon, Alexis F , Boivin, Anick, Breton, Sarah-Judith, Ouellet, Catherine, Grégoire, Claire, Samson, Mélanie, Lellouche, François, Khwaja, Kosar, Grushka, Jeremy Richard , Garcia, Laura, Magder, Sheldon A. , Corey, Alyssa, Mian, Jasmine, Hall, Rick, Green, Robert, Gillis, Diana, Anderson, Brenda, Brunn, Greg, Stern, Erin, Taylor, Robert, Fowler, Kim, Krause, Katie, Moore, Kaitlin , Ghanem, Alaaeldien, Hegazy, Mohamed I. , Villafranca, Marjane

JAMA | September 21, 2021 | Volume: 326 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1024

10.1001/jama.2021.13355 | PMID 34546300 Get It

Characteristics of paediatric weight management in the United States: Associations with program retention and BMI outcomes in the paediatric obesity weight evaluation registry ( PO
Tucker, Jared M. , Stratbucker, William, King, Eileen, Cuda, Suzanne , Negrete, Sylvia , Sweeney, Brooke , Kumar, Seema , Borzutzky, Claudia , Binns, Helen J. , Kirk, Shelley, Group, The POWER Work, Group, The POWER Work

Pediatric Obesity | September 9, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ijpo.12848 | PMID 34498814 Get It

Summary Objective To describe characteristics of paediatric weight management (PWM) programs across the United States and evaluate associations with program‐specific retention rates and body mass index (BMI) outcomes at 6 months. Methods A program profile survey was administered to 33 programs within the Paediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER) to assess program staffing, services, and treatment format. Patient retention and percent of the 95th BMI percentile (%BMIp95) changes were assessed for each program. Results At 6 months program retention rates ranged from 15% to 74% (median: 41%), and program %BMIp95 changes ranged from −9.0 to +0.5 percentage points (median: −1.7). Percent of patients with ≥5 percentage‐point decrease in %BMIp95 ranged from 17% to 71% across programs (median: 29%). No associations were detected between program characteristics and retention or %BMIp95 changes. Conclusions Six‐month patient retention and BMI outcomes vary substantially in PWM programs across the United States. Yet, no associations were found between PWM treatment factors and these program‐level patient outcomes.
The obesity paradox and orthopedic surgery
Hennrikus, Matthew T., Hennrikus, William, Lehman, Erik , Skolka, Michael , Hennrikus, Eileen , Skolka, Michael P

Medicine | August 20, 2021 | Volume: 100 | Issue: 33 | Pages: e26936

10.1097/md.0000000000026936 | PMID 34414951 Get It

Abstract The Obesity Paradox describes the counterintuitive finding that although obesity contributes to the development of chronic conditions such as chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease, obesity seems to improve mortality in patients with these diseases. This paradox has also been sited in the critical care literature in regard to acute kidney injury, obesity and mortality. This study's objective is to examine the impact of obesity and post-surgical acute kidney injury on hospital length of stay and 2-year mortality after orthopedic surgery. We reviewed the electronic medical records of all adult elective orthopedic surgery patients over 2 years in a large academic hospital. The 1783 patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into obese (body mass index, BMI ≥ 30, n = 1123) and non-obese groups (BMI <30, n = 660). Demographics, medications, comorbidities, and perioperative variables were included in multivariable logistic regression analyses with acute kidney injury, length of hospital stay, and two-year mortality as primary outcomes. Outcomes were analyzed for the entire group, the obese cohort and the non-obese cohort. Acute kidney injury developed in 5% of the post-surgical orthopedic patients. Obesity increased the likelihood of developing acute kidney injury post orthopedic surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82; 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.05–3.15, P = .034). Acute kidney injury increased length of stay by 1.3 days and increased the odds of two-year mortality (OR = 2.08; 95% CI 1.03–4.22, P = .041). However, obese patients had a decreased likelihood of two-year mortality (OR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.33–0.84, P = .009). In adult orthopedic surgery patients, obesity increased the risk of acute kidney injury. Patients who developed an acute kidney injury had longer hospital stays and higher two-year mortality. Paradoxically, obesity decreased two-year mortality.
Humanizing the ICU Patient: A Qualitative Exploration of Behaviors Experienced by Patients, Caregivers, and ICU Staff
Basile, Melissa , Rubin, Eileen, Wilson, Michael E. , Polo, Jennifer , Jacome, Sonia , Brown, Samuel M. , Calle, Gabriel Heras La , Montori, Víctor M. , Hajizadeh, Negin

