Back to Authors

Borzutzky, Claudia

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5731-8074

Mayo Clinic

University of Southern California

Citations 2

Characteristics of paediatric weight management in the United States: Associations with program retention and BMI outcomes in the paediatric obesity weight evaluation registry ( PO
Tucker, Jared M. , Stratbucker, William, King, Eileen, Cuda, Suzanne , Negrete, Sylvia , Sweeney, Brooke , Kumar, Seema , Borzutzky, Claudia , Binns, Helen J. , Kirk, Shelley, Group, The POWER Work, Group, The POWER Work

Pediatric Obesity | September 9, 2021 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ijpo.12848 Get It

Summary Objective To describe characteristics of paediatric weight management (PWM) programs across the United States and evaluate associations with program‐specific retention rates and body mass index (BMI) outcomes at 6 months. Methods A program profile survey was administered to 33 programs within the Paediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER) to assess program staffing, services, and treatment format. Patient retention and percent of the 95th BMI percentile (%BMIp95) changes were assessed for each program. Results At 6 months program retention rates ranged from 15% to 74% (median: 41%), and program %BMIp95 changes ranged from −9.0 to +0.5 percentage points (median: −1.7). Percent of patients with ≥5 percentage‐point decrease in %BMIp95 ranged from 17% to 71% across programs (median: 29%). No associations were detected between program characteristics and retention or %BMIp95 changes. Conclusions Six‐month patient retention and BMI outcomes vary substantially in PWM programs across the United States. Yet, no associations were found between PWM treatment factors and these program‐level patient outcomes.
Trends in prescribing anti‐obesity pharmacotherapy for paediatric weight management: Data from the POWER Work Group
Borzutzky, Claudia , King, Eileen, Fox, Claudia K. , Stratbucker, William, Tucker, Jared M. , Yee, Jennifer K. , Kumar, Seema , Cuda, Suzanne , Sweeney, Brooke , Kirk, Shelley, Group, on behalf of the POWER Work, Fox, C K

Pediatric Obesity | September 2, 2020 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ijpo.12701 Get It

SummaryIntroductionTo better inform the field of obesity medicine, we set out to describe the current use of pharmacotherapy meant to improve patient weight status among a group of clinicians connected through the Paediatric Obesity Weight Evaluation Registry (POWER), as well as reasons behind clinicians' use or non‐use of the medications.MethodsPaediatric weight management (PWM) programs participating in POWER were asked to complete a program profile survey in 2014 (n = 30) and 2017 (n = 33); questions about pharmacotherapy use were included. Descriptive statistics were used to identify: (a) the proportion of PWM programs offering obesity pharmacotherapy; (b) the medications most commonly prescribed; and (c) reasons among non‐prescribers for not offering pharmacotherapy.ResultsThe 2014 and 2017 surveys were completed by 29 PWM programs (97%) and 30 PWM programs (91%), respectively. Twenty‐one programs completed both surveys. In 2014, 10 (34%) programs reported offering pharmacologic agents specifically for weight control, whereas in 2017, 16 (53%) reported offering pharmacotherapy for a primary indication of weight loss. Metformin was reported as the most commonly used agent in 2014, and topiramate in 2017. Largest reported increases in use over time were for topiramate and phentermine.DiscussionOur survey results demonstrate that a majority of this group of PWM programs offered pharmacotherapy to promote weight loss in patients with complications or associated medical conditions. There was a trend indicating increasing use over time, despite the significant gap regarding pharmacotherapy use in the literature.ConclusionsThese data suggest the need for (a) additional robust paediatric drug trials to further develop the evidence base guiding use or non‐use of pharmacotherapy in paediatric weight management, and (b) increased understanding of both facilitators and barriers to prescribing anti‐obesity pharmacotherapy for youth with obesity.