Critical Care Explorations | June 15, 2021 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 6 | Pages: e0463

10.1097/cce.0000000000000463 | PMID 34151284 Get It

Objectives: To understand how patients and family members experience dehumanizing or humanizing treatment when in the ICU. Design: Qualitative study included web-based focus groups and open-ended surveys posted to ICU patient/family social media boards. Focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Social media responses were collected and organized by stakeholder group. Data underwent qualitative analysis. Setting: Remote focus groups and online surveys. Patients: ICU patient survivors, family members, and ICU teams. Interventions: Not available. Measurements and Main Results: Semi-structured questions and open-ended survey responses. We enrolled 40 patients/family members and 31 ICU team members. Focus groups and surveys revealed three primary themes orienting humanizing/dehumanizing ICU experiences: 1) communication, 2) outcomes, and 3) causes of dehumanization. Dehumanization occurred during “communication” exchanges when ICU team members talked “over” patients, made distressing remarks when patients were present, or failed to inform patients about ICU-related care. “Outcomes” of dehumanization were associated with patient loss of trust in the medical team, loss of motivation to participate in ICU recovery, feeling of distress, guilt, depression, and anxiety. Humanizing behaviors were associated with improved recovery, well-being, and trust. “Perceived causes” of dehumanizing behaviors were linked to patient, ICU team, and healthcare system factors. CONCLUSIONS: Behaviors of ICU clinicians may cause patients and families to feel dehumanized when in the ICU. Negative behaviors are noticed by patients and families, possibly contributing to poor outcomes including mental health, recovery, and lack of trust in ICU teams. Supporting ICU clinicians may enable a more empathic environment and in turn more humanizing clinician-patient encounters.
Randomized Phase II Study of PET Response–Adapted Combined Modality Therapy for Esophageal Cancer: Mature Results of the CALGB 80803 (Alliance) Trial
Goodman, Karyn A. , Ou, Fang‐Shu , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Fruth, Briant, Twohy, Erin , Meyers, Michael O. , Boffa, Daniel J., Mitchell, Kisha A. , Frankel, Wendy L. , Niedzwiecki, Donna , Thurmes, Paul J., Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A. , Ilson, David H. , Meyers, Michael O , Boffa, Daniel J , Mitchell, Kisha , Noonan, Anne , Janjigian, Yelena Y , O'Reilly, Eileen M , Meyerhardt, Jeffrey A , Ou, Fang-Shu , Niedzwiecki, Donna , Bekaii-Saab, Tanios S , Hall, Nathan C. , Noonan, Anne M. , Venook, Alan P. , O’Reilly, Eileen M.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 25 | Pages: 2803-2815

10.1200/jco.20.03611 | PMID 34077237 Get It

PURPOSE To evaluate the use of early assessment of chemotherapy responsiveness by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging to tailor therapy in patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS After baseline PET, patients were randomly assigned to an induction chemotherapy regimen: modified oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil (FOLFOX) or carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP). Repeat PET was performed after induction; change in maximum standardized uptake value (SUV) from baseline was assessed. PET nonresponders (< 35% decrease in SUV) crossed over to the alternative chemotherapy during chemoradiation (50.4 Gy/28 fractions). PET responders (≥ 35% decrease in SUV) continued on the same chemotherapy during chemoradiation. Patients underwent surgery at 6 weeks postchemoradiation. Primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in nonresponders after switching chemotherapy. RESULTS Two hundred forty-one eligible patients received Protocol treatment, of whom 225 had an evaluable repeat PET. The pCR rates for PET nonresponders after induction FOLFOX who crossed over to CP (n = 39) or after induction CP who changed to FOLFOX (n = 50) was 18.0% (95% CI, 7.5 to 33.5) and 20% (95% CI, 10 to 33.7), respectively. The pCR rate in responders who received induction FOLFOX was 40.3% (95% CI, 28.9 to 52.5) and 14.1% (95% CI, 6.6 to 25.0) in responders to CP. With a median follow-up of 5.2 years, median overall survival was 48.8 months (95% CI, 33.2 months to not estimable) for PET responders and 27.4 months (95% CI, 19.4 months to not estimable) for nonresponders. For induction FOLFOX patients who were PET responders, median survival was not reached. CONCLUSION Early response assessment using PET imaging as a biomarker to individualize therapy for patients with esophageal and esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma was effective, improving pCR rates in PET nonresponders. PET responders to induction FOLFOX who continued on FOLFOX during chemoradiation achieved a promising 5-year overall survival of 53%.